Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I believe this will bring in many jobs, further destinations and enable gatwick to operate much more efficiently than it currently does. As long as the proposed plans are followed and the area of...
Read more
-
I’m in support of this proposal as it will drive employment and investment into the area. Having worked at senior levels within the Travel Industry for over 25 years I have seen the benefits of such...
Read more
-
I believe the environmental impact has not been correctly considered. The additional aircraft will by definition create more noise than if there we no additional flights. The argument in the...
Read more
-
Can you consider the following: Flight Time there should be a watershed of no flights 12:30 am to 5:30 am and introduce a kpi fine that would be imposed should the watershed be breached. These fines...
Read more
-
I think they should be in North Runway because planes are always queueing up to get onto the original runway
-
Gatwick Airport should have the planning permission approved for the Northern runway as it will help grow the community and create jobs in and around the local area which has to be a bonus.
-
Unreasonable added aircraft activity over residential towns
-
I feel it will bring an increase in economic growth to the surrounding areas
-
I would like to see Gatwick improve with more routes employing more people
-
We should not be building any new commercial airport capacity, including new runways because this will enable and encourage more flying when we are facing a crisis in our climate.
-
Ground noise emanating from the airport can often be continuous. Engine noise on approach, low frequency reverse thrust noise, engine noise exiting the runway and positioning to stand. Immediately,...
Read more
-
I support the plans to use the 2nd runway at gatwick
-
I object to this proposal on the basis of: climate change, air pollution and harm to health, increase risk of flooding, noise pollution from increased air traffic, severe objection to increased night...
Read more
-
Great idea
-
Adverse impact on the environment particularly increased motor vehicle traffic and emissions from the additional planes. Water neutrality- what are the plans to meet the requirements that the rest of...
Read more
-
I am appalled that expansion of the airport is being proposed when the government has pledged to cut carbon emissions.
-
I am opposed to this application on many grounds, but most especially because it would bust the carbon budget that we have left. There are currently no proven technologies for reducing aviation...
Read more
-
Long awaited and overdue. UK needs to improve European transport hub connectivity for economic growth Accepting local protests but airport there long before them and aircraft getting steadily cleaner...
Read more
-
The number of potential flights from Gatwick due to this proposal is frightening. The potential expansion does NOT help the Uk meet its climate goals. The airport itself is situated in the wrong part...
Read more
-
I am concerned the runways are too close together causing wake turbulence drift problems in windy conditions. Also the ils is dedicated to the main runway so in low visability conditions could cause...
Read more
-
oppose expansion
-
We act on behalf of Sackville UK Property Select IV (GP) No.1 Limited, a subsidiary of Columbia Threadneedle Invest-ments, in respect of their freehold ownership of land and buildings at [Redacted]...
Read more
-
Yes please we want new runway for jobs and appurtenances and good and easy for any on travelling a broad.
-
I feel that an additional runway and increased volume of air traffic at Gatwick will severely impact Sussex and Surrey, and particularly the Surrey Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The main...
Read more
-
The main issues are increased noise and environmental damage to local residents. A lack of demand in shoulder periods of the day means Gatwick is not full, they only want to be able to sell expensive...
Read more
-
Support the growth of gatwick
-
The proposed development is too close to the South Downs national park. The noise will damage quality of life in the area, be disruptive to wildlife and more air traffic will be damaging to the...
Read more
-
As a regular user of Gatwick it is great to see our fantastic local airport thriving. Whilst I share concerns around the environmental impact of flying and welcome initiatives for more environmentally...
Read more
-
I fully support the project
-
This project should not go ahead. I do not support it as a resident of Reigate as there is enough noise and air pollution above us, including flights from Heathrow and other UK & International...
Read more
-
Airport expansion at a time when increasing carbon emissions are the biggest threat to mankind is absurd and should not be countenanced. We are supposed to be heading towards net zero and limiting...
Read more
-
Expansion will be good for the area
-
We live around 25 miles from Gatwick. Aircraft taking off from Gatwick and landing at Gatwick fly over our home and this area at around 5,000-6,000 feet, sometimes below this. I often observe aircraft...
