Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
more noise and more pollutions
-
I work for Gatwick Airport Ltd and see the tremendous opportunity this has to grow jobs and income for the local economy as well as bringing more competition to the aviation market.
-
This seems like a pragmatic way to provide a required increase in airport capacity without significantly increasing the airport's footprint and with consideration to local road infrastructure. However...
Read more
-
Massively for Gatwick utilising its current runway and for moving its centre line to accommodate more passengers and aircraft to use it. It will be hugely profitable for not only Gatwick Airport but...
Read more
-
iNCREASED NOISE, POLLUTION, TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE
-
NATS En-Route wishes to register as an Interested Party. It will submit a formal representation in due time.
-
Residential property owners of (redacted) which is located adjacent to the northern perimeter road. As this property is one of the closest if not the closest residential property to the north terminal...
Read more
-
Born and raised in (redacted), I have witnessed first-hand the detrimental impact of the pandemic on both the local economy and the environment surrounding Gatwick. For nearly 15 years, I dedicated...
Read more
-
This project is a must for our area, it will establish the airport as a major hub and bring much needed jobs and money to the local economy. This project needs to go ahead for the future heath of the...
Read more
-
The proposal for Gatwick Airport to move to a duel runway operation will have a negative impact on the local area, and contradicts the governments aim to reduse the UK's carbon footprint. Duel runway...
Read more
-
The South East needs more runway capacity. Even though I live on the fringe of the Northern flight path, I still consider the overall benefit outweighs any noise issues. Gatwick have kept their...
Read more
-
For an extensive period, Gatwick has steadfastly functioned as a substantial pillar of national infrastructure, fostering the prosperity of our members and the diverse entities we stand for in the...
Read more
-
I think it is a good thing to utilise our emergency runway and will be good for the airport and the local environment by not building a completely new runway
-
The 2nd runway will have a direct impact on our day to day living. A lot more noise and air pollution and a reduction in the value of our property.
-
Gatwick airport is big enough. One can’t help but think that Gatwick sets out to deceive when documents put out for public consultation are unclear, blurry, so making it difficult to know how exactly...
Read more
-
More flights will have an adverse effect on air pollution and noise pollution. There will be more traffic on the local minor roads as well as main roads. More jobs mean more houses for workers in an...
Read more
-
There is a very real threat from climate extremes exacerbated by the increase in air traffic. The expansion of airports is a sign that the economy is seen to be more important than this threat. I am...
Read more
-
We do not need even more aircraft over the quiet Sussex countryside. Its already very busy day and night..also if we are to get to net zero we need less aircraft not more I oppose this Gatwick Airport...
Read more
-
I belive the expansion of Gatwick Airport is needed and will significantly benefit the local economy. However, I would like to better understand how the impact of emissions would be mitigated during...
Read more
-
Aircraft noise is already incredibly intrusive, having a major impact on time spent outside. Sometimes planes go over, low, every 4-5 minutes, making simply sitting in the garden unbearable. The...
Read more
-
I object on the grounds of poor air quality and noise. These planes are flying too low and the noise is unbearable. What happen to climate change
-
Planes taking off from Gatwick have been more obtrusive this year than previously, particularly from about 5.30am until 8.0, and again late evenings, sometimes until at least 12.30am. It’s bad enough...
Read more
-
I oppose the development consent order because of the resulting impact on climate change, increase in pollution, decline in air quality, increase in aircraft noise especially overnight, lack of...
Read more
-
I oppose the Development Consent Order to rebuild the Gatwick emergency runway as a 2nd runway. This is because it will mean an increase in aircraft noise, especially at night. Gatwick flights taking...
Read more
-
Increased overflying of my home - sleep interruption. Noise pollution. Strain on airport infrastructure - roads, rail. Air pollution with increased traffic.
-
The courses of the aircraft flying from Gatwick often operate way out of the preferred noise path route and travel over the AONB near Coldharbour creating a major noise nuisance for those trying to...
