Filter
A303 Stonehenge

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 501 to 525 of 2370 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Lea Surs

    Please listen to the experience of UNESCO who are so much against this plan. I am very anti- this plan.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Les Hudson

    I am very concerned about the future of Stonehenge, it seems to me that English heritage are taking it upon themselves to close down all the surrounding roads that give a view of Stonehenge, in order... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Lesley Arrowsmith

    As an archaeologist, I am very concerned about the entire landscape around Stonehenge, as well as the stones themselves. This is a site of global importance, and the links between the different areas... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Lesley Docksey

    I have known Stonehenge for most of my life. The thought that I would lose the sight of it as I drive past is distressing, and the thought that I would have to pay to see it is worse. Our history is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Lesley Wertheimer

    Car ownership is dropping as recent data shows therefore creating more roads is not in line with this. Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Linda Cadier

    I am deeply concerned about the damage that will be caused to this site. I do believe that the major earthworks proposed will cause irreparable damage to this site which is of major archaeological... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Lisa Mills

    The proposal is to put the road into a tunnel where it passes the stones, but the tunnel would be at most only 2.9 km long. This would result in at least 1.6 km of above-ground 21st-century road... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Louise Smith

    I am writing to object to this. I object because of possible damage to our stones. I mainly object..and really very strongly object, that this will stop the public seeing the stones, being anywhere... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Lucia Nixon

    No further damage should be done to the archaeological landscape of Stonehenge. If A303 widening at Stonehenge is felt to be essential it should be done by means of a deep bored tunnel at least 4.5km... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • M A Taylor

    I would like to object to the plans for the following reasons, 1 This may improve traffic flow in the short term but traffic will build again, indeed it will encourage traffic to use the route. - the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • M king

    Stonehenge is an ancient site of international significance. We do not understand it fully; there is so much more to be learned. It is vital that this site remain undisturbed so we can continue to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Maggie Brotherston

    My representation is as follows on the grounds of objection due to: Wildlife: Rare bird species such as the Stone Curlew and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Marcus Naylor

    The current plan will render the neolithic landscape damaged beyond recovery!

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Margaret Barrett

    1) The A303 Stonehenge Expressway will irretrievably damage unique and very important and fragile archaeology. (Irreparable damage has already occurred at Blick Mead) 2) The Expressway threatens the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mark Robinson

    I strongly object to this scheme since UNESCO have advised that it should no go ahead because of the potential to damage a World Heritage Site. There has been no consideration given to alternatives,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Marshall Stapleton

    Damage to the world heritage site It goes against Unescos advisors Loss of view also being forced to pay in future Disturbing wildlife - rare birds etc. Faster,noisier traffic

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Martin Ash

    I am most concerned about the potential for permanent damage to an ancient and world heritage site. This scheme is far to close to the monument and should the road should be moved to be further away... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mary Bates

    this site is a hugely important site to Druids and other Pagans. It is also a historical site with so much mystery.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Maxine McAdams

    I feel that the proposals would do irreparable damage to a site that is not only of importance to the UK but is unique in the world. Advisors from the WHS are also in agreement that this proposal in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Melanie Humphries-Cuff

    The crime of obliterating a great swathe of the most revered ancient site in the world is beyond comprehension. Does Highways England not understand that the monument of Stonehenge is only a small... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Michael Carver

    Any alteration to the route of the A303, whether above ground or through a tunnel, should not in any way damage or compromise any archaeology of the Stonehenge site or any other related sites nearby.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mick Cannon

    People will no longer be able to see stonehenge from the road. This is an iconic sight which is a large part of British culture. Slos it will mean that many people who are unable to afford the high... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mickey Gibb

    I profounly object to the proposed irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and lanscape UNESCO’s international advisers say the proposal should not go ahead in the way it has been... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mike Newton

    I object to the destruction of any areas simply to facilitate a road

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mr B J Craven

    Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site and it's value to our nation is beyond price. Apart from the all clear objections about the damage to adjacent sites, threats to wildlife, loss of view from the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018