Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
No sea wall to prevent flooding where proposed route is going
-
1. The Port of London Authority (“PLA”) is the statutory harbour authority for the tidal Thames (the “River”). Its statutory functions include responsibility for conservancy, including dredging and...
Read more
-
1. Why is the proposal going ahead if it is not going to reduce the required level of traffic away from the Dartford crossing. You have quoted only 4% when much more is needed. 2. You are proposing...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact of the Lower Thames Crossing on wildlife and habitats in Essex , including: • Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. • Damage to,...
Read more
-
OUTLINE OF MAIN POINTS OF OBJECTION TO LOWER THAMES CROSSING 1. Unacceptable impacts on Whitecroft Care Home, Stanford Road, Orsett, Thurrock, and its residents and employees, due to the magnitude of...
Read more
-
OUTLINE OF MAIN POINTS OF OBJECTION TO LOWER THAMES CROSSING 1. Unacceptable impacts on Whitecroft Care Home, Stanford Road, Orsett, Thurrock, and its residents and employees, due to the magnitude of...
Read more
-
We do not want the new road to come near Brandon groves for health and environmental reasons to the people that live on the estate as all wildlife around
-
Objection to Location Objection to Noise Pollution Objection to Air Pollution Objection to Loss of Green Belt Objection to poor maps of the proposed plans that exclude majority of the housing in South...
Read more
-
The environmental impact on the area will far outweigh any benefits. The years it will take to build causing chaos will double the environmental impact in the area and then it will bring more polygon...
Read more
-
Main points I intend to raise in relation to the application are: Would not solve the problems suffered due to the Dartford Crossing and be over capacity before it’s finished. Lack of adequate...
Read more
-
Lower Thames Crossing Pre Examination Representation Thank you for notifying Sevenoaks District Council on the formal notification of acceptance for the Lower Thames Crossing (LTC) Development Consent...
Read more
-
Shorne Parish is located east of Gravesend, a “reverse-L” shape extending from the middle of the A2 in the south to the middle of the Thames in the north. It includes several areas of ancient...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
In a climate emergency, there’s no justification for going ahead with this project. The data on this is clear, our planet can’t cope with this and it’s going to increase our dependence on fossil fuels...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the impact on traffic on the M2/A2 between M25 interchange at Dartford and going down to the Bluebell Hill interchange, and beyond. The proposed tunnel will increase the amount of...
Read more
-
I last submitted consultation comments in September 2021 and my concerns still hold true today. Benefit - I do not agree that a crossing in this location would ease congestion at Dartford. The A2...
Read more
-
I believe the annihilation of the countryside is despicable and the estimated costs far outweigh the benefits. The new roads will increase CO2 pollution, reduce wildlife habitat.
-
See attached
-
The response provided by the Trust on 19th December 2018 at 16:17:08 for the original statutory consultation remains valid (Response ID ANON-5C4S-Y8ZS-W), particularly in relation to the wider...
Read more
-
The Thames Estuary Growth Board fully endorses the Lower Thames Crossing application for Development Consent. The Thames Estuary Growth Board combines private and public sector representatives with a...
Read more
-
Holmes and Hills LLP is instructed by [Redacted] who are the owner-occupiers of Foxburrows [Redacted]. Part of their property falls within the Lower Thames Crossing DCO Order limits. Our client has...
Read more
-
Mark Osborne, Shaun Osborne and Ms J Bower as freehold owners have instructed me to submit the following objection to the Lower Thames Crossing (“LTC”) application as their land is included in this....
Read more
-
Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council (TMBC) continues to support the Lower Thames Crossing Project, as we recognise that the existing Dartford Crossing is operating over capacity and there are limited...
Read more
-
The representation has been prepared by Stantec who are working on behalf of Uniper in relation to the MedwayOne development at the former Kingsnorth Power Station on the Hoo Peninsular in Medway. The...
Read more
-
I am writing on behalf of our client, Warley Green Limited, in response to the notice of acceptance by the Secretary of State for the A122 Lower Thames Crossing Development Consent Order (DCO). The...
Read more
-
I believe that the location of the proposed site is completely wrong, that it is not value for money, and that it's imposition will be detrimental to the residents of both Dartford and Thurrock , by...
Read more
-
1) I believe in the light of the changes in inflation and uncertainties in Britain and The World during the last two years the total project cost will be significantly more than the £6.9 billion we...
Read more
-
Impacts to listed buildings adjacent to High Road Orsett by the frequency and load of vehicles on High Road during the construction, mitigation and legacy phase of works. In particular the a circa...
Read more
-
Public transport needs to be considered above and beyond more roads more cars means more carbon estimated at 6.6 million tonnes.
-
This scheme is completely incompatible with the UK's obligations under the 2015 UN Climate Agreement made in Paris, and should be rejected out of hand.
-
Anglian Water is the statutory wastewater recycling provider (sewerage undertaker) for the project area north of the River Thames. Anglian Water and National Highways have been in discussion on the...
Read more
-
I want to object to the £10bn Lower Thames Crossing. I do not agree with spending public money on a single new road when fossil fuel use & resulting carbon emissions need to be stopped. This road will...
Read more
-
Hello, as the window for guaranteed climate breakdown is fast closing, I feel that I must object strongly to this application to the Lower Thames Crossing. There is, imho, nothing post about this...
Read more
-
I campaigned successfully for National Cycle Route 177 and created the "Cyclopark" activity centre in Gravesham which in its missive statement encourages access to its facilities by sustainable...
Read more
-
I am a volunteer climate and transport campaigner, and I have reviewed the issues relating to this project on the Thames Crossing Action Group's, and the Transport Action Network's, websites. The ones...
Read more
-
Arundel Scate is a community group of around 200 residents concerned with the quality of transport infrastructure, impacts of transport on the environment, seeking progressive, evidence-based...
Read more
-
BPL has no objection to the principle of the Project. The majority of matters are agreed as set out in the Statement of Common Ground. Its concern the subject of this Representation relates to the...
Read more
-
I don’t think it would solve the problems suffered due to the Dartford Crossing, the impact to the local environment and communities is too significant and I feel it will make things worse. Traffic,...
Read more
-
The project would damage valuable green belt land in a rural area, and create traffic and noise pollution. The lorry movements during construction project would also be disruptive to local residents....
Read more
-
Buglife has engaged with Highways England prior to the submission of the Lower Thames Crossing application over a number of years, with a focus on ensuring that the proposed mitigation and...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
I am emailing to register my strong objection to the scheme. More roads = more traffic. We need fewer vehicles on the road even if they are electrical, since the latter contain embedded carbon even if...
Read more
-
I am making this application to register interest as a means to support all those that are asking a change in the transport network of this country. To ask that roads and cars are not at the centre of...
Read more
-
I object to the scheme. Do not increase traffic and carbon emissions in a climate emergency.
-
I disagree very strongly with the Lower Thames Crossing for the following reasons: The large and adverse impact on the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and the ancient woodlands is...
Read more
-
Our client objects to any permanent rights over the access route identified as plot 44-112 and area identified as plot 44-90 on the Land Plans Regulation 5(2) (i) Sheet 44 that would impede the use of...
Read more
-
I wish to strongly object to the Lower Thames Crossing which fails to deliver on its objectives, leaving Dartford still over capacity while causing huge damage to people and the environment. It will...
Read more
-
I am disgusted by this proposition for many reasons: * In hard times such as these, the Government should be prioritising our money on the less well of * The Government should be concentrating on...
Read more
-
The proposed crossing will make no difference to the traffic, coming from Dartford. The pollution caused will make Thurrock a no go area and quite frankly we cannot afford this to happen.