Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
The expansion should not be allowed. It should not be considered in an already polluted country
-
Noise: I live within a 20 minute drive from Gatwick and I already am affected by the noise of flights. the expansion of the airport will increase this significantly. Also, as I am a County Councillor...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the lack of consideration of the impact of this proposal on public transport infrastructure and the impact on our UK carbon budgets if this goes ahead.
-
I strongly reject this application on the basis of noise, road traffic, pollution and flood risk. In December 2013 experiencing extreme weather Gatwick discharged its holding tanks into the River Mole...
Read more
-
I represent a community organisation that is developing a new community orchard in Crowborough. Our work is to help combat the climate emergency and biodiversity loss by planting fruit trees and...
Read more
-
The infrastructure around the airport with increased thoroughput of people and vehicles - roads, services and industry
-
The construction of a further runway at Gatwick must, by its very nature, increase the number of flights; therefore, more greenhouse gas emissions, more noise pollution (I live on the incoming flight...
Read more
-
Far too much air traffic already without another runway. The existing “second” runway is a back up runway and not in use at same time as main runway so we are looking at doubling air traffic and...
Read more
-
Expanding Gatwick airport will cause an increase in air and noise pollution. But more importantly it will lead to a big increase in greenhouse gas emissions that are causing the global climate...
Read more
-
I am extremely concerned about the damage to the environment and on our personal lives as we already have huge numbers of planes flying over our house. I am doing everything I can in my personal life...
Read more
-
I believe that the expansion will in effect exacerbate a situation which is already unsustainable. In fact, the current flight path arrangements heavily affect our whole parish both during the day and...
Read more
-
The government's own CCC have stated that there must be no net increase in airport capacity across the UK. But the government are not controlling, or even monitoring this. So the public must.
-
I am objecting to this proposal due the increased air & noise pollution that would be an outcome, also the increased traffic in the local area.
-
I want this proposal to go ahead as I think it will boost the local economy and furthermore more jobs
-
Currently Gatwick fail on significant number of days to stay within allowed flight paths . Noise and pollution have increased significantly. As they cannot keep within the flight limits now I feel...
Read more
-
The last thing this planet needs is another runway. The fact it is even being discussed beggars belief. If the UK really needs more airport capacity it certainly doesn't need it in the south east
-
Gatwick air traffic overflies the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, which is also within the Metropolitan Green Belt. Planning Policy protects certain qualities in those areas, and the...
Read more
-
PLEASE NOTE: ALSO E-MAILED TO PINS GATWICK PROJECT E-MAIL 26.10.23 This Relevant Representation sets out a summary of East Sussex County Council’s (“ESCC”) concerns with the Gatwick Airport Northern...
Read more
-
As we live high on a hill, as the planes come overhead, they are very low and the subsequent noise and pollution will be increased.
-
Already the area is busy with air traffic we are concerned at increased noise, pollution, road traffic, devaluation of housing stock
-
This is in direct conflict with government commitments to reach net zero. It will increase co2 emissions by over 50% and increase pollution, congestion and wear and tear on local roads and...
Read more
-
The expansion plans are contrary to the UK’s obligations on net zero. The measures the airport cites to explain how it will mitigate the pollution construction and operation of an expanded Gatwick...
Read more
-
Dear Planning Inspectorate Team GATWICK AIRPORT NORTHERN RUNWAY DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDER APPLICATION Please find below our Relevant Representation on behalf of the Environment Agency in relation to...
Read more
-
The resulting expansion of flights would be a significant contributor to climate breakdown, and the Government's own climate advisors, the Committee on Climate Change, say that there should be no new...
Read more
-
The plans would effectively give Gatwick a new second runway, but Government policy is that any new runway in the South East should be at Heathrow. (Though we think that there shouldn't be any new...
Read more
-
An ever increasing capacity at airports and the additional vehicle movements associated with that expansion is contrary to the need to reduce UK global warming emissions.
