Filter

The Sizewell C Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 51 to 100 of 1290 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Belgian State (Belgian State)

    Belgium candidates to be considered as an ‘interested party’, for the following reasons: - In emergency situations, in case of atmospheric – and to a lesser extent also liquid – discharges, an impact... Read more

  • Belinda Agar

    I write to object to the planning application which will destroy the area of outstanding natural Beauty in which we live due to the amount of traffic congestion and people and buildings involved which... Read more

  • David Hoult

    I want to protest in the strongest possible terms about the location of the proposed lorry interchange on the old A45 At Levington. The Planning Inspectorate recently rejected an application for a... Read more

  • Sarah Gorry

    I do not believe the Sizewell C project should go ahead for the following reasons: 1) unacceptable levels of traffic congestion and pollution for 10-12 years 2) link road has no long-term use, and... Read more

  • Sharron Jarvis

    I work locally as a [Redacted] seeing may people who live in the area and feel a great sense of peace by seeing the countryside, wildlife and the sea. If the proposed building of Sizewell C takes... Read more

  • Peter Palmer

    Although an Aldeburgh Town Councillor this registration is my own personal contribution and should not be taken as representing the views of the Town Council. The consultation process has been long,... Read more

  • Garry Booth

    This project is a short and long term blight on the local environment and the technology is questionable, even risky. The jobs benefit to local people will be offset by the degradation of the coast... Read more

  • Ian Cliff

    I am a regular visitor to East Suffolk where I was brought up. I am a member of the East Suffolk Travel Association, although I am not presenting the views of that organisation in this Representation.... Read more

  • Jackie Catterwell

    I live facing the Woodbridge to Sizewell rail track. I object vehemently to trains coming past this residential area throughout the night. I was here the last time it happened and the intense... Read more

  • Pettistree Parish Council (Pettistree Parish Council)

    Our village of Pettistree will be adversely affected by the development of Sizewell C especially during the construction phase. The plans submitted do not mitigate the problems we have identified,... Read more

  • Carla Hall

    My name is Carla hall I live at [Redacted] We have lived here two years and enjoy the remote peaceful location. I live [Redacted] away from Location: Bratts Black No1, grid ref:TM 399 639. I looked... Read more

  • Terence Jeffrey

    I put it the examine body that the Sizewell C proposals will if allowed have an adverse impact on the holiday and visitor numbers which will result in a economic collapse costing the local economy far... Read more

  • Malcolm Rowe

    The issue is the use of heavy goods trains at night from 11pm to 6am every night for up to ten years, hundreds of people are living along side this track some within 20ft, the resulting sleep... Read more

  • UK & Ireland Nuclear Free Local Authorities (NFLA) (UK & Ireland Nuclear Free Local Authorities (NFLA))

    NFLA has made detailed comments in all four rounds of local consultation by EDF Energy on Sizewell C (see our website [Redacted]. We would be concentrating our comments on the following: - The... Read more

  • Whitearch Residential Park (Whitearch Residential Park)

    We have concerns about the use of heavy goods trains being used to transport materials to Sizewell C at night from eleven pm to six am every night over a period of time lasting up to ten years, we... Read more

  • Jonathan Rutherford

    I am against the Sizewell C proposals. I am convinced that the way forward is with Green Energies: Solar, Wind and Tidal. It is important to think ahead and not make a massive blunder. It is not a... Read more

  • The Wilford Family

    We live on the A1120 which is already inundated with traffic and are concerned about the environmental impact on Peasenhall village and more importantly the mental well-being of its residents combined... Read more

  • Christopher Lewis

    The consultation process The size of the site Environmental damage The future prospects of Sizewell C The future damage to the area's prospects

  • Fiona Hay

    I wish to voice my concerns about the above project. I am astounded at the estimated number of lorries and buses this project will demand and bring onto quiet, local roads. I believe this traffic is... Read more

  • Guy Renn

    I urge you to support the planning application for the Sizewell C project in order that Suffolk benefits from the investment and long-term employment that it will bring. Regrettably, well-paid, secure... Read more

  • Julian Michael Cusack

    I wish to object to the siting of a new nuclear power station at the proposed site of Sizewell C. The primary grounds of my objection are environmental, incljuding damage to important wildlife habitat... Read more

  • Nick Scarr

    I wish to raise concerns about the following issues within NNB Generation Company (SZC) Limited Development Consent Order Application: * NNB's flood risk assessments and modelling for the main nuclear... Read more

  • Malcolm Watson

    I am concerned about the economic and environmental feasibility of the Sizewell C project. In economic terms I am aware of reports about the precarious financial situation of EDF and the issues it is... Read more

  • Alice Bull

    There is no evidence that Sizewell C will aid the UK's economic recovery: a third of construction value and up to half of investment revenue is predicted to leave the UK. Large infrastructure projects... Read more

