Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
more noise and more pollutions
-
I work for Gatwick Airport Ltd and see the tremendous opportunity this has to grow jobs and income for the local economy as well as bringing more competition to the aviation market.
-
This seems like a pragmatic way to provide a required increase in airport capacity without significantly increasing the airport's footprint and with consideration to local road infrastructure. However...
Read more
-
Massively for Gatwick utilising its current runway and for moving its centre line to accommodate more passengers and aircraft to use it. It will be hugely profitable for not only Gatwick Airport but...
Read more
-
iNCREASED NOISE, POLLUTION, TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE
-
NATS En-Route wishes to register as an Interested Party. It will submit a formal representation in due time.
-
Residential property owners of (redacted) which is located adjacent to the northern perimeter road. As this property is one of the closest if not the closest residential property to the north terminal...
Read more
-
Born and raised in (redacted), I have witnessed first-hand the detrimental impact of the pandemic on both the local economy and the environment surrounding Gatwick. For nearly 15 years, I dedicated...
Read more
-
This project is a must for our area, it will establish the airport as a major hub and bring much needed jobs and money to the local economy. This project needs to go ahead for the future heath of the...
Read more
-
The proposal for Gatwick Airport to move to a duel runway operation will have a negative impact on the local area, and contradicts the governments aim to reduse the UK's carbon footprint. Duel runway...
Read more
-
The South East needs more runway capacity. Even though I live on the fringe of the Northern flight path, I still consider the overall benefit outweighs any noise issues. Gatwick have kept their...
Read more
-
For an extensive period, Gatwick has steadfastly functioned as a substantial pillar of national infrastructure, fostering the prosperity of our members and the diverse entities we stand for in the...
Read more
-
I think it is a good thing to utilise our emergency runway and will be good for the airport and the local environment by not building a completely new runway
-
The 2nd runway will have a direct impact on our day to day living. A lot more noise and air pollution and a reduction in the value of our property.
-
Gatwick airport is big enough. One can’t help but think that Gatwick sets out to deceive when documents put out for public consultation are unclear, blurry, so making it difficult to know how exactly...
Read more
-
More flights will have an adverse effect on air pollution and noise pollution. There will be more traffic on the local minor roads as well as main roads. More jobs mean more houses for workers in an...
Read more
-
There is a very real threat from climate extremes exacerbated by the increase in air traffic. The expansion of airports is a sign that the economy is seen to be more important than this threat. I am...
Read more
-
We do not need even more aircraft over the quiet Sussex countryside. Its already very busy day and night..also if we are to get to net zero we need less aircraft not more I oppose this Gatwick Airport...
Read more
-
I belive the expansion of Gatwick Airport is needed and will significantly benefit the local economy. However, I would like to better understand how the impact of emissions would be mitigated during...
Read more
-
Aircraft noise is already incredibly intrusive, having a major impact on time spent outside. Sometimes planes go over, low, every 4-5 minutes, making simply sitting in the garden unbearable. The...
Read more
-
I object on the grounds of poor air quality and noise. These planes are flying too low and the noise is unbearable. What happen to climate change
-
Planes taking off from Gatwick have been more obtrusive this year than previously, particularly from about 5.30am until 8.0, and again late evenings, sometimes until at least 12.30am. It’s bad enough...
Read more
-
I oppose the development consent order because of the resulting impact on climate change, increase in pollution, decline in air quality, increase in aircraft noise especially overnight, lack of...
Read more
-
I oppose the Development Consent Order to rebuild the Gatwick emergency runway as a 2nd runway. This is because it will mean an increase in aircraft noise, especially at night. Gatwick flights taking...
Read more
-
Increased overflying of my home - sleep interruption. Noise pollution. Strain on airport infrastructure - roads, rail. Air pollution with increased traffic.
-
The courses of the aircraft flying from Gatwick often operate way out of the preferred noise path route and travel over the AONB near Coldharbour creating a major noise nuisance for those trying to...
