Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 151 to 200 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Rachael Johnson

    I have concerns about the increase in vehicle movements in the surrounding area. If it was to go ahead, a link road from Earl Shilton A47 would be essential, however this will have a detrimental... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Rachel Burlingham

    I am writing to you to raise my concerns regarding the proposed development by Tritax (Hinckley railway hub). My husband and I own wentworth stables on Burbage Common road, next to the proposed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Raj Chinger

    We have recently purchased a property in Burbage and will be reconsidering our application. We decided to move here as it is a lovely quiet village with surrounding rural areas. Should this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Family group -husband and wife (Both retired) (Family group -husband and wife (Both retired)) on behalf of Ralph Andrew and Gillian Yardley (Ralph Andrew and Gillian Yardley)

    This is an inappropriate use of productive agricultural land in an area which is already saturated with warehouses, distribution depots and the like. Sited immediately adjacent to Burbage common and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Rebecca Shearing

    Don't do it. Please find somewhere else. We already have loads of industrial sites and housing in the area, so roads in and out of Hinckley can't cope with the amount of traffic. It would be a real... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Richard Hamilton

    Main issue here.is building such a large scale development right next to the only bit of open space in the Hinckley area where you can go for a walk and escape from the local hustle and bustle.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Richard Todd

    Noise levels are my main concern. I live about 400m as the crow flies from the closest part of the current (sunken level) track with many houses and gardens in between. The noise of the trains in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Robert Bryan Lees

    The construction of this development will severely impact Burbage Common, the surrounding footpaths and the SSSI area. The surveys undertaken today seem to have found a number of protected species... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Robert Hayes

    Loss of agriculture land in our area. The affect on the Burbage common beauty spot, ie, wildlife, noise, views, visitors mental welfare etc The immense increase in HGV traffic in the local area across... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Robert Riley

    I am against this development as I do not believe the existing infrastructure will support the project. The M69 is extremely congested at the M1 J21 and this will increase the congestion. It will also... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Robin Irons

    I want to know more about developments there

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Rosemary Elaine Payne

    Loss of agriculture space in our area. The M1 and M69 junction is already overwhelmed with traffic with queing to get on the M1 getting longer and longer, it will only become worse if this proposal... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Ross Carrigan

    This application will destroy surrounding local villages. Roads can barely cope with the volume of traffic at the moment let alone putting more pressure on them.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Roy Bennett

    I oppose the application of the rail freight hub as I feel it is far too close to the common land & woods. Complete detriment to the local wildlife and ambience of quite a large area that is currently... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Ruth Hancox-Berrie

    This planned work will have an extremely negative affect on the local environment and public. It will destroy vital habits for wildlife and cause a huge amount of noise and disruption to the local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Samantha Jane Green

    I live in Narborough village which already has trains, including numerous freight trains, thundering through. The noise and frequency of these trains is at the maximum that such a small village can... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Sarah Cleaver

    I object to the proposal of building the Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange due to the massive impact to the wildlife and increased traffic in the local area.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Sarah Johnson

    The local infrastructure cannot facilitate such a large development and it will wipeout a large area of green countryside.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Sarah Nuttall

    Big impact on green areas for the community, negative environmental and sustainability impact on local area, environmental ncreaded traffic and noise pollution.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Melissa Joanne Sarson on behalf of Sarson family (Sarson family)

    I have lived in Burbage all my life, therefore witnessed first hand the overdevelopment that it can not cope with. Sapcote Road in particular to this project gets gridlocked daily. Also, I have our... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Sheila Stewart

    Noise and traffic impact on local community

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Shirley M. T. Price

    This project will ruin the small and already overcrowded town and should be carried out away from Hinckley - put on land such as Magna Park was, not close to where there are inhabitants. The proposed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Simon Hope

    The "project" from what I can tell is just a money making excercise and any potential positive impact is greatly outweighed by the negative impacts it will have on the local area, environment and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Simone Jordan

    Environmental impact, loss of green space, lack of local infrastructure to support the development, local people don’t want it and are being ignored

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • South Leicestershire Liberal Democrats (South Leicestershire Liberal Democrats)

    The South Leicestershire Liberal Democrats are a local political organisation who operate within the current parliamentary constituency of South Leicestershire. The application for the Hinckley... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Stephanie Lee

