Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1251 to 1275 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Mr Brian Tristam

    This development is unnecessary as the local Midlands area is already well served with rail freight hubs and it is not part of any national strategy. The size of the development will have a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 May 2023

  • Neil Smith

    The proposed development will significantly increase traffic and congestion upon the roads around Hinckley which already struggle with peak load. In particular, the increased traffic on the A47... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 May 2023

  • Robert Thomas

    I am against this application. I fail to see the need for such a scheme in this location, because; 1. There are at least 2 similar facilities with 25 miles, 1 at DIRFT rail freight terminal, off... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 May 2023

  • Simon Hurley-Smith

    Is it really necessary or is it just a big project for ego purposes ?

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 May 2023

  • Alison Ford

    I write to lodge my opposition to the Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange (HNRFI). My ‘consultation response’ covers: Environmental Impact, Highways and Rail Networks, Actual vs Perceived Need,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Anthony David Harding

    I’m all for progress but convince me that this will not be a devaluation of every thing around it, from the environments to peoples living conditions

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Brian Tristam

    This development is unnecessary because the area is already well covered with rail freight depots. It is a random development not fitting into a national strategy. It will substantially adversely... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Chris klenk

    This project is in my opinion in totally the wrong location, IT WILL BRING LIGHT POLLUTION,TRAFIC CHACOS TO THE AREA , NOISE POLLUTION , THE VISUAL IMPACT WILL BE INCONCEIVABLE , THE ROAD NETWORK CAN... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Chris M Allen

    If this reduces the number of lorries travelling long distances then this must be beneficial to the environment over the long term.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • JEAN MARGARET BRYANT

    The complete devastation of the area surrounding the Burbage Common. The Common is an important area to locals and is used by people all day every day. Wildlife will be gone never to come back which... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Jeffrey Badland

    Although I am personally disappointed that the proposal is in close proximity to where I live, I am broadly supportive of efforts to move freight from road onto rail due to the myriad environmental... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Jonathan Paul musson

    With the local area already loosing so much of its green space I don't think we can afford to loose more of it. The road system in the local area is already carnage with somedays it taking over 45... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Mr Terry Lightfoot

    Pollution from increased road and rail traffic( the railway has not been electrified). Light pollution. The A5 cannot cope with existing traffic due to the large warehouse facilities between... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Peter Jones

    Details of Motorway junction

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Rachel Wareham

    I disagree with this development as we have one around 9 miles away already! Why do we need so many. It is too close to the town and local nature reserve and will destroy our peaceful town This will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Anne Hackett

    The area around Hinckley is already congested with heavy goods vehicles. The country side around Hinckley has been covered in industrial storage warehouses-enough is enough.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 May 2023

  • Anthony Richard Green

    A further rail freight interchange (RFI) cannot be justified in this area; there are already five RFIs with a 25 mile radius of Hinckley. In addition the vast Magna Park complex can be served by... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 May 2023

  • Emma Smart

    The proposed development will have an long lasting detrimental impact on such a large area of natural space surrounding Hinckley. Burbage Common and adjacent land is a haven for wildlife and enjoyed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 May 2023

  • Graham Friston

    So many detrimental factors that this development would cause to the area. Firstly an area of natural beauty (that I have used for over 50 years) will be destroyed or changed beyond recognition.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 May 2023

  • Mrs Brenda Ann Grant

    We will be Losing our rural village, we do not need to have more warehouses in this relatively small area. This area is actually larger than the initial site of magma park which is now massive. Then... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 May 2023

  • Paula O’Reilly

    As a resident of a local village that will be massively adversely impacted by this unnecessary project, I strongly object on the following grounds. 1 - It is not needed! There are other rail freight... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 May 2023

  • Richard Allen

    The proposed development will have a catastrophic effect on the local environment and infrastructure. The applicant has been reticent to provide base traffic data to the County Council to allow formal... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 May 2023

  • Andrew David Lee

    The main issues I have with project is on a number of levels. Firstly, it is not required in this area as there is already Daventry (DIRFT) and East Midlands Gateway in the near surrounding region, as... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 May 2023

  • Bob Gibson

    Object to the project on the grounds of lack of necessity, location , disruption to the local area during construction and after.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 May 2023

  • Christina James

    Main issues and impacts:- 1. Impact on the environment. Burbage Common is a public space that is used by residents in the Hinckley and Burbage area and further afield. It is a home to much wildlife... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 May 2023