Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
There are many reasons why this is the wrong thing to do both morally and factually. Examples of the latter are listed below:
The damage to the site will be totally unacceptable (paraphrasing...
Read more
-
The project has seemingly not investigated other options to stop this desecration of a sacred landscape with World Heritage status. Notwithstanding the damage to the archaeological structure of this...
Read more
-
I object to the A303 Stonehenge tunnel.
My main objection is to the destruction of the landscape. Many years of construction will ruin this World Heritage Site and then we will be left with two...
Read more
-
Disturbance to rare birds / other wildlife.
Traffic speed increasing will increase noise.
Serious adverse affect to the WHS and it's archaeology - UNESCO describe it as a
landscape without...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about native fauna and flora and the visual vista of a world heritage site.
-
Registry my opposition to the freeway plans in and around Stonehenge the world heritage site - please do not build this out.
-
I strongly object to the proposal on the grounds that it will remove the opportunity for everyone to see this magnificent monument at a distance from the road. The citizens of this country have been...
Read more
-
I am objecting for the reasons below:
1./ There will be excess noise caused by the faster road traffic.
2./ The shear lack of alternatives to the proposed that would not damage the World Heritage...
Read more
-
I am very concerned that the historic site will be irreparably damaged. It is a World Heritage site, and I believe that the WH do not think that the current plan for the road is acceptable. I think...
Read more
-
The proposed plan will ruin the natural landscape and destroy a great heritage site.
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
Any tunnel should be of sufficient length to avoid any ground breaking within the WHS. It is particularly concerning that the proposed design will cause damage to a mesolithic site. Furthermore, the...
Read more
-
I object on the strongest terms to this application. It will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. It goes against...
Read more
-
I am writing to object to this proposal on the grounds that it would cause irreparable damage to the site.
-
I object to the A303 Expressway on grounds of damage to unique Mesolithic archaeology (some avoidable damage has already been done at Blick Mead) and danger to rare bird species (Stone Curlew and...
Read more
-
I am objecting to the proposal because I think that it will seriously damage the nature and integrity of this World Heritage Site. There are areas surrounding it which have not yet been subjected to...
Read more
-
It is my opinion that any further traffic alterations to the surface traffic around the relic that is known as Stonehenge, will only result in more movement of the earth surface covering the area...
Read more
-
Stone Henge is a renowned World Heritage Site, and its importance stretches far beyond its locality. Considerations important to all such sites should be taken into account, not just local...
Read more
-
I am objecting to the potential loss of the view from the road. The need to pay to see the Stones in the future is a step to far in my opinion. Some of us are too infirm to hike for a glimps of our...
Read more
-
As an archaeologist and previous History teacher of forty years, I condemn these planning processes as they conflict with our national heritage values in many ways. The historical environment must be...
Read more
-
I first set eyes upon Stonehenge when I was in my twenties.... and that sudden view from the A303 absolutely stunned me. I could hardly believe I was actually seeing this marvellous site right in...
Read more
-
When I was a child we would go to Stonehenge, at a time when we could wander amongst the stones, sit on them and feel part of the extraordinary landscape. I remember later the frightful tourist...
Read more
-
I object to this, as it will irrevocably damage this heritage site. I believe it would constitute wanton damage to an irreplaceable part of our history, landscape and culture. Other options have not...
Read more
-
Please reconsider damaging a national heritage site of such importance, alterations done in haste and misjudgement cannot be undone. Many a heritage site has been lost due to this ignorance and...
Read more
-
More options should be considered to safeguard this WHS its Archaeology , Landscape and rare Flora and Fauna , and also the Blick Mead Mesolithic Site and Setting.
UNESCO'S International Advisors ...
Read more
-
For too long the World Heritage site at Stonehenge has been subjected to the noise and visual blight of a major road. This A303 Stonehenge National Infrastructure Plan does too little to solve the...
Read more
-
I am completeing this representation as I am concerned about the proposal by Highways England to the A303 Stonehenge. Firstly the plans would mean irreparable damage to this WHS and is likley to lead...
Read more
-
Regarding Stonehenge -
I am against the new suggested road because of :
damage to the World Heritage Site.
the disturbance of rare birds.
increased traffic.
-
This proposed roadwork will do irreparable damage to a landscape which has been recognised internationally as having special importance. What's more, UNESCO's advisers have raised concerns about the...
Read more
-
I know this route well, from using it on an almost weekly basis when we lived in Devon. I remember the improvements around the roundabout west of the Solstice Services. It took years to complete, it...
Read more
-
The plan as proposed for a dual carriageway and tunnel at Stonehenge will be damaging to it as a World Heritage Site, and better solutions must be considered instead.
-
Purely and simply, I object to the proposal on the grounds that it will, firstly, interfere with the undeniable uniqueness of this World Heritage site in that it violates the ground on which it is...
Read more
-
I am objecting to the plans on the grounds that any works to a world heritage sight will obliterate any future and past archaeology for ever , I believe there is no need to widen the road or dig a...
Read more
-
Highways England have recently demonstrated that they are not competent to oversee the construction of a road, including a tunnel and elevated sections without irreparably damaging the UNESCO World...
Read more
-
There are routes available for Bristol/ Bath and the West re other motorways. It is a beautiful scenic route that is being destroyed by applying to put in a by pass. In its historic value, and as an...
Read more
-
I am VERY concerned that the presently proposed road development will cause irreparable damage to this magnificent WHS, is contrary to UNESCO's advice and will risk Stonehenge losing its WHS status.
-
The history of England's is being destroyed because the government are trying to make some quick money. You can't change the water trample and not effect the land. I've also been made aware that the...
Read more
-
I understand the need to improve traffic flow along the single carriageway section of the A303. But a tunnel is unnecessary. It will be disproportionately expensive and it is likely to disturb and...
Read more
-
I am concerned about damage to the World Heritage site, not only to the stability of the structures during and after construction working, but also for the environment due to loss of habitat and the...
Read more
-
I believe the action proposed action will damage a historically significant site and seek further reassurance in that matter.
-
I would be very much against the proposed plan since it would disturb this ancient site which still holds many secrets as to how our ancestors lived. Furthermore it would carve up this beautiful...
Read more
-
This proposal is 'un-neighbourly' to an ancient and extremely historic site. Stonehenge should dominate the landscape not 21st century structures.
It seems as if wildlife, traffic and noise have...
Read more
-
I consider this an outrage .This is a world famous site of great importance and it is a nonsense that it could be endangered .This suggestion regarding Stonehenge is unbelievable.We should be...
Read more
-
The current road plans will have a negative impact on the Stone Henge World Heritage Site.
This will be detrimental to our culture and heritage.
-
I am concerned at the damage that will be done to the historical site in general and the loss of the view of a national heritage site from the road forcing people to pay, which will exclude those on...
Read more
-
I object on the grounds that the current plan is at fault in these aspects:
Despoliation of, and incursion of increased noise and vibration into, what is essentially a sacred space, whether the...
Read more
-
This application will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. The visible stone circles will be made to appear...
Read more
-
I think that the current plan endangers the integrity of this World Heritage Site and would cause irreperable damage to it. Other, less damaging options should be considered as a matter of urgency.
-
As English Heritage and National Trust members, we object strongly to any planning anywhere around this valuable site.
-
As a World Heritage Site, I do not like the idea that people will no longer be able to drive past and see Stonehenge. The only way they will be able to see this historic monument is by buying a...
Read more