Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I am extremely concerned about the proposed road/bypass passing so close to a World Heritage site. The extra traffic will cause problems with pollution and vibration, causing possible damage, to these...
Read more
-
The designated WHS and much of the surrounding area is a landscape of world-wide importance both in terms of endangered wildlife and unique archaeological sites. Once destroyed or damaged we and...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the impact on the unknown treasures that lie under the earth that could be lost forever by tunneling. Unless they plan to build the tunnel as archaeologists, carefully...
Read more
-
Utterly horrified by the lack of protection offered to a world heritage site that cannot be replaced when destroyed -- Britain is famous for this site, how can it be treated with such disrespect?!...
Read more
-
Devon County Council strongly supports the A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down scheme, along with other schemes currently being progressed at Sparkford to Ilchester and Ilminster to M5 at Taunton, as a...
Read more
-
I object to this proposal on several points:
1) The damage to the local environment, in the context of the area being of significant archeological/historical status, and also the disturbance of...
Read more
-
As a dowser I am very concerned that the earth energies of this site will be further destroyed.
-
Stone Henge is famous throughought the world and brings us many tourists to the area. It is also a very important and significant structure historically, and for many people also has a spiritual...
Read more
-
UNESCO's international advisers warn that the scheme should not go ahead in its present form because of the damage it will cause to the site. There is a lack of alternative options in the...
Read more
-
My main reasons for objecting to the A303 development at Stonehenge (described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’) are as follows:
* The development will cause irreparable damage to the...
Read more
-
The importance of the prehistoric area surrounding the Stonehenge Monument cannot be understated. The plans submitted will irrevocably damage the area for ourselves and for future generations...
Read more
-
My concern is in particular about Blick Mead:
* The boundaries of the site have not been established. As well as the spring itself it appears that the site extends to Countess Roundabout (borehole...
Read more
-
I find the plan for the Stonehenge, A303 Expressway quite ill thought out. It would irreparably and for all time damage the World Heritage site, destroy valuable unique archaeology, and threaten...
Read more
-
The proposed road will irrevocably damage the World Heritage site and its surroundings. The tunnel should be longer or the road should be moved away from the site altogether. Road building is a short...
Read more
-
I find it disturbing that the planning decisions for this historic site should be made contrary to the UNESCO advice which is likely to be more objective with a wider perspective. Those responsible...
Read more
-
My representation is concerned with the archaeological and environmental impacts of the proposed scheme damage to the landscape of the Stonehenge World Heritage site - one of the world’s most...
Read more
-
I have no time, but i am making this time to register my total opposition to this vile & ill conceived plan.
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its...
Read more
-
Stonehenge and the area surrounding it, as a world heritage site, is of immense historic and archaeological importance. It is world renowned and receives visitors from all over the globe. The...
Read more
-
The whole of the landscape and its archaeology is an UNESCO World Heritage Site. The new road will irreparably damage important parts of that, including damage to the Blick Mead Mesolithic site and...
Read more
-
I am horrified that this route could even be considered. Stonehenge is a designated world heritage site and this route will irreparably damage this sacred and very important monument. Any road...
Read more
-
Please don't build anything in the area which will spoil the history of the country! Take all the modern road structures further out, thus protecting Stonehenge. Put the car park further away - if...
Read more
-
World Heritage Site is for all international citizens. We ask that you do not damage a site that is sacred to some of us. The construction will damage the site and prevent the viewing of the stones...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an important historical site not just for Britain but for the world. There is a misconception that the only part of this site that is important is the henge itself and this is not true....
Read more
-
I object to the new scheme as I feel it will cause irreparable damage to the surroundings of Stonehenge, both on the surface and below ground all around the site.
Archaeologically speaking there...
Read more
-
Birds such as Stone Curlews and Great Bustards would have their habitat disturbed. Also it is an important Ancient site of world-renown, which also must not be disturbed, plus the the view across to...
Read more
-
Although aware of the current traffic problems surrounding this issue, I do not consider the current suggestions valid as they interfere too much with the whole of this ancient and unique site
-
The creation of a A303 Stonehenge Expressway would cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site of Stonehenge, thus affecting its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a...
Read more
-
With this plan there will be irrevocable damage to a site of international importance which will prevent future generations from truly understanding its significance and meaning. Far better to wait...
Read more
-
Future generations will not forgive us for the damage to the site
There is no other place in the world like it, nor ever will be
UNESCO are against the scheme
Damage to Blick Mead would be...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned about the irreparable damage to a World Heritage Site and to that of the surrounding wildlife ,that the views of UNESCO are being ignored and that no better alternatives are...
Read more
-
Stongehenge and it's surrounding environs are an irreplaceable part of our heritage and contain many sites and artefacts that we only hold in trust and have a duty to preserve for future generations.
-
I will object to this s planning, as it affects an ancient monument In As much
That it affects, not just the monument itself, but the original final bronze, iron and Neolithic age especially...
Read more
-
Apart from the obvious environmental damage which is caused by road-building and the disastrous change of the topography and accessibility of Stonehenge itself, this whole project is a wast of money...
Read more
-
I am wholly against the building of the A303 Stonehenge expressway because it will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a "landscape without...
Read more
-
The site is unique. Already it is being damaged irreparably. So to retain its present state, and preserve the surrounding area for future research, in my opinion as much should be preserved both above...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ - I visited Stonehenge as a young adult and was overawed by the stones and the...
Read more
-
I have been to Stonehenge and drove by it several times. Also I am a science person with some experience at UNESCO sites. In sites like Stonehenge you really have no idea the implications of...
Read more
-
We would like an understanding of the likely impact on journey times on these services modelled through the project so we can understand the need for additional vehicles during certain elements of the...
Read more
-
I am a regular user of the A303 and have been for some fifty one years. I am interested in the plans for improving the A303 in the Stonehenge area and keen to see the improvements made. I support...
Read more
-
This hugely expensive plan will deface a world-wide admired historical site .
There must be far better and cheaper methods to keep traffic flowing such has a simple widening of the road. There is...
Read more
-
The proposed road scheme and tunnel will do irreversible damage to the site of Britain's foremost ancient monument. The entrance and exit of the proposed tunnel would sit inside the Stonehenge world...
Read more
-
I am concerned about damage to the integrity of the entire WHS landscape and in particular the Blick Mead site.
-
I am concerned that the planned scheme will damage this World Heritage site, which I have visited years ago, and irrevocably disturb the archaeologic and areal setting of the site. This could...
Read more
-
I believe that in it's current form the proposal will cause untold damage to the World Heritage Site, and its archaeology. I am also concerned about possible damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and...
Read more
-
I think it is awful that an area of such worldwide historical importance is to be subjected to such potentially damaging activity. Once done, the damage done can never be undone and historically and...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a UNESCO World heritage site and should not therefore be disturbed either directly or in the immediate surrounding area. It should remain preserved.
-
The disruption to the local area which will cause disturbance to wildlife will be irreversible. Any remaining wildlife will be disturbed by the increase in traffic and the extra noise it will make...
Read more
-
the plans as in existence will destroy the nature and chracter of the area for ever
-
I object to the proposed Expressway because of:
1. Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
2. UNESCO’s international...
Read more