Read more
-
I am opposed to any expansion of air travel (particularly short haul) because it is environmentally disastrous particularly its impact on CLIMATE CHANGE and the waste of fossil fuels which will be...
Read more
-
I fully support the proposal. It will bring much needed investment into the region, it will create significant employment opportunities and will be a stimulus for growth.
-
The aircraft noise we experience is already extremely bad. Any increase will be completely unacceptable. I live in a beautiful area where many people come to walk and cycle and yet we have continuous...
Read more
-
The ozone is being destroyed and all the aviation fumes emitted by flights is playing a big part in this so it’s madness to want to introduce an extra runway that will produce even more pollution....
Read more
-
Gatwick is big enough. I twas decided in 2017 that Heathrow would be the site for any expansion of London area and not Gatwick so there is no case for expanding Gatwick. The additional noise and air...
Read more
-
The expansion contravenes targets for climate change. The infrastructure is insufficient. Additional noise and night flights are a nuisance. House values fall. This is a rural area that will be hugely...
Read more
-
The proposal to move, rebuild then use what was the emergency runway as a live runway, goes against all noise, air pollution and carbon emission targets. It can be dressed up as offering massive...
Read more
-
To low and noisy over North Holmwood. Too many flights. Night flights are particularly disturbing and this needs to be limited. The extra traffic to and from the airport increases pollution. The rail...
Read more
-
AN EXPANSION WILL OVERWHELM THE SURROUNDING AREA
-
GATWICK ALREADY HAD AN APPLICATION FOR A SECOND RUNWAY REJECTED. IT IS TRYING AGAIN ON BEHALF OF ITS OWNERS TO INCREASE ITS VALUE. THE INCREASED POLLUTION, AND EFFECT ON LOCAL TRANSPORT IS...
Read more
-
Ifield suffer from the pollution and noise from aircraft from 6.0am until 10.30pm to have another runway would be detrimental to residents health, mental and physical. The pollution sometimes is so...
Read more
-
I oppose the move on the basis of the following being negatively impacted. - noise pollution - air pollution - stretched public infrastructure such as roads, housing, GP etc..
-
This project will increase carbon emissions, noise, traffic on M23. It will furtherarm the local environment and contribute to the threat to our planet. We should be reducing the number of flights not...
Read more
-
light, sound, atmosphere pollution, over development the airport started as a race course and evloved the area is not able to sustain more development; housing, roads etc. burden on roads extents to...
Read more
-
I oppose a second runway at Gatwick. It is a disgrace it is even being considered by the authorities. The reasons are obvious and too numerous to mention here. The proposed second runway at Gatwick...
Read more
-
A second runway would have a serious detrimental effect on air quality, which would affect the health of people living in the area. Road & rail traffic would increase significantly, with no planned...
Read more
-
I already ,since 2013 ,have aircraft over my house whereas before I did not. They are noisy; low flying and often keep me awake after 11.30pm and sometimes until 2am . Very distressing. Add to which...
Read more
-
Pollution Noise Environment Lack of infrastructure De- valuation of my property Mental health I oppose this new runway for lots of reasons, namely the increase of aircraft and the noise, the impact on...
Read more
-
I believe that given Gatwick Airports infrastructure- it can barely cope with the flights, passengers and size that it already has. Expand it, you lose more countryside, habitation for wildlife and...
Read more
-
I am concerned that a second runway will have a direct impact on noise affecting my house
-
I object to expansion for following reasons. Increased air traffic noise, which is already unbearable. Damage to mental health. Increased emissions. Fair allocation of flight paths needed to relieve...
Read more
-
I fully object to this project going forward as it already causes air and noise pollution, traffic and overcrowding to surrounding small towns which puts stress on local schools, doctor surgeries and...
Read more
-
I am opposing this because it will have a negative impact on the local area. It will be nosier due to the aircrafts, impact on climate change and the wildlife. Potentially devalue people’s home and...
Read more
-
The CEO of Gatwick Airport should not be allowed on the Aviation Council Acknowledgement by Gatwick Airport of the environmental damage and contribution to climate change that will be caused by the...
