Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Live in Woldingham and concerned about increased number of flights flying over the village which is an AONB on the North Downs
-
The expansion will mean LGW becomes the size of LHW - over 100,000 additional flights and 34 million passengers per annum. The existing infrastructure is poor and the proposed infrastructure is...
Read more
-
If we have any chance of reaching our climate goals, and halting the increase in global temperatures the last thing we should be doing is encouraging more air travel. Arguing that it will provide jobs...
Read more
-
I am principally concerned at the noise impact of the proposal as we are on the landing flight path, and already blighted by overflying aircraft on their way into Gatwick. This is already an...
Read more
-
I am registering because I am extremely concerned about the climate impact of all airport expansions. This is a national, cumulative issue and not just one that affects local people.
-
I am objecting because I am concerned about an increase in road traffic with no improvements to local infrastructure to allow for increased traffic. Also concerned about the impact on the environment...
Read more
-
Added pollution in an already very busy area. More traffic and delays meaning added pollution from standing traffic. More staff needed and where will they live?
-
We live directly under the flight path and as I type this I can hear a plane flying far too low on its descent into Gatwick. It is bad enough now - planes not observing the correct heights on their...
Read more
-
We already suffer intrusive noise polution every day for 5 or more hours, not to mention the chemical polution, which is not monitored. Any increase in traffic can only make things worse.
-
Even at the moment we get planes flying directly over our house-I mean DIRECTLY. Often well below the permitted height !!!
-
In view of the shortage of housing and excessive amount of water being taken from local rivers I do not think we need this sort of development in Sussex. In order to encourage airlines to use regional...
Read more
-
Gatwick is very close to an area of outstanding beauty, the North Downs, Box Hill, Leith hill etc, and a number of villages. Increased plane traffic will not only create significant noise pollution,...
Read more
-
I am (redacted) years old. I live right in the middle of the village, under the flight path. Night after night, I am woken at different hours. I realise that the fact of being woken up so frequently...
Read more
-
The unacceptable impacts on my life and environment are; Loss of green space and increase in hard landscaping will result in more floodwater and pollution in the River Mole, flooding our vulnerable...
Read more
-
Noise Expansion of Gatwick would significantly increase aircraft noise both for those living near the airport and for those further away under flight paths. The noise envelope Gatwick has proposed are...
Read more
-
For our day visitors, enjoying time away from the noise and stresses of everyday life; for our residential guests hoping for a good night sleep; for our wedding couples saying ‘I do’; for the children...
Read more
-
This will create further noise disturbance which seems to have increased significantly lately even without another runway.. Even more road congestion through Horley which struggles already even at out...
Read more
-
I object to this development for many reasons. I live under the flight path, the noise pollution is horrid. I struggle to hear the birdsong, you want to make it worse. And plane lights shining into...
Read more
-
concerned about increase in aircraft noise very concerned on impact on climate change concerned about the devaluation of my home concerned of the affect on my wellbeing through increase in aircraft...
Read more
-
I write to you on behalf of Leigh Parish Council. The Councillors have considered the proposal and its impact on it as a community. The following areas are of great concern and asks that they be taken...
Read more
-
This relevant representation has been submitted separately for both LHR Airports Limited and Heathrow Airport Limited, which are related companies within the Heathrow group corporate structure. For...
Read more
-
Limpsfield Parish Council is a democratically elected organisation, representing the residents of the Limpsfield Parish in the District of Tandridge. We have reviewed the expansion plans, studies and...
Read more
-
I am astounded that this project is even being considered. It will cause so much pollution, especially noise. It's terrible for the environment. The local roads are full and we don't have...
Read more
-
The DCO application should not be accepted as making best use of existing infrastructure, as Gatwick do not and cannot deliver a 2 runway airport using the current emergency runway. It is misleading...
Read more
-
I oppose Gatwick airport expansion with no extra funding for infrastructure and no compensation for noise for environmental reasons. A 2nd runway would add more noise pollution, over 1 million tonnes...
Read more
-
Richmond Council opposes airport expansion in light of the climate emergency, and wishes to register as an Interested Party in case we wish to make further representations.
-
The expansion to the runway will severely affect the lives of residents in this area. We already have to cope with numerous aircraft and related noise and a greater number of planes will cause...
Read more
-
I object to any development / expansion of UK airports in light of the Climate Crisis. I would therefore like to express an interest in this proposal
-
There are planes flying over Tunbridge Wells that wake me every night at times that they are not supposed to be flying overhead. It happens EVERY night. Planes fly over the town all day long when they...
Read more
-
I live on the A25, the current new diversion route for the M25. We already have many sleepless nights with the diverted motorway traffic passing through our small village. If the airport expands, this...
Read more
-
I’m writing to express my objections to the expansion plans of London Gatwick. London Gatwick Airport is a single runway airport with an emergency runway (now called the Northern Runway by the owners...
Read more
-
I live in Horsham and I fear that a second runway at Gatwick will reduce my quality of life, in many ways. 1) Increase in aircraft noise – with up to an additional 101,000 flights a year, running from...
Read more
-
I do not want flights re routed over Hever Castle
-
I am opposed to airport expansion. We are in a climate crisis which is only going to accelerate if we don’t stop this reckless use of fossil fuel. Planes are the most polluting form of transport and...
Read more
-
I absolutely object to this project because of the airline industry's substantial addition to the causes of Climate Change. Climate change is the most serious and far reaching emergency on this planet...
Read more
-
I am against the development on a number of grounds: 1. Detrimental impact on AONB and historic protected assets, including Hever Castle, which is a Grade 1 listed heritage attraction set within a...
Read more
-
1. Noise pollution - flights have already increased over our home and in addition they are flying lower than they used to. The noise has increased late at night affecting sleep. This will only worsen...
Read more
-
Main issues that I want to address are: - local area infrastructure (roads, trains services) being put in place given the increase in flights - noise pollution impact and how this will be mitigated -...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – · Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
Our roads (motorways and local) are not suitable for the amount of traffic that the additional runway and terminal would bring to the area.
-
In order to comply with legally binding carbon-reduction targets for transport, the proposal would necessitate a full network of out-of-road walking and cycling infrastructure, both for the airport...
Read more
-
How this will effect my child, work and I.
-
The proposal would engender increased reliance on flying and thus reduce the possibility of reducing UK CO2 emissions to meet net zero targets. The associated personnel and housing demand would...
Read more
-
The DCO application should not be accepted as making best use of existing infrastructure, as Gatwick do not and cannot deliver a 2 runway airport using the current emergency runway. It is misleading...
Read more
-
I have lived in the Lingfield area since 1989. Since then, except for the downturn in the national economy in 2008 and then for the duration of the Covid lockdown, there has been a steady increase in...
Read more
-
I have concerns about the impact to the surrounding area when the works to the road network is undertaken abd would like to know more about this. I would like to know what measures are bring put in...
Read more
-
We are already greatly affected by the noise from aircraft on Route 4 flying over this area, even though we are not in the NPR. Gatwick and the regulator do nothing about this, in fact it is getting...
Read more
-
The DCO application should not be accepted as making best use of existing infrastructure, as Gatwick do not and cannot deliver a 2 runway airport using the current emergency runway. It is misleading...
Read more
-
I am against the development as Hever Castle is a Grade1 listed heritage attraction set within a Grade 1 listed park and garden which, in itself, is within the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural...
Read more
-
I live on a country road which has a 40MPH speed limit. It is already very busy with airport traffic and the village has a single lane bridge, narrow winding road and a junior school. Also the...
Read more