Read more
-
I am opposed to any expansion of air travel (particularly short haul) because it is environmentally disastrous particularly its impact on CLIMATE CHANGE and the waste of fossil fuels which will be...
Read more
-
I fully support the proposal. It will bring much needed investment into the region, it will create significant employment opportunities and will be a stimulus for growth.
-
The aircraft noise we experience is already extremely bad. Any increase will be completely unacceptable. I live in a beautiful area where many people come to walk and cycle and yet we have continuous...
Read more
-
The ozone is being destroyed and all the aviation fumes emitted by flights is playing a big part in this so it’s madness to want to introduce an extra runway that will produce even more pollution....
Read more
-
Gatwick is big enough. I twas decided in 2017 that Heathrow would be the site for any expansion of London area and not Gatwick so there is no case for expanding Gatwick. The additional noise and air...
Read more
-
The expansion contravenes targets for climate change. The infrastructure is insufficient. Additional noise and night flights are a nuisance. House values fall. This is a rural area that will be hugely...
Read more
-
The proposal to move, rebuild then use what was the emergency runway as a live runway, goes against all noise, air pollution and carbon emission targets. It can be dressed up as offering massive...
Read more
-
To low and noisy over North Holmwood. Too many flights. Night flights are particularly disturbing and this needs to be limited. The extra traffic to and from the airport increases pollution. The rail...
Read more
-
AN EXPANSION WILL OVERWHELM THE SURROUNDING AREA
-
GATWICK ALREADY HAD AN APPLICATION FOR A SECOND RUNWAY REJECTED. IT IS TRYING AGAIN ON BEHALF OF ITS OWNERS TO INCREASE ITS VALUE. THE INCREASED POLLUTION, AND EFFECT ON LOCAL TRANSPORT IS...
Read more
-
Ifield suffer from the pollution and noise from aircraft from 6.0am until 10.30pm to have another runway would be detrimental to residents health, mental and physical. The pollution sometimes is so...
Read more
-
I oppose the move on the basis of the following being negatively impacted. - noise pollution - air pollution - stretched public infrastructure such as roads, housing, GP etc..
-
This project will increase carbon emissions, noise, traffic on M23. It will furtherarm the local environment and contribute to the threat to our planet. We should be reducing the number of flights not...
Read more
-
light, sound, atmosphere pollution, over development the airport started as a race course and evloved the area is not able to sustain more development; housing, roads etc. burden on roads extents to...
Read more
-
I oppose a second runway at Gatwick. It is a disgrace it is even being considered by the authorities. The reasons are obvious and too numerous to mention here. The proposed second runway at Gatwick...
Read more
-
A second runway would have a serious detrimental effect on air quality, which would affect the health of people living in the area. Road & rail traffic would increase significantly, with no planned...
Read more
-
I already ,since 2013 ,have aircraft over my house whereas before I did not. They are noisy; low flying and often keep me awake after 11.30pm and sometimes until 2am . Very distressing. Add to which...
Read more
-
Pollution Noise Environment Lack of infrastructure De- valuation of my property Mental health I oppose this new runway for lots of reasons, namely the increase of aircraft and the noise, the impact on...
Read more
-
I believe that given Gatwick Airports infrastructure- it can barely cope with the flights, passengers and size that it already has. Expand it, you lose more countryside, habitation for wildlife and...
Read more
-
I am concerned that a second runway will have a direct impact on noise affecting my house
-
I object to expansion for following reasons. Increased air traffic noise, which is already unbearable. Damage to mental health. Increased emissions. Fair allocation of flight paths needed to relieve...
Read more
-
I fully object to this project going forward as it already causes air and noise pollution, traffic and overcrowding to surrounding small towns which puts stress on local schools, doctor surgeries and...
Read more
-
I am opposing this because it will have a negative impact on the local area. It will be nosier due to the aircrafts, impact on climate change and the wildlife. Potentially devalue people’s home and...
Read more
-
The CEO of Gatwick Airport should not be allowed on the Aviation Council Acknowledgement by Gatwick Airport of the environmental damage and contribution to climate change that will be caused by the...
Read more