-
Noise Expansion of Gatwick would significantly increase aircraft noise for those further away under flight paths. The Environment Gatwick Airport is situated within an area valued for its unparalleled...
Read more
-
There is absolutely no need for an additional runway at Gatwick. I am a frequent air traveller and, if anything, observe that the volume of travellers at Gatwick and other airports has significantly...
Read more
-
Living close to the airport, I am concerned about the increase in air pollution and the impact of this on our health and that of our future family. The impact of having substantially more planes in...
Read more
-
My concerns lie with the additional noise as well as the detrimental effect of carbon emissions where the UK is already dismally failing. In addition there will be an impact to road congestion and...
Read more
-
Global Airlines is a new, British based carrier, with ambitions to enhance the passenger experience and provide additional, much needed, connectivity and capacity from the South-East of England to the...
Read more
-
there are many reasons to oppose a new runway at Gatwick, but the most important of all is the fact that we are living in a climate emergency - declared by our own government in 2019 (despite the...
Read more
-
I am concerned by the expansion being proposed. I understand the time to comment has been extended. Dear Sirs, I, Gordon Lee-Steere of (Redacted) oppose the Gatwick Airport application for a northern...
Read more
-
I am totally opposed to having a second runway at Gatwick Airport. This is for several reasons. The world needs less flying and it is becoming increasingly unnecessary. We face a huge crisis and need...
Read more
-
Dear Sir/Madam Gatwick Airport Northern Runway Statutory Consultation Response from Greensand Holdings Limited 1. Please note that Greensand Holdings Limited, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Reigate...
Read more
-
Oppose the Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – it is NOT using existing infrastructure and should not be accepted as such. 1. Policy has been misinterpreted...
Read more
-
Increased harm to the natural environment in the Surrey Hills area caused by additional noise, pollution, associated traffic to and from the airport and the planes themselves. The effect on climate...
Read more
-
I'm so concerned about this, how we can an extra 100,000 flights a year be a good idea? This will have such a significant impact on our environment, climate, and all the communities in the surrounding...
Read more
-
This relevant representation has been submitted separately for both LHR Airports Limited and Heathrow Airport Limited, which are related companies within the Heathrow group corporate structure. For...
Read more
-
The local infrastructures are unable to cope with present day needs, schools, GP surgeries, roads, parking, trains. Increased noise and pollution from aircraft and local service traffic and...
Read more
-
In the view of Historic England, under this scheme proposal there is the potential for harm to a range of heritage assets, including: • to a number of undesignated archaeological heritage assets in...
Read more
-
I make the following comments in respect of any planned expansion of the airport at Gatwick Environmental Impact The proposed expansion would significantly increase Gatwick’s CO2 emissions and other...
Read more
-
Increasing accessibility to the airport, free drop off and parking (redacted) for the increased air travel. While managing the traffic flows in and around Gatwick and the town of Horley. Ensuring long...
Read more
-
Concern about negative impact on environment and existing infrastructure. Anxious that it represents another South East investment contrary to levelling up agenda.
-
We do not need airport expansion due to health and environmental reasons. We already have too many aircraft along with noise. We can smell aircraft fuel on a daily basis which is terrible. Think bc...
Read more
-
Gatwick Airport is already used to capacity. Local areas are blighted by the noise pollution ( and probable air pollution) of continuous flights taking off and landing at the airport.The impact of...
Read more
-
I am concerned the impact this will have on the area we live in and have objected to the application and the significant damage and impact it will have on our village and local area. There are great...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the increase in proposed aircraft movements if the Gatwick expansion is allowed to go ahead will cause greater aircraft noise and pollution over my property, which is already...
Read more
-
Air pollution from the extra flights. The flight path would then make to much noise in my area could effect my sleep as I do shift work. The expansion would also effect people living in the areas...
Read more
-
Climate change - impact on UK's greenhouse gas emissions from airport expansion before low emissions aircraft (of the passenger capacity envisaged by these plans) have been developed. Please see the...
Read more