Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
unacceptable on good farming land at a time when home produced foodstuff is in great demand as a country unacceptable so close to other villagers should be built on poor quality land away from...
Read more
-
Project to large for area, loss of productive farmland and impact to area with high levels of wildlife. Major disruption to village life and traffic if construction go's ahead. Areas of natural beauty...
Read more
-
This proposed project is far to big Taking all facts and figures it is not viable and does not produce enough power to warrant the destruction of the local area this will be catastrophic Wildlife will...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the installation is far too large for the area and will take over valuable farmland. I am unhappy that the panels will apparently be manufactured by Uyghurs in China, and that...
Read more
-
I feel it is an unwise use of much needed agricultural land especially in these times when we are trying to become more self reliant as a nation. The construction of the project is going to have...
Read more
-
As a local resident i have significant concerns about the size of the proposed facility, its impact on the rural character of the area and the infrastructure challenges associated with the completed...
Read more
-
The size of the project is utterly inappropriate for the UK. We risk losing huge amounts of valuable farming land and damaging this beautiful unspoilt area. Nature will suffer and the impact on local...
Read more
-
The development is too large, will impact the countryside and those living in the area. It will take a large amount of land out of agricultural production (particularly sensitive when we are meant to...
Read more
-
Solar panels should be installed on all new builds as a matter of course not on prime agricultural land. This area is a natural habit for all sorts of wildlife and should not be ravaged in this way....
Read more
-
The project is net-negative. Huge disruption to local residents during building. The impact on an important historical town will affect locals and the tourism industry, vital to this area. Well-being...
Read more
-
This planning application is inappropriate and should be denied because: 1. The proposed development will change the use of land from largely agricultural use to being occupied by concrete, glass and...
Read more
-
Whilst fully appreciating the need for the UK to increase its sustainable energy capacity I am totally opposed to this proposal. I briefly summarise my objections as below: 1. Scale of proposal. At...
Read more
-
The sheer scale of this proposed development is actually beyond belief, and completely inappropriate for this area. The development, given the vast area it covers, will utterly destroy the impacted...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the size and scale of the proposed Mallard Pass solar farm. I accept that we need alternative energy sources but at 2,105 acres, it is eight times the size of the UK’s largest...
Read more
-
Solar panels should not be built on prime agricultural land, They should be built on the masses of roofs in industrial areas, specifically Peterborough and Spalding. We are not aware of the danger to...
Read more
-
Size of the proposed project, infrastructure (access for construction will all need to enter the site through minor country roads), quality agriculture land, industrial landscape and decommissioning ....
Read more
-
The plan should have looked at the many disused airfields and sparser populated areas of Lincolnshire instead of focussing on an area full of villages. The Mallard Pass people did not look seriously...
Read more
-
I'm keen to support the proposed project and be a counter to NIMBYs
-
1. This project is on an extremely huge scale with a solar area of 1,052 acres and a total site area of 2,105 acres. I believe the size will make it impossible to eradicate all the adverse impact. 2....
Read more
-
The Mallard Pass Solar Farm would cause permanent damage and disruption to local people's lives and to established wildlife and ecology.Proposed potential mitigation is questionable in it's...
Read more
-
The scale of this project will impinge on the surrounding countryside for both human beings and wildlife. During the proposed 2 years of its construction there will be extra traffic causing noise,...
Read more
-
Loss of BMV land Unsuitable route for construction traffic Without battery storage cannot contribute to peak demand times-inefficient use Impact on wildlife Totally out of keeping with local rural...
Read more
-
Please see attached.
-
Despite fully understanding & indeed supporting the need to increase the UKs sustainable energy capacity. I remain totally opposed to this proposal after considering the developers application .My...
Read more
-
I believe the amount of additional road traffic brought about by the Solar Farm construction will place risks to individuals within those small, surrounding villages as existing road infrastructure is...
Read more
-
As we are non EU member we really should be producing our own crops etc. therefore we should be using greenfield sites for this purpose not putting solar panels on them Solar Farms should be placed on...
Read more
-
The negative impact on wildlife habitats The use of valuable farmland that should be used for food The visual impact on our beautiful countryside
-
Ecological and Visual damage to this beautiful countryside. Impact of prime crop growing land where the country will have to import it's grain.This will increase our carbon footprint. What happens to...
Read more
-
negative impact .. during construction...narrow roads can't cope with the increase in lorries. Destruction of good quality farmland which we need ,we should be more self-sufficient with our quality...
Read more
-
We have previously objected to the proposed scheme and again confirm our OBJECTION on the following grounds 1, Total desecration of the appearance and visual environmental enjoyment of a vast section...
Read more
-
Dust, dirt, traffic problems, inconvenience etc. etc. during the build of at least 2 years. Many large lorries will travel on some of our back roads to reach the sites. Our country lanes will be...
Read more
-
Our main objections to the project are *The Total Size of the site (it will surround and overwhelm the village) *Compulsory Acquisition (no mention of this was made in original information, this could...
Read more
-
I am entirely against this project on many grounds. Aside from the environmental impact, there will be a massive degradation of the quality of life of those of us having to live through not only an...
Read more
-
The solar panels surrounding Essendine will impact the village as it covers a very large area and visual implications are unprecedented. The area is susceptible to flooding and increases the risk....
Read more
-
1. This development is situated in the wrong place. Only being placed here because it is close to a substation that feeds the East Coast main line and will be very lucrative for the developers. 2. A...
Read more
-
Impact of increased flow of traffic in the surrounding area. Impact of Noise Pollution early in morning and in evenings.
-
The site is far too big.The solar panels will be overpowering for people nearby. Valuable agricultural land lost. The use is not for ever …will the land ever be reclaimed? Why not panels on new...
Read more
-
Concerns over 1. Scale of Project 2. Suitability and expertise of Developers. 3. Industrialization of rural environment used by many for leisure activities. 4. Loss of good quality arable land. 5....
Read more
-
I'm all up for protecting the interest of our children with renewable energy, but this project is far far to big for the area. I can't see why we have to use valuable farming land to take up this...
Read more
-
Careby with Aunby and Holywell is the next Parish north of Essendine on the East Coast Main Line. Mallard Pass Solar Farm starts very close to Aunby. The main issues of the parishioners I represent...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned at the impact this development will have on the character of an enormous swathe of rural England, its productive farmland and natural environment. I strongly support renewable...
Read more
-
Whilst the completed Solar Farm will be far enough away not to affect Great Casterton, we will be greatly affected by construction traffic passing through the village from the A1 to the site, Great...
Read more
-
I’m registering to raise the following objections to the Mallard Pass project: Operational Issues - The scale of the operation, with a total site of 2105 acres, means it will have an unprecedented...
Read more
-
Quite simply, this project is totally pointless and a waste of time and money. This earth would not have been created by God with insufficient resources to see us through until Christ comes back to...
Read more
-
Why can’t they use land that is more rural and won’t become an eyesore
-
Objection to Mallard Pass Solar Farm
-
It is far too big for this rural countryside area and so close to residents homes and would have a large impact on the rural views . It’s using up good arable farmland that is needed for food...
Read more
-
Worry that decent land is being taken out of farming that produces good levels of wheat/barley/rapeseed etc Visual aspect might influence potential tenants for us Possibly might affect our livery yard...
Read more
-
Additional traffic during the construction, loss of use of the land for all forms of food production.
-
Toft cum Lound and Manthorpe Parish Council lies within the South Kesteven District Council area – and comprises three small rural villages approximately two miles north of the proposed Mallard Pass...
Read more