Filter
Mallard Pass Solar Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 801 to 900 of 1223 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | View 50 results per page | 100

  • Jaquelin de Trafford

    Issues in respect of the rationale of the project: The proposal in effect takes over 2000 acres of agricultural land out of production. Given recent events across the world both geopolitically and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Jason Fenn

    I feel it is an unacceptable loss of agricultural land and worried about the impact on the biodiversity within. Additionally the visual impact will destroy the beautiful countryside.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Jennifer Brattan Gralka

    The main issues I have with the project is the destruction of arable land, the impact on wildlife habitats and traffic issues that will arise during and after construction.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Jennifer Margaret Issitt

    1. Size of Development: If constructed, Mallard Pass would be by far the largest Solar Plant in the UK to date. As such, full and proper consideration is required to assess the greater impact this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Joanne Coulter

    In my opinion, the proposal should not go ahead, for the following reasons: The site is using valuable, productive agricultural land. Government policy is clear that ground mounted solar should use... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • John Crampin

    The matter of visual impact and the health of our local countryside with its links to personal mental health and well-being are at the centre of my response to the Mallard Pass Proposal. I am... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • JOHN GORMAN

    The scale and complexity of this project is much too large for a rural community with limited infrastructure and roadways to support either the build or the maintenance of such a project. The impact... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • John Hughes

    The proposal to build Mallard Pass Solar Farm is not being done in the long term interests and benefits of the residents of Essendine and surrounding Villages, the Rural economy or the environment.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Julia Lister

    I disagree with the proposed project because of the inappropriate scale of this development and the impact and irreversible damage that developing a site of 2,105 acres will have on the local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Julia Wight

    Huge scale of area affected is totally inappropriate, not sympathetic to surroundings, with 3.3 high solar panels, 2m high security fencing, CCTV and security lighting, machinery in storage... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Justin Paul osborne

    Good evening, We moved to Essendine in 2006, we have raised a family, a dog and are quite settled in the village. The news that one of the largest solar farms in Europe will now surround our village... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Karen Brown

    I object to the proposed Mallard Pass Solar Plant development. The scale of this project is unprecedented in the UK, and therefore the impact on the local area, the environment and the quality of life... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Kathleen Alexandra Knipe

    I feel that this Solar Project is too large for the Community in which it is to be sited. The farm land would be better used for agriculture. The Solar Panels themselves are very large being 9metres... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Kathleen Ann Parkes

    I am amazed that this project is being considered in England's smallest county taking up so much farming land when food production is so necessary these days. It will be a huge blot on the landscape... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Kevin de Trafford

    Issues in respect of the rationale of the project: The proposal in effect takes over 2000 acres of agricultural land out of production. Given recent events across the world both geopolitically and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Linda Thompson

    I am not against solar panels but totally against the use of perfect agricultural land for this purpose, we can not feed ourselves currently let alone giving up this valuable agricultural land for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Louise Caroline Blaes

    I believe that food security is more important than energy security. Life will go on without the television, it won't without food.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Lucy Pengilley Gibb

    The loss of productive agricultural land with such impact to a rural setting is not reasonable and sets a worrying precedent to the future of our landscapes if approved.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Luke Mazzocchi

    I am against the proposed solar farm as I believe it will be a travesty to ruin the beautiful landscape locally for many many residents who will have to look at this for many many years to come if not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Lynne Ohara

    I wish to object to this proposals due to the adverse environmental affects it will have on the area and it is far too near human settlements. I believe there will be problems also with chemicals from... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Margaret Jennifer Bentley

    Although I support solar I am not sure about this project. I would like the government to have control of large solar farms without any Chinese connections.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Mark Hodgkiss

    I object to this project on the following grounds; 1. Size - despite Rutland being the smallest county in the country, this project, if constructed would be the largest solar plant in the UK to date.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Mark Younger

    The size of the development is too big for the site proposed and the surrounding area. Whilst I agree with renewable energy, this will be the largest solar plant in the UK (over 8 times larger than... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Matthew Bremner

    Loss of productive farmland. Adverse effect on local villages. Considerable adverse visual impact on local area.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Michael Patrick Sharpe

