Filter
Lower Thames Crossing

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 801 to 900 of 1148 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | View 50 results per page | 100

  • Andrew Moore

    I am opposed to the Ltc because I do not believe that it will not achieve the objectives of lowering the traffic numbers at the Dartford crossing. In turn lower emissions, noise, and traffic at the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Anna Bryant

    The stated aim of the project is to reduce congestion at the Dartford Crossing. However the proposal for the LTC does not achieve this aim, as it does not alleviate the problems at Dartford in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Brian Maurice Murphy

    Additional pollution arising in an already heavily polluted area is unacceptable. The congestion on local roads in particular the A13 and A 128 , acting as feeder roads for the new A13 junction.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • C.Dawson

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Camille Simonet

    In the context of climate breakdown, the LTC road project is not fit for purpose. By providing more road capacity, it will inevitably increase traffic. This compromises our ability to meet Net Zero... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Charles Perceval

    The Lower Thames Crossing scheme as proposed by National Highways is excessively detrimental to the environment damaging to to the local area and the local people and enormously expensive. It goes... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Charlotte Lyons

    This absolutely cannot go ahead. The damage to the local environment, animals and eco system would be catastrophic and enough damage is already being caused in other areas of the country.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Strutt & Parker (Strutt & Parker) on behalf of Chelmsford Diocesan Board of Finance (CDBF) (Chelmsford Diocesan Board of Finance (CDBF))

    This summary sets out the key concerns of the Chelmsford Diocesan Board of Finance (CDBF). The CDBF’s concerns are set out in full in a letter dated 21st February 2023 to Sarah Collins, Head of Land,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Christine Bell

    I am against the lower Thames crossing because of the impact on wildlife. This includes the biodiversity loss such as water voles, reptiles and all insects. There will also be damage and irretrievable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Cobham Parish Council (Cobham Parish Council)

    I am the Vice chair of Cobham Parish Council, and this represents the opinions and concerns of my fellow parish councillors and I. During the consultation period we have been working with the LTC... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • BTF Partnership (BTF Partnership) on behalf of Cole Family (Cole Family)

    Representations on behalf of Alex Nyman Alison Jean Bush Amanda Mary Harborne Ann Louise Cole Chloe Evans C.H. Cole & Sons (Mill House) C.H. Cole & Sons (Heath Place) C.H. Cole & Sons (Cherry Orchard)... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Colin Kidner

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Cycle Advocacy Network (Cycle Advocacy Network)

    Cycling UK’s Cycle Advocacy Network (CAN) brings together people with a shared interest in creating the conditions that enable more people to cycle, including better infrastructure for cycling and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • David Cowlbeck

    I wish to make representation with respect to the following areas of concern: - Wildlife - the LTC development would have severe harmful implications to wildlife and habitats, from Biodiversity loss... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Debra Malyon

    Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats, including ancient woodland and local wildlife sites. Increased noise and lighting disturb... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Derek West

    I object to the proposed lower Thames Crossing on the grounds of the environmental impact and it is not compatible with with the Government's policy on greenhouse gas reductions.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Braeside Developments Ltd (Braeside Developments Ltd) on behalf of DHL Supply Chain Ltd (DHL Supply Chain Ltd)

    1. DHL supports the Project in general as a major infrastructure improvement and potential economic driver. 2. DHL objects to the lack of connectivity to the Thurrock Urban Fringe where various growth... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Dr David Macpherson

    I strongly object to the Lower Thames Crossing presently under consideration. These enormously expensive - did I read possibly £5 billion ? - and highly destructive infrastructure projects must be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Elizabeth Mary Murphy

    Additional pollution in our area and loss of productive farmland.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Frances Sladden

    I have lived in Thurrock all my life and the roads around us now , due to the M25 and Dartford crossing have polluted and destroyed so much and trapped us residents at times when the bridge is shut.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Staff member of Gareth Johnson MP (Staff member of Gareth Johnson MP ) on behalf of Gareth Johnson MP (Gareth Johnson MP )

    I am fully supportive of the Lower Thames Crossing. As the MP for Dartford, the single biggest issue in the town is the problematic traffic caused by the Dartford Crossing. Every time there is a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Gary Davidoff

    Being a member of the public that will be living in a rural area of south Ockendon I’m worried about this impact of the new road firstly the disruption in building this new road the noise & the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Geoffrey Martin Gibbs

    There are higher priorities for addressing trunk road issues such as the A27 at Worthing.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Gillian Jones

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: •Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. •Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Graham Parker

    The proposed crossing will considerably increase the pollution in Thurrock which already has a Thames crossing. The route will ruin the countryside disturbing many species of wildlife and vegetation.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Gravesham Rights of Way Committee (Gravesham Rights of Way Committee)

