Filter

The Sizewell C Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 551 to 600 of 1290 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Christine Collett

    I wish to register as an Interested Party in the hearings on the Sizewell C planning application. I fully endorse the Stop Sizewell C’s Relevant Representation and all that is contained therein, and... Read more

  • Christine Silver

    I oppose the building of Sizewell C on the following grounds:- 1. Safety issues - Fukushima, Chernobyl etc. No safe way of disposing of radioactive waste. 2. Site - unstable coastline, AONB, Minsmere,... Read more

  • Darren Halford

    Sizewell C The B1112 was closed for a stretch of 20m for 2 days at Theberton. This meant an additional 10km and 20mins drive diverted along tracks not meant for two-way traffic nor wider vehicles.... Read more

  • Daryl Ash

    Site position. The Proposed site is in AONB and is just too big. This is a potential flood area so increase in water from site increases this risk. Impact on RSPB, a world renowned nature reserve will... Read more

  • David Moodie

    I wish to register the following concerns: 1. The nuclear industry has a history of delays and cost increases. We would be better advised investing further in renewable energy as those projects come... Read more

  • Deborah Booth

    We live in Harrogate and for 20 years have lived in France, but over this time we and our children have had many holidays in Eastbridge from which we have visited Minsmere. We have found nothing like... Read more

  • Derek Eaton

    I am very concerned about the proposals for Sizewell C. I am concerned about the potential damage to the Suffolk coastline and the negative impact that this will have on its rare species and habitats.... Read more

  • Dominic Giles

    I oppoae the planned "sizewell c" project primarily on environmental concerns. The world needs to be transitioning towards "green", renewable, sustainable energy options. There are plenty to choose... Read more

  • Dr Jed Boardman

    Relevant Representation Sizewell C I wish to raise the following issues of concern about Sizewell C. 1. Site Selection • New energy sources that are developing and the fact that the development will... Read more

  • Eleanor Jenkin

    EDF Stage 4 Consultation for Sizewell C 27/09/20 I am a resident of East Suffolk and as such very familiar with the Suffolk Heritage Coast. I would like to register as an interested party to the... Read more

  • Emma Jackson

    I fully support the building of Sizewell C. It has been a long time in the planning and can not be built soon enough. It will bring much needed jobs to the area and stimulate the local economy. I do... Read more

  • Emma Lucy Victoria Norton

    The Suffolk coast is drastically eroding. Sea levels are rising and the site will be flooded by 2100. Extreme annual sea events will happen by 2050. Building on a flood risk site is utter madness. The... Read more

  • Fiona Curtis

    The validity of the project. The former Energy Secretary (who as I understand it approved Hinkley Point) and current leader of the Liberal Democrat Party, Ed Davey has this evening (27.09.20) appeared... Read more

  • Gail GordonBrown

    It is a colossal waste of tax payers money. It is very expensive electricity.No other country in the world is contemplating this type of investment as green renewable energy is so much cheaper and... Read more

  • Gina Gow

    I wish to raise the following concerns about Sizewell C. 1. Site Selection The site is unsuitable The coast is one of the fastest eroding coasts in Europe The area will see rising sea levels and... Read more

  • Griff Chamberlain

    I wish to raise the following issues of concern about Sizewell C. 1. The location of the site • The site is at risk of rising sea levels and flooding as predicted by climate change studies • Academic... Read more

  • Harry Smith

    I wish to make the case that the proposed planning and development of Sizewell C would be a complete and total disaster for the natural environment and also local residents and tourism to the area.... Read more

  • Helen Hepburn

    I have been a resident of Suffolk for 50 years. I am a keen supporter of wildlife, belonging to many organisations such as the RSPB, Butterfly Conservation Trust, and Wildlife Trusts. I am also a keen... Read more

  • Ian Booth

    We live in Harrogate and for 20 years have lived in France, but over this time we and our children have had many holidays in Eastbridge from which we have visited Minsmere. We have found nothing like... Read more

  • Ian Castle

    In my view the forecast costs and completion time will both over run, on this sort of contract history tells us exactly that. By the time the station is generating it will be redundant. It will be... Read more

  • James Eaton

    I am very concerned about the proposals for Sizewell C. I am concerned about the potential damage to the Suffolk coastline and the negative impact that this will have on its rare species and habitats.... Read more

  • James McLeod

    My concerns about Sizewell C concern the construction time and disruption that will be caused to the whole area. • The wildlife and habitat which will be lost forever • The terrible loss of amenity... Read more

  • James Youngman

    The site selected is unsuitable. Rising sea levels over the next 100 years are likely to make the site an island containing 5 nuclear reactors and their waste. The impact on nearby international... Read more

  • Jane Blore

    - Lack of meaningful engagements and results from landowners concerns - Concerns over environmental impact of the project - Scheme design concerns – provisions for severed land etc, access -... Read more

  • Jeff Higgott

    Impact on adjacent and nearby Sites of Special Scientific Interest Projected and actual cost and funding

