Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 876 to 900 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Linda Montgomery

    * Why is it necessary? There are a number of existing hubs locally, no automotive industry locally, massive distribution parks already exist Manga Park still being increased in size and warehouse... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 June 2023

  • Mark Ingham

    Concerns; Traffic flow directions. New air pollution and the impact on the area, country and globally Number of vehicle movement increases Existing infrastructure ability to move vehicles Driver... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 June 2023

  • Mrs Jacki Weightman

    The congestion in the village is terrible already and extra traffic will create mayhem . My house shakes now with the number of lorries that pass through.The air quality for those suffering with... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 June 2023

  • Mrs Karen Wardle

    Considering we have the environment as massive consideration nowadays, more common land is being ruined yet again and the impact to wildlife will greatly suffer. Noise and night time light pollution,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 June 2023

  • Pat Shields

    I am very worried about the projects affect on traffic in the neighbouring villages e.g. Stoney Stanton which already has a traffic problem. I also worry about the environmental effects.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 June 2023

  • Terry Hunt

    * WHY IS IT NECESSARY? Number of existing hubs locally, no automotive industry locally, massive distribution parks already exist, Warehouse space availability locally, * ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT removal... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 June 2023

  • Alyson Kay Wren

    I am concerned about the impact that the proposed Rail Freight Terminal will have on my life. I am a keen runner, walker & cyclist and the additional traffic will certainly negatively impact on all of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Barbara Wistow

    I am a Hinckley resident and having attended two local consultation meetings and read widely about the subject, I wish it to be recorded that I am totally against the plan to develop the area adjacent... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • David John Wood

    You say this will bring 800 job to the area. This is not a high unemployment are so this will mean being more people in to work. That will mean more houses to house the 800 workers, more cars on the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Elizabeth Webb

    I object to the proposal because: It would have a detrimental effect on the surrounding area particularly Narborough where there is a big problem with cars queuing while the barrier is down, the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Gillian Holyland

    It will scar the countryside. Our town has suffered enough destruction of natural habitat. It is fast becoming not a nice place to live in our area of what used to be a beautiful county. Not to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • H Goswami

    I have considerable reservations with regard to this project as from an ecological and biodiversity stance taking up 662 acres of rural land seems unnecessary when there are so many brown field sites... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Iain Duncan Kinnis

    Objection as the environmental cost (post-mitigation) of developing, constructing and operating the scheme is disproportionate to the potential societal benefits.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Jack Robert Feast

    The impact of this project will stretch far beyond Sharnford, I'm surmising an area around 15 to 20 miles will be affected by the increased volume of traffic generated by this rail hub. Which is only... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Jeremy Reginald Davis

    I am concerned about the likely increase of traffic flowing through our village and consequent rise in noise and pollution level. My access to Hinckley and the city of Leicester is likely to be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • John Alan Padbury

    Light polution affecting wildlife, impact to wildlife in fields and hedgerows, impact of industry onto the current beautiful peaceful woodlands. I have enjoyed walks on paths around and through the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Mary Louise Sherwin

    I do not agree with this freight terminal. It is in an inappropriate location. Adjacent to an area of natural beauty used by a great many people all year. The proposals to construct a road through the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Mr Jitesh Chandarana

    The site of this project is in the area where I go for my walks into the woods. The infrastructure around here would not be able to cope with all this extra Traffic and the impact will catastrophic on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Mrs Ann Crabtree MBE

    The Hinckley Rail Freight Interchange is not required in this area. There are many very large freight depots in the Midlands area and existing or approved rail freight interchanges already - namely A5... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Nicholas Andrew Lewis

    As a Hinckley resident, I question the necessity for another RFT so close to the one already in operation, just 15 miles down the A5 in Daventry. Is it worth the destruction of yet another popular... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Valerie Moore

    I am concerned about the location of this proposed project and the rational for it. My concerns arise from the following points: 1. The proposed site is right next to Burbage Common, an SSI and an... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Austin Charles Reeves

    I am [Redacted], so use text only with the phone. I have two broad comments, Burbage Common and effect on M69. Burbage Common. The site is very close to the Common. It is not clear what impact the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 June 2023

  • Charles G Dunn

    I wish to oppose this development because it is totally unnecessary. We already have or in process of being built, in very close proximity, at least 7 rail freight interchanges. ALL of them underused.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 June 2023

  • Christopher Paul Wren

    All my comments apply to both Stoney Stanton and Sapcote. I am worried about increased heavy commercial traffic loading through the villages causing noise and vibration. There is already a large Rail... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 June 2023

  • Dr Luke Evans MP

    I am the member of Parliament for the constituency of Bosworth. Although the proposal itself is not within my constituency, it has the potential to significantly impact Hinckley, the surrounding... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 June 2023