Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Total disagreement with the proposals on air pollution and other environmental grounds. The carving up of Thurrock by a new major motorway Lack of consultation and relevant easy to read materials Lack...
Read more
-
LTC road when it is built will be directly in front of my home. Firstly, the tunnel is to close to the current Dartford Crossing to be a viable alternative it will just add to congestion in Thurrock...
Read more
-
This Relevant Representation outlines the main issues for the Medway unitary authority area relevant to the proposed Lower Thames Crossing (LTC). It is understood that the Relevant Representation will...
Read more
-
1. Continued rising Cost of LTC 2. Will not meet its original purpose to resolve the problem at the Dartford River Crossing 3. Will add to the frequent congestion issues on the M25 both directions...
Read more
-
Numerous study’s and reports have already highlighted the area has illegal levels of air pollution. Will only partially resolve the issues at the Dartford Crossing. The constant tinkering with the...
Read more
-
- the proposed route will not meet it's primary commitment of reducing congestion on the Dartford Crossing and is therefore a waste of tax payers money. - the construction as planned will not deliver...
Read more
-
The damage on the rural nature of Thurrock and its green belt The air pollution concerns have still not been addressed The fact that the proposals do not address the issues at Dartford The cost vs the...
Read more
-
I would like to review the documentation to ensure I get the best possible outcome, which I didn't get at the Dartford crossing. I am still paying crossing fees today as your residents scheme is...
Read more
-
1. The chosen route for the proposed Lower Thames Crossing may not achieve its main purpose of relieving congestion at Dartford. 2. The methodology for assessing the public's response to the various...
Read more
-
We are concerned about the impact the Crossing and new roads will have on the area around Thurrock where we live. Initially, the work which will be required during the build process will be extremely...
Read more
-
Dear Sirs, Hill Residential Ltd has contractual interests over wider land known as Kemps Farm. Kemps Farm includes land in titles; AA35431, EX864036, EX861191 and EX861187. On the basis of the...
Read more
-
I wish to make representations concerning the deleterious effects that the proposed road may have on the pulchritude - I speak now of physical beauty - of the Thurrock countryside. This is a section...
Read more
-
I am a long term resident of East Tilbury ([Redacted]) and have seen the area change very much over the years. This project does nothing to improve the lives of East Tilbury residents, even when...
Read more
-
The chosen route for the proposed Lower Thames Crossing may not achieve its main purpose of relieving congestion at Dartford. The methodology for assessing the public’s response to the various...
Read more
-
The South East Local Enterprise Partnership (SELEP) is a public private partnership which seeks to encourage growth and investment in the South East, to support businesses and encourage development of...
Read more
-
I wish to state that I have followed this since the beginning and do not want this crossing. It is too close to the Queen Elizabeth crossing and starting at junction29 will be of no benefit to us in...
Read more
-
This present project will not cure the traffic problem. Outer village roads will be gridlocked. Carbon emissions will rocket. Countryside ruined.
-
Simply that if you build more roads you get more traffic: even electric vehicles are traffic, which pollute and consume resources and have a high carbon footprint to build ad decommission: the money...
Read more
-
I object strongly, completely to this entire project. It is completely anachronistic to all sensible and long term community, health, transport, environment, pollution and climate change policy and...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the LTC. These thoughts represent only some of my reasons. Having been born in and lived in Thurrock most of my [Redacted] years, I’ve witnessed many changes. Over the decades...
Read more
-
The road plan appears to be badly thought out regarding the alleged reduction in traffic using the Dartford Crossing. The destruction to our local countryside will be devastating, especially...
Read more
-
I want to see how it affects the roads around where I live and how long it will take to complete
-
there is enough pollution in Thurrock we do not need anymore, the roads can not cope with the amount of traffic at the moment let alone after it is finished.
-
The project would: increase traffic growth leading to more carbon emissions, and combined with the construction emissions (see below), the total carbon emissions from the scheme would be at least 6.6...
Read more
-
The extremely poor quality and complete Lack of detail in all of the hand outs with maps that are impossible to read. When information has bean requested no response or no answer given. The habitat...
Read more
-
We are instructed by Yue Keung Stephen Lee and Lai Yu Cheung (our clients) care of Strutt & Parker, Coval Hall, Rainsford Road, Chelmsford, CM1 2QF and of Flat C, 12/F., Wah Yu Court, 8 Hong Ping...
Read more
-
Against the construction of this project
-
The proposed crossing plans are flawed , will cause problems for surrounding roads and are not fit for purpose
-
As a frequent user of the M25 Dartford Crossing I am keen for this project to go trough to relieve the pressure on the Crossing and the delays entailed. I am also an agricultural consultant on soils...
Read more
-
I am against the construction of LTC. I believe that the initial consultation was severely flawed and that the views of the local residents were not truly represented I am concerned over the loss of...