    Our members are concerned with the impact the crossing, both during construction and in operation, will have on the rural areas and villages where they live and the countryside access enjoyed by all... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • James Adams

    I am wholly in support of Essex Wildlife Trust's fundamentally opposition to the plans for a Lower Thames Crossing As they have stated there are serious concerns about the impact of these proposals on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Jane Smith

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: • Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. • Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Jean Rogers

    This crossing wouldn’t solve the problems suffered in Thurrock, which gets gridlocked when there are accidents or breakdowns. There are a lack of connections and local traffic is unable to move due to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • John Blake

    I am strongly against the Lower Thames Crossing for the following reasons and more. It's not going to do the job it's supposed to do. It's in the wrong position, and should have had more consultation... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • John Short

    I would like to discuss issues of the Environmental Impact that LTC will bring to the areas where it is proposed to pass through. Issues such as Pollution - Heavy Construction, Construction Machinery,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Josephine Delaney

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Julia Colley

    I am strongly opposed to the proposed Lower Thames Crossing. It is clear from looking at capacity figures that it would not solve the problems suffered due to the Dartford Crossing. Furthermore there... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Julie Chaney

    As a resident of Essex and witness to what appears to be a huge amount of unbridled development (buildings and infrastructure) on open spaces right across our county, the Lower Thames Crossing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Karine Suhrbier

    The proposed LTC would be hugely destructive and harmful, it would destroy and impact homes, lives, health and wellbeing, greenbelt, woodland (inc ancient woodland), agricultural land (inc grade 1... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Katy Jarrett

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Whirledge and Nott (Whirledge and Nott) on behalf of M Osborne (M Osborne)

    Mark Osborne as freehold owner has instructed me to submit the following objection to the Lower Thames Crossing (“LTC”) application as his land is included in this. Engagement from National Highways... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • M Salter

    In order to protect our climate from further devastation, and meet our Net Zero goals, it is vital that we cut greenhouse emissions. The government’s Transport & Environment Statistics 2022 state that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Maud Waret

    In order to protect our climate from further devastation, and meet our Net Zero goals, it is vital that we cut greenhouse emissions. The government’s Transport & Environment Statistics 2022 state that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Medebridge Solar Limited (Medebridge Solar Limited)

    Dear Examining Authority, I am writing for and on behalf of Medebridge Solar Limited (MSL), which a ground-mounted solar PV project at land off Fen Lane and Medebridge Road, South Ockendon, Essex (the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Mel Perry

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Michael Ashby

    The 'Lower Thames Crossing' proposal supports reducing congestion at the Dartford crossing and providing more connectivity between Kent and Essex. The proposal also suggests reducing pollution in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Michael Brooks

    The proposed LTC would be hugely destructive and harmful and impact agricultural land woodland, wildlife and habitats.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Mr Michael Enifer

    The LTC in their notice for CPO has provided a plan of 1:100,000 therefore no person can see which land is affected . At the very least a plan of 1:1250 or 1:2500 should be given to those affected.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Muriel Blake

    I wholeheartedly object to the Lower Thames Crossing. It will definitely not solve the congestion and pollution at the Dartford Crossing and will cause even more problems on the local road network... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Natasha Clark

    I have huge concerns that this costly plan will have a negative impact on the environment. It will destroy acres of natural habitat; including ancient woodland, established hedgerows and greenbelt... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Ockendon Solar Limited (Ockendon Solar Limited)

    Dear Examining Authority, I am writing for and on behalf of Ockendon Solar Limited (OSL), which a ground-mounted solar PV project at land off Fen Lane and Medebridge Road, South Ockendon, Essex (the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Pamela Bunton

    I strongly objection to the proposals for the LTC in our area for the following reasons: * It fails on the WHO standard for PM 2.5 which is unacceptable * The carbon emissions would be over 5 million... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Persimmon Homes Essex (Persimmon Homes Essex)

    Persimmon Homes Essex Land Interest: Land at Grey Goose Farm, North-east Greys, Orsett Title Number: EX584003 Status: Inside order limits Persimmon Homes Essex (PHE) supports the Lower Thames Crossing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Peter Rowe

    I wish to register my opposition to the proposed Lower Thames Crossing and agree with the points raised by the Essex Wildlife Trust. these are as follows :- Biodiversity loss, such as water voles,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Phil Church

    I am against the development as it simply in the wrong place. I live a mile from the existing Dartford crossing and having this new one only “up the road” will not make a blind bit of difference to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Philip Maber

    Please include me as an interested party in the Lower Thames Crossing / Silverton Tunnel DCO Application. My concerns include: The ecological destruction, The Lifetime cumulative carbon and associated... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Pippa Hepburn

