Filter

A303 Stonehenge

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 51 to 75 of 2370 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Anne Dunn

    Stonehenge is a unique site of world heritage. It must not be tampered with for the short-term gain decided by planning committees. In centuries to come people will have discovered new ways of... Read more

  • Anne Wichmann

    The planned road building is likely to destroy important archaeological evidence on a site which has shown itself to be extremely important to the understanding of Stonehenge in its wider context.... Read more

  • Anthony Conder

    Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present... Read more

  • Anthony Lamb

    I am concerned that the plans for the upgrading of the A303 at Stonehenge will disrupt and possibly destroy priceless archeological and sacred relics and other artefacts. The road should be diverted... Read more

  • April Claridge-Elstob

    Dear Sirs, I am dismayed that there has not been a better solution put forward for this problem of through traffic and never ending increase in motor vehicles past this ancient site. Does the road... Read more

  • Arto Keklikian

    A303 risks irreparable damage to the national and international heritage stature of Stonehenge. The commuting needs of motorists cannot be allowed to take precedence over the security ad integrity of... Read more

  • Barbara Wilkinson

    To proceed with this plan is to go against UNESCO advice, and to put at risk the world heritage site. This must be preserved for future generations. I believe that permanent damage to the World... Read more

  • Barry Tyler

    Stonehenge is a world heritage site and far too much damage has been done to it already. It should be declared a NO BUILD zone and that should include the government. To excavate in that area is to... Read more

  • Ben Davey

    I strongly object, the irreparable that could be caused to such an important area, a world heritage site no less. I also object to the cost in our current financial climate & do not understand why... Read more

  • Bibi Freeman

    Other options should be considered that don't cause such irreversible destruction.

  • Bill Day

    I believe that the proposals will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s international advisers say the... Read more

  • Birgitta Fletcher-Tomenius

    Irreparable damage to the WHS, it’s archeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a landscape without parallel UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present... Read more

  • Bob Swan

    My objections to this Planning Application are as follows:- Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ UNESCO’s... Read more

  • Bradley Dale Swinderman

    This is an international heritage site which we understand only a part of thus far future generations may be able to discover more than research has demonstrated thus far; but not if areas surrounding... Read more

  • Brenda Dimbleby

    Please leave this World Heritage Site alone!

  • Brian John Crowe

    A tunnel will have problems if an emergency occurs where emergency services will have restricted access to reach those who might be injured, such as in an accident resulting in a fire. Damage to... Read more

  • C I King

    International specialists from UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS have advised against the road scheme which will damage Stonehenge. UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee in 2018 urged the... Read more

  • Carole Green

    My concerns involve primarily the environmental and archaeological damage that would occur should this project be allowed to go ahead. Stonehenge sits alongside one of Wiltshire’s green roads that... Read more

  • Caroline Moor

    I am very concerned about the impact on Stonehenge and the surrounding area. I believe that the proposal has only gained this much credibility amongst certain parties because viable alternatives have... Read more

  • Caroline Sharp

    I understand if this goes ahead there will be Irreparable damage to this WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s international advisers say... Read more

  • Ceryn Bartley

    I strongly disagree with the proposed planning on the Stonehenge road. I have driven past this site many times. It is of huge historic importance to Britain being a UNESCO World Heritage... Read more

  • Charles J Vickers

    Stonehenge and its surroundings are recognised worldwide as one of those special places where we humans girded our loins and set out on the path to modernity. Despite the long time over which we... Read more

  • Charles Singer

    The current proposal destroys part of a UNESCO World Heritage Site, potentially damages the Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting and disturbs several rare bird species. This site is not simply a... Read more

  • Chasity Hungerford

    Please don’t turn the ancient site that inspires awe into one that is only awe inspiring from one careful angled photograph. The pyramids in Giza are crowded and surrounded by the city. They are more... Read more

  • Chris Barber

    I am concerned that the current plans are likely to impact negatively on the whole status of the area as an internationally important world heritage site. There are parts of the site which will be... Read more