Filter
The Sizewell C Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1 to 50 of 1290 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Binita Walia

    I am writing as a regular tourist to Suffolk and a member of the public who cares about our environment. I have grave concerns about the environmental impact of Sizewell C and from my in depth... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 July 2020

  • Christopher Yeo

    I wish to lodge my strong objection to the location of the lorry park in Felixstowe Road (the Seven Hills lorry park). Its proposed location will be danger to road users with slow moving large... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 July 2020

  • Dawn Lacey

    EDF - SIZEWELL C SUFFOLK IS AN OUTDATED COSTLY DESIGN - EDF HAVE FAILED TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUESTED IN CONSULTATIONS 1,2,3 AND 4. APPARANT TO ALL CONSULTEES, INC. COUNCILS, LOCAL HOMEOWNERS AND... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 July 2020

  • Jonathon Foster on behalf of Dr Daniel Poulter MP

    Dr Poulter has noted various concerns with the current proposals, including: • Extensive damage to Suffolk’s coastline and protected landscapes and habitats • Due to the change from sea-based to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 July 2020

  • Natural England (Natural England)

    As per your email dated the 8th July 2020 Natural England will provide relevant representation by the 30th September 2020. Please see attached

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 8 July 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Paul Sutton

    As a member of the engineering community involved with systems (electrical, electronic and programmable electronic systems) used for process control and safety I intend to provide meaningful... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 July 2020

  • David Costain

    The application is in the interests it the local comMunity and the country in general and should be approved

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Henrietta Palmer

    I wish to register that I protest against the proposed Sizewell C development . 1) Devestation to local environment 2) whatever attempts are made by EDFs to deal with the traffic it will nonetheless... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Lynda Whitbread

    I have concerns on all aspects of the plan to build a nuclear power station at Sizewell. The following bullet points are only a brief synopsis of my views. 1. We have concerns over the construction of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Martyn Bishop

    My wife and I [Redacted] and close to the proposed green rail link. As a result we intend to fully review and understand the details of the works and how the works will impact on our day to day lives.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Mr Jeffrey Paul Hallett

    Our village of Pettistree will be adversely affected by the development of Sizewell C especially during the construction phase. The plans submitted do not mitigate the problems we have identified,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Mrs Alexandra Adams

    I oppose the Sizewell C southern park and ride site at Wickham Market and believe it should be sited further south on the A12 away from residential areas and near the A14 for the following reasons: -... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Southwold and Reydon Society (Southwold and Reydon Society)

    We share the reservations and concerns of many local organisations. These have been lodged by the Society during the Consultation process. The Society is not convinced by the currently proposed... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Steven Teeder

    I can give a valued insite on the build at Hinckley point in respect of the greater good that has been achived fot the environment and wild life im a wild life photographer and nature lover and i can... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Stichting Greenpeace Nederland (Stichting Greenpeace Nederland)

    Stichting Greenpeace Nederland is an environmental NGO with seat in the Netherlands. It wants to focus on the following issues: - sufficiency of comparison with alternatives, including viable... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Suffolk Chamber of Commerce (Suffolk Chamber of Commerce)

    Suffolk Chamber supports the building of new nuclear to facilitate economic growth within Suffolk, boost job creation, investment and supply-chain benefits.... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Rosemary Martin

    No to park and ride at wickham market. Cut through traffic via Easton will be dreadful.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 July 2020

  • Brigitte Artmann

    Dear Madam and Sir. I'm the communicant of ACCC/C/2013/92 Germany. [Redacted] I wish to participate as a member of the public concerned under the Espoo Convention and under the Aarhus Convention. My... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 July 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Corporation of Trinity House (Corporation of Trinity House)

    Dear Sir / Madam We refer to the above application for development consent. Trinity House is the General Lighthouse Authority for England, Wales, the Channel Islands and Gibraltar with powers... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 13 July 2020

  • David Beavan

    I believe that this development would harm our economy and environment for no perceptable gain when nuclear energy costs so much more than offshore wind energy. The build period will severely impact... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 July 2020

  • John Cocker

    I am representing myself. I oppose the Sizewell C southern park and ride site at Wickham Market and believe it should be sited further south on the A12 away from residential areas and near the A14.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 July 2020

  • Bredfield Parish Council (Bredfield Parish Council )

    1. Traffic levels on southern part of A12: The A12 immediately to the North of Woodbridge is a single-carriageway road. Sizewell Stage 3 Consultation Document acknowledged that this part of the road... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 14 July 2020

  • Mark Solomons

    I live locally, on [Redacted] that is threatened by the construction of Sizewell. I am also a volunteer with the RSPB and a keen nature watcher. I believe the size of the project, the excavation of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 July 2020

  • Martin Bailie

    The proposed southern park and ride for the construction of Sizewell C is just off the A12 at Wickham Market. I think this is a totally inappropriate site. This is a vast site; 1250 cars is a huge... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 July 2020

  • British Telecommunications plc (British Telecommunications plc)

    I represent British Telecom and their property department. I wish to be kept informed of any updates on the planning for Sizewell C so as to ensure any BT property interests are protected.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 July 2020

  • Jane Haviland Webster

    The argument against using a sea delivery facility is extremely weak and unjustified, in my opinion. The impact Of the development on the road network will be irrevocable and have an adverse impact on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 July 2020