Read more
-
Great opportunity to invest in the local infrastructure and diversify the local area
-
There is already too much noise pollution from the existing Gatwick airport traffic. Increasing the capacity more flights will exacerbate the issue. We live under the flight path. We have low flying...
Read more
-
Perfect idea
-
Objecting for the following reasons: negative impact on climate control, the cost of clean up will be be staggeringly expensive and the tax payer will be asked to foot the bill. It will also result in...
Read more
-
I currently work at Gatwick,it brings much needed employment to the area and has potential for so much more ,it would be a shame to miss out on an amazing opportunity and yes I do live on the flight...
Read more
-
The main issues for me are loss of nature, biodiversity, green space and wildlife. Negatively, there will be gains in air pollution, noise pollution, traffic congestion - all this at a time of climate...
Read more
-
I object to the second runway because of the impact to the environment with increased air and noise pollution. Also with the net zero target we should be reducing air travel not increasing it. I am...
Read more
-
My main concern is there will be twice the amount of noise and pollution. We made a decision to remain in the area after the government said there wouldn't be a second runway. We were in the original...
Read more
-
Gatwick Airports expansion is crucial to the local economy and I support it.
-
Climate change is an immediate and present danger. The value of this project will be wiped out and worse.
-
The area needs to keep developing and growing , we have all been hit massively with Covid the down turn in growth and financial status , it’s the time old quote IF WE STAND STILL WE GO BACKWARDS Let’s...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
An extra runway will bring more business and job to the area
-
I would like to strongly object to planned expansion of Gatwick airport. We are already plagued by noise, that will only increase. We should not be expanding airports and certainly not in unsuitable...
Read more
-
I don’t think the runway should be use there is enough noise pollution already this would just increase it .this also would add traffic to the area more Taxie’s who park on yellow lines in povey...
Read more
-
I believe growth of Gatwick Airport is in the best interest of the local economy.
-
I am commenting as an individual, as a resident of Surrey. I fully support and endorse the comments made by Surrey Climate Commission and Gatwick Area Conservation Campaign (GACC), as outlined below....
Read more
-
CO2 emissions need to be cut immediately. Expansion is counter to all scientific advice on reaching net zero. Millions are already suffering the devastating effects of climate change. Their lives are...
Read more
-
I support this application. I lived in Crawley since 1956 to 1999. The Airport is a very important part of Crawley, and surrounding area, for it's economy, infrastructure, and the people of the area...
Read more
-
I am a taxi driver and this project will bring more work for this industry and will be beneficial for me and my family
-
I support this as Crawley needs significant investment
-
The main issue is pollution and climate change caused by air traffic
-
I object to the project on the following grounds because I believe it to be a new runway: 1. I am greatly concerned that the increased level of air traffic will have a detrimental impact on the level...
Read more
-
While we face a climate emergency, any expansion in air travel cannot be considered necessary.
-
This submission has been prepared based in part on the response of others including Gatwick Area Conservation Campaign (GACC) and New Economics Foundation and in part on my own professional expertise...
Read more
-
The proposed project will create additional aircraft noise in the surrounding area. Expansion of the airport will also put pressure on transport facilities in the area. It will also have an adverse...
Read more
-
Nothing has changed since Gatwick was turned down in favour of Heathrow expansion by the Airport Commission in 2015. Gatwick sits on a single arterial road (M23) and a single railway line that can’t...
Read more
-
I object most strenuously against the expansion of Gatwick, including the construction of a second runway. The most significant issues are the increasing local and global pollution, especially...
Read more
-
My principal objection is on the grounds of carbon emissions. I do not believe the economic argument is well-supported for expansion, but I also think the economic aspects are marginal relative to the...
Read more
-
Living below the flight path means that the noise intrusion will increase above what I would consider to be already high levels - but surely cutting down on the fossil fuel usage alone should push the...
Read more
-
Gatwick Airport needs to expand. The lack of infrastructure invested in airports since the war is a disgrace
-
I am opposed to the second runway at Gatwick due to the increased noise pollution and other major environmental factors.