  • Jennifer Wilson

    I request PINS recommend to the Secretary of State that EDF’s application be refused because of the cumulative impact the project will have on the environment, people and businesses of Suffolk, for... Read more

  • Jill Bowring

    To continue with technology that uses fuel which is unable to be cleaned up safely at the end of its useful life is unacceptable. To further scar some very delicate and nationally important landscape... Read more

  • John Horsnell

    Why is the Government allowing the Chinese General Nuclear involvement to be a major State Holder in Sizewell C Project will State Security and Technology be an Issue which is highly controversial... Read more

  • John Stebbing

    I want to add my name and my support to ALL of the representations made by the following organisations: The STOP SIZEWELL C group The RSPB The SUFFOLK WILDLIFE TRUST and to support the Suffolk County... Read more

  • Joy Castle

    My points of concern about Sizewell C are:- I believe the proposed construction in this place is wrong because:- • It will cause irreversible damage and destruction to this AONB • Which will be... Read more

  • Ken Baugh

    I have many concerns about the construction of and need for a nuclear power plant at Sizewell C. Below are my main concerns which are the same as those submitted by my wife. LOCATION This is the wrong... Read more

  • Kirsten Hecktermann

    These are my concerns about the proposed Sizewell C development, I wish to register them: Having attended the last three consultations by EDF, reading the changes and discussing my concerns with... Read more

  • Letheringham Parish Council (Letheringham Parish Council )

    Letheringham Parish Council Are concerned that the original EDF proposals proposals for the transport of materials to the the Sizewell construction site, was an integrated Sea ,rail and road system.... Read more

  • Lindsay Carrier

    I am very concerned about the proposals for Sizewell C on environmental grounds ,the impact on local communities ,tourism in the local area and businesses which depend on this .Sea levels and erosion... Read more

  • Margaret Davis

    I would like to raise the following issues regarding Sizewell C 1. Selection of site - Risks from flooding due to climate change and sea-level rise - Potential impact on neighbouring or near-by areas... Read more

  • Margaret Grenham

    I feel that the proposed building of two new nuclear reactors at Sizewell is really not necessary. The thinking behind the move is old thinking and we to develop smarter types of energy producers.... Read more

  • Marilyn Hands

    I am writing to object to the construction of Sizewell C. I endorse the representations made by Stop Sizewell C. There is no doubt that the negative impacts of the proposed development of SZC are... Read more

  • Mark Goyder

    1) The proposal is unsafe in the light of the latest scientific understanding of the rate of climate change. By 2050, says the International Panel on Climate Change, extreme sea events will be... Read more

  • Martin Wilks

    What I have not liked about this series of enquiries is the way in which EDF have set the agenda. And, in appearing to be generously listening to the complaints about it: wildlife, ecological impacts,... Read more

  • Maureen Hales

    I have been visiting this area since the 1970s, drawn by the wildlife and the special landscapes that are so rare, not just in Britain but the whole of Europe. Since moving here permanently 5 years... Read more

  • Michael Bradshaw

    I am opposed to the application on a number of grounds as follows: 1. I do not believe that we need more nuclear power stations. The pace of change in renewable generation and battery storage is such... Read more

  • Mr Rhett Griffiths

    I'd like to mention the following concerns about Sizewell C. Location of Site: - at serious risk from climate change (sea level rise/flooding) - negative impact on nearby AONB areas and sites of... Read more

  • Mrs Helen Bishop

    I live in the centre of Woodbridge, but am very conscious of train noises especially at night. Since the roads are already congested Any extra traffic on either would damage the town.

  • Mrs Joyce H Annandale

    Sizewell C does not address the near to medium term urgency in reducing carbon emissions and diverts taxpayers’ money and government time from dealing much more effectively with carbon reduction. In... Read more

  • Neil Boast MBE

    My property is directly alongside the railway line in Woodbridge [Redacted] and the increase in rail traffic, and the increase in weight/size/speed will adversely your home and our lives. It will... Read more

  • Nicholas Bridges

    APPLICATIONS TO PINS TO REGISTER AS AN INTERESTED PARTY I am a chartered architect with 35 years’ experience, specialising in heritage and expert witness consultancy, and who has lived in the area... Read more

  • Nigel Robson

    I wish to object to the proposed Sizewell C (and D) development for the following principle reason; the development is too large for the land available. As a consequence the adverse impact of the... Read more

  • Paul Chandler

    I am very concerned about the volume of road traffic this project will generate. I have particular concerns over the use of Sizewell Gap Road prior to the establishment of the new access road to the... Read more

  • Paul White

    Apart from not wanting China General Nuclear Power Group ANYWHERE near this development, I am a life fellow of the RSPB who run a reserve adjacent to Sizewell. It is my opinion that construction of... Read more

  • Peter Mitchell

    It is obvious that the main problem is the amount of construction traffic to reduce this the rail network is the only answer with major sidings and land available at both Ipswich and lowestoft both... Read more