Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Planes taking off from Gatwick have been more obtrusive this year than previously, particularly from about 5.30am until 8.0, and again late evenings, sometimes until at least 12.30am. It’s bad enough...
Read more
-
I oppose the development consent order because of the resulting impact on climate change, increase in pollution, decline in air quality, increase in aircraft noise especially overnight, lack of...
Read more
-
I oppose the Development Consent Order to rebuild the Gatwick emergency runway as a 2nd runway. This is because it will mean an increase in aircraft noise, especially at night. Gatwick flights taking...
Read more
-
Increased overflying of my home - sleep interruption. Noise pollution. Strain on airport infrastructure - roads, rail. Air pollution with increased traffic.
-
The courses of the aircraft flying from Gatwick often operate way out of the preferred noise path route and travel over the AONB near Coldharbour creating a major noise nuisance for those trying to...
Read more
-
I am opposed to any expansion of air travel (particularly short haul) because it is environmentally disastrous particularly its impact on CLIMATE CHANGE and the waste of fossil fuels which will be...
Read more
-
I fully support the proposal. It will bring much needed investment into the region, it will create significant employment opportunities and will be a stimulus for growth.
-
The aircraft noise we experience is already extremely bad. Any increase will be completely unacceptable. I live in a beautiful area where many people come to walk and cycle and yet we have continuous...
Read more
-
The ozone is being destroyed and all the aviation fumes emitted by flights is playing a big part in this so it’s madness to want to introduce an extra runway that will produce even more pollution....
Read more
-
Gatwick is big enough. I twas decided in 2017 that Heathrow would be the site for any expansion of London area and not Gatwick so there is no case for expanding Gatwick. The additional noise and air...
Read more
-
The expansion contravenes targets for climate change. The infrastructure is insufficient. Additional noise and night flights are a nuisance. House values fall. This is a rural area that will be hugely...
Read more
-
The proposal to move, rebuild then use what was the emergency runway as a live runway, goes against all noise, air pollution and carbon emission targets. It can be dressed up as offering massive...
Read more
-
To low and noisy over North Holmwood. Too many flights. Night flights are particularly disturbing and this needs to be limited. The extra traffic to and from the airport increases pollution. The rail...
Read more
-
AN EXPANSION WILL OVERWHELM THE SURROUNDING AREA
-
GATWICK ALREADY HAD AN APPLICATION FOR A SECOND RUNWAY REJECTED. IT IS TRYING AGAIN ON BEHALF OF ITS OWNERS TO INCREASE ITS VALUE. THE INCREASED POLLUTION, AND EFFECT ON LOCAL TRANSPORT IS...
Read more
-
Ifield suffer from the pollution and noise from aircraft from 6.0am until 10.30pm to have another runway would be detrimental to residents health, mental and physical. The pollution sometimes is so...
Read more
-
I oppose the move on the basis of the following being negatively impacted. - noise pollution - air pollution - stretched public infrastructure such as roads, housing, GP etc..
-
This project will increase carbon emissions, noise, traffic on M23. It will furtherarm the local environment and contribute to the threat to our planet. We should be reducing the number of flights not...
Read more
-
light, sound, atmosphere pollution, over development the airport started as a race course and evloved the area is not able to sustain more development; housing, roads etc. burden on roads extents to...
Read more
-
I oppose a second runway at Gatwick. It is a disgrace it is even being considered by the authorities. The reasons are obvious and too numerous to mention here. The proposed second runway at Gatwick...
Read more
-
A second runway would have a serious detrimental effect on air quality, which would affect the health of people living in the area. Road & rail traffic would increase significantly, with no planned...
Read more
-
I already ,since 2013 ,have aircraft over my house whereas before I did not. They are noisy; low flying and often keep me awake after 11.30pm and sometimes until 2am . Very distressing. Add to which...
Read more
-
Pollution Noise Environment Lack of infrastructure De- valuation of my property Mental health I oppose this new runway for lots of reasons, namely the increase of aircraft and the noise, the impact on...
