Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Making more effective use of the existing northern runway will, I believe, contribute many of the economic advantages offered by flight capacity expansion while at the same time minimising the damage...
Read more
-
This Gatwick Airport plan fails to address the negative impact a second runway will have on my community and the countryside. The existing level of aircraft noise already disturbs my sleep and...
Read more
-
Fully back the proposal it will bring much needed investment to the area
-
At a time of climate crisis we need to be reducing air traffic not increasing it. It effects carbon emissions terribly, air pollution, local traffic adds to carbon emissions and air pollution. The...
Read more
-
I object to the creation of a second runway. I live under the flight path which has been altered in the past several years so that planes now fly close to and sometimes over my property. The flight...
Read more
-
Introduction This submission has been drawn from that prepared by the Gatwick Area Conservation Campaign (GACC). I strongly oppose this Gatwick Airport Ltd (Gatwick) DCO application. GACC was actively...
Read more
-
I think sharing flights between lhr and Gatwick will reduce the noise of flights over Wokingham plus Gatwick is a much easier airport to get to than Heathrow.
-
Bexhill-on-Sea used to be quiet with little disturbance from passing aircraft; at times these can now be relentless and intrusive even though our noisy neighbour (Gatwick Airport) is fifty miles away....
Read more
-
Expanding Gatwick airport will be good for the area and split the load from Heathrow
-
Second runway will provide lots of scoring opportunities and also job opportunities and will help the local area become stronger
-
Working all over Gatwick in the construction industry. I now 100% realise how import the airport is to the area . Especially my home town of Crawley. I welcome any growth to protect employment to my...
Read more
-
I am in favour of changing the use of the northern runway for take offs etc. any complaints about noise are not valid as by the time the runway is operational aircraft will be quieter than they are...
Read more
-
Concerned by excessive and intrusive noise as this is already too much fro, aircraft flying overhead our home.
-
It's a complete joke to be expanding an airport during a climate emergency. It's not even a debate. The airport should be reduced in scale commensurate with the scale of the emergency as proven by...
Read more
-
Great idea. Low cost. Enhances services and jobs.
-
I strongly object to the increased pollution, noise and other detrimental effects such as more road traffic to the airport. It is likely that extra infastructure will be required to support this...
Read more
-
The additional passenger traffic would put unacceptable pressure on the surrounding area in terms traffic congestion, the lack of affordable housing for the additional workers required would also be...
Read more
-
Gatwiçk nèeds to expand and grow and with ulez is the only airport NOT in the zone as such cheaper to get to
-
It will bring much needed employment in this area and also reduce waiting times for take off/landing slots. This is not a new runway but utilizing the existing emergency runway..which is a good thing
-
I am concerned about additional noise from increased air traffic and impact to local infrastructure. Furthermore, Gatwick is one of the dirtiest airports in the world. When they can look after the...
Read more
-
I am totally in agreement for the conversion of the taxiway/emergency runway at Gatwick into a full-time runway. I assume that the conversion would be to a standard which would permit full parallel...
Read more
-
I support the use of the runway to accommodate existing air traffic and reduce delays but I am also aware that this could lead to expansion of the airport by stealth without the additional...
Read more
-
Fully support the initiative based on economic development in the area and an alternative to Heathrow where we are still forced to go on many occasions
-
Expansion of Gatwick would significantly increase aircraft noise both for those living near the airport and for those further away under flight paths. The noise envelope Gatwick has proposed is not...
Read more
-
During a climate emergency it is not in the interests of human health to open a new runway at Gatwick, both because of carbon emissions and air pollution.
-
The introduction of a second runway at Gatwick will be horrendous for those of us who are close to the flightpath. There are already too many flights and in an age when we are all supposed to be...
Read more
-
Gatwick Airport plays such a large role in the local economy. When Gatwick Airport is thriving the small local business around it thrive too. As the owner of Dynamic Beauty on Gatwick Road, I saw...
Read more
-
Ed Winter GATWICK AIRPORT “Relevant representation” INTRODUCTION I have lived in Betchworth, which is a rural village situated 7 miles north of Gatwick airport, for 36 years. I am a retired airline...
Read more
-
As someone who has worked at Gatwick for over 7 years this would be great to help ease currently on the main runway during peak times. Development of Gatwick as a whole, is wildly needed. I am fully...
Read more
-
Operating two runways concurrently at Gatwick would increase aircraft movements significantly. Therefore the associated noise and air pollution impacts to people living underneath existing flight...
