Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
Better travel connections, good employment for the County.
-
I object to the expansion as it will increase the noise pollution over Sevenoaks due to flight paths. The noise from planes passing over Sevenoaks is already disturbing. Especially in the summer...
Read more
-
have concerns about the increased noise and pollution levels. If this expansion is allowed to progress this will also have a negative impact on the value of my property. With all the current changes...
Read more
-
I object to the second runway for the following reasons - Our UK government Climate Change Committee. 6th carbon budget. Aviation – states there should be no more airport expansion until there is a...
Read more
-
More air traffic means more noise, pollution and congestion at a time where we have a climate emergency and need to step back from one of the biggest contributors to global warming- air traffic!!!!...
Read more
-
The proposal should be allowed, as its good for growth, both at Gatwick and surrounding areas, it will bring in more jobs, not only to local areas, but uk wide, more money for the uk itself, more...
Read more
-
I live on the flight path already which is noisy enough. To have more flights would be horrendous especially in the night. I strongly object to this. Planes fly over me all the time which I accept as...
Read more
-
Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an application for a new runway and as such does not comply with policy, or the Government’s Aviation Strategy. Gatwick does not have 2...
Read more
-
I do not believe that Gatwick should be allowed to change its emergency runway into a a second runway. What happens if an emergency happens.
-
I am concerned about noise and air pollution. I am already noticing more planes flying over us this summer and when we are in the garden we can hear them. Another runway will make the situation...
Read more
-
Permission to use the emergency runway as a second runway should not be given for safety reasons.
-
Increased pollution, damage to sleep, the list goes on
-
I have concerns about the increase in traffic and air pollution expansion would create along with increased noise pollution. I also have concerns about the required amount of extra housing being built...
Read more
-
The northern runway would be good for jobs during construction, and also afterwards with more flights meaning more people employed at the airport and in the local area I'm for the new runway
-
Gatwick Airport is busy enough already. And the way they run night flights shows low regard for nearby communities regarding noise. There are night restrictions with a limited number of flights, but...
Read more
-
I live under the flight path, where additional flights would cause excessive noise and disturbance (already excessive with existing flights). I am also concerned about the increase in pollution from...
Read more
-
Tonbridge and Malling Green Party oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is in fact a new runway being brought in by the backdoor– · The policy has been...
Read more
-
I object to any further development of Gatwick airport mainly on the grounds that any airport expansion is incompatible with the need to reduce air travel and our carbon footprint, thus endangering...
Read more
-
How much of our beautiful countryside will be destroyed for ever when it is covered in concrete to provide this new runway? No mention has been made of the: Numerous buildings to provide all the extra...
Read more
-
We are concerned that there should be no further Gatwick expansion. In this area we have frequent intrusive aircraft noise, increased pollution levels and significant impact on the environment all of...
Read more
-
I think it is a fantastic idea for the development which will include more development, jobs,increases in property prices and jobs and infrastructure
-
I wish to object to the second runway on the grounds that it will increase carbon emissions, road traffic, noise and air pollution. We cannot afford to increase the release of greenhouse gases,...
Read more
-
We are against the expansion of a second runway at Gatwick Airport due to the impact this will have on Crawley and the surrounding areas. The M23 and M25 are suffering from the volumns of traffic as...
Read more
-
I am fully supportive of the additional runway at London Gatwick. It is essential for jobs and for our place internationally in terms of trade and tourism and is long overdue. In the last 30+ years...
Read more
-
I think it is a good development and will help local employment levels
-
Jersey Farm - DCO Northern Runway at Gatwick Airport Interested Party Registration - for Windsor Developments. We are writing to register our clients Windsor Developments as an interested party, in...
Read more
-
Expansion will bring new employment, business and commercial opportunities to many, it needs to be considered and offset against the additional noise, flight paths, pollution and traffic from more...
Read more
-
Aircraft is highly polluting. We must have fewer flights. It is our duty to preserve our planet for future generations. It is irresponsible to temp people to take unnecessary flights. Aircraft...
Read more
-
The impact of potential / pending airport growth on, and not exclusively, climate heating, the environment, noise and air pollution, physical and mental health, and over reliance on fossil based...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the health impacts arising from the increased number of over-flights, both for myself and my family. I am also concerned about the increased noise levels and air quality impacts...
Read more
-
Noise Pollution Lack of doctors, hospitals, housing, roads, water
-
I object to the proposal. An additional runway will significantly increase already high levels of aircraft noise over this part of the country. Aircraft noise is already intolerable in the summer...