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Rachel Cross

    I am very concerned about the environmental impact and doubt An effective environmental impact investigation has been carried out. Some of the proposed build space is in sssi. There are ancient... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Rees Hales

    I made an email enquiry for which I received a response dated today 22nd Feb 2023. ref CAS-02290-D4P6C6 Of the many queries I raised given the location of my property being in the small hamlet of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Ria Bejko-Cowlbeck

    I wish to make representation with respect to the following areas of concern: - Wildlife - the LTC development would have severe harmful implications to wildlife and habitats, from Biodiversity loss... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Richard Hayward

    I have serious concerns about the impact of the proposed Lower Thames Crossing on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: - biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects -... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Robert Kelly

    The noise pollution of the new road during construction and then after completion would be of an unacceptable level. The air pollution in Thurrock is already at an unacceptable high level and the new... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Robert Knight

    To the inspector In my representation regarding the proposed road construction I would like to raise the following points: 1. The impact of the excavation and road construction will have a severe... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Robin Ball

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • BNP Paribas Real Estate (BNP Paribas Real Estate) on behalf of Royal Mail Group (Royal Mail Group)

    Royal Mail Group Limited (Royal Mail) supports National Highways’ Lower Thames Crossing scheme, but is seeking to secure mitigations to protect its road based operations during the scheme’s... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Sappho Brammer

    1. Noise pollution of new road when open 2. Air Pollution on an already polluted borough 3. Impact on natural wildlife and arable farming 4. Inconvenience, and disruption to daily life with the on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Sardra Conway

    *Diesel is not being used during construction. Will HE visit to check this is happening. When there is a problem will this be forgotten. *if diesel vehicles use LTC once it is finished these promises... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Pinsent Masons LLP on behalf of Southern Water Services Limited (Southern Water Services Limited)

    This relevant representation is submitted on behalf of Southern Water Services Limited (“SWS”). SWS is the appointed water undertaker under the Water Industry Act 1991 for certain areas in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Stephen Baron

    This proposed new road tunnel is totally the wrong approach to transport in London. When we should be encouraging carbon-free transport such as cycling and walking and also an increase in public... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Sue Slade

    This will destroy valuvle agricultural land and communities. Its out of date and will not solve the problem at the dartford crossing.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Susan Bejko-Cowlbeck

    I wish to make representation with respect to the following areas of concern: - Wildlife - the LTC development would have severe harmful implications to wildlife and habitats, from Biodiversity loss... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Susan Francis

    I oppose this application because the new crossing will generate more traffic and increase CO2 emissions, which directly conflicts with the government's target to achieve net zero by 2050. I have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Swale Borough Council (Swale Borough Council)

    In March 2020, Swale Borough Council responded to the Lower Thames Crossing consultation strongly indicating that it could not support the published proposals. Our response cited concerns regarding... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Smith Leisure (Smith Leisure) on behalf of Swing Rite Golf Ltd (Swing Rite Golf Ltd)

    For 17 years Swing Rite Golf Ltd has operated Gravesend Golf Centre. The centre includes a floodlit driving range and a 9-hole par 3 course. LTC’s proposals mean the loss of the existing 9-hole... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Teresa Webster

    The LTC is not fit for purpose. By the time it would be built it would be over capacity It is too close to the existing Dartford Crossing and therefore does not offer an alternative route. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Whirledge and Nott (Whirledge and Nott) on behalf of The Executors of the late R L Osborne (The Executors of the late R L Osborne)

    The Executors of the late R Osborne have instructed me to submit the following objection to the Lower Thames Crossing (“LTC”) application as their land is included in this. Engagement from National... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Whirledge and Nott (Whirledge and Nott) on behalf of The Owners and Occupiers C/O of Buxton, Princess Margaret Road (The Owners and Occupiers C/O of Buxton, Princess Margaret Road)

    My client Mr K Osborne and Ms Janis Hayden as freehold owners and Mr K Osborne and Mr V Turner as occupiers have instructed me to submit the following objection to the Lower Thames Crossing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • HCR Hewitsons (HCR Hewitsons) on behalf of The Rochester Bridge Trust (The Rochester Bridge Trust)

    See attached

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Thurrock District Scout Council (Thurrock District Scout Council)

    Thurrock District Scout Council (TDSC) wish to register as an Interest Party (IP) for the proposed Lower Thames Crossing (LTC) Development Consent Order (DCO). The southeast corner of the Condovers... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Timothy Root

    In order to protect our climate from further devastation, and meet our Net Zero goals, it is vital that we cut greenhouse emissions. The government’s Transport & Environment Statistics 2022 state that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Toby Buttress

