Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
My concerns about the damage to an area of both national and international significance as the standing stones at Stonehenge are just a tiny part massive area of archaeology and setting, described by...
Read more
-
The proposed tunnel will cause needless, irreparable damage to one of the world's, most iconic Word Heritage Sites. UNESCO describes it as a ‘landscape without parallel’, and its advisers say the...
Read more
-
How many times have we destroyed and damaged our priceless ancient sites in the past? I can't believe there's anybody would agree to a road or tunnel being built anywhere near Stonehenge, one of the...
Read more
-
Concern about the potential damage to the archaeological heritage of the site that will be caused by this unwanted development.
-
Damage to the area and the invaluable artefacts.
Increased road noise and associated pollution damaging the experience of people attending the sacred sites and damage to the sites themselves from...
Read more
-
Given that it is common place for archaeological sites of profound importance to be left in situ for future generations when archaeological techniques are further developed, it seems ridiculous that...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is one of the most sacred sites in Britain. It's integrity should be maintained and protected. The needs of commuters is in my opinion irrelevant. We must uphold our heritage not destroy it...
Read more
-
I oppose this planning application on the grounds of the destruction of this site and surrounding countryside and the environmental impact of more road traffic in the area
-
Andover Ramblers have two interests. One is to ensure the plans accommodate walkers and open up the right of way network for people to enjoy. Two is to promote easy vehicle access to the west of...
Read more
-
I believe that the cut and cover tunnel will destroy very important archaeological evidence.This will no longer be available for our future generations.In the future there will be technological...
Read more
-
This brief note is intended to register my objection to road building in the vicinity of Stonehenge, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. I believe that the landscape of which Stonehenge is a part is a...
Read more
-
As a former Wiltshire County Councillor for Amesbury and thus for Stonehenge I have continued to engage in the debate of routeing the A303 past Stonehenge for the past twenty years. I like to think...
Read more
-
The form is very simple – you fill in your details*
Give the reasons why you are objecting without going into great detail. Examples could include (but please use your own words):
Irreparable...
Read more
-
I strongly oppose this scheme on multiple grounds:
* In general road budget should be focused on fixing and improving existing roads, especially with the backdrop of climate change it's not...
Read more
-
I strongly object to any tunnel with entrances or exits that are constructed within the boundaries of the World Heritage Site. I strongly object to the construction of any related roads or service...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a world class heritage site. Please make sure it will be fully protected for us all and future generations. The proposed road sounds as if it will possibly cause structural damage to the...
Read more
-
I think Stonehenge should be prioritised over any roads for traffic.
-
The Stonehenge World Heritage Site MUST be preserved as an absolute priority. NOTHING should be allowed to 'taint' this historic, world famous landmark and link to our prehistory. It is SACRILEGE that...
Read more
-
I believe this will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
-
I would like to see Green Bridge no. 1 be built as a 'standard concrete & steel structure'. The 'green capacity' of this bridge could then be moved into the World Heritage Site. This change would then...
Read more
-
I merely wish to register my support for the scheme and hope that it can be constructed as soon as possible. I have been satisfied that my original concern regarding the effect of the tunnel on...
Read more
-
I have summarised my objections in a bullet list. To be clear, I object to this new road entirely. My objections include:
- Fact that building more roads does not ease congestion, it attracts more...
Read more
-
I object to this project because of the damage to the Stonehenge World Heritage Site that would inevitably occur.
I am concerned that no alternative has been proposed that would not damage...
Read more
-
As an American journalist who covers arts, culture and history, I care a great deal about the issue of historic preservation, and I am deeply concerned about the way this project is being handled. The...
Read more
-
I believe the cut and cover tunnel plan is destructive to the archaeology and heritage of the wider area and will destroy the world heritage site's potential for future archaeological research.
-
The new road not impact on the World Heritage Site in any way.
-
I am objecting to your plans for the A303 where it passes Stonehenge. I have often enjoyed the view whilst driving past and feel it should remain possible to see these stones from a distance for free....
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an important historical, spiritual and ancient site. We are losing so much of our heritage in the name of so called 'progress' and enough is enough!
-
In my view the proposed scheme will irreparably damage not just the area presently designated as a World Heritage Site, but the wider environment that is part of the essential context of the...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the plans to isolate Stonehenge from the A303. The view of Stonehenge from the A303 is a symbol of permanence which, in my view, gives reassurance and pleasure to countless...
Read more
-
I was saddened to hear of the habitat disturbance at Blickmead recently and really cannot understand why certain parties still intend to carry on with detrimental work in the area. Having grown up...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is unique......if the archaeology is damaged irreparably we lose our heritage and our deeper understanding of our ancient ancestors. It will be a loss for the world and deprive future...
Read more
-
I am very unhappy about the application for changes to the Stonehenge roadways, for a number of reasons:
- I believe that this will destroy areas of this important achaeological setting in ways...
Read more
-
A classic example of knowing the costs of everything (building a cheaper by-pass) and the value of nothing (StoneHenge)
If this goes ahead...History will not look kindly on you.
Would love to...
Read more
-
My organisation has a number of employees (c1000) who use the A303 on a daily basis to access the Boscombe Down Airfield site and any service diversion or works to the A303 will affect the travel...
Read more
-
Unesco has recommended that this work should not proceed. Please stop. Thank you
-
These proposals will irretrevably damage the archaeology of the sites either by design or neglect.
There have already been reports of damage to the archaeology of the Stonehenge...
Read more
-
The unique architectural heritage of this area needs to be protected and undisturbed for future generations. There would be significant damage if this scheme were allowed to go ahead. I am also...
Read more
-
ABOUT
The Society was founded in 1853 to “educate the public by promoting, fostering interest in, exploration, research and publication on the archaeology, art, history and natural history of...
Read more
-
Please see attached
-
I strongly disagree with any further desecration of the World Heritage site. Once you destroy this, it will never be able to be recovered. This does not just impact the current generations but also...
Read more
-
I favour minimal intrusion into Stonehenge and the area around it. I favour cutting back on existing intrusions like the road running close by that was removed recently. For the A303 my view is that...
Read more
-
The current plans are likely to damage this World Heritage Site.
UNESCO do not support the plans in their present form.
THe unique character of the site and its surrounding area should be protected...
Read more
-
PROW:
The proposals within the application unjustly affect existing public rights of way and fail to make adequate provision for their conservation. This is contrary to both the recommendations...
Read more
-
I am an academic archaeologist by training. My D.Phil research, undertaken at the University of Oxford, focused on evidence for astronomy in the ancient societies of the British Isles. Stonehenge was...
Read more
-
The Western tunnel entrance should be moved further westwards making the tunnel longer, or a covering put over the A303 where it is down in the cutting creating a green tunnel. I would like there to...
Read more
-
The strange vibrations that are present at this site is not easily understood by our modern? view, we have yet to catch up with the ancient mind that is much more advanced than we the ignorant give...
Read more
-
The land around Stonehenge is sacred land. Stonehenge was a central meeting place for the British tribes. Leylines run from here all over our blessed country. We are constantly uncovering new...
Read more
-
This scheme will cause Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. Points that are of huge relevance and seem not to have been...
Read more
-
NATS anticipates no impact from the proposal and has no comments to make.
Regards
S. Rossi
NATS Safeguarding Office