    The Mallard Pass solar farm should not be allowed to proceed for 2 fundamental reasons :- Firstly, if all large buildings ( supermarkets, sports halls, factories etc) had solar panels on their roofs,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Michael Timmis

    Loss of productive agricultural land to produce food.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Rita Grundy on behalf of Mr and Mrs Halford

    We object to the use of good land when there are plenty of brown sites available. There should be legislation that all new buildings of warehouses etc should have panels on the roof.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Mr Richard John Taylor

    The project is too big and will harm the natural environment and cause a bigger risk of flooding.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Mrs Helene Belinda lumbard

    Project is far too big for the area, will destroy valuable agricultural land

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Mrs Jennifer Trawford

    I am writing to reiterate my objections to the proposed Mallard park solar development on land near Essendine and surrounding villages .I have attended all the meetings in respect of this next stage... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Nicola Catherine Younger

    The size of the development is too big for the site proposed and the surrounding area. Whilst I agree with renewable energy, this will be the largest solar plant in the UK (over 8 times larger than... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Nicola Richardson

    The local residents when buying their lovely homes in this area surely have some say where they live.. It is totally unfair that this beautiful rural area with its pretty villages should be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Nigel Gareth Eveleigh

    Mallard Pass represents the industrialisation of the countryside. It represents the lamentable absence of joined up thinking in so many areas of government thinking. The use of solar panels has to be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Pamela Adams

    My family and I have lived in Toft for some 23 years, not three miles from where the proposed site MP will be located just off the increasingly busy B6121. Currently we are fortunate enough to still... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • N/A (N/A) on behalf of Paton (Paton)

    This development and the scale are inappropriate in what is attractive and undulating countryside. Essentially a significant area of productive farmland will be lost at a time where it is becoming... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Patricia Rentowl

    I am strongly opposed to the increased traffic on rural roads and the associated pollution, congestion, pot holes, disruption and danger to school children, pedestrians, cyclists and other road users... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Paul Biggs

    Concerned about the impact of solar farms on prime agriculture land.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Paul Morriss

    I can not see the logic of constructing this inefficient monstrosity on good quality agricultual land which is located in beautiful ungelating countryside that will have such an impact on the wider... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Peter Beever

    Damaging to the landscape, countryside and the environment. Unnecessary development to meet government's flawed "net zero" policies.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Rachel Herron

    In response to the statutory consultation, I wish to express my objections to the scheme for the following reasons. 1. The proposed site is largely high grade agricultural land which is needed for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Richard Green (Richard Green)

    I fully support this proposal. The project delivers:- Environmental gain to wild life and the local community. Visual impact is minimal The large majority of the land chosen is only used for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Rita Grundy

    We need all the agricultural land we have to grow food for this country. We rely too much on imports. There are many more sites suitable for these projects without taking arable land

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Roger Burton

    1. Solar power is not a reliable power source. 2. This project will occupy valuable farm land which is needed to produce food for this country.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Rutland Solar Action Group Ltd (Rutland Solar Action Group Ltd)

    I am interested in the proximity to housing and the impact this development may have from a noise as well as visual perspective.

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Samuel John Younger

    The lack of benefits/perks to the local residents of having the farm surrounding us. There is no reason that's counters the huge eyesore/traffic issues the locals would have to deal with.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Sandra Chapman

    The scale of the scheme is far too big and will visually and physically overwhelm this attractive rural area impacting wildlife, house prices and recreation and take land out of food production. There... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Sandra Maria Trickey

    My home will be subject to compulsory acquisition by the developer and at this stage, the impact on my life has not been sufficiently explained but described in such a way that the developer can do... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Sharon forrester-Jeckell

    There is far too much building works taking place in stamford. I know that the land works is in Rutland but all the people working and living on this site will cause the inferstructour in Stamfords... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Simon Houghton

    Hello there. I have to admit the scale of this project is frankly ludicrous for the amount of energy it will produce. Would be much better, putting it done the motorway or use up all available roofs.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Simon Moody

    I feel this development is in the wrong place and will do unmeasurable damage to the area and it's community. It is a green field site so will have a massive detrimental impact on the wildlife. We... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Stella North