-
The approval of this plan is a no-brainier - if we want our country to be competitive we need to have good links with the rest of the world - expansion of Gatwick’s capacity is essential to ensure...
Read more
-
Decline the expansion request - it is not warranted and the current flight activity is already a nuisance
-
The main issues are increased noise and environmental damage to local residents. A lack of demand in shoulder periods of the day means Gatwick is not full, they only want to be able to sell expensive...
Read more
-
I’m against the proposal. Local infrastructure and roads do not have capacity for more traffic. The countryside around the western and southwestern side has no major roads to carry extra traffic. The...
Read more
-
It’s good for people living and working around
-
Introduction The Surrey Climate Commission is an independent body with the role of supporting and guiding the transition of Surrey to a carbon neutral future. This document accompanies the...
Read more
-
Writing as Chair of a Surrey-wide organisation that supports many voluntary partners across the county, I know that a lot of those are working with people who are either employed directly by Gatwick...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the proposed new runway at Gatwick airport. 1. Aircraft noise from the existing runway has noticeably worsened over the past few years and blights the lives of those who live...
Read more
-
As we are situated so near to Gatwick Airport we are already on blighted land, so proposal of extending the emergency runway is just an added nightmare. The ‘over flights’ we suffer from when landings...
Read more
-
I am against the expansion of Gatwick airport because we already suffer a great deal from aircraft noise in the local area, including frequent flights directly over our house. I am also concerned...
Read more
-
The already increasing fumes and noise will get even worse and make using outside spaces impossible for any form of socialisation as the noise from the planes forces you to stop talking as its too...
Read more
-
I do not believe this is the right decision for our area. I oppose this Gatwick northern runway application. Inunderstand that it will help jobs and Gatwick to grow. However, the infrastructure of the...
Read more
-
It is good for the economy
-
I am hugely concerned about the increase in carbon and noise pollution that this would cause. My area is already above WHO recommended levels of air toxicity and I’m especially worried for vulnerable...
Read more
-
Noise and polution
-
I think this will be good for the local and wider economy. It will also reduce the current delays experienced during peak periods
-
1. Gatwick claims that that many thousands of new jobs will be created and presents this as an advantage. On the contrary, it will impact negatively. There is already a severe shortage of housing in...
Read more
-
Flight Path and Flight Times
-
We lie under the landing flight path for the prevailing westerly wind conditions. During summer weekends flights start at 0630 and continue at up to every 2-3 minute intervals through til late. We...
Read more
-
I object to this for environmental reasons and the noise impact it will have on my home.
-
Great idea
-
I live in Redhill. I don't see why this is required.
-
I support the use of the emergency runway being used as a second full time runway.
-
I think is a good idea as it will generate business for the town
-
I am concerned about flight paths and noise. A second runway will increase the number of aircraft forcing new flight paths over the countryside and communities who already have to deal with flights...
Read more
-
I live in (Redacted) which is a rural location in an area of outstanding natural beauty. My home is impacted by flights arriving and departing from Gatwick airport. In the operation of Gatwick airport...
Read more
-
I’m ok with Gatwick new plans for growing the number of flights and be able to use the second runaway.
-
This is a terrible idea. The environmental impact of further air travel is terrible. The impact on the local area, the carbon footprint of all the concrete. This is terrible.
-
The proposal would have a huge impact on local air quality, local noise pollution, residential amenity and the environment generally. I also don’t think it would deliver the anticipated economic...
Read more
-
Safety its an emergency runway
-
My main concerns with this proposal are: 1) increased noise levels in the local area due to increased air traffic; 2) increased air traffic will increase carbon emissions when we are in a climate...
Read more
-
We would like to object to the proposal to develop a second runway operation at Gatwick Airport for the following reasons: Expansion of aviation would contradict policies to reduce carbon emissions....
Read more
-
There is a near continuous drone / noise pollution from the airport, this goes on to the early hours well after last flight affecting local residents and sleep, it can be difficult to be outside in my...
Read more
-
We must all get behind and support a growing industry.
-
This second runway should not have permission to go ahead as it completely contradicts the net zero targets, causes pollution, noise and increases traffic on the roads.