Read more
-
The application counters evidence of induced demand i.e. that the more road space provided the greater the volumes of traffic The scheme will increase Carbon Emissions, both in building and use at a...
Read more
-
This is an outline of the principal submissions I intend to make in relation to the application. I reserve the right to raise further points at a later date if necessary. National Highways are running...
Read more
-
A now out of date construction, Does not help dartford, to much damage to the environment, pollution levels not met . A2 will struggle, too expensive in a cost of living crisis. Proposed to be built...
Read more
-
The route looks very good to me and is essential to relieve the pressure on the extreme traffic problems around the Dartford crossing.
-
I am worried about the amount of cars going through our village due to air pollution and carbon emission. This worries me due to my health. I am concerned about the farm land to be used in the area...
Read more
-
What I consider to be the main issues about the Lower Thames Crossing 1. Construction of the Lower Thames Crossing runs counter to the government’s Net Zero Strategy, which requires reductions in...
Read more
-
Causing additional pollution including noise, light and air pollution in the area where the M25 is already heavily congested when the current bridge and tunnel are disrupted.
-
As im the WELCOM Forum Secretary i will relay issues that may arise from the presentation of the Design Consent Order onwards on behalf of the residents of East Tilbury, West Tilbury and Linford who...
Read more
-
The proposed lower Thames crossing is not fit for purpose. Your own studies show that it will not reduce the congestion on the QE11 bridge as advertised, it will exceed targeted carbon output, and...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed LTC based on the following. As a resident living within 500 metres of the proposed road and within a mile of the a13/a1089 junction I have severe concerns about the impact of...
Read more
-
The British Horse Society London & South East is the UK’s largest equestrian charity with over 118,000 members representing the country’s 3 million horse riders. BHS staff and volunteers from Kent and...
Read more
-
The proposed Lower Thames Crossing will not relieve congestion as much as other proposed routes would; the proposals do not comply with carbon emission reduction targets; other original proposals...
Read more
-
I feel the proposals for the crossing will cause severe damage to the environment on what is existing green belt land and add to traffic congestion in the area of Thurrock
-
Dear Sir/Madam, In the first instant I wrote to the LowerThamesCrossing@planninginspectorate.gov.uk They have replied and given me yhis information and told me that I should be contacting you with my...
Read more
-
My main concern about this road is that, despite the huge cost in both taxpayers' money and environmental destruction, it will still fail in its primary purpose and traffic demands on the existing...
Read more
-
to propose that the development proceeds a soon as possible giving due regard to the local environment but giving prime importance to the benefits to the whole country in improving transport...
Read more
-
This is an outline of the principal submissions I, as an interested party, intend to make regarding this application. I make this representation as this is my main residence and someone who has a...
Read more
-
My representation is based on the points made in my consultation responses: - traffic levels at the existing crossing will still exceed operating capacity - there is no strategy for managing the...
Read more
-
The Society was formed in 1972. The Society has submitted representations during the route selection process and in response to each consultation. The congestion at the Dartford Crossing is primarily...
Read more
-
The redesigning of junction 29 on the M25 and the A127, how can this cope woth increased capacity.
-
Luddesdown Parish Council has participated in all the many consultations run on this project and have concerns that have not been addressed in the consultation materials. Below is a summary of the...
Read more
-
My concerns are over the effect on the roads at the Orsett Cock roundabout and the A13/A1014 roundabout. Also the loss of green belt land through Thurrock. It also appears the new road will not solve...
Read more
-
The Essex Area Ramblers provided a response in September 2021 and in summary is: We are generally content that the replacement PRoWs are adequate in principle, but as there are no detailed plans at...
Read more
-
I am interested in assessing the scheme in the following areas; Overall project programme feasibility and cost compared to similar projects around the world. As a tax payer, I want an honest...
Read more
-
APPLICATION BY NATIONAL HIGHWAYS LIMITED FOR AN ORDER GRANTING DEVELOPMENT CONSENT FOR THE LOWER THAMES CROSSING Planning Inspectorate Reference Number: TR010032 Section 56 Planning Act 2008: Relevant...
Read more
-
On behalf of Bluewater Shopping Centre, which is owned and managed by Landsec, I would like to make the following representations in support for the Lower Thames Crossing. To provide some context,...
Read more
-
We wish to Register as an “Interested party” The Forestry Commission is a Statutory Party where NSIP applications are likely to affect the protection or expansion of forests and woodlands which we...
Read more
-
The UK has a legal obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Road transport is now the economic sector which contributes most to these and action needs to be taken on reducing it. The Lower...
Read more
-
The plans for the LTC fly in the face of UK commitments on climate change and the reduction of carbon emissions. They are estimated to add 6.6 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent. They are opposed by...
