Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
The road will cause much damage to the historical site, and to wildlife, especially breeding birds.
-
Damage to world heritage site.
-
Cannot and will not believe that it is necessary to tunnel under a world heritage site to improve this road. Another solution just has to be found or leave road as is.
-
The scheme will cause irreparable and unwanted damage to a unique World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, which is described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. It will destroy the...
Read more
-
It is very likely this project would result in serious damage to the most important Neolithic archaeological site in England, and one of the most important in the world. This project cannot make sense...
Read more
-
I am worried that our unique World Heritage Site at Stonehenge is about to be irreparably damaged for short term traffic management purposes. I am also concerned that, as a country, we are not...
Read more
-
I'm am very concerned due to the impact this will have on wildlife, local traffic and for me personally, the damage to a world heritage site. Being a practising pagan, there are no other places like...
Read more
-
I object to this application as it will not solve the traffic problem on the A303 near Stonehenge and will irreparably damage the archaelogical site near Stonehenge. The ancient site of Blick Mead has...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the planning proposal (Planning Inspectorate Reference: TR010025) which would involve putting a dual carriageway through the World Heritage Site which currently exists around...
Read more
-
I am appalled that this dual carriageway and tunnel is even being proposed on this ancient site of such archaeological importance. Even UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go...
Read more
-
The fact that Highways England has not considered any alternatives to its current, controversial plan suggests that its tactic will be to use its superior financial strength to force its design...
Read more
-
There will be irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. There should be some changes to the layout before plans go ahead, one...
Read more
-
I object to the A303Stonehenge Stonehenge because:
It will cause damage to this WHS that can never be restored. As UNESCO has said, ‘it’s a landscape without parallel.’ This A303Stonehenge seems to...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the construction of the stone henge tunnel and flyover, for the following reasons.
1 I am concerned about further damage to the Blick Mead mesolithic site, which has already...
Read more
-
As a world heritage sight Stonehenge should be preserved and protected at all costs. It has stood for many years and should continue to do so until it returns to dust naturally not to build a...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the threat of irreparable damage to one of the planet's best known and unique World Heritage Sites, not only its archaeology, but also its setting. Stonehenge has been described...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site and the most important archaeological site in this country. I, therefore, object to the A303 Stonehenge Expressway on the following grounds:-
1 The irreparable...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed scheme due to the damaging effects it would have on archaeology, wildlife, and the public.
It would destroy much vital evidence about the landscape in which the site is...
Read more
-
The proposed road development around Stonehenge would cause serious and irreparable damage to the prehistoric landscape and archaeology in the area. This world heritage site is still not fully...
Read more
-
Better not to further damage this site. A new road should be constructed well away from this historic site and wider historic landscape. The existing road should be closed. Only to be used as access...
Read more
-
I object the currently proposed A303 Expressway expansion due to the following reasons:
1. There will be physical harm (akin to vandalism, is it wasn't approved) to the Stonehenge World Heritage...
Read more
-
•Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
•UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
There is absolutely no need for any interference in the road system as it stands. The hold ups are not every hour, every day. There are far worse hold ups every day along the A303 to and from the West...
Read more
-
This project will cause environmental damage, in particular to the World Heritage site. Alternative options must be considered
-
I fully believe that this act will be detrimental to both a valued and ancient monument as well as destroying valuable research in nearby sites, jeopardizing future historical discoveries.
-
I am objecting to thew proposed development of the A303 for a number of reasons. They are:
It will be outrageously destructive to the historical and ecological environment.
Most importantly the...
Read more
-
I am horrified that we are considering jeopardizing the irreplaceable surrounds of Stonehenge - where records of our ancient human and natural history are still to be discovered by future technologies...
Read more
-
This is a very sacred place to the whole of the UK and a great tourist attraction and building this road will damage the area and make it less attractive to visitors
-
We should not compromise the environment of a world heritage site or its environs which is tantamount to cultural vandalism.
Additionally, local wildlife, particularly rare birds , will be adversely...
Read more
-
I object to this proposal.
Stonehenge is just one of the features in the wider Stonehenge landscape. The proposed work would irreparably damage the landscape. This landscape has been preserved by...
Read more
-
I have used the A303 for a long time when travelling from Cornwall to my family in Guildford. I am very worried that the proposed tunnel and new road will damage the World Heritage Site with...
Read more
-
Just another nail in the coffin of humanity. Our successors will never understand such damage. Now would be a great time to start protecting meaningful long term value and stop knee-jerk destructions....
Read more
-
I object to the proposed A303 expressway construction on the grounds that it is likely to cause irreparable damage to a number of the stones, vthe surrounding wildlife & also therfore people visiting...
Read more
-
This idea seems to pose a great threat to the area that surrounds one of our most famous landmark.
It saddens me that such such a disruptive scheme could get the 'go ahead'.
It makes me wonder if...
Read more
-
As a local, I'm against this development because I feel the site should not be developed further as it . Its an ancient site, which should be treated with caution and respect. Preliminary work has...
Read more
-
1. There has been insufficient consultation to discuss alternative solutions that would not damage the World Heritage Site.
2. UNESCO has described it as a "landscape without parallel" and it would...
Read more
-
In my opinion, the planned route will disturb our most important historical monument.
-
Concern about irreparable damage caused to a World Heritage Site, and Blick Mead.
UNESCO advisers against present scheme.
Lack of alternative options.
-
I am dyslexic so pls forgive any miss phrasing or spelling, this is the best I can do.
The risk of damage to the site and the wider environment has already been proven even by its advocates to be...
Read more
-
I am very concerned at the possibility of damage to one of our iconic historical sites, and have read that UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in this way. . The...
Read more
-
Appalling damage to a World Heritage Site which has impacted on my view of the world and of life all my life. I used to visit it when I was child when we could just wander round freely. It has...
Read more
-
I can't believe this plan which prioritizes a road over this ancient historic site - we, the public and future generations deserve better as does the preservation of Stonehenge. The plan, which is...
Read more
-
The scheme being considered would be extremely damaging to the World Heritage Site of Stonehenge. Any damage so caused would not be reversible.
-
I am deeply concerned about further destruction and disruption of our oldest and most important historical landmark. It sets a precident suggesting that sites of historic value, special scientific...
Read more
-
Stonehenge and it's environs are irreplaceable and we don't have the right to damage it, especially for short term ends.
-
As one of the world's most important historic sites the scheme seems to me to be an appalling intrusion and an act of irreversible vandalism to what has been a sacred site since prehistory .
I live...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an historical site, and should not be damaged by the building of a huge
dual carriageway. I understand that this section of the 303 causes a traffic jam but surely you can build this...
Read more
-
This is a site of unique archaeological and historical interest which will be irreparably damaged by the proposed road development. The importance of Stonehenge is recognised by its status as a World...
Read more
-
My reasons for objecting to this scheme are
1. Damage to a world heritage site.
2. Damage to the environment
3. Damage to wild life.
4. The amount of money it will cost.
-
I have close friends in the area and have been visiting Stonehenge all my life. This proposal will cause irreparable damage to this World Heritage Site in its incomparably beautiful setting – and as...
Read more