Read more
-
With the world in a climate emergency it makes no sense to expand airports. Airplanes are some of the worst polluting forms of transport. Instead, it makes more sense to heavily tax air travel in...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway and as such does not comply with policy, Government’s Aviation Strategy (Gatwick does not have 2 runways...
Read more
-
For it to not happen. Gatwick is already busy and noisy
-
We must meet our legal obligation to achieve the net zero target by 2050. The sooner we reduce our carbon emissions the easier and cheaper this will become. Increasing air traffic is completely...
Read more
-
This should not be allowed. We already deal with the businesses of Gatwick, let alone a 2nd runway. This will affect our property values; mean we'll probably subjected to 24 hrs of noise or certainly...
Read more
-
The additional environmental impact from a second runway is wrong, when we are already seeing harmful effects from climate change. Also, as a resident of Crawley, there will be increased noise...
Read more
-
As Enter Air LTD, an airline carrier, we are interested in the development of LGW airport, increasing its capacity, and enhancing the flexibility of slot availability for ground handling agents. We...
Read more
-
Expansion and / or increasing the capacity for the number of flights at Gatwick is the wrong decision. It is wrong at a local level, nationally and globally.
-
Expansion of Gatwick would significantly increase aircraft noise both for those living near the airport and for those further away under flight paths. The noise envelope Gatwick has proposed is not...
Read more
-
I see nothing but benefits in opening the existing runway for scheduled flights. Will bring more jobs, more tourism and more money for our local economy
-
Increased volume of air traffic across a designated area of outstanding natural beauty which so many enjoy
-
Flying is not good for our atmosphere It contributes to global warming and climate change; the use of fossil fuels should be reduced. Airplane noise is already disruptive in the area around Gatwick as...
Read more
-
The boost to the local economy would be wonderful. Because of the east-west alignment of the runways, the nuisance impact on Crawley would be minimal.
-
On behalf of Greening Steyning, I want to express our strong opposition to any expansion of Gatwick Airport capacity. We are an active climate action group with over 1000 members. We are working hard...
Read more
-
Adverse consequences of additional flights; noise, nuisance, environmental impact. Adverse consequences of additional traffic on local quality of life.
-
I fully support this proposed project, Gatwick airport needs to be able to compete internationally and this will allow that, bring more jobs and infrastructure to the area and will positively impact...
Read more
-
I object to any proposal to extend Gatwick airport or build an additional runway. The grounds for my objection are environmental - air pollution, noise, consumption of non renewable resources and...
Read more
-
Horsham Trafalgar Neighbourhood Council (HTNC) is very concerned that the expansion of the Airport will negatively impact the Trafalgar Neighbourhood and HTNCs position is to oppose additional runway...
Read more
-
This expansion is not in line with what humans need to do to fight climate change. Unless zero emissions aircraft technology is discovered and zero noise pollution, this proposal is merely benefiting...
Read more
-
Absolutely no need for this,aircraft held off. Stands for 30 mins plus as no staff available , how is increasing capacity going to improve this. More pollution and noise, May create jobs but not good...
Read more
-
Gatwick needs expansion and the area can only benefit
-
I fully support the proposal by LGW to fully utilise the standby runway in a joint-operation format alongside the existing runway ASAP
-
This is a relatively simple way of adding capacity to London airports. It will reduce planes holding while they wait for runway capacity, and allow airlines to move some flights from night time to day...
Read more
-
I wish to object to the second runway at Gatwick Airport for the following reasons: 1. The airports at Southampton, Luton and Stanstead have excess capacity (i.e. they are operating at less than full...
Read more
-
I support the expansion of Gatwick and the new runway. It is the engine of economic growth in the area.
-
The use of an emergency runway as a second runway flies in the face of government objectives of zero carbon emissions. The use of a second runway will result in a large increase of traffic in the...
Read more
-
I wish to object to the proposal for Gatwick to change use of its second runway from emergency to normal scheduled use. There are already enough planes overflying this area and it will impact not just...
Read more
-
Great idea
-
It’s important to expand Gatwick. Good for the economy good for local people
-
precisamos realmente de mais carbono no ar
-
1. The noise from air traffic landing and taking off from Gatwick is already very invasive in the area around Gatwick, and the development of a second runway would make this unbearably worse. 2. The...
Read more
-
Will benefit the local area/community - will give more jobs -would hopefully allow those in employment there the opportunity to stay and not be made redundant
-
The planning permission for a second runway at Gatwick has only just been turned down in favour of Heathrow. Increased flights would lead to increased noise and increased air pollution. The current...
