Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Stonehenge is of huge historical importance, not just for the UK but internationally.
To go ahead with the current plans has the potential to destroy this archaeological site.
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I believe the World Heritage Site, and the historic landscape surrounding it, should be sacrosanct. Less invasive options exist and should be sought at all costs rather than tamper any further with...
Read more
-
This plan will cause Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go...
Read more
-
The scheme proposed is unnecessary. It would be far more sensible to construct, above ground, a dual carriageway to the south of the existing A 303 for westbound traffic.
-
I believe that it is important to preserve humanity's ancient and sacred sites. We can learn much from our ancestors. Much of my ancestry is rooted in the British Isles and I want to see that...
Read more
-
I object to the work as I believe it will damage the landscape and the archeological importance of the site and surrounding areas will be compromised.
-
I am opposed to the road work along A303 that will effect the Stonehenge landscape. I have visited the site repeatedly and have researched the region extensively, included presenting classes at my...
Read more
-
I am opposed to the present plan to tunnel close to Stonehenge as it do serious and irreparable damage to the priceless archaeological heritage of the World Heritage Site. The traffic should be...
Read more
-
Recent archaeological discoveries have revealed that the site is far more complex and extended than previously thought. The road should therefore circumvent this unique part of our heritage. Building...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the UNESCO advisors are not happy for this to go ahead in its present mode.
It's upsetting to me that the view of the Stones would be gone thus making the public pay to see them....
Read more
-
My main concerns with the proposal is the apparent ignoring of advice from UNESCO regarding what is a world heritage site and the potential for irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and...
Read more
-
I consider that the proposed changes to the highways in the vicinity of Stonehenge and across the World Heritage Site will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described...
Read more
-
UNESCO has described this world heritage site as a ‘landscape without parallel’ and said that the scheme should not go ahead in its present form. There is NO good reason for that to be ignored.
-
I am objecting to the significant new road structure which is not appropriate for the area. We must preserve such an incredibly important site and still be able to carry out more ivesstigations of the...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
The scheme will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ and that UNESCO’s own international advisers say...
Read more
-
Dear Sir/ madam ,
I beg of you to consider your actions before causing irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’,
please...
Read more
-
I strongly object to proposed A303 STONEHENGE EXPRESSWAY PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE TR010025
I am deeply concerned that irreparable damage will be caused to this World Heritage Site and ...
Read more
-
You have failed to follow the expert advice of UNESCO'S international advisors
Stonehenge belongs to the nation I do not see why I should have to pay to see it
-
I wish to register my personal objection to the plan to dig a tunnel under Stonehenge. At the time of my birth, my parents lived in Amesbury, about three miles from Stonehenge, and Stonehenge is part...
Read more
-
From discussing the issue with many people in my local area, and some being archaeologists this decision to make a tunnel will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting. There...
Read more
-
Please note that I object to large scale infrastructure, such as roadworks and tunnel excavation, being carried out near Stonehenge as I am concerned that such works will seriously impact upon and...
Read more
-
The proposal to widen the A303 will damage the archaeology and ecology of this World heritage site. Already too many areas have been damaged by road widening and building in this once green and...
Read more
-
I object to the A303 current proposal due to the irreparable harm and damage it will inevitably cause to a World Heritage Site of unique global significance.
Furthermore the works will seriously...
Read more
-
I object to the A303 expressway through the Stonehenge WHS for several reasons. The Stonehenge WHS, including its famous archaeology, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’, will be...
Read more
-
Something like Stonehenge , is truly unique and mystical. I know it belongs to a distant past, which we today can barely relate to? However going to all that effort, if nothing else warrants our...
Read more
-
The proposed dual carriageway scheme would intrude into the UNESCO World Heritage Site, causing irreversible harm to the scenery, wildlife habitats, geology, and possibly destroy archaeological sites...
Read more
-
It would be a terrible shame in the eyes of history and of the world if this incredible monument were to be damaged in the interests of a building project which is likely to have a very limited...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
Hi,
It’s simple - I am objecting the building of a road that will probably be in use for 100 years or less under and around a site that is world heritage listed and has been present for several...
Read more
-
I am very seriously concerned by the proposal to push a tunnel through a registered site of such importance as the whole Stonehenge area. When a World Heritage site so famed as this is under clear...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the current plans will damage the World Heritage Site particularly the archaeology of the site as set out by the UNESCO report.
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without paralle
-
1.Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
2.UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
Please reconsider this scheme as it currently is not recommend by UNESCO. Neither Does it give sufficient protection to rare birds.
Thanks
-
Apart from the damage that will be done to the WHS itself by the tunnel and other works, I remain convinced that insufficient work has been done on the long term sustainability of the tunnel in terms...
Read more
-
I am very concerned to hear about the proposals for the area around Stonehenge. The damage that this would cause to the environement and wildlife at Stonehenge would be devistating. Once these changes...
Read more
-
I am very concerned by the potential damage done to a unique World Heritage Site: one of the jewels in the United Kingdom's crown. As technology enables new, non-invasive methods of archaeological...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site and must be respected as such. This means it needs to stay as original as possible--as it is now! History cannot be replaced. Noise, traffic, disturbed site lines...
Read more
-
1/ The proposed development will cause destabilisation and irreparable damage to an archaeological 'burial' site
2/ Increased noise pollution from faster travelling vehicles
3/ The Stonehenge...
Read more
-
I object to the denial to everyone of the iconic view of a world heritage site that should belong and be available to us, the public, not hidden away for only those who wish to pay to visit.
-
I am a UK citizen presently resident in France.
I see this World Heritage Site as of inestimable value, not just for England, nor even Europe, but for the world entire.
It is meaningless unless...
Read more
-
It would seem that the proposed road development could have a deleterious effect on a major World Heritage site, and quite possibly destroy important archaeological evidence. We are looking at a far...
Read more
-
I object because this proposal is against UNESCO advice, and while threatening irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site as a whole, does not offer alternative safer options. It may also cause...
Read more
-
It is inconceivable to ruin a World Heritage Site any more than it already has been. The construction of A303 Stonehenge Expressway should be avoided at all costs , there would be faster traffic,...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a sacred site that is spiritually connected to the earth it is built on and no new roads should be built anywhere near it, beneath or above ground! The new road should be diverted far...
Read more
-
I am objecting because:
I consider this to be an act of cultural vandalism, the effects of which can never be reversed. Future generations will hold us culpable for the destruction of this unique...
Read more
-
The values are all wrong. We need to care more about our heritage than the speed of traffic
-
1. Stonehenge is a site of international importance.
2. The entire landscape around Stonehenge is part of the monument; especially the Mesolithic site at Blick Mead.
3. Damage to the environment...
Read more