Read more
-
The building of a new runway will have a huge carbon footprint, destroying green space and plants and animals living there. Increased aviation will contribute to pollution and global warming which is...
Read more
-
Expansion of Gatwick 1. would significantly increase aircraft noise in Kent and East Sussex, particularly at night. 2. flies in the face of UK's Net Zero targets. 3. would increase local traffic...
Read more
-
Completely opposed to the second runway as it will have an enormous impact on all the surrounding areas and is definitely not good for the environment
-
I do not support this project. It will increase noise and overflights for those under the flight paths (and others close by) which, in turn, increases pollution & CO2, and is likely to have an adverse...
Read more
-
Gatwick Airport Northern Runway Comments on Climate Change and Air Quality in the Environmental Statement Contents Greenhouse Gas Emissions PM2.5 Air Quality Criteria and Assessment Model Verification...
Read more
-
The proposed second runway will involve a very substantial increase in aircraft movements leading to yet more noise and disturbance throughout the day, throughout the year. There will also be a...
Read more
-
The project will have a positive effect on the tourism businesses in the Gatwick area. This is an industry that continues to suffer post Covid . This project would support job creation and existing...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – · Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
I am against this proposal for a number of reasons. 1- noise, living as we do under the flightpath to Gatwick we already find it hard to enjoy our garden as the noise from the aircraft mean it is...
Read more
-
I think this is a brilliant opportunity for the local community
-
We must drastically reduce our use of fossil fuel - there is no alternative fuel for aviation. Biofuel is utter greenwash. Most flying is a luxury unavailable to most of the World. An increase in...
Read more
-
Chiddingstone Parish Council comprises of democratically elected Parish Councillors who represent the views of their electors. The Parish Council and parishioners of Chiddingstone object to the...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – • Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
Increased activity at Gatwick would mean more people working there and local infrastructure cannot cope, eg local NHS, schools. Increased road traffic, workers and passengers, would mean more cars on...
Read more
-
I am worrried about increased noise and pollution
-
Pollution as I’m (redacted) and already struggle. Noise as I note in the summer planes still going overhead in the early hours of the morning meaning you can’t sleep with your windows open.
-
The majority of aircraft landing at Gatwick seem to route over Groombridge at less than 5000 ft. Flights continue through out the night especially in summer and the noise is so loud to prevent...
Read more
-
My house lies directly under one of the flight paths for aircraft landing at Gatwick . Having lived in the house for thirty years we have noticed increases in noise and frequency of aircraft - there...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the increase in air traffic generally in light of the unfolding climate crisis and the damage being done to the climate by air travel. I also have a personal concern about...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway which does not comply with policy, Government’s Aviation Strategy. Gatwick does not have 2 runways that it...
Read more
-
My main concern is the destruction of the countryside and villages in an area that have historical significance and great beauty which once destroyed can never be replaced. There is also the huge...
Read more
-
Additional aircraft would only bring a huge increase in air and indirectly car pollution. It would also increase the risk of an air accident. Noise pollution would also increase ten fold. Peace and...
Read more
-
There is no reasonable case for ruining the ecology and the quality of life in the Gatwick airport catchment area by building a second runway. Anyone taking the least amount of responsibility for...
Read more
-
I am very much in support of the Gatwick Airport Northern Runway changes that have been proposed. I think that this is great for the economy and most of all has minimal environmental impact and is...
Read more
-
Understanding how the increased demands will be mitigated
-
Noise disturbance Pollution Negative climate impact Negative mental and physical impact Negative environmental impact
-
increase in aircraft noise - day and night impact on climate change devaluation of my home affecting my wellbeing through increase in aircraft movements - flights will go directly above my home. We...
Read more
-
I object to the Gatwick expansion plan because of the lack of consideration given to the impact on the surrounding villages, including the health and well-being of those communities, which will be...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
I object to an expansion of Gatwick airport. This is destroying the South East, particularly Kent, with it's many tranquil beauty spots. The damaging effects are among other things air and noise...
Read more
-
Gatwick is quite big enough already. It doesn’t need to be any bigger and ruin more peoples lives in Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Our planning on the ground because of our status is highly...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
I consider a second runway unsuitable as air traffic is often overcrowded and having to use the hold patterns resulting in aircraft overhead every minute or more at busy times
-
This will cause more pollution, noise , traffic and harmful for the environment, health of residents and to the wildlife
-
Already we are affected by the noise . It wakes us up it stops us sleeping . We never used to hear planes and it is now a big issue . More planes would be a nightmare with noise and pollution . The...
