Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Mallard Pass Solar Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 751 to 800 of 1222 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Russell Wilcock

    The government policy is clear that ground mounted solar should use previously developed land, contaminated land, industrial land and agricultural land of grade 3b, 4 and 5, not Best and Most... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Sheila Douty

    Increased Traffic impact on wildlife impact on farm land smallest county with biggest impact detrimental to the countryside lack of amenities in the area

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Victoria Mary Jackson

    I opppose this project. I believe it is totally wrong. I believe it is the absolute opposite if helping the environment. It is just about an investment company making money from the countryside not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Emma Ellis

    Mallard pass solar farm should worry everyone, wherever they live. The 2,105 acre site equivalent to 1,300 football pitches and 10 times larger than the largest solar farm currently in the UK. Almost... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 February 2023

  • Jennifer Higham

    The wildlife, the roads and the beautiful countryside views will all be affected by the astronomical solar far! The roads are already bad enough with fast drivers who have no concern or respect for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 February 2023

  • Kenneth Raymond Upton

    1/ A short time ago there was a scandal when it was found that [REDACTED] were supplying parts to the national telephone system which could be used for spying on this country and is still costing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 February 2023

  • Kirstie Clifford

    This will be hugely detrimental to the village of Essendine and surrounding villages. Why in a populated area? The sourcing and manufacture of the panels themselves is questionable as is the longevity... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 February 2023

  • Linda Jepson

    This is not the major source of energy the UK requires. There is currently no proposed provision for continuous energy supply for every 24 hour period from solar farms. There is no resilience in this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 February 2023

  • Lynda Patricia Ravilious

    I am opposed to this project for a number of reasons. There are serious Construction and Operational issues which include the following: Years of noise, light pollution and damage. Cabling to new... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 February 2023

  • Patricia Frances Wright

    I am against this project because it will totally envelope the neighbourhood, it will take good farmland out of production, it will ruin a rural area and swamp the local area with traffic which its... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 February 2023

  • Caroline Louise Anders on behalf of Philip William Anders (Philip William Anders)

    Objection to proposed project - loss of agricultural land. Involvement of [Redacted] foreign nation in vital UK infrastructure.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 February 2023

  • Robert Clifford

    My main concern is the appearance and detrimental effects it will have in and around the village of Essendine including my village. Why on earth are we putting these panels all over beautiful... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 February 2023

  • Brett Walsh

    We have a significant food security challenge in this country (exacerbated by the war in Ukraine) now where 50% of UK food consumption is already imported from overseas. With a cost-of-living crisis,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2023

  • Christopher Ian Bichard

    The loss of 2175 acres of prime farm land to build this solar farm is completely unacceptable, solar panels are a valuable source of power but should be sited on the roofs of all suitable buildings,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2023

  • Eastern Properties Anglia Ltd (Eastern Properties Anglia Ltd)

    We have a considerable amount of land and industrial buildings immediately adjacent to the proposed development. We wish to ensure that the development does not affect the use of our premises for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2023

  • James Everitt

    Sheer unprecedented size of this project Resulting in may construction issues,loss of habitat,loss of amenity and use of good arable farm land. 2 yrs of disruption during building phase in affected... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2023

  • Karen Collins

    Mallard Pass Solar Farm, plans are to build on 2,000 acres of farmland turning my local countryside into an industrial wasteland. The scale is massive and its impact huge. My concerns include the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2023

  • Louise Boon

    Proposed solution is via the main road through the village of essendine - this will cause major disruption and impact to the village in which our house is located.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2023

  • Margaret Try

    Alleged links to Uyghur forced labour by [Redacted], The scale of the development 2,105 acres is too large, Loss of agricultural land, The loss of biodiversity and damage to the local environment,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2023

  • Michael Quant Lemon

    Appalling Desecration of Wildlife Habitat and destruction of Landscape by Interested People and Companies from outside of Our Area lacking appreciation and Sensitivities of the local inhabitants and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2023

  • Rachel Williams

    Whilst I am in favour of renewable energy, I have grave concerns about the size of this project and the use of prime agricultural land for this purpose. I feel there are better ways to generate power,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2023

  • Rosemary Trollope-Bellew

    I have concerns that this application has overlooked the need to produce food in place of an inefficient source of energy eg solar panels. There is very little information on the percentage of Best &... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2023

  • Sarah Blackmore

    I understand that many of the parts involved in construction are coming from China. This is so sad given their human rights practices. it is so sad that you are prepared to sacrifice productive... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2023

  • Stamford Storage (HG) Ltd (Stamford Storage (HG) Ltd)

    We have a considerable amount of land and industrial buildings immediately adjacent to the proposed development. We wish to ensure that the development does not affect the use of our premises for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2023

