Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I think you need to take into consideration the following in the decision making process for the number of reasons included below;
* Ireparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting,...
Read more
-
Proposed tunnel too short. MODhave to give up land to create much wider ring road to restore the whole processional landscape around the henge.
-
I feel that the work will put this, the most important World Heritage Site in the UK in utmost danger, as well as neighbouring sites, and also it will devastate the buzzard and curlew population in...
Read more
-
I'm very concerned that the route and structure has not been assessed enough to ensure that there isn't any damage to the historical landscape! The main area I'm aware of is Blick's Mead. This is our...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage site, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO also find the scheme to be unsuited to such a landscape. They should not be ignored. Highways...
Read more
-
This planning inspectorate must study the long term effects of any short tunnel as it will damage prime unevaluated land and prehistoric sites.
-
Having visited the site on several occasions I cannot see why the proposed dual carriageway cannot be moved much further from the site, as it not just Stonehenge but tumuli that are part of the...
Read more
-
1.As a UNESCO World Heritage Site (WHS), Stonehenge is one of the world’s most important prehistoric sites. It is situated in the UK but the UK’s responsibilities lie well beyond the UK, which must...
Read more
-
A tunnel and dual carriageway across Stonehenge World Heritage Site would cause untold damage to a unique and ancient landmark of our history. Stonehenge is not even fully understood, if we further...
Read more
-
It is a huge mistake to disrespect the land of our ancestors in such a way. I'm sure there are ways around it. The site and its surroundings must be prioritised and not a motorway. We will become our...
Read more
-
This is a UNESCO World Heritage site that will be irreparably damaged, along with other important sites, not all of which have been fully excavated. It hampers views from some of the stones, the...
Read more
-
Our roots and history must be preserved at all costs. It is a scandal to risk damaging a world patrimony for the immediate satisfaction of one spoilt generation - a scandal, and also a big...
Read more
-
The landscape and setting of the World Heritage site Stonehenge is unique. The proposed development of the A303 would irreparably damage the visual setting of not only Stonehenge but also other...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is precious to the UK. We can't afford to lose or damage this ancient structure. Do not build a dual carriage way or tunnels near this site.
-
I am opposed to the loss of a precious cultural asset, the classic view of the stones, at the hands of the very bodies entrusted with its protection.
-
This is a World Heritage site. There does not appear to be alternatives that do not impact on the site.
As it has been there for millenia, there is a whole ecosystem which would be threatened,...
Read more
-
I am writing to register my objection to the A303 Expressway on the Stonehenge World Heritage Site, my reasons are many fold and varied, but in the main contain a sense of responsibility for something...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the irreperable damage the plans will cause to a Workd Heritage Site. I am a regular user of the A303 and love being able to see the stones as I pass - I do not believe that...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is prehistoric monument, a world heritage site and a special, sacred landscape with thousands of years of history,secrets and mystery. It is unique and there is still much archaeological...
Read more
-
Loss of view to a WHS and Unesco "landscape without parallel" which links all who pass by to their humanity.
Damage to an incredible archaeological site, with so much more to discover.
-
This is a world heritage site and an iconic British landmark.
This road will more than likely lead to an increase in traffic which will further erode iit and also threaten wildlife .
-
The current plan effectively removes this most important monument entirely from public view, except for those that have the time & money to use the visitor centre. Having already removed one road from...
Read more
-
The proposed tunnel and dual carriageway are positioned partly within the World Heritage Site. This is unsatisfactory. The tunnel should enter from the East as near to the Amesbury roundabout as...
Read more
-
I strongly object to this development because it will cause irreparable damage to an internationally important archeological site.
-
The irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ would destroy this unique piece of British history for current and future...
Read more
-
I have grave concerns about the proposal to build an expressway, A303.
This is an UNESCO World Heritage site and should be treated accordingly. UNESCO Adviers do not approve of this proposal.
I...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned that despite many objections from parties as diverse as Archeologists, Naturalists, Druids and even UNESCO, this plan is apparently being bulldozed through.
It is remarkable -...
Read more
-
I was brought up in Stratford sub Castle, Salisbury and spent much time at Stonehenge. It is our history. Once it has gone, it will never come back. I am in complete opposition to the proposal.
-
To ensure that the needs of non-motorised users (NMUs) are considered both on the route of the A303 and the wider area, and appropriate measures implemented in accordance with HE Cycling Strategy and...
Read more
-
Apart from the obvious fact that stone henge is a national monument which also is held sacred by certain persons in their religious beliefs , and the fact i enjoy driving the 303 i wish to point out...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme will undermine a unique world heritage site whilst increasing traffic, which completely contradicts the UK'S commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. I regularly drive along...
Read more
-
The consultation is something of a farce. My principal interest is the impact the building of the proposed road works and the changes in the landscape after completion will have on the bird life in...
Read more
-
I am primarily concerned by the UNESCO objection to this development. This part of Wiltshire is a designated World Heritage Site for specific reasons and any move which endangers that designation...
Read more
-
I wish to object to the current plans for the Stonehenge site.
The site, of outstanding international importance, is huge. It is not conceivable that we have discovered and identified all there is to...
Read more
-
I hereby assign myself as an Interested Party and that I am opposed to anything happening to this historical and precious site
-
I am concerned about the damage to the archaeology of the wider Stonehenge landscape, including the mesolithic site of Blick Mead. I am concerned that the scheme has been condemned by UNESCO, and how...
Read more
-
As a native of Salisbury Plain (born and lived till 18 in Tilshead) and as a specialist in global megalithic architecture, I object to the massive disruption to the ancient and globally-important...
Read more
-
Stonehenge (and Avebury) is an iconic feature in the British landscape, which I have enjoyed for the past 35years, while driving past it or visiting the site with friends and family.
Altering the...
Read more
-
The significant possibility of further damage to Blick mead preliminary work has already damaged site.
damage to wide area including archaeology and the setting.
I have traveled passed Stonehenge...
Read more
-
I am concerned that there will be irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
Also, UNESCO’s international advisers say the...
Read more
-
People tend to see Stonehenge as just the obvious megaliths, but it is part of a much wider neolithic landscape, which we are just starting to explore and understand, and which could be irreparably...
Read more
-
My representation regards the provisions being made under this road scheme for instances where the act of the construction of this road will result in the removal of an individual's ability to...
Read more
-
I strongly object to any work or disturbance to the sacred Stonehenge monument and surrounding site, I strongly object to the tunnel plans, I would urge the government to read _ think these terrible...
Read more
-
It will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
It will also cause disturbance of rare bird species,...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed A303 expressway past Stonehenge world heritage site, I myself and my children have visited stonehenge many times over the last 40 years and feel that irreparable damage will...
Read more
-
To destroy any part of this unique site would be the act of Philistines and barbarians. We would be worse than those destroying statues and buildings in Syria and the Middle East. Please consider our...
Read more
-
It will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should...
Read more
-
The landscape surrounding Stonehenge is of supreme importance Historically, Archeologically, Educationally and as a Social amenity. To destroy that landscape irreparably by driving a road through it,...
Read more
-
This site is of enormous historical importance. It has already been damaged during preliminary work and if this plan goes forward it is likely to cause far more damage.
Any proposed development must...
Read more
-
It will destroy the sacred heritage of this site.