Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Irreparable damage to the Stonehenge World Heritage Site and its archaeology
Disturbance of rare bird species eg Stone Curlew and Great Bustard
-
I object to the closure of the Drove because it makes the Stonehenge landscape inaccessable for the disabled and infirm, especially important during the main festivals of the pagan calender. I object...
Read more
-
The proposed work will cause irreparable damage to a World Heritage Site.
-
Nothing at the moment. I am just registering.
-
I am concerned over irreparable damage to the site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
The UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should...
Read more
-
I am a druid as well as a spiritual person and my belief is grounded in my and humanity's connection with mother earth or Gaia which is one organism which we can not exist without. gaia has been...
Read more
-
I object to the enormous damage that will be done to a unique and important historical site.
-
This construction work will cause significant damage to the archeology and context of this important World Heritage Site (WHS). UNESCO have already advised that this construction scheme should not...
Read more
-
Stone henge is a unique and ancient monument, unparalleled in significance, and its protection deserves greater priority than whether traffic flows smoothly on the nearby A303.
When I drive to Devon...
Read more
-
The documents used to provide evidence for the submission appear to contain discrepancies whose effect is to reduce the benefit of the project and potentially make it fall outside National Policy...
Read more
-
I am only a history student a US college, but it pains me that anything, anywhere, of historical value - much less Stonehenge - could be damaged irreparably for the sake of ease or progress. Let...
Read more
-
“I OBJECT to this DCO Planning Application."
REASONS FOR OBJECTION
Viability / Judicial Review.
The Treasury, National Infrastructure Commission, Office of Road & Rail and National Audit...
Read more
-
i object to a tunnel being built under Stonhenge This is an ancient important site and the tunnel will chnage its energy and weaken the earth
-
I a appalled that the UK Goverment can even contemplate this road and tunnel proposal which will adversely effect the iconic Stonehenge landscape. What kind of message does this send out about Britain...
Read more
-
The current plan has too many disadvantages (disturbing archeological sites and wildlife, too noisy, making it only possible to see the stones if you pay)
Other realistic options should be developed...
Read more
-
As an Archaeologist and a concerned member of the public, I see 'no case' that would justify the permanent alteration and damage to the nationally and internationally iconic and heritage rich...
Read more
-
I'm objecting because I disagree with the inevitable irreversible damage which would occur to the land in the area. It's a unique setting of immense archaeological value and a hugely important part...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the destruction of yet undiscovered archaeology within this very special landscape.
-
This is one of the most important sites in our country and the world. We should be doing all we can to protect it not try and destroy it. We are merely custodians and we must not fail in our duty.
-
The monument that is Stonehenge is unique. There's nothing like it in the rest of the world.
I understand that the section of A303 running past it is always a bottleneck, and that is inconvenient....
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an ancient site and loss of this from public view from the existing road excludes all those who do not have the resources to pay to see it. The road itself is a part of the existing...
Read more
-
I am extremely concerned about the proposed expressway, given the importance of the Stonehenge World Heritage Site to the history and culture of the United Kingdom. UNESCO's international advisers...
Read more
-
I object strongly to the building of the building of a Stonehenge tunnel. There are viable, cheaper to build, alternative road improvement routes available that would not cause irreparable damage to...
Read more
-
Stone henge is a sacred site and should be left alone, not to mention disruptions to.local businesses & wildlife
-
It is a historical site, with so much more to learn. Do no destroy it.
-
I am against this proposal
-
This is a world heritage site and deserves to be preserved for generations to come. Building a tunnel under the site will disturb natural wildlife, have potentially damaging consequences to the site...
Read more
-
As a farmer and landowner in the Stonehenge WHS, south of Stonehenge I have grave concerns over the tunnel scheme.
1. I believe the scheme will have a negative impact on the quality and quantity of...
Read more
-
I object to the destruction of the landscape around one of the country's most significant landmarks.
-
I believe the current plan will cause too much damage to the archaeological record at Britain’s most important historical site.
-
To whom it may concern,
I am concerned about the A303 tunnel construction plans at Stonehenge for the following reasons:
- UNESCO has not approved of the tunnel plan in its current form
- 10...
Read more
-
WHY ARE YOU BUILDING UNDERNEATH A TUNNEL STONEHENGE IS A NATIONAL TREASURE WE HAVENT A LOT TO BE PROUD OFF BUT THIS WE ARE. MY SELF I DONT UNDERSTAND CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS 3 CAN SEE IT AND GO MUMMY...
Read more
-
I am totally opposed to the proposed road and tunnel construction at Stonehenge, one of the world’s most important ancient monuments. This plan is opposed by historians, archaeologists, and even...
Read more
-
These are my issues shared by many who visit stonehenge or talk about it to visitors and friends
*Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
*UNESCO's advisers say...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form. Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site...
Read more
-
Please do NOT do aqnything that will affect Stonehenge in any way. This is such an important place, to people all over the world.
-
I feel that the developemnt will destroy an internationally important Landscape and cause irreversible destruction. Therefore I would suggest stopping this process and changing the route proposed to...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a unique and invaluable part of the fabric of this country. Given expert opinion (from as respected a body as UNESCO) that these plans will cause irreversible damage to this site, not to...
Read more
-
Remembering visits to Stonehenge some 60 years ago when one could park by the roadside and wander round the stones in peace I deplore the potential noise and intrusion of extra traffic on the...
Read more
-
I OBJECT to this planning proposition because it will disturb an ancient site that is still sacred to, and used by, Pagan worshippers to this day.
It will also be likely to disturb a great deal of...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is arguably our greatest national treasure and must be protected at all costs.
-
It will ruin immense amounts of archaeology and change the landscape forever.
It will take away the joy of seeing the Stones on the skyline when passing and feeling a connection to them and the...
Read more
-
I do not think the proposed development should be allowed to take place, for the following reasons:
* Stonehenge, a world heritage site, will be irreparably damaged, and its importance as a British...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the impact on our national treasure of stonehenge both visually and its structual integrity.
-
Stonehenge is a precious treasure at the heart of a sacred stone age landscape. Its historic and current setting functions in helping people worldwide, from toddlers to centenarians, to better...
Read more
-
As a concerned member of the British public, I do not think sufficient provisions are made in this application to protect out ancient and historical heritage from damage. The damage may be accidental...
Read more
-
A tunnel under Stonehenge could damage the site, it could destroy ancient archeology. A wider range of routes should be reassessed. The U.K’s reputation for protecting ancient heritage will be...
Read more
-
I feel the proposed infrastructure changes would compromise the integrity of Stonehenge and I am greatly opposed to them. Please reconsider in the interests of heritage
-
Stonehenge sits in a unique and highly sensitive landscape that's already under intense pressure from traffic, tourism and economic development.
Digging a tunnel would undoubtedly involve destroying...
Read more
-
The flyover at Countess roundabout will adversely affect the local walk along the river Avon below Lord's Walk in Amesbury. The flyover will follow nearly all of the river walk and really ruin it. ...
Read more