Read more
-
as a researcher of environment and society, I am opposed to another new road project – the Lower Thames Crossing (LTC), a proposed six-lane, 22-kilometre motorway with a tunnel under the Thames near...
Read more
-
The main points that I would like to make are: The Lower Thames Crossing will result in increased travel by road when what is needed now and in the future is a modal shift away from private vehicle...
Read more
-
While I am generally in favour of the Lower Thames Crossing, I do have some major reservations about the design that Highways England have submitted to you... because I think that the selected route...
Read more
-
We received Notice (under section 56 of the Planning Act 2008) that the above DCO application has now been accepted by the Planning Inspectorate This letter contains the representations of Canterbury...
Read more
-
I am very pleased with the consultation materials provided and the clarity on the project itself.
-
This scheme is not the best available in that being road based will create too much NEE It should be rail based with no pollution at the point of use
-
I am convinced that it will not provide value for money and that Ministers are being mislead as the figures they will be presented with are two years out of date. It is an ill-conceived scheme...
Read more
-
As Member of Parliament for South Basildon and East Thurrock I wish to make representations in person on a number of issues of great concern to my constituents, including but not limited to: Ability...
Read more
-
Concern and opposition to the Lower Thames Crossing for some of the following reasons:- Cost of the project Long running timescale of the project Impact on local health Impact on air quaility Impact...
Read more
-
Impact on local roads and lanes with movement of construction vehicles. Also the impact on local housing prices.
-
There is no evidence that this link road will have any benefits for this area. I live in South Ockendon and the impact this will have on the environment is criminal! The air pollution, the destruction...
Read more
-
The Kent Countryside Access Forum is a statutory body which advises Councils and other organisations on matters concerning Public Rights of Way (PRoW) and Green Spaces. The Forum represents the...
Read more
-
I am opposing the Lower Thames River Crossing on the following grounds and the project would: -Increase traffic growth leading to more CO2 emissions, plus construction emissions -Not solve Dartford...
Read more
-
I'm opposing the proposed new Thames Crossing. I don't believe it will solve the current problems suffered due to the Dartford Crossing, and will have various negative impacts: There's no provision...
Read more
-
the provision of also upgrading junction 3 on the M2 that connects to the A229 for access for coast bound traffic onto the M20 for Folkstone & Dover Tunnel & Ferry ports. At Peak times this is already...
Read more
-
I am wishing to represent the interests of cyclists and other users of sustainable low carbon transport. Currently, the plans seem to only allow users of vehicles (cars, lorries etc) to use the lower...
Read more
-
Our Client, Seventyholds Ltd, is impacted by the LTC proposals, as submitted as part of this DCO application. We have and are still in ongoing discussions with Highways representatives about our...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
I would like to find out more as thi scheme will affect the lives of many of the local residents for ever. It will not solve the issue of the incomplete M25. I would like to know more about the...
Read more
-
Dear Project Team, The concerns I have with Lower Thames Crossing project are as follows: ~ Pollution, especially with regard to the Government's Environment Act and its stated intention of clamping...
Read more
-
The proposed new crossing will destroy the air quality for all residents of the area in which it runs, it is well documented that the air pollution in high traffic areas is exceeds safe levels so the...
Read more
-
The project would: increase traffic growth leading to more carbon emissions, and combined with the construction emissions (see below), the total carbon emissions from the scheme would be at least 6.6...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
It really concerns me when any future and further building across the country has and is not taking into any consideration, wildlife and the distraction of habitat in itself. Improving public...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns regarding the Lower Thames Crossing: it will cause yet more damage to already hard pressed wildlife via habitat destruction, noise & pollution. Intended to ease traffic...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
I believe that this work will break laws of Co2 emissions and be potentially harmful to the environment and in particular wildlife. I am very concerned that we as human beings think we have the right...
Read more
-
I have great concerns re loss if wildlife. Many species will lose habitat and emissions from use will cause further harm to our environment
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
I am horrified by the devastation that this proposal will wreak on south Essex. Wildlife will be irreparably damaged as SSSIs are destroyed or severely affected and biodiversity will be diminished....
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
I am looking to register myself as an interested party. I am doing so because I live very close to both the final road and the potential compound and its entrance which is very close to my property on...
Read more
-
This project will cause immense environmental damage. Despite mitigation measures, there will be loss of habitat, disturbance to insect life, birds, mammals etc. In addition there will be a loss of...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: • Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. • Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact that the new crossing will have on wildlife and habitat. Water voles, pollinators, increased light pollution and its affect on breeding patterns etc. once we...
Read more
-
We are in a climate and environmental emergency and this proposal is in direct conflict to the direction we need to be taking. Specifically I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and...
Read more
-
I should like to bring to the attention of the planning inspector the following . The unsure nature of the lower Thames implementation staff when attempting to discuss details of what and where and...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more