Filter
A303 Stonehenge

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1451 to 1500 of 2370 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Ian Mitchell

    A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down The Issues – Travel versus Amenity, Values and Assumptions Stonehenge is unique. It is the highlight of the World Heritage Site (WHS). The A303 runs... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • J. Capell

    I can't see that just building more and wider roads will relieve congestion. The proposed scheme is completely out of place here.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Jan Hobbs

    I am surprised that a scheme of this type is even being considered at such a unique and special site & one which has been attracting visitors from all around the globe for many decades. This is a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Jane Callaghan

    I am a British person, so Stonehenge and its surrounding area is part of my own heritage and an heirloom for the future. Stonehenge itself is at risk of damage by the A303 development and would be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Jerry Elsmore

    It will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • John Colin Gill

    I object to the A303 Stonehenge proposal because of the serious damage it would inflict on a most important World Heritage Site (WHS). Much of the damage would be visual: although close to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Juliana Freeman

    I urge you to reconsider this tunnel and road plan. Stonehenge is a world reknowned site of historical interest that brings thousands of tourists into the country every year. We must preserve it... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Karen Marshall

    Concerns about surrounding ancient site and wild life Loss of view of stones and surrounding landscape and having to pay for any view at all. Being turned from a place of beauty and wonder, a WHS to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Karoline Smith

    My objections to the proposed tunnel are concerned primarily with the Portals and the close proximity to sites of Scientific (Archaeology) and Spiritual (Burial Mounds) significance; And to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Kelly Green

    I dont believe that a sufficient number of viable alternative options have been considered in addition to the proposed scheme for the expressway. I think that more time should be spent as there are... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Lesley Kahney

    * Roadworkers have already been accused of damaging part of the Stonehenge site as part of the preparation for the tunnel. * UNESCO said a gunnel would have an adverse impact on the WHS. * Rare,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Linda Mallett

    I feel very strongly that the landscape around Stonehenge sheds light on the monument's context and is part of the whole heritage of the world famous earthworks itself. To build the proposed dual... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Llinos Belcher

    I'm concerned about the effect on the monument and of the wildlife conservation n and around the area. Also I am concerned that the people will not be able to see their monument from the road and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Lorraine D'Cunha

    To tunnel under Stonehenge is a ridiculous idea. The place is steeped in history and you are running the risk of destroying it. Plus the laylines run there.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Madeleine Bamfield-Dillon

    This scheme will cause irreparable damage to a World Heritage Site. Stonehenge is not just a NATIONAL TREASURE BUT AN INTERNATIONAL TREASURE, and as such should be protected by any means. UNESCO... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Maggie Tallerman

    I am convinced that the proposed road scheme will cause irreparable damage to our leading UK World Heritage site; UNESCO are the experts here and they do not support the scheme, and therefore must be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Marchia Pratt

    Irreparable damage to the site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Marion Smylie

    I am against the proposals due to the irreparable damage it will cause to the site and to wildlife.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Mark Charlwood

    I object strongly to the proposed development of the infrastructure surrounding the UNESCO Worl Heritage Site at Stonehenge. This is a dreadful and poorly conceived plan, that will cause huge damage... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Mary Black

    I am objecting to the proposals for the A303 Expressway and the impact that it will have on the Stonehenge World Heritage site. New areas of interest within the site are continuing to emerge, such as... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Mary Milne

    Stonehenge has stood for 1000s of years and is visited by many local people and tourists from all over the world every year and is a World Heritage Site. The construction planned would result in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Mary Whiting

    This scheme sounds appallingly insensitive. It is especially shocking since this site is probably the most famous WHS in the world, described by UNESCO as a 'landscape without parallel'. Indeed,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Mavis Linstrum

    The damage to an important World Heritage Site, in addition to being avoidable, would be irrevocable. It is our duty to preserve and conserve important historical, architectural and archeological... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Maxine Alexander

    This site is of huge historical and spiritual significance to thousands of people both locally and internationally building this road would have unbelievable consequences for those that regularly... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Melvyn Brown

    I holiday in the south west of England and would lose sight of Stonehenge by the routing suggested. I object most strongly to this. It is the way to start a holiday. Yes the traffic needs attention... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Michael Farman

