Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I am deeply concerned about the impact of the expansion of the A303 on Stonehenge, it being such an incredible historic monument. It brings people to Britain so is good for the economy, but it is so...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned about the evironmental and aesthetic impact of this development. The importance of getting this right is immeasurable. Stonehenge is just the most important historical sight in...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the proposals as a resident of Wiltshire but also as someone who appreciates archaeology. The main issues for me are:
- the number of experts who have objections to the...
Read more
-
Having until recently lived in the Amesbury area for 4 years, I passed Stonehenge and its related Neolithic remains in the World Heritage Site on many occasions, a superbly uplifting experience, and...
Read more
-
This will be so wrong if it is allowed as it will destroy a place of beautie and of historical interest
I am against the plan to put a bypass through the Stonehenge site as it would create more...
Read more
-
I object to the form and concept of the Stonehenge Tunnel. That is on the basis of extensive experience in infrastructure and as a qualified archaeologist.
The locale and setting of the monument...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the 303 Stonehenge expressway because it will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
In fact,...
Read more
-
These road works will damage a unique site of historical interest and future generations will not forgive us it must be stopped.
-
Stonehenge is both archaeological and spiritual importance.
The site is both deeper and wider than previously thought, and excavations to alter access will destroy parts recently dicovered, and have...
Read more
-
Stonehenge lies in a complex and unique archaeological landscape, recognised as being of world-class importance. It shoould be fully protected, as a matter of highest priority. The A303 Stonehenge...
Read more
-
I am against this proposal, it would cause terrible impacts to the heritage sites in the area, and untold damage to the local environment and wildlife.
-
I feel that the scheme should not go ahead in its current form as I believe the entrances to the tunnels should not be within the World Heritage Site boundaries and that the current plan goes against...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an immensely important archeological site, acknowledged as being the most important in Europe. In my opinion to even consider a shortcut for traffic to be a viable reason for risking...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the following areas in particular:
Significant dame to the UNESCO WHS caused by the proposal, despite UNESCO's advice not to proceed
The damage that will be caused to Blick...
Read more
-
I don’t believe this is a necessary risk of what is unnown historical relevance. That land is a time capsule to the past and it will be destroyed!
-
As a member of the public I consider that the proposed road will cause untold damage to: the heritage assets represented by the stones and the Blick Mead mesolithic site;
the unique landscape in...
Read more
-
The Stoneheenge site is an iconic landscape known and appreciated accross the world. Hence its World Heritage status. Unesco describs it as a 'Landscape without parallel.'
Future generations will see...
Read more
-
1. Damage to the World Heritage Site
2. In the consultation, no alternative given which would not do such damage
3. Conflict between such road proposals and the government's stated policy of acting...
Read more
-
I am concerned that irreparable damage will be caused to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’, particularly given that UNESCO’s international...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an almost unparalleled site of archaeological importance, recognised by historians and UNESCO. Preserving it for future generations is far more important than a risky and misconceived...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the proposed scheme which would do damage to our past and to a world heritage site of great significance to this country. Construction will destroy archeology and cause...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about what is proposed for the area around Stonehenge and would like to be kept informed.
-
UNESCO’s international advisers believe the scheme will be detrimental to what is a world heritage site. Large amounts of archaeology will be destroyed by the scheme.
-
The wanton destruction of archeology yet to be discovered, both inside the WHS andbearing in mind that although the WHS is defined nobody knows the full extent of the archeology, outside the area...
Read more
-
this scheme has already damaged an ancient platform. No more industrial digging on this delicate artifact filled landscape.
-
I am against any road worked in and around Stone henge without proper consultation with the English Heritage.
-
This plan is wanton vandalism on a monumental scale, build the road as far away as
possible, at least 2 miles from the site.
John Hendry
Whilst not by any means the oldest of our stone...
Read more
-
Do not go further and destroy this UN registered site of great archaeological importance.
Should you continue with the economic "underground bypass" the site. ever expanding, will be ruined.
Please...
Read more
-
I believe that we ought to consider very carefully before contemplating damaging precious sites whihc cannot easily be replaced or 'mended'.
-
The construction of a dual carriageway at the western end of the tunnel will cause irreparable damage to much archaeology and ruin the integrity of this unique landscape.
Visitors to the western end...
Read more
-
I am conderned about irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting. It is a ‘landscape without parallel’ according to UNESCO and its international advisers say the scheme should...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme would wreak incalculable damage on a highly valuable site, understood as such around the world but seemingly not in our own country. It would represent a catastrophically...
Read more
-
1. I agree with UNESCO’s international advisers who say this scheme for a WHS should not go ahead in its present form as it will cause irreparable damage
2. I have significant concerns about damage...
Read more
-
I STILL FEEL VERY STRONGLY THAT AN ADDITIONAL TWO LANES PARALLEL TO THE A 303 IS THE BEST OPTION AND LESS DAMAGING TO AREA AROUND STONEHENGE,AS HAS
ALREADY BEEN PROVED BY THE DAMAGE FROM TRIAL HOLES...
Read more
-
No further damage should be done to the archaeological landscape of Stonehenge.
Future generations would be appalled at those who decided that road widening should be at the expense of England’s...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a site of international importance and the land around it contains much that is still to be investigated by archaeologists. The fabric and character of the visible and invisible...
Read more
-
I'm concerned that these plans should not go ahead due to the possible damage to an archeological site, because of noise pollution, changes to the current view from the road and disturbance to bird...
Read more
-
I object to this plan due to the following reasons:
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’;
UNESCO’s international advisers...
Read more
-
I think the stones should always be visible from the road. They are our heritage and not to be owned by anyone but the public. I also don't want the birds to suffer from
This extremely disruptive...
Read more
-
The whole Stonehenge landscape has an outstanding universal value that is of immense significance for all people for all time, and this transcends any consideration of sorting out a 21st century...
Read more
-
This is known to be a landscape without parallel.
There is great risk of damage to this world heritage site, its setting and its archaeology.
There is a distinct lack of alternative options in the...
Read more
-
Having a deep interest in the Neolithic landscape, and being a Stonehenge (and its environs) visitor for over 20 years, I'm deeply concerned over this project. I have talked at length with the...
Read more
-
This disastrous plan would cause serious damage to the whole site, a huge upheaval to the wildlife of the area most probably resulting in great loss, and the additional noise pollution from vehicles...
Read more
-
Surely there must be an alternative route for the road so as not to desecrate Stonehenge.
Also nesting sites for rare bird species ( stone curlew and great bustard ) should not be put at risk as...
Read more
-
I am most concerned that irreprable damage will be done to my grandchildren heritage. A one way
System around the Stones could be a solution.
-
I object to the A303 being built near, on, above or below the Stonehenge and it's surrounding prehistoric land. The contractors have already damaged one area just buy surveying and the BBC ridiculed...
Read more
-
I am dismayed at the apparent lack of care and concern about the damage this work will cause not only to a highly important, respected and beautiful landmark, but also to the wildlife around it. This...
Read more
-
I object on the grounds that the proposed solution ignores internationally recognised expert advice and does not take into account the wider archeological importance of the surrounding site. The...
Read more
-
I object to these plans: Because they will cause long-term and detrimental changes to the valuable Heritage site, in terms of disturbance of other (as yet unfound) historical characteristics:
Because...
Read more