Filter

The Sizewell C Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 101 to 150 of 1290 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Martin Allen

    I am concerned that the impact of the building works over many years (even without the now familiar delays in such schemes) will impact on my enjoyment of the natural wildlife and nature in the area... Read more

  • Mr Alexander Ross

    The design of the reactor(s) building(s) should incorporate my invention for an Emergency Roffing System (UK Patent AWARD GB2526507). Without my invention the reactors will not have the maximum... Read more

  • Alan Manley

    • Noise, air quality and vibration issues of up to 1,250 HGV movements at peak construction on the A12 (that is about one every minute during a peak working day). • The effect of long term pollution... Read more

  • Deptartment of Housing, Planning and Local Government (Deptartment of Housing, Planning and Local Government)

    Dear Sir/Madam, I am registering Ireland as an Interested Party in order to ensure that Ireland is kept informed of progress with this application and the final decision. Regards, Declan Grehan EU &... Read more

  • Clarke and Simpson (Clarke and Simpson) on behalf of Family Mellen (Family Mellen)

    Upon moving to [Redacted] we went to see the initial plans for Sizewell C and were told that our small parcel of land that came with our house and is integral to our future plans, formed part of the... Read more

  • Keith Drew

    I fully understand that this development is of a National need and there will be disruptions for many. My concerns are really about traffic movement for the site being centered so close to the end of... Read more

  • Lesley Krohn

    I object to the building of Sizewell c on these points. 1. The amount of traffic coming and going to the site will be detrimental to the environment and clog up the A12 even though there are by passes... Read more

  • Andrew Kinsella

    Sizewell C will not contribute to net zero until 2040. EDF wants us to pay for £20 billion with a nuclear tax on our energy bills. It’s too slow to help our climate emergency. So why destroy an Area... Read more

  • Joanna Atherton

    I am against the building of SZC because I believe: -it will have a hugely negative impact on the ecology of the area; -more local jobs will be lost than gained due to the negative impact there will... Read more

  • Mr Stephen Dorcey

    Moving to the area 16years ago I did realise that C/D was on the cards Times Change. Sellafield closed in 2014 and the storage of Size well B nuclear waste was foisted upon the community I refuse... Read more

  • Amy Coulter

    I am a resident of East Suffolk writing to you to oppose the construction of a new nuclear power station at Sizewell. Transport I believe the associated congestion and noise and air pollution... Read more

  • David Watson

    I own and manage a caravan and camping park at Darsham. I am concerned with the effect of Sizewell C on the tourism industry in the area. Of particular interest is the proposed park and ride at... Read more

  • Julian A C Royle

    In response to the proposal to build a new Nuclear Power station C at Sizewell I would make the following points in objection 1] Security & Safety A]The involvement of the Chinese Government agency in... Read more

  • Marie Gameson

    I would like to register as an Interested Party. I live less than 100 yards from the Ipswich-Lowestoft railway line and suspect that I (and my neighbours) will be substantially impacted by the plans... Read more

  • Benhall & Sternfield Parish Council (Benhall & Sternfield Parish Council)

    Benhall & Sternfield Parish Council submit the following comments on aspects of the proposed works within our parishes. Fen Meadow, Benhall. Whilst we support the proposed Fen Meadow in Benhall and... Read more

  • Ciarán CUFFE MEP

    Madam/Sir, Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this planning process: As a Member of the European Parliament I wish to raise the following issues: 1. the importance of sharing important... Read more

  • Denise Potter

    The impact on the local area has not been addressed, it has been put forward by people who work in the area, not by people who live in the area and quite clearly this shows on the routes being... Read more

  • Fish Guidance Systems Ltd (Fish Guidance Systems Ltd)

    Fish Guidance Systems (FGS) will be commenting upon the requirement for an Acoustic Fish Deterrent (AFD) that was original proposed by EDF, but subsequently removed from the consultation documents. An... Read more

  • Great Bealings Parish Council (Great Bealings Parish Council)

    Our concerns include: Traffic Environment Cost Suitability

  • John Busby

    I have attended and made presentations to the ONR/NGO forums and its HSE predecessors for over 10 years as the Technical Advisor to Stop Hinkley. I have also made presentations to Sizewell B and its... Read more

  • JP Dorgan

    To Whom it may Concern I am a new resident to Hacheston and live on the main road from Framlingham to the A12. I have grave concerns on the level of traffic that will be increased due to Sizewell and... Read more

  • Caroline Pyke

    This proposed nuclear power station is obsolete technology, environmentally dangerous and unnecessary. It will be making electricity while producing such toxic and dangerous material that we will... Read more

  • Dr Catherine Northover

    I have lived in Suffolk for 42 years. For 34 years I was a local GP. I am very opposed to the building of Sizewell C and these are my main concerns. 1) The building of the power station and the... Read more

  • Ipswich Friends of the Earth (Ipswich Friends of the Earth)

    + Sizewell C is proposed to be situated directly in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The AONB is designated largely for its natural beauty and tranquillity. The main development site would be... Read more

