Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it


Filter

Mallard Pass Solar Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 901 to 950 of 1222 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Mrs Patricia Ann Leaper

    * There will be continuous noise, pollution, disruption, and damage to property and surrounding area. * It will increase the impact of heavy HGV lorries and project associated workforce and vehicles... Read more

  • Mrs Vanessa Kimberley

    The profits of the proposed site will not , in my view, benefit the UK as the company who own Mallard Pass is not a UK one. The proposed site is larger than Westminster, imagine looking out the office... Read more

  • Pamela Russon

    This proposal is far too large . It would be using farmland/ green fields , that should be used for agricultural purposes . The effect on wildlife would be devastating. Solar panels should be on roofs... Read more

  • Philip Leaper

    * The vehicles entering and exiting the A6121, from the industrial areas, are already large, heavy, dangerous and unsuitable for the infrastructure of Essendine. *The further impact of weighty... Read more

  • Richard James Granville White

    My main concerns about the Mallard Solar Plant Proposal are: Increased Flood Risk for properties in the flood prone village of Greatford and the local area. Misuse of vast area of good quality... Read more

  • Sandra Jane Collins

    I live in what will be the centre of this proposed solar farm. The disruption to my everyday life will be immense. The roads in this area are rural lanes and are not able to cope with the volume of... Read more

  • William Adkin

    This vast project (2000+) acres will be a dominant feature of the surrounding area. it will be built, in part, on what is good agricultural land which in the long term interests of the country as a... Read more

  • A Mitchell

    In no order at this point: Sheer Scale Land use….AGRICULTURE not solar Visual impact combined with Mental Health transferring to physical health of the people affected by this. Ecology and Wildlife... Read more

  • Alexandra Ellis

    I am concerned about the use of agricultural land when there are numerous alternatives eg roof slopes of large industrial buildings. The prospect of compulsory acquisitions in Essendine is not... Read more

  • Benjamin Tony Evans

    I oppose the mallard pass solar farm because of the sheer size of the development in the chosen location. It will be a great loss of beautiful countryside, there are far more suitable areas for this... Read more

  • Darren Gray

    This will have a significant impact on the future use of high grade arable and grazing land, by removing it from use. Also, the resultant impact on wildlife is very much a concern. Other than during... Read more

  • David John Gladstone Wilby

    To big, too many disadvantages would ensue for a small rural community

  • Eric Tindall

    COVERING OUR AGRICULTURAL LAND WITH SOLAR PANELS IS A MISTAKE WHEN SO MANY INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS ACROSS THE UNITED KINGDOM HAVE VACANT ROOF SPACE THAT WOULD EASILY BE FITTED WITH SOLAR PANELS TO DO THE... Read more

  • Helena Swallow

    As a local resident I believe this land should remain as farming land. This project is planned with short term benefits in mind. We will need our agricultural land into the coming years - population... Read more

  • Joan Bavister

    Farmers allowing the use of good agricultural land have become turncoats and taken the Kings shilling. We are surrounded by notices keep out, get off my land, private. They despise the public, yet... Read more

  • Joanna Winterbourne

    This solar farm is going to decimate the countryside around stamford and impact all the villages to the north east of the time. The Secretary of State has just announced the need for access to the... Read more

  • Julie Beecham

    Extra traffic and restrictions on dog walking. Excess noise and disturbance to wildlife impacting on mental health.Compulsory aquirement of my land which I previously knew nothing about.

  • Madeline Davies

    We live in a beautiful productive area and can not understand why good quality farmland will be taken out of production when as a country we need more self sufficiency. To spend the rest of my life... Read more

  • Malcolm Osborne

    [redacted] are a Chinese Company, the panels would be assembled in China. DONOT support PRChina by awarding this contract. Great Britain should be utilising Business and Companies from friendly... Read more

  • Marian Busby

    This project will not only visually ruin a beautiful area of open land, it will remove the habitat of the local wildlife. I am also concerned that the already damaged local roads are not up to the... Read more

  • Martyn Mason Bradshaw

    too large on very good farm land.too near villages .the building will bad extra heavy traffic. bad to excise my horse not a inefficient as a source of energy.who will clear up at the end

  • Mary Ludlow

    . Loss of valuable farming land . Disruption to area by heavy traffic . The vista!

  • Miss Ann Hughes

    The problem with this project is that it is far too big for a rural village location and solar farms should not be placed on good farm land that is needed to feed our growing nation. The government... Read more

  • Muriel Ann Johnson

    Solar panels will be 3.3m high security fencing and CCTV, solar stations or shipping containers housing inverters/transformers dotted across the solar area. New sub-station will be visible & audible... Read more

  • Philippa Ball

    Far too big a site. Solar panels should be on roofs not arable land.

