Filter
Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 201 to 250 of 309 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Susan Griffin

    Unnecessary upheaval and impact on all nearby residents and wildlife. Increase in heavy traffic. Huge financial cost Carbon cost to the environment and loss of green belt. Questions about length of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Susan Roberts

    • I object very strongly to the plan to move the CWWTP to Honey Hill. Fundamentally, I see no convincing reason for the move. The current works on Cowley Road are fully functioning, have capacity and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Susan Valerie Buttery

    I am registering my concerns about the relocation of the sewage treatment plant from Milton to the Honey Hill site.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Teresa Ross

    I’m concerned about the wildlife, with all the building works in our area we are losing all our green spaces, The smell is another thing, sometimes we can smell the sewer from Milton, I really don’t... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Design&Conservation (Design&Conservation) on behalf of the Yandell family. (the Yandell family.)

    We are opposed to the relocation in principle but on the basis that it may obtain consent we object to the plant's unnecessary size , the ill-considered intrusiveness of the design, its... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Alan Duffy

    At over £200 million pounds, this is a disgraceful waste of taxpayers money on a project that does not need to happen. The existing waste water plant has been upgraded and will be suitable for many... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Deborah Balm

    The present sewerage works is more than adequate for the next 20 years. As residents we even paid a supplement after the list time the sewerage works was proposed to move to Honey Hill to improve the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Dina Archer

    Under no circumstances should this project be relocated to Honey Hill. The destruction of wildlife can never be replaced. For what? To make way for housing. If it does have to be moved surely, the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Dr Donald Fleet

    Since we have been told there is no technical need to re-build the swage works, I object to its relocation onto productive green-belt land over a chalk aquifer.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • EarthQuakers (EarthQuakers)

    Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation CWWTPR 17th July2023 Save Honey Hill EarthQuakers strongly object to the relocation 1.5 km east of current Cowley/Milton Road location, with tunnel... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Elizabeth Cotton

    Project: Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Applicant: Anglian Water Services Limited Relevant Representation of Ms Elizabeth Cotton of [REDACTED] Dear Sir/Madam, My representation is in three... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Elizabeth Harrison

    The Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation: I strongly object to the proposed relocation of the sewage works to the Honey Hill green belt area. Our green belt is an invaluable asset that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Emily Williams

    I object to the Anglian Water (AW) application for a Development Consent Order to relocate the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant to the area between Horningsea, Fen Ditton and Stow Cum Quy, known... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Emma Hodson

    My main concerns relate to: 1) the destruction of green belt land and severe negative impact on sites of special scientific interest at Qui Fen and Wicken Fen, along with the ancient footpaths that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Fiona Orme

    1. The carbon cost of building a new sewage works at Honey Hill and decommissioning the old is far too high and goes against government guidelines. I strongly object to relocation of sewage works... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Francesca Elizabeth Giove

    I am objecting to the proposed relocation of Cambridge’s Water Treatment Plant for the reasons stated below: I have concerns regarding the impact on the naturally occurring wildlife, including the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Frederick William Hyde

    Dear Sirs I am writing to object to the proposed relocation of the Milton WWTP. I have family connections to the area. My father was raised in Barton, Cambridgeshire and my aunt lives at [Redacted]. I... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Bidwells (Bidwells) on behalf of Gonville & Caius (Gonville & Caius)

    Rep 1 – Scheme design Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge (‘The College’) is concerned by the design of the scheme and lack of detailed rationale for elements of its design. We believe the proposed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Grant Otto

    There is no operational reason to build a new treatment works. Anglia water should instead focus on their regulatory, social and environmental responsibilities to halt all outflows and minimize... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Hazel Smith

    I am pleased to see the proposal before you for relocation of the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant. Anglian Water have consulted widely in our parish and went through a rigorous site selection... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Hon Hill

    Key Points covering: * ‘Carbon calculations’ analysis * Environmental Aspects * Economic Aspects * Social Aspects * No need for this WTTP move: the ‘do nothing’ much better alternative

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Horningsea Parish Council (Horningsea Parish Council)

    Horningsea Parish Council (HPC) Registration as an Interested Party and initial Comments on the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation HPC would like to register as an Interested Party and... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Ian Gilder

    I am a long-standing resident of Clayhithe, Horningsea [Redacted]. From 1998 until July 2022, I was Head of Planning at ERM, a leading planning and environmental consultancy. I have had extensive... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Jen Nì Dèasunaìgh

    The relocation plan for arable land is unacceptable, they should not be allowed to build on green belt land. Especially with the rising population how do we feed ourselves? Without importing food that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Joanne Timerick

    I object to the proposal to rebuild on Honey Hill

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • John Andrew McMunn

    The relocation of Anglian Water's sewage works to Honey Hill would be a travesty. It would be a major building project on green belt land in contradiction of national and local planning policy. It... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • John Rymell