  • James Lewis

    The proposed Sizewell C project should not be in the Suffolk Coast & Heaths AONB (Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty) or on the Suffolk Heritage Coast. I grew up in Colchester and I used to visit this... Read more

  • Angela Lee-Foster

    I wish to raise the following issues of concern about Sizewell C. Need - nuclear power is far more expensive than renewables; Site - too large and impactful for effecting AONB, heritage coast, RSPB... Read more

  • Dominic Adams

    1. Site Selection • I believe it is the right project in the right place • Sizewell C will be built to withstand a 1 in 10,000-year event characterised as sea elevations 6.43m above the present mean... Read more

  • East Suffolk Travel Association (East Suffolk Travel Association)

    Book 6.10, Vol. 9, Chap. 1-12. Our representation is summarised as follows. A full version will be sent before September 30th. We support the rail[-led option. There is need for extra capacity saouth... Read more

  • Farley Family

    1) Concern for our health in the event of a Radioactive material leak into the environment. 2) The project is too close to important wildlife sites. 3) The project is too close to Heritage coast which... Read more

  • Harriet Bowes

    Sizewell C - I am concerned about the fragile coast line, will the construction make erosion worse? How well is the North Sea understood. How will the radio active waste be stored? What about climate... Read more

  • Katy Attwater

    My representation is that:- - The financial model is not robust enough to deliver the project - The contingency for the effects on the design of Climate Change are not appropriate - The proposals for... Read more

  • Lynne Barrett

    I believe that damage to our protected wildlife and their habitats would be so severe that this project should not go ahead. 

  • Peter Allsop

    1. By the time it is built improvements in storage technology and the input from the many wind farms off the North Sea coast will render the project obsolete. 2. The coastline is fragile and has been... Read more

  • Rachel Kellett

    1. Challenging the given cost of Nuclear power. 2012 Hinkley £102 per MW hour / Offshore £39 (on shore even cheaper) 2. Challenging the time it takes to build safely. 12 year plus delays. 3.... Read more

  • Robert Rusack

    I wish the inspectorate to consider the following factors in assessing the validity of the application 1 The impact the development will have on other road users over the development period. 2 The... Read more

  • Trimley St Martin Parish Council (Trimley St Martin Parish Council)

    Trimley St Martin Parish Council note that the freight management facility is intended to be situated off Felixstowe Road in order to facilitate access to the A12. The number of HGVs which may use the... Read more

  • Chris Adelson

    I have been a resident of East Suffolk for over 50 years. These are my objections to the building of Sizewell C. Erosion - I have witnessed the unstable and changing coastline. It is not suitable for... Read more

  • David Adelson

    I have been a resident of East Suffolk for 36 years. I object to the building of a new Nuclear power station at Sizewell on the following grounds. Dangerous site - I have witnessed the unstable and... Read more

  • Debra Hyatt

    it is hard to know where to start. Effects on the landscape of the building work- the new road and the building of accommodation blocks on an area that was forest with the loss the wild life habitat... Read more

  • John Ball

    The points I wish to make in my submission are related to: Site selection Environmental concerns Safety Radioactive hazards Coastal and marine concerns

  • Judie Shore

    I wish to make clear my many concerns about the planning application for the building of Sizewell C Nuclear Power Station. In addition I support the Relevant Representation submitted by Stop Sizewell... Read more

  • Kim Vanhinsbergh

    Please consider these concerns when assessing the application to build two more nuclear reactors at Sizewell. Site location, is it in the wrong place? What effect will building a new power station... Read more

  • Nuclear Consulting Group (NCG) (Nuclear Consulting Group (NCG))

    Accidents are, by definition, accidental There seem no resounding new revelations over the vulnerability of nuclear to unforeseen natural disasters or through human or engineering-based fault... Read more

  • Parish of Friston (Parish of Friston)

    That the proposed development(s) in the parish and surrounding area will alter the character of the district to such an extent that major detrimental changes to life, habitat, usage and income... Read more

  • Prof Peter Dickinson

    WRONG DECISION SIZEWELL C The situation has changed dramatically in view of recent events. It is now obvious that the Chinese input through Huawei and our power stations must be curtailed. Failure to... Read more

  • Rob Piggott

    My submission will focus on the exceptional damage this development will do to this beautiful area of Suffolk. In particular I am concerned with: * transport provision, especially the proposed new... Read more

  • Rupert Wise

    I wish to raise the following issues of concern about Sizewell C. 1. Site Selection I believe it is the wrong project in the wrong place Site at risk from climate change, sea level rise and flooding... Read more

  • Terry Jeffrey

    To comment on tourist and holiday let impact, along with traffic noise. Pollution concerns from the development build and harm to the environment. Loss of income. Health impact, including mental... Read more

  • Andrew Burtenshaw

    I am deeply concerned that EDF has proceeded with submitting this application whilst the country is dealing with a coronavirus epidemic and consider the timing to be totally inappropriate.... Read more

  • Darsham Parish Council (Darsham Parish Council)

    Darsham Parish Council Submission to Planning Inspectorate re EDF's DCO for Sizewell C & D. 1. Introduction and scope of submission. While Darsham Parish Council (DPC) shares the wider concerns about... Read more