Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
This is an ill-conceived scheme that will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s...
Read more
-
The Stonehenge World Heritage Site is a unique and priceless landscape, so important to us for so many different reasons. The damage to the site caused by the building of the expressway could be...
Read more
-
This plan would cause enormous damage to this invaluable World Heritage Site.
In fact UNESCO is advising that the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
It would also make the Stones...
Read more
-
This development is within a site and setting that is unique, described by UNESCO as 'a landscape without parallel.'. 'There are not two Stonehenge.' It is just simply not known what lies in the...
Read more
-
stop the tunnel you are desecrating an ancient sacred site
-
I remember when one could wander at will among the stones at Stonehenge and realise that it was a privilege to do so. I know that time cannot return, but the site, in protecting it, has been...
Read more
-
There has been a great need to build a modern and effective road past Stonehenge for a very long time. The A303 is a vital trunk road and is so often bottle-necked near to Stonehenge.
I am strongly...
Read more
-
I am greatly concerned that the current A303 road proposals will have a damaging effect on the Stonehenge ancient monument because:
UNESCO’s international advisers have said that the scheme should...
Read more
-
Much of the World Heritage Site's beauty and value is in landscape as a whole so the current proposals would do irreparable damage.
The plan does not mitigate the risk of disruption to rare...
Read more
-
Words fail me that you can contemplate any further works near Stonehenge
-
This is a reckless development in an area of such national and international significance for understanding our past.
-
The main point I wish to make is that I know the tunnel has to be built but it has to be long enough to eleminate traffic noise from the monument and that no part of the road, cuttings and associated...
Read more
-
This is a very sensitive site; unless it is handled very sensitively a lot of our past will be destroyed.
A team of archeologists should oversee all work, and have the power to stop any further work....
Read more
-
I want the A303 alterations to fully protect Stonehenge and all the surrounding area for future generations.
-
The proposed development should be refused consent because the scheme will inevitably damage the integrity of a World Heritage Site, destroy important archaeology not only at Stonehenge but the...
Read more
-
The proposal will do untold damage to a National Treasure and World Heritage Site. While other neolithic stone circles exist in these Islands, Stonehenge is unique and must not be damaged.
-
I am the Flood Warden for Shrewton and look after the community as regards the River Till and Ground water levels and as such am concerned about how the said road improvements will effect our...
Read more
-
This is an internationally important archaeological site, nothing like it anywhere else in the world. It's a huge part of our culture and we should be doing everything in our power to preserve it and...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a world known historic icon. It must be preserved and its integrity maintained. The 21st Century must be kept as far away as possible from its doorstep.
I am conscious of my heritage...
Read more
-
This is a rare , ancient historic site and should not have any type of invasive work done near it . This will threaten the stability of a world heritage site and shows contempt of our heritage. The...
Read more
-
The proposals will destroy irreplaceable archaeology, severely damage a World Heritage Site (indeed the proposal has been condemned by UNESCO), and does not suggest any alternatives that lie outside...
Read more
-
This is an internationally recognised area of major historical and archealogical significance. It enhances national prestige and brings increasing tourism revenues. The proposals treat this area as if...
Read more
-
As a historian and heritage academic I am concerned about potentially inappropriate
issues being raised in this context of national heritage and history.
-
Any proposed scheme should avoid damage to the whole World Heritage Site, so precious and unique. The current proposed road scheme damages significant areas of the Site.
-
The Stonehenge area contains one of the most complete ancient landscapes in Britain. To fully comprehend any part it requires an understanding of the whole. The preservation of the integrity of the...
Read more
-
• There is no coming back from this proposal once it goes ahead. The damage to this, arguably a beating heart of this land and its attendant culture(s) over many thousands of years, cannot be undone....
Read more
-
i strongly object to this major disruptive and potentially destroying road works through one of the most iconic 'sacred' and prehistoric sites of england and indeed the whole world.
Seeing the stones...
Read more
-
Rabid road building, continuing to raise capacity for even more cars, is highly inappropriate in this moment of global warming - made yet worse by constructing through an area of outstanding value...
Read more
-
I object to the desecration of this most sacred site.
UNESCO have described the site as a 'landscape without parallel' and their international advisers have said that the scheme should not go ahead...
Read more
-
I believe that the proposed road scheme will do incalculable damage to Stonehenge & the sacred landscape surrounding it.
-
I have objections to tbe proposed scheme for the following reasons:
1. Stonehenge is a UNESCO registered World Heritage site and this road scheme compromises the integrity of the area in many ways,...
Read more
-
The site is ancient, unique and precious. I’d like to see it honoured for its age and magnificence, allowed to stand unadulterated in ancient mystery and timelessness.
The current plans to...
Read more
-
To retain its historical authenticity, no further damage must be done to the site of Stonehenge.
It is a World Heritage Site, and far more important in the long term than the convenience of having a...
Read more
-
1. Irreparable damage to a World Heritage site.
2. Alternative options not fully explored.
3. Harm to wildlife and flora.
4. Damage to a sacred site.
5. Expert opinion ignored.
6.Public opinion...
Read more
-
This WHS, its archaeology and its setting will be seriously damaged by the proposals. Unesco have said that the scheme should not go ahead in this "landscape without parallel".
The current view from...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned by these proposals. I believe that they will cause irreparable damage to this World Heritage Site, both archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without...
Read more
-
My concerns are that the road construction will cause massive and irreversible damage to the structure, integrity and environment of our world heritage site.
-
These plans are likely to:
* cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site and its archaeology and setting, which has been described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s...
Read more
-
When I was a child I was taken to Stonehenge and we walked freely among the stones. Since then I have been disappointed to find it all fenced off and we had to pay to cross the road and visit the...
Read more
-
My representation will:
- Challenge design aspects of the A303 Stonehenge road scheme around the village of Winterbourne Stoke
- Offer alternative, solutions to flaws in the current design
-...
Read more
-
I have been using the A303 for 40 years and the ability to see Stonehenge as I drive past is of great importance to me.
I understand that UNESCO are opposing this plan and I believe other options...
Read more
-
This is a massively destructive road scheme which will have a detrimental effect on this World Heritage Site
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I feel that this project will damage the unique archaeological landscape
-
1. UNESCO have said that damage would be caused to the archaelogy, a 'landscape without parallel', so should not go ahead.
2. Damage to other mesolithic site.
3. Original consultation flawed as no...
Read more
-
I am concerned at the effect on and possible damage to the World Heritage Site of Stonehenge and to the Blick Mead Mesolithic site. The lack of appropriate and suitable options in the plan is...
Read more
-
Good Day,
I strongly object to the underpass as it will cause damage to the site and surrounding areas.
I realise you are trying to solve the traffic in the area but sending it underground is...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a “one off”. It is special and should have special treatment. We just can’t go on destroying the environment just for money and convenience. It can never be replaced. We are relying...
Read more
-
I don't think the A303 should not be built over with a tun el. The disruption to Stonehenge and surrounding area will impact on the present wildlife and surrounding countryside unnecessarily so. We...
Read more
-
Please resconsider the plans for the A303.
Stonehenge is a national treasure which MUST be protected. Having wonderful areas of interest such as this world heritage site should be protected at...
Read more