Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
The economic benefits and local infrastructure can only benefit from a fully functional Airport, the Northern runway will make the airport more fluid which will save fuel so also benefits the...
Read more
-
Are Concern is the negative impact on our parish from aircraft noise, pollution and extremely low flying planes
-
This proposed new runway will increase flight traffic directly over my house and will not only raise air pollution levels will also increase noise dramatically. This plan will also have a dire impact...
Read more
-
As a local authority, immediately below the current flight path, the Council is interested as to how a second runway will impact upon the lives of its residents and businesses, both in terms of...
Read more
-
Chichester College Group supports the proposed Gatwick Airport Runway Project. Whilst we fully understand and appreciate some of negative affects, but we believe overall the the positives...
Read more
-
It will improve the local economy and boost the local areas
-
The overall net benefit of the scheme does not seem to account for the wider environmental impact cost. The Detrimental effects of noise levels are not transparent.
-
I am a resident who lives adjacent to the flight path. The additional runway went to Heathrow and this makes a mockery of that process. This will add to air pollution, noise pollution, traffic and a...
Read more
-
As part of the planning condition I would like the following included: Point 1 Install strict night flight curfews to allow respite Point 2 When wind condition allow, ensure swap of landing directions...
Read more
-
I believe it should happen, It will boost Sussex and Surrey trade with the world, also it would increase the number of jobs in the area, especially for students especially working in the retail at...
Read more
-
I live near and I want to see the plans and how this may affect my home and family
-
I live under the flight path approaching Gatwick Airport (when the wind is from the West) and the planes are fairly low overhead - we can see them putting their wheels down. My main concerns are: a)...
Read more
-
We already have a lot of planes flying near to our houses and only stopping for a few hours during the night. The plan to have another runway is unacceptable because of increased noise and pollution....
Read more
-
My comments are in opposition of this planned activity. Already there is significant air pollution and noise caused by Gatwick airport. Despite not being in the major flight pattern there is...
Read more
-
London Gatwick describe the Project as “low impact” yet the proposal is for significant new airport infrastructure, hotels, offices, taxi way, car parks as well as an increase in passenger numbers...
Read more
-
1. House Price Value due to noise pollution. How do residents prepare for this? Will we be compensated? 2. Commuting to work via local roads which will experience a higher level of traffic. Also an...
Read more
-
To keep abreast of the changes and how this will affect roads and access to our business and any health & safety issues to our colleagues. Also the change to our current boundary and the effects this...
Read more
-
Aircraft noise, especially in early and late hours, has become much worse in recent years, leading to an adverse effect on life and increased levels of (redacted). At times, flight after flight flies...
Read more
-
I would like to have more detail on the economic benefits of the project to the local community. There is no breakdown on how this has been calculated and it appears to have been exaggerated. In...
Read more
-
No matter how much the plans say they are considering the impact of noise and air pollution, neither can be mitigated for hence I do not agree with the development.
-
increased number of noisy low flying planes at all times of the day and night. With a second runway which is an emergency run way this will only increase. The smell of plane fuel can be smelt...
Read more
-
The Brighton & Hove Economic Partnership is primarily interested in the economic impact of the scheme and value added in terms of jobs and tourism. Current figures suggest that the expansion activity...
Read more
-
I am totally opposed to expansion at Gatwick. With global warming evident, more traffic at Gatwick in the air and on the road will make climate change even worse. Gatwick brings misery to residents...
Read more
-
This is described as national infrastructure. However the benefits will accrue to a private company. The government's Climate Commission has stated that no airports should expand because of the...
Read more
-
Alongside the obvious increase in noise, carbon emissions, pollution etc. As it is effectively a rural airport which operates 24/7, this would impact several areas of outstanding natural beauty...
Read more
-
A second runway will destroy the village of Charlwood and other surrounding villages. Even with a noise envelope it will significantly worsen the noise and air pollution. This goes against the UK's...
Read more
-
I am against the proposal. Higher pollution levels from increased cars and flights will adversely affect people's health in the area. The M25 and other roads to Gatwick are already extremely busy,...
Read more
-
A second runway will destroy the village of Charlwood and other surrounding villages. Even with a noise envelope it will significantly worsen the noise and air pollution. This goes against the UK's...
Read more
-
Im am commenting in support of the proposed project. At the forefront of Sussex Wine Tourism, we have seen an increase in private and business travellers visiting the area. Increase in capacity and...
Read more
-
The new runway will result in an unacceptable increase in departure noise to the historic town of Reigate, which already suffers from this problem. It should not happen due to increased disturbance to...
Read more
-
London is the world’s biggest air travel hub, but our airport infrastructure is struggling to cope. This is the most practical short term fix to the problem. Please allow it to proceed for the benefit...
Read more
-
Will there will be any potential new routes over Warnham. What will be the likely hours of operation. What increase in traffic will there be. Will there be any changes to the existing current take-off...
Read more
-
Current level of flights causes noise and extreme pollution levels, without expansion. Flight paths are a noise intrusion
-
A second runway will destroy the village of Charlwood and other surrounding villages. Even with a noise envelope it will significantly worsen the noise and air pollution. This goes against the UK's...
Read more
-
The increase in noise, carbon emissions, pollution and disruption to wildlife would be unbearable, as a rural airport which operates 24/7 it will impact several areas of outstanding natural beauty,...
Read more
-
As a local resident living close to Gatwick Airport I object to any plans to increase flight arrivals and departures at the Airport. We already have a considerable number of jets overflying Horsham...
Read more
-
Concerns over increased aircraft raffic due to rojpect
-
Living in the vicinity of Gatwick Airport is already challenging enough at most times, without these extra works. The plane noise can be unbearable at times, and doubling that would honestly, without...
Read more
-
I support the expansion of Gatwick airport as it will bring jobs and growth to the surrounding areas, a second runway was needed years ago. Aircraft noise and emissions are a fraction of what they...
Read more
-
Utilising the existing Northern Runway will boost the local economy, creating jobs and prosperity all around the airport including where I live in Reigate and Banstead borough. Securing growth for the...
Read more
-
A second runway will destroy the village of Charlwood and other surrounding villages. Even with a noise envelope it will significantly worsen the noise and air pollution. This goes against the UK's...
Read more
-
I am very much in support of this project. It is important for the area that Gatwick Airport remains a major airport for the UK. It needs more capacity to be able to offer the range of destinations...
Read more
-
This project is vital for the health and wealth of the region. With the government having failed to offer the second runway to Gatwick, now highly unlikely to be built by Heathrow, that was a huge...
Read more
-
On the whole we are very positive about the proposal. Our only concern will be to ensure that the infrastructure in terms of roads and housing will be sufficient to accommodate the increased activity...
Read more
-
Worried about increased traffic, pollution and noise impacts on locality. As well as a personal interest in changes to the local environment specifically around land usage on Riverside and Cheyne...
Read more
-
Plans for 100,000 additional flights and 1m tonnes of CO2 in a rapidly escalating climate emergency is complete anathema; it directly conflicts with the government's legal and moral duty to tackle...
Read more
-
Pro expansion. A great thing for local Communities
-
Gatwick desperately requires a second runway and is long overdue. Gatwick provides itself as an established alternative to the slot-constrained Heathrow and over the past year, has seen a...
Read more
-
I want Gatwick to have more scheduled connectivity to the world in general but to the USA and India in particular. Although Air India's recent direct services to India from LGW are welcome, travel to...
Read more
-
Increased noise Increase aircraft movement and increased pollution Night flights - over the last 20 odd years these have already significantly increased Detrimental effect to house prices in the area...
Read more