  • Richard Hare

    I grew up with Sizewell 'A' visible from my Southwold schoolroom in the early '60 and I accepted 'B'. I reject 'C' as there are so many better, cheaper alternatives. Sizewell 'C' is immensely... Read more

  • Susan Marling

    I should like to strongly object to the Sizewell C project for a number of reasons: 1. The scale, disruption and length of time involved in building Sizewell C will greatly harm the local area which... Read more

  • Peter Glen

    I intend to submit that the building of Sizewell C is not in the interest of the UK for the following reasons: Its detrimental impact on the environment Its high cost to build and run and the high... Read more

  • Adam Cobbold

    Dear Madame, Sirs, I am writing to try to persuade you not to build Sizewell C. There are multiple reasons why i feel this way. Firstly, but not so importantly, the country road (A1120) I live on will... Read more

  • County Councillor Christopher G Hudson

    Dear Inspectorate, For the following reasons,I submit my Representation: Vast increase in HGV’s and other vehicles on roads that are inadequate through rural and green belt areas,causing gridlock and... Read more

  • Denise Johnson

    1. • The worst scenario from a nuclear reactor accident would be multiple deaths, injuries and environmental degradation. Spent nuclear fuel storage creates terrorism risks. No project is worth those... Read more

  • Erica Rae

    As a resident of Yoxford in Suffolk, and in response to EDF’s planning submission for Sizewell C, I would like to register my opposition to the scheme. Nuclear strategy, cost and renewables: The UK... Read more

  • Fay Sweet

    Building Sizewell C will cause more harm than good.. please try solar or water power instead.. for the sake of us and future generations. Continuing with Sizewell C is a big mistake in so many ways.... Read more

  • Sarah Osborne

    as a local resident I am fully supportive of the project and the long term benefits that it will bring to the young people in the area. Offering long term, stable employment in an industry that has... Read more

  • Molly Irene Elmy

    I understand that the country needs more energy generation provision, and take a pragmatic approach to these needs. Yes i would prefer the nuclear power station to go some where else, but it has got... Read more

  • Stephanie Williams

    1/ The UK does not need additional power infrastructure from developments such as Sizewell C - not only is the risk of the proposal outlined here [Redacted] there is evidence that the project is more... Read more

  • Derek V H Downer

    As per my previous correspondence, fully explains my objections to this project being carried out by the Chinese. As stated I lived in East Africa during the period of the railway being built between... Read more

  • Marie Curtin

    I live on the B1122 in Yoxford on the section of the road that has been identified by EDF as suffering from an impact of the development. I quote from EDF's documentation:- 'It is also recognised that... Read more

  • Martial Pardoen

    I am interested by the protection of environment, biodiversity, well-being,...

  • Mrs Pat Dorcey

    My main concern is the fact that huge amounts of radioactive material will be stored in the location amounting to a dangerous and vulnerable area . A terrible legacy to leave for he future .... Read more

  • Michael Olding

    I guess that I am one of those classified as the "silent majority", not one for normally writing to express my views, but I think the time has come to put "pen to paper" as it were. I am writing to... Read more

  • Edith Summerhayes

    As a local resident who has known and loved Suffolk most of my life, I consider it a destructive and short-sighted plan to massively extend Sizewell nuclear site in the face of climate crisis. The... Read more

  • Clive Lovelock

    EDF's most recent proposals see an increased role for rail transport for bringing materials to site for the project which is welcome, however the lack of detail in these proposals for the rail options... Read more

  • English Heritage Trust (English Heritage Trust)

    English Heritage Trust (EHT) was formed in 2015 as a registered charitable company, independent of government – effectively English Heritage at that time was split into Historic England and EHT. We... Read more

  • Christina Campbell

    My main objection is that this technology is now outdated. Recent development in sustainable energy sources render nuclear power now longer fit for purpose. To pursue this would be total folly. I am... Read more

  • James Osborne

    Traffic and pollution effects of the Southern Park and Ride plans on the immediate environment and on the wider countryside. The proposed scheme will attract traffic into a small concentrated area... Read more

  • Anthony Franklin

    I am fully supportive of the plan to build Sizewell C

  • Anthony Martin

    I am in support of the plan to build Sizewell C. Sizewell B has been operating safely and efficiently for 25 years. It has played a vital role in providing carbon-free electricity. Nuclear power has... Read more

  • Graham Ford

    Building a large nuclear power station on sand, on a rapidly eroding coastline with rising sea levels is clearly extremely dangerous, and should not be allowed, for the sake of present and future... Read more

  • Mrs P Jenkinson

    I seriously question the need for any further nuclear power stations at a time when this country is committed to becoming carbon neutral and there is no sensible framework for dealing with nuclear... Read more

  • Jacky Carpenter

    The Sizewell C project lacks a realistic emissions lag in terms of offsetting greenhouse emissions generated in its construction. EDF estimate that 6 million tonnes of carbon dioxide will be emitted... Read more