Read more
-
I live under the flight path close to Gatwick, we moved in in 2015 and at that point the planes were not an issue - in the past few months planes have got closer to over our house and the noise is so...
Read more
-
Night flights between 11 pm and 6am. Aircraft noise pollution. Concentrated flight patterns.
-
Main objection is the constant noise that has already happened and will be worse with planes now flying directly over my house. The flight path which was moved over (redacted) a few years back causes...
Read more
-
The main objection would be the air pollution and noise distru ruin. These plane are frequent enough and so low and loud it disturbs my piece
-
My home has become under the departure flight path within the past 8 years. The approval of an additional runway, to sidestep full plannng and enquiry, will, I have no doubt lead to an increase in...
Read more
-
I most definitely oppose the development of the second runway in particular - the increase in aircraft noise, the impact on climate change, the devaluing of my home, the destruction of rural life, the...
Read more
-
I consider that moving air traffic movements further North is bringing the dangers involved with aircraft movements overhead much closer to adjacent built up areas. The option to extend to the South...
Read more
-
I oppose the reassignment of the 2nd runway due to increase in aircraft noise, the huge impact on climate change, the reduction of wellbeing through increase in aircraft movements and the decline in...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the ufp ( ultra fine particles) uptick that will inevitably rise causing a further deterioration of health in & around Crawley & mixing car fumes & pollution will produce...
Read more
-
Irreversible destruction of one of the most beautiful rural countryside areas in England for the expansion of an airport with limited accessibility for travellers.
-
I am concerned that, if the emergency runway at Gatwick is established as a second runway, it will damage the environment as well as increasing noise disturbance for the residents in this part of...
Read more
-
Substantial and destructive noise, road vehicle movements and air polution increases as a direct result of expansion. No mitigations possible.
-
I am firmly against an additional runway at Gatwick as it will severely impact on the quality of my family’s life, close as we are to the airport. I also have no confidence in Gatwick Airport Ltd to...
Read more
-
I am a local resident, already severely impacted by noise from the airport, in terms of regular sleep disturbance, inability to entertain friends/family outside, thus reducing opportunities to...
Read more
-
I don’t want the emergency runway conversion to go ahead, we already have enough air traffic! Noise is my issue. Bad enough as it is being on the flight path, be even worse with the extra runway. I...
Read more
-
I OBJECT to the proposal to use the emergency runway on a regular basis for the following reasons: In the light of the climate emergency there should be a reduction in the number of flights, not an...
Read more
-
I fully object to this project going forward as it already causes air and noise pollution, traffic and overcrowding to surrounding small towns which puts stress on local schools, doctor surgeries and...
Read more
-
Bringing the use of the second runway back and increasing the capacity of the airport is an excellent idea which has my support. Great for the economy of the local area and beyond.
-
I live in the Village of (redacted) Surrey and the planes are not meant to fly over us they are meant to fly around us but that never happens. As I am writing this there is a plane going over me every...
Read more
-
I already have many flights over the house , no more is needed . Also what about global warming , has this been forgot ? This is a crazy idea and must be stopped , greed greed , (redacted) every one...
Read more
-
The opening of a new runway will cause excessive noise throughout the day and evening and cause more pollution from more traffic on the roads and more pollution from increased air traffic.
-
Too much engine noise. Too narrow flight paths. Insufficient infra structure. Extra road traffic. My key concerns are Noise generation from flight path and traffic generation. Additionally,...
Read more
-
This expansion of Gatwick will cause an increase of fossil fuel use both in the building and infrastructure changes as well as its capacity for increased flights. Given everything that is known...
Read more
-
The hinterland's roads are already overloaded. It will be impossible to handle more traffic without seriously affecting the health and livelihoods of local residents.
-
Comments - - an airport gateway south of London is key to the SE region, for intrastructure and easy accessibility of public transport, environmental factors. Having 2 runways makes the offering more...
