Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 101 to 150 of 309 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Thomas Ward

    I used to live in fenditton and I work in the area. It is a beautiful wild area and the loss of biodiversity and wildlife would be a very sad and long lasting disaster for the local area. The building... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Tracy Rolls

    Ruin environment Traffic pollution Wildlufe

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Tristram Riley-Smith

    Introduction. I am a long-term resident of Fen Ditton (30 years). My home is closer to the existing Waste Recycling Centre (WRC) at Cowley Rd than the proposed site on Honey Hill. The prevailing wind... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Ursula stubbings

    I am a frequent visitor to the proposed relocation site and the area is valued for its unspoilt nature. The relocation of the current sewage works to Honey Hill is completely unnecessary. The Milton... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Amy Cudmore

    I do not agree with the proposed move of the sewage treatment works to Honey Hill. The biggest impact from this are the negative effects to the local countryside and wildlife, negative impact on local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Angela de Burgh

    *The Cambridge Sewage works have been designed to provide sufficient capacity until 2050. Anglia Water has stated that there is no operational need to move the works. Why move them? *Taxpayers’ money... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Anthony Arnold Wieser

    I object to the plans to relocate the sewage works to honey hill on the following grounds. The plant was recently upgraded at the current location to provide service until 2050, and now the new plant... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Carol Ernestine Parker

    1. Why build over the Chalk Aquifer? In the ever increasing threat of global warming, with increasing sudden and heavy rainfall, Waste Water Treatment plants are overflowing on site. There is a risk... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Catherine Rodwell

    I am a regular visitor to this area and I strongly object to this proposal. It is a totally inappropriate industrial scale development on the Cambridge Green Belt. It will be a permanent eyesore and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Chris Pratt

    Dear Sir I write to register my objection to the proposed relocation of the Milton WWTP. I am a Chartered Civil Engineer and have links to the locality having grown up in Cambridge. I have family in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Christopher Howell

    There is a desperate shortage of housing across our region, and particularly in and around Cambridge. This project is an essential prerequisite to allow the development of the North East Cambridge... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Conservators of the River Cam (Conservators of the River Cam)

    CONSERVATORS OF THE RIVER CAM STATEMENT OF INTEREST The Conservators of the River Cam are the statutory navigation authority with responsibility for the River Cam. The main jurisdiction of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • CPRE Cambridgeshire & Peterborough (CPRE Cambridgeshire & Peterborough)

    CPRE is the countryside charity which campaigns to protect Green Belts and prevent urban sprawl. Our remit is also to protect and enhance greenfield land, natural landscape, rural villages and to... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • David Williams

    As the licensed lay minister (reader) for St Peter's church in Horningsea I am very concerned with the proposed move of the sewage works to the village in a green field site. There is already a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Donald Trevor Wildman

    As a resident of Milton Village, I object to the current proposals for the relocation of the Cambridge Wastewater Plant from its current site for a range of reasons. Anglian Water have stated that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Douglas Peter William Russell

    I believe there are a number of reasons that relocation of the sewage works should not go ahead, any one of which should be compelling enough, but together are overwhelmingly strong reasons not to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Ellen Francis

    In assessing the proposals, the Planning Inspectorate, and in turn the Secretary of State, must be satisfied that the impacts of the proposals have been adequately assessed and the weight attributed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Frank Hopkirk

    It is not needed in terms of capacity - Anglia Water have confirmed that the existing site is sufficient for requirements till 2050. The proposed site is grade 1 green belt agricultural land and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Gary William Dew

    • There is a lack of consideration given to keeping the plant where it is and making it state of the art and smell proof. Redesigning it with a smaller footprint would release land for building if... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Helen Oakley

    I object to the proposal: I cycle, run and walk around this area at least 3 times per week, often on my way to and from Quy Fen. I will be denied the beauty, peace and joy this gives me and also the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Helen Symonds

    Loss of arable farmland in the greenbelt. Impact upon the surrounding fens. Loss of recreational space for mental health and wellbeing. Lack of consideration to retain the current works.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Horningsea Village Hall and Green Trust (Horningsea Village Hall and Green Trust)

    • I am writing this on behalf of the Horningsea Village Hall trust who wish to object very strongly to the plan to move the CWWTP to Honey Hill. • Fundamentally, we see no need to move the sewage work... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Ian Fearnley

    Objection to this use of public monies. This use of public finances for this project, the relocation of an existing operational sewage works at currently 227 million pounds (currently), is effectively... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Jennifer Dawson

    I object to the sewerage works being moved one mile down the round to a conservation area between 2 small villages just so £227,000,000 can be claimed from the government for building a development on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • John Barry Rooke

    T Rehis is a prominent open Green Belt Site Site sits on an aquifa hence previous refusal Anglian confirm current site more than sufficient to expand if necessary. Move is solely profit motivated.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Julia Hochbach