Read more
-
By opening another runway for use, a positive impact may be less holding times for aircraft waiting to land, therefore reducing the environmental impact of flights
-
I believe this project should go ahead. Though I do not live in immediate proximity to the airport, I fly via Gatwick Airport every month. I understand there are concerns about this project, however,...
Read more
-
1. The proposal is against "levelling up”, does not comply with Airports National Policy Statement, or the findings of the Airports Commission. 2. Gatwick have misrepresented local support and...
Read more
-
What are the changes to the flight paths and how this will effect residential areas
-
I am concerned about the additional pollution that will be generated. The skies above East Sussex are already full of aircraft noise. The use of the Northern runway can only make the situation...
Read more
-
I support this fully, the local community needs jobs
-
The proposal isn’t serving a wider public good and will cause a great deal of social, environmental and economic loss to those living beneath the flight paths. There is no evidence that those who...
Read more
-
I think this should be supported, it is great expansion for our area and the huge economic benefits it will bring to Sussex
-
I want to register my objection to expansion of Gatwick Airport
-
I am very concerned about Gatwick's plans to open the emergency runway for routine use. The airport maintains that doing so will create hundreds if not thousands of jobs in the Crawley/Horley area,...
Read more
-
Expansion of Gatwick would significantly increase aircraft noise both for those living near the airport and for those further away under flight paths. The noise envelope Gatwick has proposed is not...
Read more
-
More traffic in Reigate Object to the charge to drop off /collect Airlines not able to cope with extra capacity as shown by cancelled flights in June 2023
-
We live in the path of flights both landing and taking off from Gatwick and can hear them clearly even inside the house. The plan to add an additional 100,000 per year would be an inordinate increase...
Read more
-
I have lived in Horsham for over 20 years and have lived in North Horsham for nearly 14 years. Since then, the number of planes flying over my house has increased and the disruption from low flying...
Read more
-
I wish to register my objection to the planning of the expansion of Gatwick Airport. As a local resident, my family and I are already negatively impacted by the airport with regards to noise and...
Read more
-
My main concern is the noise impact if flight paths are permitted over Horsham. During a previous trial, the noise level was very intrusive and impacted thousands of people adversely
-
I object to the proposed Gatwick Airport expansion of capacity on the grounds that it will be detrimental to efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and it will increase noise pollution under the...
Read more
-
I believe such expansion with newer generation of planes will be good for the airport and Crawley. A vibrant and modern airport has got to evolve to meet the demands of tomorrow’s technology.
-
I support it.
-
I am against this proposal. The local environment is already impacted by noise, light and air pollution and this will get worse with the northern runway being used.
-
As a small landowner in the neighbouring / surrounding area, I want to know what the impact of the expansion will be. How far will supporting and industrial infrastructure spread from the vicinity of...
Read more
-
Happy for Gatwick to expand promoting job opportunities
-
I oppose. Too noisy, too much traffic and houses already. Infrastructure lacking to support more people living here. E.g. hospitals
-
I am concerned with extra noise from nightflights( directly over my house ). Air pollution increasing in the vicinity. I have (Redacted) Roads in the area are becoming highly congested already Housing...
Read more
-
In principle, I am in support of the project but would like to see credible plans to: 1) encourage and support local jobs 2) encourage and support the local supply chain 3) ensure adequate...
Read more
-
With the right preparation and planning, Gatwick can unlock its runway's full potential and it would boost Gatwick's resilience and flexibility bringing positive change to the airport and surrounding...
Read more
-
I am against this proposed project for reasons of pollution and impact on the local environment.
-
Stop pollution, the noise is appalling, the planes come so low over our houses we can read the names. They start early and go on til late, in summer with windows open they wake us up but this is a...
Read more
-
increase in aircraft noise impact on climate change devaluing your home affecting your wellbeing through increase in aircraft movements lack of surface transport decline in air quality lack of...
Read more
-
its dope
-
I want to be kept up to date with the planning process. I live locally and work at the airport
-
I am concerned that any restrictions on operations as a condition of planning consent will be breached, as has been the case with the existing runway. I am worried that noise and fuel pollution, which...
Read more
-
1. Environmental concerns - climate damaging fuels are used in increasing quantities and the carbon footprint grows 2. Disruption - noise and traffic are inflicted on local people in a very wide...
Read more
-
To go ahead and complete the proposal to operate a second runway at LGW
-
I live 30 mins drive from Gatwick and on certain days am woken between 6am and 630 am by aircraft going to or from Gatwick I find this unacceptable now and any increase in capacity at the airport will...
Read more
-
I think it’s a good idea to use the second runway because Gatwick need a second runway
-
I am in favour of Gatwick being able to increase the number o& flights as this will be good for the local economy