Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 4001 to 4025 of 4813 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

• Linda Mason

  NOISE - increase from 286,000 flights to385,000. This will involve daytime and night flights which will disturb our day to day life at home and disturb our sleep which is already happening and will be... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Lynne Watson

  I would like to object to the proposal put forward by Gatwick Airport for a new northern runway. Gatwick operates as a 24 hour airport and we already have disturbed nights and days without an increase... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Mark McCord

  The airport has already had its application for a second runway rejected and this proposal strikes me as an attempt to run roughshod over the democratic process. Airport expansions create few new... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Matthew Payne

  1) This is an application for a new runway in disguise which does not comply with policy, ie Government’s Aviation Strategy. Gatwick does not have 2 runways that it can operate concurrently today as... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Mrs Margaret Billinghurst

  Please see attached.

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023
  Contains attachment(s)

• Mrs Robin Joanna Temple

  I own 21 acres of land under the flight path on Partridge Lane. This area is agricultural land and we have developed a wildlife reserve on this land in order to not only protect the land itself but... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Nicholas Bargeton

  The additional runway is not in keeping with uk climate change plan. It will increase air pollution and noise pollution. Converting Gatwick emergency runway into a second runway is not acceptable This... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Nick Bush

  I object to the proposals on grounds of; Increased noise - a massive increase in flights must mean more noise Increased pollution- more jets =more CO2 Increased pollution- more people using the... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Richard Henry Marks

  I object to the expansion of Gatwick Airport. We are already affected by significant noise pollution from planes approaching and leaving the runway. Expansion would mean a significant increase, which... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Richard Horobin

  I have lived under the Gatwick flight path for over 20 years and in that time the frequency and number of flights has increased greatly. During the summer months we have planes going over our house at... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Robert Park

  I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – • Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Russell Francis Burchell

  My wife and I live directly on the flight path of Gatwick airport ,in Lingfield. We have been given very little information about the expansion of Gatwick to assess the impact upon our home lives and... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• SAS Scandinavian Airlines System (SAS Scandinavian Airlines System)

  SAS Scandinavian Airlines supports the development and considers the main impact to be the addition of capacity that would enable new airlines to enter the currently congested airport. This would be... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Sheila Chessell

  There is enough noise from planes using gatwick to have a second runway will make it worse for people already having noise from planes

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Spencer Riley

  Not in line with climate objectives Higher noise and pollution levels

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Sue Toyer- Bloom

  Concerns to the lives of local people It will not create the 14,000 jobs as it states as the airport is becoming more mechanised but it will create massive car problems with all the extra passengers

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Surrey Wildlife Trust (Surrey Wildlife Trust)

  Dear Sir/Madam, Re. Northern Runway Project - Application Reference: TR020005. Thank you for this opportunity to make representations on the above notice. This representation is compiled in view of... Read more

  Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Susan Bracher

  I do strongly object to this application going ahead - it will not only affect my day to day life dramatically, but it goes against all we are trying to do to reduce harming the environment, and... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Suzanne Baker

  We know the new runway at Gatwick airport would have devastating impacts locally and globally. The expansion plan would: increase the release of greenhouse gases, which are responsible for the climate... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Swiss International Air Lines Ltd. (Swiss International Air Lines Ltd.)

  As a Network Planner at SWISS I support the development plans at London Gatwick, as it would allow additional capacity to be released, enabling airlines to further develop their operations to this... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• The Coal Authority (The Coal Authority)

  The Coal Authority is a non-departmental public body sponsored by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero. As a statutory consultee, the Coal Authority has a duty to respond to planning... Read more

  Submitted by: Other statutory consultees

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Adrian John Mundin on behalf of The Mundin Family (The Mundin Family)

  The substantial increase in air traffic, consequent congestion on local roads, overloading of public transport and other infrastructure will fundamentally change the nature of an already busy rural... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Jennifer Turley on behalf of The Turley Family (The Turley Family)

  Our quality of life is already affected, continuous noise from low flying planes every 60 seconds is not healthy way to live. Struggling at the moment let alone a new runway that increases the number... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Trudy Weaver

  Increase in air traffic over the area and our house in particular. More pollution from aviation fuel often discharged prior to landing. Excessive noise level increase from low flying aircraft... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023

• Viviane Doussy

  I wish to register my OBJECTION against this Gatwick Airport proposal for a new runway. Air travel using fossil fuels needs to be phased out as soon as possible, not expanded to accommodate any... Read more

  Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses

  Date submitted: 16 November 2023