    I am opposed to moving the sewage treatment works to a new site at Honey Hill. This will mean building on the Green belt, which is contrary to national and local planning policy. Since its creation... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Jonathan Ben Quash

    This proposal does not meet the essential criterion of being *necessary*. The existing sewage works are fit for purpose and could be operative for several decades to come. This plan proposes to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Jonathan Buchanan

    1 – traffic: the number of HGVs especially and construction traffic between Horningsea and Fen Ditton and the A14 road bridge. Mr Buchanan is reliant on a bicycle for transport and feels it will be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Julian Wolstan Francis (Julian Wolstan Francis) on behalf of Julian Wolstan Francis (Julian Wolstan Francis)

    Carter Jonas on behalf of the principal landowner of the site continue to be in negotiations with Anglian Water. These representations are submitted on behalf of Mr Julian Francis and are in addition... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Katherine Restif

    As a resident of Horningsea, I object to Anglian Water’s DCO application to relocate the sewage works to Honey Hill on the following grounds: • Substantial investment has already been made to upgrade... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Laura Mary Taylor

    There is no need to move the current water treatment plant. It will be a costly exercise for little to no gain. I will be personally hugely inconvenienced by the increase in traffic to Horningsea Road... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Madelaine Clark

    Anglia Water have no clear need to move or upgrade the sewage works. This is a project purely driven by a desire to develop and profit from the land it currently sits on. Building on green belt land... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Major Thomas Michael Daniel

    I wish to protest very strongly against the proposed removal of the sewage works from its present site to Honey Hill, Fen Ditton. As a Fellow of the Chartered Institute in Environmental Health I have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Marc Ridyard

    I object to the Anglian Water (AW) application for a Development Consent Order to relocate the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant to the area between Horningsea, Fen Ditton and Stow Cum Quy, known... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Marie Saumarez

    Loss of agricultural land Impact of increased traffic Water table and aquifers

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Matthew Alan Stancombe

    I am extremely concerned about a possible threat to a Principle Chalk Aquifer which according to DEFRA is at high risk of groundwater contamination. Honey Hill should have been discounted as an option... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Meyland Family (Meyland Family) on behalf of Meyland Family (Meyland Family)

    We live in Fen Ditton which will be directly affected by the Sewage Project. This is on green belt, some of which is used for arable farming and some privately owned meadows which have been cultivated... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP (Addleshaw Goddard LLP) on behalf of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail Infrastructure Limited)

    APPLICATION BY ANGLIAN WATER SERVICES LIMITED FOR THE CAMBRIDGE WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT RELOCATION PROJECT ORDER 202[X] PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE: WW010003 SECTION 56 PLANNING ACT 2008:... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Nick Moir

    I write as the incumbent (rector/vicar) of Fen Ditton, Horningsea and Teversham, as a resident of the new Marleigh development, a parish councillor in Fen Ditton, and as a long-time resident in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • P. X. Farms Ltd (P. X. Farms Ltd)

    P.X.Farms objects to the proposed location of the new waste water treatment plant. The works associated with the construction and ongoing operation of the site will impact PXF’s farming activity which... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Philip John Goodwin

    Dear Planning Inspectorate, Project: Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Applicant: Anglian Water Services Limited Relevant Representation of Ms Elizabeth Cotton [Redacted] [Redacted]. The Property... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Richard Consoli

    Impact on the Conservation areas of Fen Ditton and Horningsea. Building on Green Belt is contrary to national and local planning policy. It is there to protect the setting of our historic city and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Rowena Small

    The water treatment works were up-graded and 'future-proofed' relatively recently, so there is no pressing need to move them. This scheme is a waste of public money and will severely damage the green... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Sarah Ann Smart

    Objection to use of green belt

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Sharon Byrne

    I strongly objec to this proposal for a number of important reasons. It is proposed to build on green belt and this is contrary to both national and loca planning policy. There is also a high risk of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Stow-cum-Quy Parish Council (Stow-cum-Quy Parish Council)

    I am providing comments on behalf of the Parish Council of Stow-cum Quy. First and foremost, we do not believe the current planning application sufficiently justifies relocating the water treatment... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Suffolk County Council (Suffolk County Council)

    Thank you for notifying Suffolk County Council that the above application has been accepted by the Planning Inspectorate for examination. I am responding on behalf of Suffolk County Council to your... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • The Woodland Trust (The Woodland Trust)

    Thank you for the opportunity to register as an interested party on the following project. We hold concerns regarding two veteran trees which are likely to be affected by the proposed Waterbeach... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Thomas Ward

    I used to live in fenditton and I work in the area. It is a beautiful wild area and the loss of biodiversity and wildlife would be a very sad and long lasting disaster for the local area. The building... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023