Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I oppose this proposal because of the potential damage it will cause to the Stonehenge Site.
-
I am seriously concerned about the impact of this scheme.
Firstly any new road will generate MORE traffic, causing increased noise from faster traffic and possibly further backing up of traffic in...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the impact of this scheme on this World Heritage Site, its archaeology and its setting. There will also be disturbance arising out of this scheme to rare bird species - Stone...
Read more
-
I am greatly concerned about the impact on one of the most important historical landscapes in this country
-
I am objecting to the Stonehenge Expressway, as I believe it is an act of unacceptable vandalism. It will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. In fact,...
Read more
-
This project is wholly damaging to the Stonehenge landscape - a WHS described by UNESCO as ‘landscape without parallel’ and whose Directors state that the project should NOT go ahead in it's present...
Read more
-
That this development causes irreversible archaeological and environmental damage to one of our most important heritage sites.
-
Over the last 18 years I have followed the discussion about the changes to the A303 with interest.
The current proposals will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, not only to the...
Read more
-
The scheme does not safeguard the archaeology of the site. Stonehenge should still be visible from the road and is an attractive sight to behold. A scheme to dual the existing road on slightly raised...
Read more
-
My parents used to live in Devon, while I lived in Bristol and other parts of the U.K. so I used to regularly drive past Stonehenge. Stonehenge was and is a most impressive landmark and a part of our...
Read more
-
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to express my utmost disagreement with the continuation of the work of Highways England at the Stonehenge site, as I believe it is causing irreperable damage to the...
Read more
-
I object to the planned changes as they will damage a site of great archeological importance. They will cut off the view of Stonehenge from the road, forcing people to pay for the privilege of seeing...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is our heritage from our ancester, so much is still waiting for us to learn and rediscover the wisdom and knowledge behind it. This is a site of important power for the people, the earth...
Read more
-
I have visited the site of Stonehenge many times in my 70 odd years. Now I live in Devon I use the A303 often when going to visit relatives in London. I really love driving past the site and seeing...
Read more
-
This is another wholly unacceptable putsch by the gombeen road lobby ~ the irriots have already by accident or design destroyed much of Blick Mead and now are set to do irredeemable damage to all of...
Read more
-
I am objecting to the proposed scheme since in my opinion, this will cause irreparable damage to this World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed changes on the following grounds:
Irreparable damage to a unique World Heritage site and it's environs at Bick. Some damage has been done already.
Risks to local flaura and...
Read more
-
I feel that this will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, which is described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ and I don't feel that the alternative options...
Read more
-
My main concern is that there may already have been, and it is likely that in future there will be, damage to an archaeological site that is a national monument. It seems that we have much to learn...
Read more
-
This is destroying our human heritage and must stop now. We don't want the land disturbed as it has been or our relics destroyed.
-
As a user of the A303 and a respecter of history, I urge the government to fund a LONG, low tunnel between Countess Roundabout (at ground level) and far west of Longbarrow roundabout so that none of...
Read more
-
This scheme is ill thought out and has been proposed as the cheapest possible solution to a very delicate problem in an area of world importance and significance.
The tunnel must be made...
Read more
-
My representation will be on behalf of the archaeological destruction, of features and deposits of international importance, that will take place in relation to the scheme.
-
I am an interested party. I am concerned about the impact of the road changes A303 on the world unesco site of Stonehenge and the wider archaeological area. I understand that the site has already been...
Read more
-
I object to any works that will endanger the safety and environment of Stonehenge
-
The advances made in archeological techniques and therefore knowledge in the last generation has been extraordinary. In another generation we will know more, much more about the culture and history of...
Read more
-
The proposed development will damage this very important cultural and archaeological site and also.posesba risk to.protected bird species.
-
I strongly object to A303 Stonehenge Expressway. The main reasons for my objection are:
•According to all archaeology experts that I am aware of, the construction of this road will cause irreparable...
Read more
-
I am registering as I have been following this for some time now and am appalled by the proposal and by the processes being followed. The proposal is clearly both unnecessary and extremely...
Read more
-
please drop this ridiculus unnecessary road tunnel scheme,just make the short stretch of single lanes into dual carriageway and let it be !! yours chris ford
-
My primary concern is the integrity of the World renowned Heritage site which has been acknowledged by UNESCO as well as numerous other parties. Sentiment also stacks with this, given it is a symbol...
Read more
-
UNESCO have described the ancient landscape including and surrounding Stonehenge as a "landscape without parallel". They do not believe that the scheme should go ahead in its current form and I agree...
Read more
-
Cycling UK wishes to ensure that the proposed scheme eliminates the existing severance issues for cyclists along this section of the A303 and that it does not create new severance. In particular we...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the proposed expressway will cause serious damage to the WHS and its landscape settling. One of the key aspects of the Stonehenge environs is the high density and quality of...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a monument of international importance.
It has been reported that the wider site has already been damaged by workmen.
It is outrageous to me that a scheme such as this should be...
Read more
-
I object to the fundamental damage to the WHS and to the archaeology which future generations may be able to learn more from than we can in 2018.
I object to the loss of the view of the monument...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a UNESCO world heritage site, and I believe that the current proposals will totally ruin this wonderful landscape
-
I am concerned about damage to The World Heritage Site of Stonehenge, disturbance to rare bird nesting sites and also a lack of alternative schemes which would not damage the site.
-
I feel that UNESCO realises of the extraordinary importance of this site, which the Government fails to understand. It is an ENTIRE LANDSCAPE under threat by the proposals. They should not go ahead.
-
Stonehenge and its surroundings are a World Heritage site, unique and of immense importance to many people from around the world. The scheme as it stands would damage this internationally important...
Read more
-
It is patently insane to destroy a site of such archeological importance. This is a World Heritage Site, not a village bypass.
-
I am concerned that this will cause serious damage to the World Heritage Site of Stonehenge which is an ancient and important archaeological site as well as an important site for pagans. UNESCO have...
Read more
-
Having studied the proposed A303 Stonehenge Expressway scheme I would like to raise a number of concerns in relation to this, these being that the scheme:
1. does not meet with the requirements of...
Read more
-
-This is a National Heritage archaeological site of immense importance, it is entirely unique on this earth. There is archaeology still unexcavated, therefore this set should be completely protected...
Read more
-
I wish to express my concern that whatever work is carried out does not damage Stonehenge and the surrounding areas. The whole area is has great historical significance. And any proposed work needs...
Read more
-
I object to this proposal. I believe it will cause irreparable damage to one of the most important historical & spiritual landmarks in our country. It will also have a huge impact on local wildlife....
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a sacred site with sacred energies and sacred rituals. People come from all over the world to enjoy its splendour. The planning intention decreases this sacridity. I believe it will...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the effect of the proposed scheme on the World Heritage Site. We are in danger of losing valuable information about the past due to an ill thought through process, which will...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a sacred site of which also has a burial site and if construction goes ahead everything such as the burial site itself and everything around it will be ruined. And the history of...
Read more
-
Prevent damage to site and wildlife, I object to the noise, loss of view of a world heritage site and possibly paying to view.