Filter
Gatwick Airport Northern Runway

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 2301 to 2350 of 4813 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Martin Edser

    Having already been refused this application is attempting to achieve a full second runway by the backdoor. Any benefits obtained by a greedy minority are far outweighed by the disadvantages for the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Martin Hallett

    Air travel is extremely important to our economy and jobs. As an island we need aviation. This project makes sense as it is within the existing boundary of the airfield.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Martin Patrick Hanwell

    The Gatwick Plan is to handle an additional 100,000 flights carrying 37million more passengers and achieve Net Zero emissions in 7 years time. This Holy Grail is totally unbelievable and unachievable.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Matthew David Bullen

    Gatwick Airport have submitted plans to the Planning Inspectorate which would bring their northern runway into use. This is, in effect, a second runway at Gatwick Airport. Gatwick’s plans, if... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Matthew Stockwood

    This development is needed to maintain business links with our European customers/suppliers. Gatwick needs to expand and maintain the flying routes. Time and time again we need to travel To Heathrow... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Mike Jenkins

    Dramatically increased noise levels and flights directly over, and focused around, Penshurst due to flight path rigidity. Lack of consideration of alternatives Duration of increased flight traffic and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Mole Valley Cycling Forum (Mole Valley Cycling Forum)

    It is essential that genuine measures are put in place to offset / mitigate against the inevitable increase in CO2 and other emissions that this planned upgrade will bring. Commissioning of a Cycling... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Mrs Jean Morriss

    I object very strongly to a second runway at Gatwick. It will have hugely damaging environmental consequences to Sussex, Surrey and Kent. It will increase the pollutants that cause climate change. It... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Mrs Karen Middleton

    In short; Surely our priority is to reduce environmental impact from pollution, not increase it. Flights cross the Ashdown Forest and other conservation areas. Increased flights? I thought the aim was... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Mrs Paddy Bunn

    Noises, pollution, devaluing my house.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Nancy Adolpho

    I am completely against the proposed expansion to bring the northern runway into use. This is, in effect, a second runway at Gatwick Airport being introduced dishonestly and by deception. Gatwick’s... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Nathan Adolpho

    The noise generated by overhead planes is directly impacting my families health. My wife and I are regularly woken up with low flying and extremely loud planes. Once woken up it is impossible to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Neil Halford

    As a resident of Penshurst I am registering to express my dismay at the proposal that Gatwick want to use the emergency runway as a second runway.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Neil White

    We are under the existing flight path and are concerned about the impact an additional runway will have on the number of planes passing over us. Also, at a time where we should be reducing carbon... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Nicholas Byrne

    I am extremely concerned about night flights and would like them banned between the hours of midnight and 7am. Additionally my main other concern is the much greater impact from the additional 20 to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Nicholas Peers

    I cannot put this better than Plane Wrong's summary - Noise - Expansion of Gatwick would significantly increase aircraft noise both for those living near the airport and for those further away under... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Norman Geoffrey Furnell

    There is nothing beautiful about living in an area of outstanding natural beauty which is plagued by non-stop aircraft noise both day and night. This is exactly how it is, quite often, at busy times... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Paola Portman

    I am writing to you with regards to Gatwick's plans to make their emergency runway into a second runway. In my area [REDACTED] we live near Hever Castle, and we already have aeroplane noises every 3-5... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Paul Cooper

    We have lived in Four Elms for over 30 years. The levels of noise and air pollution directly attributable to Gatwick air traffic flows has steadily increased in our area, especially in the last 10... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Penny Ciclitira

    The proposed expansion of Gatwick Airport is not acceptable for the following reasons: 1. The surrounding area and infrastructure is not sufficient to accommodate the number of people, cars etc... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Peter Anthony Spokes

    We already have too many flights some of which are below 4,000 feet over Speldhurst. South London is already well serviced by airports and continual expansion flies in the face of what the Government... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Peter Ive

    I accept that the noise from aircraft on the broad swath approach as it is at present, whilst severe, is tolerable. Any increase in noise frequency or volume would not be tolerable.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Peter Taylor

    I have serious concerns regarding the increase in noise, pollution and safety if the proposed expansion is allowed to proceed. Additionaly I do not believe that the road, rail or airport terminal... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Peter Womersley

    I live under the Gatwick flight path and already suffer from considerable negative impact with existing flight traffic. The proposed new runway will significantly add to my a families suffering,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Peter Young