    I do not approve of such a huge project that is Mallard Park

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Stephen Hawkins

    Solar panels are not very efficient generators (compared to say wind), and take up a lot of space. There is no apparent benefit to the local community, nor expected electricity price reduction,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Stewart Jeffs

    I strongly object to Mallard Pass This is to bigger project There are to many objections to list, but I am available by phone. After attending your presentations most of your so called experts where... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Sue Holloway

    I have lived in the local area for nearly 25 years; I have an in-depth knowledge of the area, amenities and local community. I am writing to express my wholehearted objection to the Mallard Pass Solar... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Susan Claire King

    1.This plan will ruin the countryside for local residents, animals, wild life and future generations. 2. In the current world, we need to be especially self sufficient for cereal crops so it would be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Tamazin Bell

    I have a number of concerns about the development. First and foremost, the sheer, unprecedented scale of the installation is just way out of proportion to the nature of the environment and the small... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Terence Padmore

    Totally inappropriate. There are better ways to create energy than utilise valuable agricultural land. Our Prime Minister is totally against this type of detail of solar panels being installed.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Tonya Orvis

    The smallest county of Rutland should not be home to one of the largest solar farms in the country. Virtually all of the proposed land is used for growing arable crops with good yields and should not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • william collins

    I am concerned about the effect on my daily life due to the extra traffic on an unsuitable road structure. I am worried about the varied wildlife which lives across this area. It concerns me greatly... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • William John Williams

    Exceedingly large scale will change the entire agricultural and rural nature of this corner of Rutland into an industrial landscape. A limited well ringfenced solar area around the sub-station would... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • William Plummer

    This is a massive project which will affect the surrounding areas from increased road traffic; damage to agricultural land and environment. There has not been adequater consultiation on this matter.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • winifred peck

    I think the problem with this project is far too big and covers too much of the Countryside, impacting on a lot of people's lives who live nearby

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 February 2023

  • Alan Charles Shelbourn

    Mallard Pass Solar Farm is in the wrong location and it will destroy forever a vast area of high-grade agricultural land. The old RAF base at Woolfox Lodge would surely be a far better location for a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Andrea mcquaid

    I am very concerned about losing land for arable and livestock farming to great swathes of metal. The impact on wildlife too is a real worry, how are hawks and owls meant to find their food when the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Anna Haines

    I wish to register my strong opposition to the proposed Mallard Pass Solar Farm development for the following reasons: 1. The negative impact on the local natural environment and biodiversity in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Barry Douglas Holt

    I object to the Mallard Pass Solar Project being approved because of the following: Loss of valuable prime farmland at a time when we need to produce more food not less. Contrary to Government policy.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Beverley Haydon

    Whilst I agree with solar panels this is not the place to put them. Using swathes of agricultural land when farmers are struggling to make ends meet as it is. Food shortages will be even more... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Calvan Sydney Player

    1.Mallard Pass would be the largest Solar Plant in the UK to date. Much greater consideration is required to assess the impact this project might have. 2.Compulsory acquisition rights were not made... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Chloe Allport

    I am strongly opposed to the Mallard Pass Solar Farm on agricultural land either side of the East Coast Main Line near Essendine on 2,105 acres of land – green land, farming land. I do not accept that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Chrissie Muir

    I strongly object to the proposed development on the grounds of environmental, economic and visual factors. I do not believe that the figures stated by Mallard Pass are anywhere near as beneficial as... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Christine Spray

    Why isn't the government insisting all new builds should have solar panelling on roofs, be it commercial or residential. We need land to grow food.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Daniel Speed

    I support the requirement for a solar farm at Mallard pass. However the current peovision of this major infrastructure project being owned by a private company and not the UK government is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • David Busfield

    I’m concerned about the impact on this small rural community from industrialised energy on a grand scale. Is there appropriate consideration for the infrastructure? Community? Environment and ecology?

