Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 151 to 175 of 309 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

• Alice Bettoney

  There is an extremely high environmental cost associated with rebuilding of the sewage works, to only move it a relatively small distance away from the existing site. The current site could be brought... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 July 2023

• Benjamin John Morris

  I am objecting to the proposed relocation of Cambridge’s Water Treatment Plant for the following reasons: I don’t feel enough was done to look at the benefits of keeping the sewage plant where it is... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 July 2023

• Catherine Rosemary Grant

  I object to the proposal For a) the unnecessary relocation of an existing sewage treatment plant with adequate capacity for the foreseeable future to a site in the green belt with the consequent... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 July 2023

• Emily Green

  Dear Examining Authority, I am writing to stringently oppose the plans to move a fully-functioning sewage work. As you are aware, the current sewage work was made to last till at least 2050, and yet... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 July 2023

• Evelyn Edith Daniel

  I object most strongly to the proposal to move the Waste Water Treatment Plant from its present site to Honey Hill, Fen Ditton. I believe this to be totally unnecessary and a complete waste of money.... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 July 2023

• Florian Urmetzer

  I would like to object to the proposed construction of a sewage plant on the Honey Hill sites, for multiple reasons: 1) The site is greenbelt land, and building on green belt land is contrary to... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 July 2023

• Luke Proctor

  I'm concerned about continued access to the right of way on Low Fen Drove Way (from High Ditch Road to Horningsea Road) which I use multiple times a week.

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 July 2023

• Margaret Wilson

  In a time of economic depression why are we moving a perfectly functional sewage works less than two miles into green belt land along with inferstructure covering many miles of green belt including a... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 July 2023

• Oana Stroe

  To whom it may concern, I am writing to you as a resident of Horningsea in Cambridgeshire to express my concerns regarding the relocation of the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant from the current... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 July 2023

• Quy Fen Trust (Quy Fen Trust)

  Please see attached

  Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations

  Date submitted: 16 July 2023
  Contains attachment(s)

• Richard McMahon

  I should like to object to the proposed relocation on the following points, which are widely shared: - There appears to have been no serious attempt to consider alternative approaches particularly... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 July 2023

• Stewart Holmes

  I am placing my objection to the relocation of the Cambridge Water treatment, sewage treatment center. I feel, there needs to be clearly outlined impact, which well be caused by this development.

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 July 2023

• The Asplin Family (The Asplin Family) on behalf of The Asplin Family (The Asplin Family)

  Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation Planning Inspectorate Project Reference: WW010003 Relevant Representation: The Asplin Family objections 16th July 2023 1) The Anglian Water proposal... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 July 2023

• Wai Ming Lee

  Solid solution to prevent odour, pollution and sewage overflows and also the impacts on traffic and sewage charge should be provided for public to consider and comment.

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 July 2023

• Amy Cudmore

  I do not agree with the proposed move of the sewage treatment works to Honey Hill. The biggest impact from this are the negative effects to the local countryside and wildlife, negative impact on local... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 17 July 2023

• Angela de Burgh

  *The Cambridge Sewage works have been designed to provide sufficient capacity until 2050. Anglia Water has stated that there is no operational need to move the works. Why move them? *Taxpayers’ money... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 17 July 2023

• Anthony Arnold Wieser

  I object to the plans to relocate the sewage works to honey hill on the following grounds. The plant was recently upgraded at the current location to provide service until 2050, and now the new plant... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 17 July 2023

• Carol Ernestine Parker

  1. Why build over the Chalk Aquifer? In the ever increasing threat of global warming, with increasing sudden and heavy rainfall, Waste Water Treatment plants are overflowing on site. There is a risk... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 17 July 2023

• Catherine Rodwell

  I am a regular visitor to this area and I strongly object to this proposal. It is a totally inappropriate industrial scale development on the Cambridge Green Belt. It will be a permanent eyesore and... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 17 July 2023

• Chris Pratt

  Dear Sir I write to register my objection to the proposed relocation of the Milton WWTP. I am a Chartered Civil Engineer and have links to the locality having grown up in Cambridge. I have family in... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 17 July 2023

• Christopher Howell

  There is a desperate shortage of housing across our region, and particularly in and around Cambridge. This project is an essential prerequisite to allow the development of the North East Cambridge... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 17 July 2023

• Conservators of the River Cam (Conservators of the River Cam)

  CONSERVATORS OF THE RIVER CAM STATEMENT OF INTEREST The Conservators of the River Cam are the statutory navigation authority with responsibility for the River Cam. The main jurisdiction of the... Read more

  Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations

  Date submitted: 17 July 2023

• CPRE Cambridgeshire & Peterborough (CPRE Cambridgeshire & Peterborough)

  CPRE is the countryside charity which campaigns to protect Green Belts and prevent urban sprawl. Our remit is also to protect and enhance greenfield land, natural landscape, rural villages and to... Read more

  Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations

  Date submitted: 17 July 2023

• David Williams

  As the licensed lay minister (reader) for St Peter's church in Horningsea I am very concerned with the proposed move of the sewage works to the village in a green field site. There is already a... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 17 July 2023

• Donald Trevor Wildman

  As a resident of Milton Village, I object to the current proposals for the relocation of the Cambridge Wastewater Plant from its current site for a range of reasons. Anglian Water have stated that... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 17 July 2023