  • Mill Hill Farm Caravan & campsite (Mill Hill Farm Caravan & campsite)

    I own and manage a caravan and camping park at Mill Hill Farm , Darsham. The Northern Park and Ride proposal is less than two miles from our site. I am concerned about noise, traffic , light pollution... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 July 2020

  • Richard Marston

    Dear Sirs Living on the side to the A12 at the top of[Redacted] the traffic flow is already at absolutely maximum levels. To add another 100 bus movements and many 1,000s of additional car movements... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 July 2020

  • Royal Yachting Association (Royal Yachting Association )

    RYA (Royal Yachting Association) desires to be involved in this application on behalf of leisure boating interests in the area --------------------------- RYA thinks there will be no affects on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2020

  • Saxmundham Town Council (Saxmundham Town Council)

    Saxmundham Town Council's position on the development of the Sizewell C Nuclear Power Saxmundham Town Council notes that EDF submitted application for the Sizewell C nuclear power plant for planning... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 16 July 2020

  • Graham K. Lacey

    My Wife & I our key stakeholders in respect of EDF's proposed development at Sizewell C. Many issues raised by ourselves at Stage 4 pre-submission of the DCO remain inadequately answered. We have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2020

  • Robin Leonard Sanders

    As a retired chartered geotechnical engineering and geological expert I shall be examining the documentation to determine if sound geotechnical and geological principles have been applied in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Alan Hatt

    Traffic/ I am a Theberton resident living adjacent B1122. I reject EDF's road led strategy. The link road cuts of Pretty road a vital link to Saxmundham,s Tesco and Waitrose. Villages access to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2020

  • Kendrick Barry Denison

    i am worried about the disruption that this will cause ( based on the pervious 2 projects )to the community's and business in the surrounding areas any compensation has been to little and to late and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2020

  • Marine Management Organisation (Marine Management Organisation)

    Good morning, Due to the word limit in this section, the Marine Management Organisation will submit our relevant representation via email to sizewellc@planninginspectorate.gov.uk on 29 September 2020.... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 20 July 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Office for Nuclear Regulation (Office for Nuclear Regulation)

    Office for Nuclear Regulation The Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) is the principal regulator of the safety and civil nuclear security of the UK nuclear industry, and licenses and regulates a broad... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 21 July 2020

  • Danish Emergency Management Agency (Danish Emergency Management Agency)

    I want to gain sufficioent insigth into the safety systems of the power plants to be able to comment on them --------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Sirs My main... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 22 July 2020

  • Georgina Paske

    My interest in the captioned project relates to Beveriche Manor Farm IP17 3LJ that my farming enterprise owns and farms Commercially. Within the proposed plans there is a desire to purchase some of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 July 2020

  • Robert Brock

    I have serious concerns about whether the views of local residents have been properly considered in the consultation and preliminary processes in respect of the proposed power stations and associated... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 July 2020

  • Jo Hannon

    I am extremely concerned about the impact that Sizewell C will have upon the local environment. Both in respect of the immediate construction area and the wider locality. Many hectares of treasured... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 July 2020

  • Tim Hannon

    Concerns over traffic management, social and environmental impact during and post construction, long term impact on the local economy

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 July 2020

  • Clive Tickner

    1) POOR RECORD. EDF's record with EPR reactors is dreadful. Finland and France, are still both facing costly construction delays. Flamanville, is 7 years behind schedule, still not online, and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 July 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Ian Collins

    My submission will be that it is unwise to extend a nuclear power station on an increasingly eroding coastline. It will bring added blight to an area of outstanding natural beauty with a network of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 July 2020

  • Lindsay Dann

    Projected traffic volumes on roads within a 25 mile radius during construction will seriously impact on the road infrastructure and unreasonably affect the quality of life of an unacceptable number of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 July 2020

  • Ruth Walker

    As a resident of East Suffolk, I am writing to express my views on the EDF planning proposals for Sizewell C. The effect on this wonderful area of “Outstanding Natural Beauty” it’s wildlife as well as... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 July 2020

  • Andrew Hunter

    I propose, once I have fully digested the contents of the applicant's Environmental Statements to make comments on the following matters: - Temporary rail infrastructure - Temporary park and ride... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 July 2020

  • East Suffolk Council (East Suffolk Council) on behalf of Green, Lib Democrat & Independent (GLI)Grp East Suffolk Council (Green, Lib Democrat & Independent (GLI)Grp East Suffolk Council)

    The Members of the GLI Group as individual Ward Members believe that; Use of Nuclear Power • Nuclear Power should not be supported as a primary source of energy in the UK because it is; o Outdated,... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 28 July 2020

  • Andrea Roehm

    I'm deeply concerned about the building of a third nuclear power station in Sizewell. To my mind, nuclear power is not at all environmentally friendly and poses a number of serious health hazards. In... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 August 2020

  • Elliot Chart

    I'd prefer a renewable solution to a nuclear one. Furthermore I oppose Sizewell C.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 August 2020

  • Nucléaire Stop Kernenergie (Nucléaire Stop Kernenergie)

    * The EPR nuclear power plants are a new kind of NPP's that already encounter numerous important technical problems. *The financial structure of EDF is a well known problem. EDF might be tempted to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 August 2020