Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I am concerned about the damage that will inevitably be caused to this ancient World Heritage site, and I believe it is far more important to preserve it, than to continue to prioritize road building...
Read more
-
The proposed tunnel would harm the significance of the world heritage site and I wish to object to the proposal for a tunnel scheme.
-
The proposed plans for the tunnel at Stonehenge are utterly ridiculous and I cannot comprehend how anyone can consider them in any way serious or sensible.
UNESCO has awarded the area World...
Read more
-
I have been visiting Stone Henge since the mid 1970s, first as a child and then as an adult. I find it hard to understand why anyone would think a massive dual carriageway is necessary at a time when...
Read more
-
Dear Sir ,
I wish to object to the proposed plan re the Stonehenge by-pass for the following reasons:
1) It will disturb some of our country's most ancient pre-historic sites .
2) ...
Read more
-
I cannot but agree with Stonehenge Alliance that the current scheme will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ and...
Read more
-
I am mindful of the fact that the Stonehenge WHS has been regarded as both sacred and enigmatic for upwards of 6000 years. To me this is what "Outstanding Universal Value" means.
It would be...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned about the potential for damage to such an important and unique historical site in mainland England. This site is important for historical, scientific, anthropological reasons and...
Read more
-
I would like to object to the proposed A303 Expressway. This would be an absolute tragedy and would damage irrevocably a UNESCO world heritage site, it's archaeology and it's natural setting....
Read more
-
We are submitting more detailed representations (Via email: Our ref A303Stonehenge_RReps_11.01.19) to assist your understanding of the outstanding information requirements and issues of concern that...
Read more
-
It seems absurd to me that this proposal could in any way provide a solution to rat running or the bottleneck frequently seen on this section of the A303. Nor do I see any evidence or proof in the...
Read more
-
I consider it will bring Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. This upsets me and many others.
ncreased noise from more and faster trafficmakes no sense and the...
Read more
-
"We feel the Western portal is too close to the ancient burial mounds and the Eastern too close to 'Blickmead' Archaeological site, and that there are issues with light pollution to the west and water...
Read more
-
Dear Sir / Madam
With regard to the current proposition for the tunnel under Stonehenge, on the A303, I would like to raise my objections to this proposal, echoing the concern raised by ICOMOS-UK...
Read more
-
I am very concerned that work is planned for a road tunnel near Stonehenge, an irreplaceable and priceless site of international value, going against UNESCO advice and without sufficient consideration...
Read more
-
The plan as it stands is poorly thought through and appears to take little cognizance of the historic and pre-historic importance of the wider site. The proposal appears to have been thought up giving...
Read more
-
Once this many-layered landscape has been re-purposed and redesigned purely for the convenience of the moment, it will to all effect have been destroyed. The layers of history, the fragile monuments,...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage site. The purpose and mystery surrounding these stones eludes and fascinates us after all this time.
At present, the 303 passes a respectable distance from these...
Read more
-
The congested road next to Stonehenge needs to be moved but the proposed tunnel is too short, in the wrong place and on the cheap. It will damage archaeological sites and affect aquifers.
This...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
From what I understand you plan to build a tunnel under our most well known pagan site. Apart from the the normal environmental and destructive arguments against this, I strongly discourage you as a...
Read more
-
I am against the Expressway, as it would permanently damage the World Heritage Site. Road-building is not the answer to problems associated with the area.
-
I strongly object to the desecration and destruction of such a valuable Mesolithic treasure, and the flagrant disregard of UNESCO opinion. This expensive destruction of our natural heritage must be...
Read more
-
Allowing anything at all which will potentialy damage or detract from this site is horrendous .The site needs protecting for future generation's
-
Under the terms of the Inscription for the Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site, the Associated Monuments and the settings of all of these, whether above or below ground are regarded as being...
Read more
-
We are concerned that the proposal will damage the archaeology of the world heritage site and may interfere in consequence with our current use of the site for ritual purposes. Our submission will be...
Read more
-
This would cause Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
-
I am concerned that the proposal could cause serious damage to the archaeological record at one of Britain's most significant prehistoric sites. To allow tunnelling on tis scale so close to the site...
Read more
-
The tunnel and associated cuttings and other works will do massive, lasting and unacceptable damage to the landscape of the Stonehenge World Heritage Site. The scheme therefore totally fails to meet...
Read more
-
I am very concerned that damage will be done to the integrity of the wider Stonehenge as a whole and, in particular, to the unique Blick Mead site,, contrary to the advice of leading archaeologists.
-
Hello,
as a lover of British and European culture and heritage, I firmly believe it is our duty to safeguard and protect archaeological sites of prominent significance as best we can. One of the...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned by the potential for damage to the Stonehenge World Heritage site, raised by UNESCO's international advisers, and by the failure to include alternative options in consultation.
-
There are several good reasons why this scheme should not go ahead but, to keep it short, damage to this internationally valued landscape once it's happened cannot be undone. It's no good saying...
Read more
-
The Stonehenge site is a designated World Heritage Site, and its setting extends well
beyond its immediate environs.
I believe the current scheme is damaging to the setting.
Furthermore the...
Read more
-
Given the age and heritage value of the monument, not to mention its religious value to a high percentage of people, development work of any kind should not take place near to this site, let alone on...
Read more
-
Damage to sensitive archeology at the world heritage site of Stonehenge.
Lack of appropriate and adequate environmental impact assessments for the planned route.
Restriction of public right of...
Read more
-
We are losing the essence of English countryside , through the loss of trees, protected spaces.
Incorporating a faster road will bring more traffic to the south west that does not have infra...
Read more
-
Since marrying my husband in 1963 I have devoted my life to supporting him with the farm and fostering a sense of responsibility and guardianship within my children, ensuring they are well placed to...
Read more
-
This is an awful proposal for such a historical national monument which is sacred to many.
-
There have been many schemes for the A303 over the years; none of them were satisfactory, and this one, despite years of planning and consultation, does not feel any closer to the solution that is...
Read more
-
I agree with Arthur pendragon.
-
I wish to object to the A303 Expressway near to stonehenge on the following grounds
1.The expressway will block the view of stonehenge - a unique ancient heritage site and deny future...
Read more
-
I am concerned about Highways England's plan for an Expressway past Stonehenge, and especially :-
Damage to Stonehenge and its satellite sites;
The lack of alternative options that would not damage...
Read more
-
I wish to object to the proposed A303 tunnel near Stonehenge, as this will cause irreversible damage to one of the world's most important archaeological sites.
-
The tunnel scheme will cause irreparable damage to a unique and important archaeological site.
UNESCO have pointed this out.
In the future if this scheme goes ahead it will be impossible to see...
Read more
-
This project cannot be permitted as it will permanently destroy parts of this iconic & unique UNESCO World Heritage Site. Preliminary exploratory work has already caused damage to the Blick Mead...
Read more
-
My list is endless but these are some of the main talking points. I am concerned about the permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. UNESCO's advisers say the scheme...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a vital part of British heritage, history and identity and too precious to be placed in jeopardy by something as ill conceived as a road that will scar an already brutalised landscape...
Read more
-
This will cause irreparable harm to one of the World's greatest prehistoric archaeological sites. UNESCO advises that this project should not go ahead in its current form, any attempt to follow...
Read more
-
I oppose the construction of the A303 Stonehenge Express Way
This will cause untold damage to the Stonehenge landscape, and destroy archaeological sites - i.e. Blick Mead, Vespasians Camp....
Read more