    The A303 Expressway is likely to do untold damage to ancient sites and artefacts that are believed to lie in abundance around the Stonehenge area. This is an unacceptable sacrifice of historic remains... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Michael Mudd

    I object to the lack of true consultation regarding the broader landscape aesthetics of this WHO site. There is also a broader issue regarding the wider archaeology of this pre historically important... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Mike Silver

    I object to the express way as I believe it will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting. I'm also concerned about damage to the Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Morgan de Clarmont

    I object vehemently to the proposal for the A303 at Stonehenge. It has already been stated that the works necessary for completion and the proposed traffic load will cause irreparable damage to this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Mr DH Palmer

    i feel this application risks irrepairable damage to Stonehenge and its environs. The surrounding area is vital in providing a context for understanding and appreciating the monument itself. That... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Mr Jan Erlstedt

    Simply to the the layman the whole stonehenge landscape we are proposing should now be classified as a national park for future generations to experience.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Mr.A.Prince

    Stonehenge is a World Heritage site,so it should be left alone,but the damage the road will cause to wildlife and air quality is important,as wildlife numbers are decreasing.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Mrs Kelly Day-Adams

    I feel that not only is this a complete and utter waste of money, but it will obstruct the view of Stonehenge from the road, which is such a shame as Stonehenge is a historic landmark that should be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Mrs P A Mouland

    I object to the building of a tunnel near Stonehenge,because it is a timeless national and world heritage site which should not be subject to the whims of the present government policy. The proposal... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Ms Maryam Halcrow

    I am [redacted]. The current plans to closed all the byways and put in a tunnel will mean I can no longer access Stonehenge at all. I am unable to use the English heritage "accessible" buses, they are... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Myrna Hayter

    I wish to add my name to the representations regarding alterations to the area around Stonehenge. The stones are not the only historic artefacts at risk. The surrounding landscape still has much to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Neil Irving

    This site was built by OUR ancestors and should be respected, once the road has been built there will be no turning back. Please reconsider and give this site the respect and tranquility away from... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Nick Groom

    I am a university professor (Exeter), a widely published author (including books on the English seasons and the history of the Union Jack), Hon. President of the Campaign for the Protection of Rural... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Nick Thomas

    I'm frankly aghast that this proposal is even being considered. UNESCO has declared the area a "landscape without parallel". The proposed expressway endangers the habitat of rare species like the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Nicola Merton-Richards

    Stonehenge is a sacred site. The proposed works will affect the energy of the land in a very negative way and any underground tunnelling or development should not be permitted.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Nikki Ward

    My concerns include: that the scheme has not taken into consideration other viable options which would protect the rare bird species including the Stone Curlew. Increased pollution from faster... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Pamela Wilson

    The grounds for my objection are simply that the whole of the Stonehenge environs and their milieu form an ancient 'funerary landscape' which is not limited merely to the Stones themselves but... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Patricia Whiteside

    Stonehenge has stood for 12,500 years. The internal combustion engine, which is less than 150 years old, relies on fossil fuel which is finite and will probably be exhausted before the motor car... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Paul D. Burley

    The A303 Stonehenge project as proposed by Highways England will result in significant and irreversible damage to the Stonehenge cultural landscape including a vast portion of the UNESCO World... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Paul Langham

    The proposed development does not represent value for money for the public purse, the local topography could easily hide the road from Stonehenge without the need to tunnel and expend vast amounts of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Paul Williams

    This is a world-renowned Heritage site which will likely suffer irrepairable damage by the development. This is also a concern of the UNESCO advisers. It will also mean an increase in noise levels... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Paula Hamilton

    The proposed route of the A303 is too close to the Stonehenge World Heritage Site and will cause irreparable damage to the site. UNESCO have advised that the A303 should not go ahead as currently... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Peter Bowyer

    I drive the A303 past Stonehenge every time I visit my parents, so I have a vested interest in improving the traffic. However, I object to the scheme because: 1. I believe it will cause... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Peter Yorke

    Anything threatening to obstruct, dwarf or polloute this WHR is wholly unacceptable. Alternatives must be considered - if not for the WHR then for the rare species like Great Bustard in the vacinity.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019

  • Philomena Hearn

    Irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site. UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form and we all have serious concerns about damage to Blick Mead... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2019