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • David Maurice Walker

    It's in the wrong place extending over valuable food growing land and this food production must take precedence over providing power that is not available 24 hours a day. I have solar panels on my... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • David Roberts

    The size of the development is too big for the site proposed and the surrounding area. Whilst I agree with renewable energy, this will be the largest solar plant in the UK (over 8 times larger than... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Deborah Bircham

    Further to the Mallard Pass Development and the second round of consultation, I would like to add my feedback to the amended proposals. I still have a number of concerns about this development. •... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Derek Jones

    Loss of agricultural land, visual and noise impacts are unacceptable. Why do the cables have to run through Essendine, surely through farmland and under the railway is a better option, or would the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Derek Van Osten Lygo

    I object to solar panels being sited on productive agricultural land, being so close to conservation villages, with regard to increased flooding risk, particularly at Greatford, the degradation of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Dr Peter John Pitt White

    I strongly oppose the large-scale industrialization of prime agricultural land, particularly as recent events have clearly demonstrated that food security is even more vital than energy supply... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Dr. Lindsey Gove

    I believe that a scheme such as this is essential to our ability to green energy production and mitigate climate change. Whilst I recognise that it might not be ideal to have such a project in one's... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • ELIZABETH ELLEN KIDD

    Detrimental to the immediate environment, loss of open spaces, intrusive to all neighbouring villages, excessive traffic and noise, too big not needed this size, individual properties will be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Fiona Mary Veronica Smith

    The size of the proposed scheme concerns me as the land is mainly agricultural and the loss of that would affect the local and wider community. The long term effects of such a huge project are not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Frances Lygo

    I am profoundly concerned with Mallard Pass and their proposed industrial development of a vast solar park on the shoulders of historic Stamford and the rural villages surrounding it for the following... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Francoise Vickers

    Impact on infrastructure

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Frank Weston

    No consent to Mallard Pass solar farm! Disinformation regarding solar power! Expensive, not eco friendly. Furthermore geo-engineering blocks out the suns energy approximately 30%. Theft of farmland,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Geoffrey Brazier

    .Cleve Hill Solar Park has been approved for construction and expects to produce 350MW on 890 acres of reclaimed marshland. Mallard Pass Solar Farm expects to produce 350MW on a variety of sites... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Glenn Anthony Fuller

    I have grave concerns about the loss of valuable farmland and the huge increase in traffic along the already over-conjested A road outside our house

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Heather Hooper

    Dear Sir / Madam, I am writing to you to raise my objection to the proposed Mallard pass Solar farm: I have a number of objections as follows: The size and scale of the solar farm, the proposed solar... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Heather McGill

    The scale of this development is completely out of proportion to the local area, swallowing an entire village, and impacting many more. The loss of fertile agricultural land is critical at a time when... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Howard Phillips

    The sheer size of the development.Consultation has been poor.Compulsory acquisition.Traffic on rural roads. Damage to biodiversity

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Ian Kirkwood

    I am opposed to the proposed Mallard Pass Solar Farm project (ENO10127) to create a solar farm for the following reasons: The solar farm will be created on good quality agricultural land needed for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Jacqueline Thorburn

    This will impact the local countryside on a major basis with loss of farming land and footpaths. Visually it will be a blot on the beautiful landscape we have. Solar should be on roof tops and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • James Scott

    eyesore in local area close to homes and local footpaths affect local property value waste of good farmland could be better sited near existing eyesores

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Janet Kirkwood

    I am opposed to the proposed Mallard Pass Solar Farm project (ENO10127) in and around Essendine Rutland, to create a solar farm for the following reasons: The solar farm will be created on good... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Jem Allport

    I am wholeheartedly against this proposed development. Aside from the obvious sighting of solar panels on roofs rather than prime agricultural land, recent events of this year (Ukraine war and record... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Jeremy Francis Hockham

    I have a number of objections to the proposed Mallard Pass solar farm development and I would also like to raise a number of points for consideration. 1) Location and scale of the development a. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Joanna Plant

    I strongly OBJECT to the proposal. In the essence of speed I have not listed all my reasons but here are the main ones: 1. Loss of land for food production – now more than ever we should be growing as... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Joanna Ward

    In previous communications, I have made my objection to this proposal very strongly. The obscene size and location of this proposal would have an immensely detrimental effect on wildlife,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • John Alistair Gray

    I am deeply concerned about the loss of agricultural land when food security is such an issue at the moment.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • John Millard

    I appreciate that solar energy may need to form a part of the non-fossil energy supply in the UK in the future. However this proposed scheme creates a number of its own problems and missed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023