Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Stonehenge is a unique site of world heritage. It must not be tampered with for the short-term gain decided by planning committees. In centuries to come people will have discovered new ways of...
Read more
-
The planned road building is likely to destroy important archaeological evidence on a site which has shown itself to be extremely important to the understanding of Stonehenge in its wider context....
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the plans for the upgrading of the A303 at Stonehenge will disrupt and possibly destroy priceless archeological and sacred relics and other artefacts. The road should be diverted...
Read more
-
Dear Sirs,
I am dismayed that there has not been a better solution put forward for this problem of through traffic and never ending increase in motor vehicles past this ancient site. Does the road...
Read more
-
A303 risks irreparable damage to the national and international heritage stature of Stonehenge. The commuting needs of motorists cannot be allowed to take precedence over the security ad integrity of...
Read more
-
To proceed with this plan is to go against UNESCO advice, and to put at risk the world heritage site. This must be preserved for future generations.
I believe that permanent damage to the World...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a world heritage site and far too much damage has been done to it already. It should be declared a NO BUILD zone and that should include the government. To excavate in that area is to...
Read more
-
I strongly object, the irreparable that could be caused to such an important area, a world heritage site no less.
I also object to the cost in our current financial climate & do not understand why...
Read more
-
Other options should be considered that don't cause such irreversible destruction.
-
I believe that the proposals will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s international advisers say the...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, it’s archeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a landscape without parallel
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
My objections to this Planning Application are as follows:-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s...
Read more
-
This is an international heritage site which we understand only a part of thus far future generations may be able to discover more than research has demonstrated thus far; but not if areas surrounding...
Read more
-
Please leave this World Heritage Site alone!
-
A tunnel will have problems if an emergency occurs where emergency services will have restricted access to reach those who might be injured, such as in an accident resulting in a fire.
Damage to...
Read more
-
International specialists from UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS have advised against the road scheme which will damage Stonehenge. UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee in 2018 urged the...
Read more
-
My concerns involve primarily the environmental and archaeological damage that would occur should this project be allowed to go ahead.
Stonehenge sits alongside one of Wiltshire’s green roads that...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the impact on Stonehenge and the surrounding area. I believe that the proposal has only gained this much credibility amongst certain parties because viable alternatives have...
Read more
-
I understand if this goes ahead there will be
Irreparable damage to this WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
UNESCO’s international advisers say...
Read more
-
I strongly disagree with the proposed planning on the Stonehenge road. I have driven past this site many times. It is of huge historic importance to Britain being a UNESCO World Heritage...
Read more
-
Stonehenge and its surroundings are recognised worldwide as one of those special places where we humans girded our loins and set out on the path to modernity.
Despite the long time over which we...
Read more
-
The current proposal destroys part of a UNESCO World Heritage Site, potentially damages the Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting and disturbs several rare bird species. This site is not simply a...
Read more
-
Please don’t turn the ancient site that inspires awe into one that is only awe inspiring from one careful angled photograph. The pyramids in Giza are crowded and surrounded by the city. They are more...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the current plans are likely to impact negatively on the whole status of the area as an internationally important world heritage site. There are parts of the site which will be...
Read more
-
I am opposed to any plan that potentially damages Stonehenge and its environs.
I object to the damage that the road etc will cause to Stonehenge and its environs potentially destroying archaeology...
Read more
-
UNESCO advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form. The tunnel is too short to be effective, as the entrances still lie within the area of WHS.
-
Any major work in the area of stonehenge will cause severe damage to a fragile site that cannot be replaced. There are enough roads to get round the site and people will just have to make allowances...
Read more
-
I have no specialist training in road planning or architecture or anything like that. But I am an engineer, albeit in electronics (and to a lesser extent mechanics), as well as just someone who...
Read more
-
Although I appreciate that people should be able to travel roads that are safe and as free from congestion as possible I do not think that the authorities, who have granted permission for this road to...
Read more
-
I have driven past Stonehenge hundreds of times, getting so much enjoyment from the experience. This plan will prevent others getting the same joy, benefitting the few at the expense of the...
Read more
-
The Stonehenge area is such an important World Heritage site that it should be preserved for the professionals to work in , should be protected from destruction for the knowledge of the Human past it...
Read more
-
This scheme, in it's present form, "flies in the face" of advice given by Unesco's advisors. Lack of less damaging options in consultation. Permanent damage to the archaeology of the World Heritage...
Read more
-
(1) This is a site of world concern.
My role (founding an internet project (City-Voice.org, @CityVoicEd) supporting ‘democracy’ in town and country planning) is to observe/record – and publish...
Read more
-
This is not the solution to the problem of heavy traffic using the 303 . Another solution must be found with great urgency - English Heritage are not the arbiter of what's best for our...
Read more
-
This scheme will cause irreparable damage to a landscape which is unique and precious, indeed, damage has already occurred at the Blick Mead Mesolithic site. This is a heritage area that belongs to...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact of this on the world famous and unique site
-
I am very concerned at the inevitable damage which will be done to irreplaceable historical artefacts. There is simply no way this project can avoid such destruction. It is profoundly short sighted....
Read more
-
Present scheme would cause permanent damage to a WHS and its archeology and setting . There could be damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site . Lack of options in consultation which would preserve the WHS...
Read more
-
I strongly object to this as it clearly gives no protection or interest in preserving the historic site. They have already damaged one part drilling cores and have proved to show no care at all for...
Read more
-
THIS SCHEME HAS THE POTENTIAL TO DESTROY THE SERENITY OF AN ANCIENT MONUMENT SUCH AS STONEHENGE, A WORLD HERITAGE SITE. IT IS HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT THAT THE SCHEME IS VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED BY ORGANISATIONS...
Read more
-
It seems inevitable that this plan will destroy the archaeology surrounding the World Heritage Site that is Stonehenge. Traffic should be discouraged from going anywhere near Stonehenge.
-
Dear Sir/Madam,
I object to this destruction of a National Heritage iste on the grounds of destruction to natural habitat and for the invasion that this will cause to the land and the historic...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the current plans for the stonehenge tunnel, as it does not sufficiently protect the surrounding archaeology for future generations to a standard which is appropriate given the...
Read more
-
This is far too historic and sensitive to allow the unnecessary development to rip it up.
-
The greater stonehenge site is unique in the world and Britain in character and completeness, so is of utmost cultural significance, as recognised by UNESCO when designating it a World Heritage...
Read more
-
Without doubt the whole Stone henge site has not only fired the imagination but has given spectacular interest to generations of people of all ages. The unique importance of the WHOLE site has Beeb...
Read more
-
I object most strongly to the proposals for the A303 at Stonehenge. A general outline of my submissions is as follows:
1. Massive loss of amenity on the borders of the site. This includes:
The...
Read more
-
I'm objecting to the short-sighted, permanent and irreversible damage to a world heritage site
-
I OBJECT to this project since it will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, which UNESCO describe as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s international...
Read more