Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Gatwick Airport Northern Runway

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 4651 to 4675 of 4813 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Bridget Paterson

    Planes taking off from Gatwick have been more obtrusive this year than previously, particularly from about 5.30am until 8.0, and again late evenings, sometimes until at least 12.30am. It’s bad enough... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Christopher Morris

    I oppose the development consent order because of the resulting impact on climate change, increase in pollution, decline in air quality, increase in aircraft noise especially overnight, lack of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Claire Robinson

    I oppose the Development Consent Order to rebuild the Gatwick emergency runway as a 2nd runway. This is because it will mean an increase in aircraft noise, especially at night. Gatwick flights taking... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Daniel Arthur Alexander Jenkins

    Increased overflying of my home - sleep interruption. Noise pollution. Strain on airport infrastructure - roads, rail. Air pollution with increased traffic.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • David Douglas Hunt

    The courses of the aircraft flying from Gatwick often operate way out of the preferred noise path route and travel over the AONB near Coldharbour creating a major noise nuisance for those trying to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • David John Ashton

    I am opposed to any expansion of air travel (particularly short haul) because it is environmentally disastrous particularly its impact on CLIMATE CHANGE and the waste of fossil fuels which will be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • David Pierpoint

    I fully support the proposal. It will bring much needed investment into the region, it will create significant employment opportunities and will be a stimulus for growth.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Deborah Chapman

    The aircraft noise we experience is already extremely bad. Any increase will be completely unacceptable. I live in a beautiful area where many people come to walk and cycle and yet we have continuous... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Dinah Rosetta Christian Clarke

    The ozone is being destroyed and all the aviation fumes emitted by flights is playing a big part in this so it’s madness to want to introduce an extra runway that will produce even more pollution.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Edmund Rotberg

    Gatwick is big enough. I twas decided in 2017 that Heathrow would be the site for any expansion of London area and not Gatwick so there is no case for expanding Gatwick. The additional noise and air... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Frances Collins

    The expansion contravenes targets for climate change. The infrastructure is insufficient. Additional noise and night flights are a nuisance. House values fall. This is a rural area that will be hugely... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Graham Ian Bourne

    The proposal to move, rebuild then use what was the emergency runway as a live runway, goes against all noise, air pollution and carbon emission targets. It can be dressed up as offering massive... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Helen Calori

    To low and noisy over North Holmwood. Too many flights. Night flights are particularly disturbing and this needs to be limited. The extra traffic to and from the airport increases pollution. The rail... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • James Alexander Toby Caulfeild

    AN EXPANSION WILL OVERWHELM THE SURROUNDING AREA

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • James Andrew Meads

    GATWICK ALREADY HAD AN APPLICATION FOR A SECOND RUNWAY REJECTED. IT IS TRYING AGAIN ON BEHALF OF ITS OWNERS TO INCREASE ITS VALUE. THE INCREASED POLLUTION, AND EFFECT ON LOCAL TRANSPORT IS... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Jan Palmer

    Ifield suffer from the pollution and noise from aircraft from 6.0am until 10.30pm to have another runway would be detrimental to residents health, mental and physical. The pollution sometimes is so... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Jemma Belsey

    I oppose the move on the basis of the following being negatively impacted. - noise pollution - air pollution - stretched public infrastructure such as roads, housing, GP etc..

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Jenny Weinstein

    This project will increase carbon emissions, noise, traffic on M23. It will furtherarm the local environment and contribute to the threat to our planet. We should be reducing the number of flights not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Jill Nash

    light, sound, atmosphere pollution, over development the airport started as a race course and evloved the area is not able to sustain more development; housing, roads etc. burden on roads extents to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • John Aylwin

    I oppose a second runway at Gatwick. It is a disgrace it is even being considered by the authorities. The reasons are obvious and too numerous to mention here. The proposed second runway at Gatwick... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • John Campbell Mansbridge

    A second runway would have a serious detrimental effect on air quality, which would affect the health of people living in the area. Road & rail traffic would increase significantly, with no planned... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Judi Best

    I already ,since 2013 ,have aircraft over my house whereas before I did not. They are noisy; low flying and often keep me awake after 11.30pm and sometimes until 2am . Very distressing. Add to which... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Julia Parker

    Pollution Noise Environment Lack of infrastructure De- valuation of my property Mental health I oppose this new runway for lots of reasons, namely the increase of aircraft and the noise, the impact on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Julia Searle

    I believe that given Gatwick Airports infrastructure- it can barely cope with the flights, passengers and size that it already has. Expand it, you lose more countryside, habitation for wildlife and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023

  • Julian Bower

    I am concerned that a second runway will have a direct impact on noise affecting my house

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2023