Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Highways will destroy important Archeology already found and in the future.
-
I have been visiting the Stonehenge site since I was a child, indeed was one of the last generations to be able to interact freely with the stones. I wrote a project on Stonehenge as a child. What I...
Read more
-
Stonehenge (including the whole landscape around the main site) is a unique and priceless part of our national heritage and it is of course also a World Heritage Site. I am concerned that the plan for...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
Lack of alternative options in consultation that would not damage the World Heritage Site.
Loss of the view from the road...
Read more
-
I HEREBY WISH TO REGISTER MY OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED A303 DEVELOPMENT ON THIS UNIQUE WORLD HERITAGE SITE. THIS DEVELOPMENT WOULD, IN MY VIEW, IRREVERSIBLY DAMAGE THIS NATIONAL MONUMENT, SPOILING IT...
Read more
-
How can we seriously consider a major road building project on a world heritage site in such a way that will render its surrounding archaeological heritage compromised. It sets a dangerous precedent...
Read more
-
These plans for an expressway so close to Stonehenge will create irreparable damage to this World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, and described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’....
Read more
-
Public access to stonehenge is being constantly attacked and withdrawn. I have a right of access along an ancient trackway now called the A303. This Road has been a public right of way since long...
Read more
-
I wish to object to the building oif the tunnel on the A303 as it destroy areas of historical interest and it change the lsurrounding ladscape of the Stonehenge site for ever in a way that is...
Read more
-
I disagree with the proposal to tunnel under or near Stonehenge.
-
This proposal would irreparably damage an UNESCO heritage sight. Even UNESCO stand against it. The plans would totally dwarf Stonehenge and ruin the impact of viewing it first from the roads around....
Read more
-
I am concerned about the proposals:
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without...
Read more
-
Stonehenge and the land around it is a very important Public asset and is far more important than cutting a few minutes off a car journey. We need to be cutting car journeys, not encouraging more...
Read more
-
SEA Oxford have been running tours to Stonehenge for nearly 20 years.
The recent archaeological discoveries in the area, turning the site from a stone circle to one of the most important historical...
Read more
-
I am objecting to the 303 tunnel on the potential destruction of environment and archeology in the world heritage site
-
I object in the strongest possible terms to the proposed Stonehenge 'expressway'. I have seen no evidence of congestion on the A303 from either personal experience or in comments and videos posted...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to a World Heritage Site
Damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting
Disturbance of rare bird species (Stone Curlew and Great Bustard)
-
Firstly, I am appalled that in a time of climate melt-down, major huge roads are being still being planned. Secondly, I believe that the planned road will have a hugely detrimental impact on a site of...
Read more
-
The Stonehenge expressway proposal is an attempt to save money at the expense of our National Heritage. That which will be damaged is priceless, irreplaceable archaeological evidence of the history of...
Read more
-
The main reasons for my objections for this project are;
The immeasurable damage it will inevitably cause to this World Heritage Site, the damage it will cause to the rare wildlife that inhabits the...
Read more
-
I wish to make the following points against the planning application:-
It will result in irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without...
Read more
-
I'm opposed to the road scheme on many grounds, the most important being the damage to a world heritage site, disturbance to birds and other wildlife, the inevitable increase in traffic that will...
Read more
-
I object to this proposal because;
1. This is an iconic Landscape which must at all costs be preserved for future generations. Driving a significantly larger road through this area will of course...
Read more
-
My chief concern about the proposals for the re-touting of the A303 around the area of Stonehenge is the impact that it may have on the heritage surrounding countryside. I strongly feel that it is...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the impact of the A303 Expressway on the Stronehenge World heritage site because of the damage it will cause to this archaeological site which will be irreparable, even...
Read more
-
I wish to object to any tunnel or similar structure being constructed near Stonehenge. The principle objections are interference with a World Heritage site and danger to rare species.
I also think...
Read more
-
As someone who is highly concerned with historic preservation and plans to re-visit the Salisbury Plain, I find that the narrow perspective of protecting the Henge by tunneling under it while damaging...
Read more
-
I am against this proposal as I feel it would damage the World Heritage Site described by UNESCO as a "landscape without parallel.
I am also against it as it would disturb the rare Stone Curlew...
Read more
-
The alteration in land scape around Stonehenge is against the World heritage guidelines.
The alterations planned are irreversible and a Major archaeological site will be severely damaged! The sacred...
Read more
-
I would like to object to the construction of the A303 Expressway on the Stonehenge World Heritage Site. As someone that uses the A303 quite a lot I understand that there is a traffic problem in the...
Read more
-
I believe that the A303 expressway should not be going through the Stonehenge national monument. The monument itself is thousands of years old & history should be preserved on that historical site.
-
It's an insult to the concept of Heritage, and an insult to a place of Worship. You should be ashamed. Stop trying to ruin ours and our childrens Heritage.
-
Amend or abandon the current proposed road scheme to avoid permanent damage to this world famous prehistoric site.
-
I am concerned about the damage being done to an ancient site.
-
I have to wholeheartedly object to this planning application to the new roadway which will ruin the beauty of Stonehenge. I am appalled that the highways could even consider such a monstrosity. Surely...
Read more
-
I believe allowing the tunnel to go ahead will cause irreversible damage to the World Heritage sites and to the surrounding archaeology.
-
To much damage to archeological sites would occur and also damage to Stonehenge views.
-
I would like to see this plan redesigned to take into account the already stated objections below:
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape...
Read more
-
I am very concerned that the proposed widening of the a303 will do irreparable damage to the world heritage site of Stonehenge. This prehistoric monument and its surrounding environs which still...
Read more
-
I'm objecting to this proposal for the irreparable damage it will do the environment and to this area of exceptional historical and archaeological significance.
-
This major world heritage site must not be disturbed. Find another way to achieve your goals without destruction to this sacred site. Please leave it alone and as is. People around the world love...
Read more
-
I object to the idea of any tunnel being used near or around Stonehenge. This is a unique and precious landscape that must be left intact for future generations in terms of cultural and historical and...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is not only a very important, worldwide famous, prehistoric monument. It is all the landscape around it that is the monument. That landscape is also full of traces of human past activity....
Read more
-
I disagree with the building of an express way on the A303 for the many reasons that I have expressed to you already, along with thousands of others who agree that the negative impact of this for the...
Read more
-
UNESCO’s international advisers are against the scheme as it stands.
Stonehenge and the surrounding landscape is a unique archaeological World Heritage site and would be irreparably damaged if this...
Read more
-
The proposed tunnel risks damaging as yet undiscovered archaeology and does not stay far enough away from known sites like Blick Mead. The historic landscape is so much bigger than the visible stones.
-
We need to stop the relentless destruction of the countryside. The road is just for the benefit of the motorist and not the tourist or visitor. There is so much history yet to be discovered.
-
Stonehenge is one of the top most valuable UNESCO WH sites in the world. International organisations such as UNESCO itself and its advisory body ICOMOS have strongly advised against the current...
Read more
-
There are some things in life which are worth preserving in as natural a state as is possible. The proposed road building project would completely alter/destroy the Stonehenge heritage.
-
In making my representation on the A303 Stonehenge Scheme as the Clerk of Winterbourne Stoke Parish Council I would wish to begin by stating the support for the scheme as a whole; an effective dual...
Read more