  • Stuart Moore

    Extremely concerned at the size, pace, and environmental impact of the proposal.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2023

  • The Heys Group Ltd (The Heys Group Ltd)

    We have a considerable amount of land and industrial buildings immediately adjacent to the proposed development. We wish to ensure that the development does not affect the use of our premises for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2023

  • Alastair Gunn

    The main issues from my perspective are as follows: 1. The impact on value of our homes. The planned development is enormous. The village of Essendine will be swallowed by it. The villagers will take... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Sarah Barnett on behalf of Barnett household (Barnett household)

    We are against the Mallard Pass Solar Farm for the following reasons: * the negative impact on wildlife and nature * the waste of excellent agricultural land which should be used to grow food for the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Evelyn Gelito

    I object strongly to the proposals. I exercise through the naturally occuing footpaths through fields and woodlands. This will all be lost if the development was to proceed. The proposals made by... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Glenda Launders

    Site is far too large, it is colossal A huge eyesore for local communities Loss of agricultural land Adverse effect on wild life Noise and impact on residents Construction and building, adverse effect... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Greatford Parish Council (Greatford Parish Council)

    Greatford Parish Council object to the development of Mallard Pass Solar Farm for the following reasons: We are very concerned about the potential that this development could have upon the speed and... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Helga Slater

    A very big NO to this happening - the Mallard Pass solar plant proposal is utterly inappropriate. By building on quality agricultural land, we will destroy a natural resource in the heart of England’s... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • James Shorrock

    As a local resident, from Wilsthorpe Stamford, I felt I needed to raise my personal concerns regarding the Mallard Pass Solar Farm Development. I realise the country’s need to pursue more sustainable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • John Goodliffe

    I am strongly objecting to the principle of destroying valuable farmland for solar energy. There are plenty of warehouses, supermarkets and carparks which could all be used for siting solar panels.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Karen Asker

    I am opposed to the proposals, I am concerned that we are permitting companies who do not have UK interests destroy our countryside for a scheme that has a number of flaws which have been glossed over... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Laura Jones

    The disruption in the village, more traffic and large trucks. Losing agriculture land around our village. Noise pollution. The affect on the wildlife. The affect on our house prices.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Leandro Gelito

    I totally object to the scale of the proposals which will loose valuable agricultural land but will spoil the peaceful countryside, creating noise and light pollution as well as a visual eyesore.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Ruth Dickens

    The size of this proposal is totally unacceptable with far too much agricultural land being used. There are plenty of brown field sites or rooftops that could be used for solar power generation. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Stuart Asker

    I have strong objections to the whole scheme, not only the construction phase , for which the local roads and infrastructure could not cope with, leading to major problems, but the visual intrusion... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Tracey Jane Broome

    The proposed site is enormous and it will be incongruous and ugly within the beautiful landscape of S Lincolnshire. The agricultural land proposed is prime, fertile land and is possibly the 'bread... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Dr John Baldwin

    In principle I am very much in favour of renewable forms of energy, particularly wind turbines. I am also in favour of solar panel farms of an appropriate size and in an appropriate place. However, in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 February 2023

  • Elizabeth Marlow

    Mallard Pass Solar Farm 1.Concerns regarding construction traffic access routes to proposed site. A project of this scale will necessitate thousands of HGV traffic movements, both during the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 February 2023

  • Giselle Brannan

    I wish to express my utter dismay at the proposed Mallard Pass solar farm. I live and have lived in Great Casterton, a village very close to the proposed farm since 1995. I chose to live in a village... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 February 2023

  • Jane Cadel

    I live and own land in Careby as have my parents and grandparents before me. We are the oldest family name in the village so have some knowledge of the area. We have been ‘custodians' of land around... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 February 2023

  • Janice Barton

    should not be built so close to surround a whole village project is far too big for this area of England should not be built on such high quality farmland should be built on poor quality land away... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 February 2023

  • Jason Halsey

    Unnecessary loss of good grade arable farm land and increased flood risks to domestic properties and villages, irreversible soil compaction.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 February 2023

  • John Robert Burcham

    I believe that the proposed project is far too large in scale. Also it is taking uo valuable agricultural land thus reducing our ability to grow our own food. A brownfield site would be far more... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 February 2023

  • Michael Parkins

    I am concerned that there are no local benefits to be had with this solar installation, whilst the implications and disadvantages will fall on the population of the area, all the benefits will go to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 February 2023

  • Mr John Stilwell

    effect bio diversity of the area , noise polution, human rights of local residents, wildlife habitat will be greatly affected , mental health of individuals , building on sight of great agricultural... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 February 2023

  • Mrs Jane Stilwell

    The solar farm is detremental to the village and surrounding area, its not environmentally friendly as its taking away productive farm land. The 2 years of construction and up heavel will also affect... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 February 2023