  • Rebecca Fitzpatrick

    My initial comments are that this would be a VAST solar farm in an area of natural beauty, farm land, listed buildings and beautiful villages, ancient woodland areas, wildlife and people who have... Read more

  • Gallery Stamford (Gallery Stamford) on behalf of Robert Walter Pheasant

    There is no plan in place for the removal of the panels at the end of their life. The use of a village to house the high voltage cabling having lost the right to run along the railway line, is... Read more

  • Sharon Mosley

    I am writing to express my massive concerns regarding this proposal to build this overwhelming solar farm in our tiny villages within Rutland. Rutland itself is the smallest county in England and has... Read more

  • Andrew Ebdon

    My over-riding concern about this project is the amount of 'Best and Most Versatile' agricultural land that will be given up to solar panels. While, nationally, we do need to have energy security, we... Read more

  • Errietta Panagiotopoulos

    In my opinion solar farms are not a good solution to our clean energy needs. There are 27 million households in the UK and many of these could have rooftop solar, not to mention the many often very... Read more

  • Margaret Elizabeth Anderson

    The proposed site is huge, far larger than any others in the UK and larger than Windel Energy and Canadian Solar have completed so far. The farm would be visible from miles around and will be a major... Read more

  • Peter Garry Smith

    I wish to object to the proposal because :- - it is inappropriate use of agricultural land - it is visually intrusive and hideously ugly - the scale is unsuitable and detrimental to the area in many... Read more

  • Rosemary Ann David

    Mallard Pass Solar Farm, is vast. A large percentage of it is to be built on high grade agricultural land and it will have a detrimental effect on all forms of wild life and the natural environment.... Read more

  • Rupert Gibson

    I object to this project. It is too large, it will destroy a huge area of countryside and farmland. Solar panels on buildings not fields.

  • Susan Bryars

    The size of the project is very worrying. Whilst I appreciate that the location is advantages in terms of access to the grid, to have split this into a number of smaller projects with similar... Read more

  • The residents of 46, High Street, Carlby (The residents of 46, High Street, Carlby)

    These are our main concerns: •The sheer scale of this project • The land is good farming land •The fact that villages and small communities will be surrounded by acres of solar panels •The impact on... Read more

  • William Michael Halford

    In my opinion solar farms are not a good solution to our clean energy needs. There are 27 million households in the UK and many of these could have rooftop solar, not to mention the many often very... Read more

  • Douglas Davidson Anderson

    The size of the site is far larger than any other proposed or operating in the UK. It will turn a rural landscape with good quality agricultural land into an industrial scar severely impacting on... Read more

  • Jill Salkeld

    The proposed solar farm is too close to housing and busy roads. It could be moved further away from these. There will be two years of noise, light pollution, disruption and damage for all those living... Read more

  • Kelham Cooke

    - 2 years of noise, light pollution, disruption and damage across 2,105 acre site and surrounding area. - Cabling to new sub-station may now run through Essendine on A6121 with Mallard Pass seeking... Read more

  • Kyla Mulvaney

    Concerns about environmental, agricultural and economic implications about this project. It is not in the best interests for Lincolnshire and the U.K. reduction of the size will only diminish the... Read more

  • Anne Wiltshire

    Though I am completely in favour of renewable energy including solar power I believe we should carefully consider the most appropriate places to put solar panels. The last place we should use is a... Read more

  • David Parry

    You should consider the impact on the local community and also the thousands of acres of good quality farm land that is just sitting there doing nothing

  • Gemma Popple

    As a resident with a young family, this project will completely ruin the village and surrounding area. I completely understand the need for alternative energy sources, but the size of this project... Read more

  • John Bavister

    This site will never become carbon neutral, as it is impossible to generate the amount of electricity claimed. To focus on the real finite generation of Carbon released by the use of PVs and the... Read more

  • Margot Walford

    I would prefer to see solar farms on brown field sites, not farm land.

  • Mary Parry

    Spoiling good agriculture land and wildlife.

  • Peter John Martindale

    I have lived in Castle Bytham for 47 years and am very familiar with the area currently being considered for the development of the Mallard Pass solar farm. I am in favour of the development as it has... Read more

  • Robert Beaver

    Solar panels should be on roofs of houses ,warehouses Factories & Brownfield sites not on food producing land And spoiling green countryside. Panels going on beautiful countryside and agriculture Land... Read more

  • Stella Morgan

    Apart from the devastation of the countryside, the loss of arable land, at a time when production needs to increase rather than the opposite, is something that must be avoided.