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Lambert and Foster Ltd (Lambert and Foster Ltd) on behalf of Trustees of AJA Booth Voluntary Settlement c/o Michael Booth (Trustees of AJA Booth Voluntary Settlement c/o Michael Booth)

    Representation submitted on behalf of the Trustees of the AJA Voluntary Settlement in respect of land at Scalers Hill, Cobham – Scotland Lane - The Trust require retained access to Well Shaw for any... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Tunbridge Wells Borough Council (Tunbridge Wells Borough Council)

    A122 Lower Thames Crossing PLANNING ACT 208 SECTION 56: NOTIFYING PERSONS OF ACCEPTED APPLICATION THE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING (APPLICATIONS: PRESCRIBED FORMS AND PROCEDURE) REGULATIONS 2009:... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • UK Health Security Agency (UK Health Security Agency)

    Thank you for your consultation regarding the above development. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) welcomes the opportunity to comment on your proposals at this stage of the project. Please note... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Alison Cogger

    The lower Thames crossing,if it goes ahead, will be another nail in the coffin for our nature. The important habitats for plants, animals, and fungi will be destroyed, disrupted, and poisoned by the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Angus Hewlett

    I object to this scheme. It will hinder the national obligation to meet our Net Zero goals. Its budget should be reallocated in entirety towards sustainable and active travel schemes: zero emission... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Montagu Evans LLP (Montagu Evans LLP) on behalf of Avis House (Nominees) Limited (Avis House (Nominees) Limited )

    Avis House (Nominees) Ltd ("Avis") are the freehold owners of plots 24-83, 24-92, 24-93 and 27-69 as listed in the Book of Reference. The land is strategically positioned on the edge of the settlement... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Barry Fleet

    My concerns about the proposals are that they will lead to the following adverse consequences : 1. Biodiversity loss, notably to water voles, reptiles and rare insects ; 2. Damage to and fragmentation... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Bean Residents Association (Bean Residents Association)

    BEAN RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION Our Ref: 22-23/E279 This is a protective Objection. Our position and concerns are: - 1. We do not feel the new LTC will overcome problems at Dartford. 2. Whilst LTC may... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Laura Howard on behalf of Brenda Angell (Brenda Angell)

    I have concerns regarding the use of the farm gate between numbers 197 and 203 Lower Higham Road for construction traffic and the pumping of excess water from the tunnel works. I also have concerns... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Cadent Gas Limited (Cadent Gas Limited)

    WITHDRAWN on 20 July 2023 (EL Reference: AS-148) Representation on behalf of Cadent Gas Limited (Cadent) to the Lower Thames Crossing Development Consent Order (DCO). Cadent is a licensed gas... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Chadwell St Mary Centre (Chadwell St Mary Centre)

    We object to the Lower Thames Crossing project: - Not fit for purpose and won't resolve the issues at Dartford Crossing which are set out as the main aim of the project - High cost of the project (and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Coranne Marney

    Loss of green space detrimental to ecology. More traffic through Orsett village with resulting increase in pollution levels Noise levels will increase due to construction Added pollution due to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Damien Bell

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: • Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. • Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • David Allen

    Please re-think you ideas. Nature seems to be an after thought with this government. Once you have spoilt it, you cannot go back and correct it.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Strutt & Parker (Strutt & Parker) on behalf of David Creamer - Foxhounds Riding School & Tack Shop (David Creamer - Foxhounds Riding School & Tack Shop )

    Further to their responses to National Highways previous Public Consultations, our client David Creamer maintains their holding objection to the LTC proposals, as shown in the designs that were... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • David Gates

    I object to this project for the following main reasons. 1) the disastrous affect it will have on an AONB. 2) the road infrastructure off of the A2/M2 (e.g A228) cannot support the increased traffic.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • David Irwin

    This part of essex is already overflowing with road systems causing hardship for what little wildlife we have left. It will cause an influx of traffic into an already congested area with the resultant... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • David Sawkins

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damge to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Deanne Attreed

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: - Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. - Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Denise Lorne

    The new road would damage the Kent Downs AONB. Affect SSSI and SAC and endangered species. With the research on continued congestion and associated air pollution with any new road, the cost of 10... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Department for Transport (Department for Transport)

    Following the application for an Order granting development consent made under section 37(2) of the Planning Act 2008 by National Highways for the proposed Lower Thames Crossing. The Department for... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Donna Goddard

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: -Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. -Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Dover District Council (Dover District Council)

    1.1 Dover District Council (DDC) supports the need for the Project and the objectives set, however, does not intend to comment on the detailed alignment and the local study area impacts. 1.2 DDC... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023