Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1176 to 1200 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Catherine Cole

    The local infrastructure is completely unable to support a new rail freight interchange – this is both in terms of the capability of the railway line and also the local roads. In addition, the huge... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 May 2023

  • Dominic Steel

    Hello and for starters It’s “an extra16+” trains a day not just “16 trains” which I’ve just read is actually 32! So that’s an EXTRA 32 trains. Secondly the road network surrounding this huge site... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 May 2023

  • Nicholas Moore

    I am appalled by these plans and object strongly. In particular I object the removal of Burbage Common Road and several miles of public rights of way, without any provision for equivalent routing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 May 2023

  • Patricia Margaret Parkin-Moore

    I am worried about the huge increase of traffic through local villages and the environment, specially Burbage Woods

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 May 2023

  • Peter Adams

    I understand that there will be an access road from the development onto the A47 joining at either the Barwell or Earl Shilton roundabouts. The road off the Common roundabout into Hinckley (Leicester... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 May 2023

  • roger toovey

    How will staff get to work?? T here is no bus or rail service, if they have to drive ,where will they park?

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 May 2023

  • Carl Fox

    Within a 50 mile radius of the proposed site there are a number of rail freight interchange developments, all of which are currently very much under utilised. The proposed site is surplus to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 May 2023

  • Mark Ludbrook

    I believe that the proposed project will have a detrimental effect on Burbage common due to the light and noise pollution caused by the additional trains and site operations. The buildings will also... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 May 2023

  • Patricia Ann Gregory

    The Hinckley Rail Freight Interchange is totally in the wrong place. We already have a Rail Freight Terminal a short distance away along the A5 in Rugby which is still operating under capacity 20... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 May 2023

  • stuart michael stripp

    I live possibly the closest to the proposed development and are concerned about the impact it will have on our future living environment with regard to visual, noise,traffic and light pollution that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 May 2023

  • Terence Lowe

    I am very concerned over what this planned development will do to an established rural area

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 May 2023

  • Alison Williams

    Increase in traffic on roads & increased pollution is not acceptable. Hinckley is gridlocked at times already, with artics being Sent down roads that are narrow & not built for such heavy traffic.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 May 2023

  • Earl Shilton Town Council (Earl Shilton Town Council)

    Dear Sir/Madam, Ref: Your letter 40/EL01LEX_S42 dated 07 Jan 22. 1. Thank you for your recent letter referenced above. 2. The Full Council of Earl Shilton Town Council (ESTC) met on 10 Jan 22 and... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 23 May 2023

  • ian swirles

    The People in this area do not require this development and it has not been requested by us. That should end any more discussion. The area is already out of balance because too many houses have been... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 May 2023

  • Paul Shurmer

    Amount of traffic in and around the village of stoney stanton Impact on the environment around the village and wider Danger to children in stoney stanton due to the above. The maintenance of roads... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 May 2023

  • Sharon Scott

    • No market need due to close proximity of other SRFIs in the area (including Daventry International Rail Freight Terminal (DIRFT) and East Midlands Gateway (part of the new Freeport complex)). •... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 May 2023

  • (Richard)John Hayes

    Increased closure time of level crossing at Narborough, which already is 15 minutes per hour. Increased local traffic congestion in Hinckley and surrounding village roads due to additional commercial... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 May 2023

  • Alan Webb

    I oppose the application on the following grounds. The proposed project is sited next to a common that is enjoyed and used by the public for its beauty and tranquility. This project will impact on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 May 2023

  • Harold Victor Howell

    I live on Morley Road Sapcote and house also faces onto Leicester Road. the traffic as increased significantly since we moved in 10 years ago and there is now no x55 bus route which as increased the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 May 2023

  • John Garofano

    1. Proposed alterations to Leicester Road Sapcote regarding this proposed development. This is already a busy route through Sapcote, any additional traffic will cause danger and further risk to people... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 May 2023

  • John Graham Widdup

    Traffic congestion, poor facilities and infrastructure

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 May 2023

  • Kirsteen Thomson

    There will be an overflow of traffic that uses the site which will impact the wider area. I would be more likely to support the site if good and services came and went by rail however I understand... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 May 2023

  • Malcolm Bradbury

    There is insufficient infrastructure in and around Stoney Stanton and Elmsthorpe to support this development. We already have too many HGVs negotiating the village roads thanks to the Calor Gas depot.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 May 2023

  • Marc Slack

    I object due to: - Increased traffic through the villages increasing pollution and road traffic accidents Removal of existing natural landscape Increased noise levels Concern of local flooding due to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 May 2023

  • Monique Soutart

    Too much damage to the environment, local villages, peoples lives, wildlife - for something that is not needed as there are several other RFIs close to Hinckley and it has not been made clear why... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 May 2023