    A northern runway will blight a beautiful area in Kent and Surrey with aircraft noise and pollution for little gain at a time when the UK should be optimising infrastructure for minimal environmental... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Philip Ient

    The main issues regarding the addition of a second runway at Gatwick will be; Increased noise from aircraft landing and taking off. Increased road traffic going to and from the airport Environmental... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Priscilla Hother

    I live in Penshurst and enjoy the amenity of peaceful country life. Already planes flying overhead in their approach to Gatwick cause noise and disturbance, including at night and in the early... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Ralph Metcalfe

    Increase of noise. We live higher than most under the flight approach which is the majority of the time due to prevailing winds. The whining of the engines is still excessive even when we were told it... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Rhodri Jenkins

    I object to the proposed project. Noise pollution from flights is already a major issue affecting residents in communities across the region and this proposed project goes against government policy to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Richard Charles Taylor

    We have continuous flight noise day time and night time in school holiday terms Emirate flights with A 380 always too low and noisy

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Richard Lockwood

    Gatwick must not be allowed to build a second runway. They are following a dishonest and underhand process to try to do so. [REDACTED] Arguments against: adverse environmental effect on the area... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Richard Selley

    Before we moved to Brockham Park 10 years ago we had not realised how badly we would be disturbed by aircraft noise from Gatwick. Sometimes it sounded as if the planes were flying right past our... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Richard William Allen

    Policy has been (deliberately?) misinterpreted by the airport as this is an application for a new runway which does not comply with government policy. Government Aviation Strategy allows one for one... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Richard William Wilson

    I wish to register my opposition to the proposed 'second runway' at Gatwick. There are several reasons:- - the noise issues and their effects on the local communities have not been addressed. I would... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Rosalie Harrison

    Environmental Impact: The expansion of an airport typically leads to an increase in air traffic, resulting in greater carbon emissions and pollution. This can have a detrimental effect on the local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Ruby Joan Holdom

    Area of outstanding natural beauty. Open up Manston where fewer residential areas and next to the sea. Makes more sense

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Rupert Michael Fleming

    Given the improved train infrastructure in the country under way do we really need more flights. The vast majority of Gatwick flights are short haul and I see no justification for increasing their... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Russell Findlay

    The increased noise and traffic within rural areas and areas of natural beauty will be detrimental to the lived environment.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • S King

    Expansion of Gatwick would significantly increase aircraft noise for us as the planes are already flying further north from their flight paths on Departure Routes 3 and 4. Think about the effect of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Sally Anne Collier

    The airport expansion isn’t acceptable to this area. We have noise late and early and the village is used as a ‘rat run’ for staff and travellers alike. We have many cars parking here rather than pay... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Sam Watkinson

    Environmental Impact on the surrounding areas including increased pollution due to construction activities and increased air traffic. Noise Pollution: Additional runways mean more flights, which in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Sarah Love

    The proposal to make the second runway wider can only be good for the area, bringing in extra jobs and opportunities for businesses.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Sarah Murphy

    We live under the flight path into Gatwick. The planes are around 2-2500 feet above us. We already incur significant noise disturbances from planes landing. This includes the very late and also very... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Sean Benson

    Increased air traffic around Gatwick, with Air Traffic Control already at capacity. Increased flow rate at Gatwick leading to an increase in passenger numbers and a subsequent increase in road traffic... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Sharon Hague

    I strongly oppose the Gatwick expansion. The infrastructure won’t cope (it can’t at the moment). The M25 & M23 are always having traffic jams. Our local schools, doctors & hospital are at full... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Simon Frederick

    Opening a second runway at Gatwick would hugely increase the already intolerable flight noise over the local area with even more flights. As a country supposedly trying to lead the way and reduce... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Simon Ryder

    Crowborough is an elevated position and East Sussex's 2nd highest point at 780 feet above sea level. It already has significant air traffic, many using it as a navigation and turning point. I am... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Sophie Buckland

    I wish to object to the expansion of Gatwick Airport with the proposition to fully utilise the Northern Runway. I live approximately 10 miles from Gatwick Airport in an area of Outstanding Natural... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Sophie Esdaile

    Gatwick Airport’s expansion would have an extremely detrimental impact on the environment together with significant impact on all the communities, the increased impact on residents living under the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Stephen Shortland

    There is ALREADY regular excessive aircraft noise from Gatwick airport which negatively impacts my family's quality of life - this further expansion plan will lead to this noise becoming significantly... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023