Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I live directly under the flightpath to Gatwick airport. The noise from existing flights is already unbearable. An additional 100000 flights per annum would be miserable.
-
It is beyond a doubt that air pollution is a major factor in lung and breathing illnesses. Adding yet more pollution is simply unacceptable. It is completely contrary to the pledge to give priority to...
Read more
-
I fully support the Northern runway at Gatwick, it will be good for jobs economy and for air travel in general it won't make a massive difference as they are already using the Northern runway
-
It'd a vitally needed infrastructure project that benefits all of South East England. Not only in terms of business & employment opportunities, but travel too. Gatwick is one of the best connected...
Read more
-
Feel that our quality of life is negatively impacted already by Gatwick airport and an additional runway would only compound this. We try to ignore the noise from over head planes but this is...
Read more
-
Already we have to keep our windows closed due to airplanes coming over our house every 3mins we are unable to have a chat in the garden can you move the flight path to the right of Lingfield only...
Read more
-
We think the project should be refused Hever is already impacted by Gatwick air noise and pollution Hever is a historic village in the green belt and an AONB Expanding Gatwick will significantly...
Read more
-
The company are very for this project, it will enhance the local business commuinty greatly and by increasing business , we will be able to offer more employment
-
This is a new runway and as such should go through the proper planning process. Not a DCO. The proposal is for the emergency runway to be rebuilt north of it's current position. The emergency and main...
Read more
-
Its needed, Its called progress.
-
Gatwick’s plans make a mockery of the Government’s consultation process, which concluded Heathrow was the best option for new runway capacity. The facts have not changed.
-
The northern runway was built as an EMERGENCY runway. How can it no longer be necessary to have an emergency runway when there will be TWICE the number of aircraft taking off and landing ?
-
Noise issues Height of Aircraft over AONB Pollution issues
-
This is an application for a new runway as Gatwick does not have two active runways that can be operated concurrently. Therefore it is not correct that it complies with policy. There will be an...
Read more
-
Vastly increased Aircraft Noise (we are on the flightpath) Reduced Safety (loss of standby runway)
-
100% for development
-
I do not think that airport expansion should be allowed in the current circumstances, mainly because flying creates too many carbon emissions, but also because planes are still much too noisy. When...
Read more
-
I think Gatwick’s plans will bring growth to the area and create a number of jobs for people. The success of Gatwick has a clear impact on the local area and this plan only improves that
-
On aircraft noise impacts: I oppose this development based on increased noise at my location, particularly at night. The information presented on the 'Aircraft Noise Viewer' requires reference to Ch14...
Read more
-
We would like to Register our strong objections against the proposed Gatwick airport planning Application to build an additional runway and increase the number of flights - noise -pollution Emissions...
Read more
-
The noise from airplanes flying over our house is continuous, seven days a week, from 4 a.m. to 11 p.m. I'm already at breaking point with this, and anything that adds even one more, large airplane to...
Read more
-
Against this project. Traffic and construction will increase and will devastate the countryside. Noise from more planes and traffic increase through the village will be catastrophic. This should NOT...
Read more
-
Constant Noise disturbance in tranquil rural area- more than we are already experiencing
-
Gatwick proposal will result in: - 1. 70% Increase in Passenger numbers 2. 37% Increase in Aircraft movements over our heads, more noise pollution, more visual pollution 3. CO2 emissions up over 50%;...
Read more
-
I live directly under the flight path. The increase in flights, every single one of which will go over my house if they are landing in the normal direction, will be intolerable noise nuisance. The...
Read more
-
I am very much opposed to bringing the second runway into regular use. The year before covid the noise over our house and regularity of the noise was unacceptable. Especially from about 10pm and until...
Read more
-
This proposal, effectively a new (second) runway, will lead to a huge increase in aircraft noise which is already at unbearable levels in areas such as ours (Redacted). This is completely...
Read more
-
As a local company we support the second runway.
-
1. I strongly disagree with Gatwick having a second runway and object to the consequential increase in size and activity at the airport. 2. People living under Gatwick’s flight path - which includes...
Read more
-
I live directly on the flight path in Lingfield meaning my garden is very noisy with the amount of flights coming in and out of Gatwick. Recently the flights seem a lot lower meaning they are...
Read more
-
Noise from planes taking off and landing, will not be able to open windows or sit in our garden during summer with extra planes flying over.
-
Excessive noise, pollution to farm land, adverse effect on the environment
-
70% Increase in Passenger numbers 2. 37% Increase in Aircraft movements over our heads, more noise pollution, more visual pollution 3. CO2 emissions up over 50%; Gatwick to generate 5.5% of all UK CO2...
Read more
-
The current noise level from arriving and departing aircraft is already intrusive to say the least. Any expansion will only make daily living with aircraft noise untenable. I object to a further...
Read more
-
Gatwick proposal will result in: - 1. 70% Increase in Passenger numbers 2. 37% Increase in Aircraft movements over our heads, more noise pollution, more visual pollution 3. CO2 emissions up over 50%;...
Read more
-
Disruption during proposed changes to the A23/M23 roads Needs to be more provision for passengers walking from guest houses/hotels in Horley/surrounding the airport. Much more EV charging required in...
Read more
-
Aircraft noise significantly impacts my quality of life. Additional aircraft movements will only serve to increase that impact and thus reduce my quality of life even further. My back garden is a no...
Read more
-
I live under the flight path of Gatwick ,the amount of planes now is to many .The noise and extra pollution of a third runway would be unacceptable . During the summer months when doors and windows...
Read more
-
At times of day there is already a constant flow of airplanes - I have counted one second between the sound of one airplane fading and the next one starting. It makes it difficult to sleep and as...
Read more
-
Very clear so far. Dear sir/madam, I object to the extra runway on noise grounds, and common sense grounds 1. The economic case is weaker for Gatwick than a third runway at Heathrow. 2 We are supposed...
Read more
-
I am objecting to the expansion of Gatwick Airport. I am a local resident in Lingfield and the aircraft noise that we suffer from in the village is already un acceptable. Its impossible in the summer...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed project on the following basis: - it will result in a massive increase in the number of planes that will fly over the local area causing more noise pollution (when it is...
Read more
-
The planned additional runway and flights will inevitably cause environmental damage including noise, pollution and damage to the flora and fauna living around the airport. The current infrastructure,...
Read more
-
The concept of a second runway for Gatwick is entirely at odds with what the world needs now. We should be thinking about limiting and reducing our carbon footprint.
-
I strongly object to Gatwick Airports plan to bring it's emergency runway in to full time use for the following reasons. I do not believe that the project meets the definition of use of existing...
Read more
-
Traffic increases will be enormous and consequently far more land will be requisitioned for car parking,eliminating villages such as Charlwood.Needless to say noise and pollution will be increased...
Read more
-
I have lived here in this beautiful area with my family for 23yrs. The aircraft noise has always been invasive but because we love everything else about this area we have tolerated it. Please do not...
Read more
-
The main issues and concerns about this proposed project is that there will be a huge impact on the number of aircraft flying over us causing even more noise pollution which is already at an extreme...
Read more
-
I want to ensure that the Planning Inspectorate understand the current noise blight caused by aircraft approaching Gatwick over the delightful village of Penshurst even though we are at least 20 miles...
Read more
-
This response is submitted on behalf of Brightling Parish Council, a democratically elected organisation representing the residents of the civil parish of Brightling. Brightling Parish Council (BPC)...
Read more