    The proposed relocation of the perfectly functional sewage works from Milton appears to have no good reason other than to develop the site of the existing sewage works for profit. The carbon footprint... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Julia Smitherman

    I oppose Anglian Water’s application to develop a new sewage treatment plant on the site of Honey Hill, Cambridge, and plan to decommission the current plant at Milton for no operational reason other... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Lily Morris

    My objections to CWWTPR are as follows: Dealing with climate change has to be above everything and doing everything we can to minimise it must be our priority. They say the sewage plant needs to move... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Mark Davis

    I object to the proposal.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Quod (Quod) on behalf of Marshall Group Properties (Marshall Group Properties)

    1 Introduction 1.1 These relevant representations have been prepared on behalf of Marshall Group Properties (MGP) following the recent submission of Anglian Water’s Cambridge Waste Water Treatment... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Mary Kay Muhr

    I grew up on High Ditch Road, Fen Ditton, [Redacted], and am still part-owner of a house there. We were proud to live on, and be able to walk along, the course of a Dyke, with open Green Belt land to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Monica Bijok

    Cambridge is already unsustainable in water. The River Cam is dying. It is no longer spring fed, but mostly recycled water. As a rare chalk stream it should be crystal clear and a constant 10°C. It is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Mr Colin Davidson

    It's appropriate to move the sewage works from their current location south of the A14 on the edge of Cambridge, but this should be dependent on the quality of the proposal for what to replace it... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Rebecca Foreman

    I object to the relocation of the sewage works on a number of points: primarily there is no real need to move the plant, the current site has been upgraded recently to ensure that it is ‘future proof’... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Richard Holton

    I live in Horningsea, and am very concerned about this project. I am concerned at the enormous environmental cost of building it; at the disruption caused by the building; and by the disruption to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Rosalind Jane Aveling

    I understand development pressures and the need for compromise. But the risk now of environmental damage in a changing climate is so high, and escalating, that it should be the first consideration in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Ruth Davis

    There is no need to move the Cambridge waste water treatment plant from its current location. It is fully functioning and was future-proofed just 8 years ago at great expense. Any future upgrades... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Sarah Farrell

    Moving the sewage works will generate lots of traffic both during construction and on an ongoing basis. This is already a busy road not fit to accept heavier traffic, which is unsafe to residents,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Steven Green

    I am very concerned about the proposal to relocate the waste treatment plant from Milton to Fen Ditton, Horningsea and Quy. It appears the a huge amount of public money, hundreds of millions, is being... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Stuart Gibbs

    I strongly object to the relocation of Anglian Water sewage works from Cowley Road , Cambridge to Honey Hill , Fen Ditton on the following grounds: impact on the conservation areas of Fen Ditton and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Susan Griffin

    Unnecessary upheaval and impact on all nearby residents and wildlife. Increase in heavy traffic. Huge financial cost Carbon cost to the environment and loss of green belt. Questions about length of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Susan Roberts

    • I object very strongly to the plan to move the CWWTP to Honey Hill. Fundamentally, I see no convincing reason for the move. The current works on Cowley Road are fully functioning, have capacity and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Susan Valerie Buttery

    I am registering my concerns about the relocation of the sewage treatment plant from Milton to the Honey Hill site.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Teresa Ross

    I’m concerned about the wildlife, with all the building works in our area we are losing all our green spaces, The smell is another thing, sometimes we can smell the sewer from Milton, I really don’t... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Design&Conservation (Design&Conservation) on behalf of the Yandell family. (the Yandell family.)

    We are opposed to the relocation in principle but on the basis that it may obtain consent we object to the plant's unnecessary size , the ill-considered intrusiveness of the design, its... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Alice Bettoney

    There is an extremely high environmental cost associated with rebuilding of the sewage works, to only move it a relatively small distance away from the existing site. The current site could be brought... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2023

  • Benjamin John Morris

    I am objecting to the proposed relocation of Cambridge’s Water Treatment Plant for the following reasons: I don’t feel enough was done to look at the benefits of keeping the sewage plant where it is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2023

  • Catherine Rosemary Grant

    I object to the proposal For a) the unnecessary relocation of an existing sewage treatment plant with adequate capacity for the foreseeable future to a site in the green belt with the consequent... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2023

  • Emily Green

    Dear Examining Authority, I am writing to stringently oppose the plans to move a fully-functioning sewage work. As you are aware, the current sewage work was made to last till at least 2050, and yet... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2023

  • Evelyn Edith Daniel

    I object most strongly to the proposal to move the Waste Water Treatment Plant from its present site to Honey Hill, Fen Ditton. I believe this to be totally unnecessary and a complete waste of money.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2023