Read more
-
I object to the use of the emergency runway at Gatwick for the development into a 2nd runway. The frequency of air planes over the area is already at a high level including night flights. The...
Read more
-
I oppose the Development Consent Order to rebuild the emergency runway as a 2nd runway for the following reasons: - increase in aircraft noise, - adverse impact on climate, - increase in aircraft...
Read more
-
We do not have the infrastructure to sustain more flights. Poor roads, inadequate railways, no east west rail lines, not enough housing and frankly we don’t want more houses built around Gatwick....
Read more
-
I oppose the expansion of Gatwick airport (two runways) because of it's contribution to climate change and local air/noise pollution As well as this transport links aren't sufficient, roads are...
Read more
-
The developments at Gatwick Airport change of use of runways and associated developments and land take are unwanted and unnecessary. New developments are only intended to increase local air travel and...
Read more
-
The impact on my daily life is noise pollution with flights over our home from 0515 to 2320 regularly. Additional flights outside of these times also cause night time disturbance. Sleep quality...
Read more
-
Increase in noise and disturbance - with open windows yesterday, as the noise of one plane went into the distance, there was barely a minute before the sound of the next one approaching. I appreciate...
Read more
-
The impact of any expansion to Gatwick Airport will be TERRIBLE for local residents, We have too much plane noise - including early mornings - already and the impact of a major increase in air traffic...
Read more
-
The noise level is already unacceptable - I am unable to carry out a conversation outside when a plane is taking off in an easterly direction. Night flights have increased and continue throughout the...
Read more
-
Hi, This new runway will have a significant negative impact on the environment primarily due to increased carbon emissions and increased noise with far less respite for the residents under or close to...
Read more
-
I oppose the use of the emergency runway for other than an emergency due to the increase in aircraft noise, impact on climate change, impact on general wellbeing through increase in aircraft...
Read more
-
I live at (REDACTED) , and I am the County Councillor for Dorking Rural Division in Surrey. 90 million passengers a year, will increase the frequency of planes flying out of Gatwick without noise...
Read more
-
The impact on AONBs and National Parks, which should be protected from being overflown Impact on Hever Castle as a heritage visitor attraction Low unemployment means there will not be sufficient...
Read more
-
I oppose 2nd Runway in Gatwick as i believe that this will lead to increase of aircraft noise, which already has an adverse impact on our family's well-being. I am also concerned about decline of air...
Read more
-
There will be more air pollution as I live about 3 miles from proposed runway. It will affect my health (redacted).
-
A second runway for Gatwick Airport would be a disaster for our environment. At a time when the entire world is trying to reduce pollution and carbon emissions, to encourage more aircraft travel (just...
Read more
-
By Gatwick's admission, a second runway will increase the number of flights to and from Gatwick Airport. However, ANY airport expansion is not consistent with addressing climate change (which is...
Read more
-
I support Gatwick expansion. The benefits outweigh the impact.
-
The proposed development and expansion at Gatwick is inappropriate and damaging to the surrounding rural arras and housing areas.
-
The impact on the environment with the additional flights out ways creating more jobs. Effecting areas that have not been affected previously and some areas continuous noise. I moved to Dormansland...
Read more
-
My main concern is the impact on climate change. The impact of air travel on climate change is being underestimated. We should be reducing aviation movements, not increasing them. There will be...
Read more
-
Completely opposed to the expansion of Gatwick . We live to the east of Gatwick and are on the. Tail end of the flight path. With planes overhead So 1. Excessive additional plane noise 2. Large...
Read more
-
I am against the second runway the main reasons as follows...increase in aircraft noise, impact on climate change, devalue my property and wellbeing through increase in aircraft movements, lack of...
Read more
-
I am opposed to any form of aviation expansion. Airspace is already overcrowded. Noise and emissions are damaging to health and the environment.
-
Aircraft flying directly overhead wake me up before 07.00 - it destroys my sleep and makes me tired for the rest of the day. It is impacting on my mental health! This will only make matters worse.