Read more
-
I believe that given Gatwick Airports infrastructure- it can barely cope with the flights, passengers and size that it already has. Expand it, you lose more countryside, habitation for wildlife and...
Read more
-
I am concerned that a second runway will have a direct impact on noise affecting my house
-
I object to expansion for following reasons. Increased air traffic noise, which is already unbearable. Damage to mental health. Increased emissions. Fair allocation of flight paths needed to relieve...
Read more
-
I fully object to this project going forward as it already causes air and noise pollution, traffic and overcrowding to surrounding small towns which puts stress on local schools, doctor surgeries and...
Read more
-
I am opposing this because it will have a negative impact on the local area. It will be nosier due to the aircrafts, impact on climate change and the wildlife. Potentially devalue people’s home and...
Read more
-
The CEO of Gatwick Airport should not be allowed on the Aviation Council Acknowledgement by Gatwick Airport of the environmental damage and contribution to climate change that will be caused by the...
Read more
-
I live under the flight path close to Gatwick, we moved in in 2015 and at that point the planes were not an issue - in the past few months planes have got closer to over our house and the noise is so...
Read more
-
Night flights between 11 pm and 6am. Aircraft noise pollution. Concentrated flight patterns.
-
Main objection is the constant noise that has already happened and will be worse with planes now flying directly over my house. The flight path which was moved over (redacted) a few years back causes...
Read more
-
The main objection would be the air pollution and noise distru ruin. These plane are frequent enough and so low and loud it disturbs my piece
-
My home has become under the departure flight path within the past 8 years. The approval of an additional runway, to sidestep full plannng and enquiry, will, I have no doubt lead to an increase in...
Read more
-
I most definitely oppose the development of the second runway in particular - the increase in aircraft noise, the impact on climate change, the devaluing of my home, the destruction of rural life, the...
Read more
-
I consider that moving air traffic movements further North is bringing the dangers involved with aircraft movements overhead much closer to adjacent built up areas. The option to extend to the South...
Read more
-
I oppose the reassignment of the 2nd runway due to increase in aircraft noise, the huge impact on climate change, the reduction of wellbeing through increase in aircraft movements and the decline in...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the ufp ( ultra fine particles) uptick that will inevitably rise causing a further deterioration of health in & around Crawley & mixing car fumes & pollution will produce...
Read more
-
Irreversible destruction of one of the most beautiful rural countryside areas in England for the expansion of an airport with limited accessibility for travellers.
-
I am concerned that, if the emergency runway at Gatwick is established as a second runway, it will damage the environment as well as increasing noise disturbance for the residents in this part of...
Read more
-
Substantial and destructive noise, road vehicle movements and air polution increases as a direct result of expansion. No mitigations possible.
-
I am firmly against an additional runway at Gatwick as it will severely impact on the quality of my family’s life, close as we are to the airport. I also have no confidence in Gatwick Airport Ltd to...
Read more
-
I am a local resident, already severely impacted by noise from the airport, in terms of regular sleep disturbance, inability to entertain friends/family outside, thus reducing opportunities to...
Read more
-
I don’t want the emergency runway conversion to go ahead, we already have enough air traffic! Noise is my issue. Bad enough as it is being on the flight path, be even worse with the extra runway. I...
Read more
-
I OBJECT to the proposal to use the emergency runway on a regular basis for the following reasons: In the light of the climate emergency there should be a reduction in the number of flights, not an...
Read more
-
I fully object to this project going forward as it already causes air and noise pollution, traffic and overcrowding to surrounding small towns which puts stress on local schools, doctor surgeries and...
Read more
-
Bringing the use of the second runway back and increasing the capacity of the airport is an excellent idea which has my support. Great for the economy of the local area and beyond.
-
I live in the Village of (redacted) Surrey and the planes are not meant to fly over us they are meant to fly around us but that never happens. As I am writing this there is a plane going over me every...
Read more
-
For an extensive period, Gatwick has steadfastly functioned as a substantial pillar of national infrastructure, fostering the prosperity of our members and the diverse entities we stand for in the...
Read more
-
I think it is a good thing to utilise our emergency runway and will be good for the airport and the local environment by not building a completely new runway