    There’s going to extra impact on surrounding villages and infrastructure. Decimating wild life habitat and ruining countryside views. Devaluing housing stock also.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Stephen Fishwick

    A complete farce. Something that in the ideal world would be needed but as the country has been run by charlatans for the past couple of decades, seems completely irrelevant. Daventry is close. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Stephen George Baker

    The proposed National Rail Interchange at Hinckley would if approved be a disaster for Hinckley itself . Additionally,Burbage common, surrounding villages, Leicestershire and the wider region as a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Stephen John Waddle

    Given the one million square meters (estimated by Trirax representative) of building footprint and hard standing are in the current plan, how much money is to be spent in mitigation and where? Miles... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Stephen Thomas

    Impact on Burbage woods & common for start. There will be an increase in pollution to what is a place of national importance as its one of only a few ancient woodlands. These sites also generate... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Steve orton

    100% against this project Damage to wildlife / environment Excess vehicles going through sapcote No infrastructure in sapcote As M 69 opening both directions traffic through the village will be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Steve Pownall

    I wish to make known my objection to this planned development. There is already several freight terminals within 20 miles and the whole Leicestershire side of A5 is becoming a continual... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Steven Whitmore

    I write in opposition to the proposed Hinckley national rail freight interchange. I submit that this venture represents a colossal threat to the area, both now and in the future. My reasons are not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Stewart Hook

    I object to the proposal, due to the significant negative impact it would have on Hinckley, Burbage and the surrounding villages, both in the loss of green space, and massive increase in vehicle... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Aitchison Raffety Ltd (Aitchison Raffety Ltd) on behalf of Stoney Stanton Parish Council (Stoney Stanton Parish Council)

    Stoney Stanton Parish Council - Relevant Representation Stoney Stanton forms a settlement located less than 1.5 kilometres from the proposed Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange (NRFI). Stoney... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Sue Allen

    I am concerned about the negative impact that this development will have on the local community in terms of noise, light pollution, extra traffic on already congested roads, the desecration of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Susan Garnor

    I would like to start by saying that our family have lived in the local villages close to the proposed HNRFI site all of our lives and regard this area as being an extremely important piece of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Susan Stevenson

    My main concerns are the impact on the local environment and the increased traffic on already congested local roads

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Susan Taylor

    This rail freight exchange is not needed. There are two alternative railheads nearby (DIRFT to the south and an unused one near Dordon to the north which is close to the M42. There are traffic jams... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Suzanne Deacon

    No more freight trains

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Tara Fox

    Disaster to wildlife and an area of outstanding beauty , greed alone drives this decision , traffic will increase and destroy our green space

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Edward Charles Bryan on behalf of The Bryan Family (The Bryan Family)

    We live very close to junction 2 of the M69 so the development of this site is going to impact our daily lives for many years. Over the last 19 years the traffic on the M69 and the surrounding local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • The Environment Agency (The Environment Agency)

    The Environment Agency's comments focus on those environmental aspects for which we have either a statutory remit, or interest in through legislative requirements. On this basis, and in summary, we... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Thomas Ronald Payne

    Loss of agriculture space in our area. the congestion on the M69 leading up to M1 has queues over over 2 miles already so this development will make it much worse The affect on the Burbage common... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Titiksha Masand

    As a Sapcote resident I am very concerned about the impact this development will have on our village in terms of traffic, pollution, noise and the environment. I am particularly concerned about the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Tom Nash

    At the moment, my wife and I use the lovely green space for both walking and more importantly, to observe the bird life in the woods. This and other wildlife will badly be affected by the noise and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Tracey hurst

    I’m based right next to the development and have not been contacted personally about the impact it will have on my land and gone this very offensive as it will have a huge impact on my lifestyle

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • UK Health Security Agency (UK Health Security Agency)

    Thank you for your consultation regarding the above development. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) welcomes the opportunity to comment on your proposals at this stage of the project. Please note... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Valerie Ann Pole

    1. There are already similar infrastructures in our area which means this development is not needed. The area is already covered. 2. This is prime farmland. We need farmland, we need food. British... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Vicki Parsons

    There are estimated to be 32 trains daily coming and going resulting in an extra HGV per minute on the roads round Burbage. This will cause unacceptable levels of pollution, noise and road congestion.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023