Read more
-
I am objecting strongly to Gatwick Airport's request for a second runway for the following reasons: Noise pollution. The current noise level is unacceptable within the entire Horley area. I gather a...
Read more
-
I feel that there is already enough air traffic in the local area which is not only noisy & an eyesore, but will also create more noise & air pollution.
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
Increased noise - v bad already Increased air pollution Climate change - should be reducing air traffic, not increasing!
-
I oppose what will effectively be a new runway - currently Gatwick do not have two runways they can use concurrently. The Government spent much time and effort in deciding where it would be best to...
Read more
-
I am against increased traffic in the sky and in the roads coming in and out Gatwick. There will be increased pollution for local residents, of which I am one, including poor air quality and increased...
Read more
-
My wife and I have lived at this address since 1970 and have become accustomed to and accepting of aircraft noise whilst always finding it objectionable to a degree. Our environment is normally...
Read more
-
The proposed increased in flights will increase CO2 emissions by 35% at Gatwick. (Gatwick’s own figures). There will also be an associated increase on CO2 emissions due to the growth in motor traffic...
Read more
-
Environmental, economic and social impact on local communities.
-
I strongly object due to the following reasons: Existing or new Runway? • From: ‘Beyond the Horizon – Making Best Use of Existing Runways’ an HM Government publication “Therefore the government is...
Read more
-
Why is Mr. Wingate on the board that decides the fate of LGW? Why does LGW not accept that low flying arrivals should be higher and since 2012 they have brought misery to communities that were...
Read more
-
I am extremely concerned about the increased noise from all the extra flights. Presently at peak times there are aircraft overhead continuously, spoiling my enjoyment of being outside in the garden....
Read more
-
Affect my sleep even more. Fumes are causing problems Traffic and parking It's also affecting my health
-
let’s do it. we love gatwick good for jobs
-
Overall I am pro the decision to expand Gatwick. It will bring construction jobs to the area alongside increased economic activity in hotels and supply chain aswell as growing the local aviation...
Read more
-
I endorse this project as Gatwick needs a second runway and will bring improved employment for the area, however I do hope that the increased air traffic is managed sensitively in regard to the...
Read more
-
The main issue is increased flights - there has been a noticeable increase in flights from Gatwick (tracked via radar24) over my property already and the proposal would only increase the noise and...
Read more
-
Totally object to this project. We do not need any more aircraft flying over the south of England. We are in the flight path and we can smell the kerosene on very still days.
-
Gatwick is already degrading a major British AONB. Increasing traffic will degrade it even further. It’s not so much house I’m worried about, it’s the systematic destruction of English culture.
-
I wish to object in strong terms to the very substantial increase in capacity proposed by Gatwick which impacts me as a resident below its eastern flight path approach and impacts me as a citizen...
Read more
-
Gatwick has an adequate runway already, with a backup runway. This would be a significant expansion allowing more aircraft traffic. More aircraft traffic would increase carbon emissions, increase...
Read more
-
My main concern is the destruction of the countryside and villages in an area that have historical significance and great beauty which once destroyed can never be replaced. There is also the huge...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the process to date has been unfair and wish to investigate the processes that take place
-
I oppose this application; 1. Gatwick has already been declined the opportunity to build a 2nd runway after years of review and analysis. 2. Gatwick is not located in a convenient place for users,...
Read more
-
Sometimes when I am trying to sleep I time the aircraft flying over and they are one every minute. It is very difficult to sleep when I am counting aircraft flying over instead of sheep. I work from...
Read more
-
Gatwick is already big enough. It will have a terrible impact on my life if they open another runway. There are planes flying 24/7. At the moment it can be hard to sleep with the drone of planes...
Read more
-
Increased noise from aircraft above my property which is already on a flight path. Increased noise and pollution.
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
Noise Pollution Lack of Infrastructure and impact upon existing Night flights and impact on health Expansion at a time when we face climate change issues
-
Langton Green village society speaks on behalf of the vast majority of residents in relation to Gatwick's expansion plans. There is a small handful of residents who see no threat to the village or...
Read more
-
Noise levels are too high!! Intrusive to what should be a pleasant living experience in the kent countryside! I can’t have a phone call in my garden without it disrupting what the person can hear on...
Read more