Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 251 to 300 of 309 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Christine Shaw

    The proposal for Honey Hill is very much against Green policies and talk from Government agencies. In these times of global warming I fail to see how it helps the planet or local area to uproot a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 June 2023

  • Mark Woolfenden

    I object to the poorly conceived and ill thought through proposed relocation of the Cambridge Sewage Works to Honey Hill, between the conservation villages of Fen Ditton and Horningsea. · Moving the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 June 2023

  • Mrs Laurie Woolfenden

    Bigger than Wembley, and floodlit I object to the poorly conceived and ill thought through proposed relocation of the Cambridge Sewage Works to Honey Hill, between the conservation villages of Fen... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 June 2023

  • Rae Langton

    I wish to register as an Interested Party for a reason particular to our own situation, and several more general reasons. The particular reason is that our water supply is entirely from our own well:... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 June 2023

  • The Federation of Cambridge Residents Associations (FeCRA) (The Federation of Cambridge Residents Associations (FeCRA))

    Dear Sir/Madam, Anglian Water’s DCO application to relocate the sewage works I am writing on behalf of the Federation of Cambridge Residents Associations’ ( FeCRA) to register as an IP and to object... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 30 June 2023

  • Alison Tollit

    The Proposed project is going to waste taxpayers money . It’s a project that is unnecessary it does not need to move from its present site . It will consume a beautiful green belt area and set a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 June 2023

  • Colin Martyn Lizieri

    This project is unnecessary, largely benefits shareholders, not local communities and, critically, threatens the local environment, including SSSIs, not least given water companies' track record of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 June 2023

  • Jon Tollit

    Honey Hill Proposed Sewerage Treatment Works The existing facility at Milton is perfectly viable for needs for many years and does not need relocation. The study to select a site was flawed and did... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 June 2023

  • Pamela McLeman

    I object to this infrastructure project. Anglian water admits there is no operational need to move. It's a waste of taxpayer money, (£227 million), a scandal, in the light of Thames Water + the debt... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 June 2023

  • Peter Charles Eric Halford

    My fundamental objection to this planning proposal is that, by Anglian Water’s own admission, there is no operational need for a relocation of Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Works. However if such... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 June 2023

  • Cadent Gas Limited (Cadent Gas Limited)

    Representation on behalf of Cadent Gas Limited (Cadent) to the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation Development Consent Order (DCO). Cadent is a licensed gas transporter under the Gas Act... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 28 June 2023

  • Charles Richard Chappell Jones

    I object to the submitted proposals for the proposed relocation of the Cambridge Wastewater Treatment Works and I wish to be allowed to make a written submission. I will avoid duplicating points made... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 June 2023

  • Colin Sparkes

    Do not re locate its fine where it is,this is just a housing scheme

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 June 2023

  • East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust (East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust)

    The East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust (EEAST) consider that the Project (Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation) is likely to have a significant impact on its operations, service... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 27 June 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Dr Sarah Beeson

    The proposed site of the CWWTPR at Honey Hill is in an entirely rural area surrounded on all sides by agricultural land. The Cambridge Green Belt Study (2012), which has informed the South... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 June 2023

  • Natural England (Natural England)

    Natural England's Relevant Representations statement attached.

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 26 June 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Susan White

    I object to the planning application to relocate the Cambridge Sewage Works to Honey Hill for the following reasons: The current sewage works were upgraded a few years ago and were deemed fit for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 June 2023

  • Malorie Delaporte

    These are time to preserve arable lands. These are times to shield wildlife. These are times to be cautious about public spending. These are times to protect mental wealth. These are not times to put... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 June 2023

  • Mrs Marjorie Pratt

    The smell from the sewage works was enormously reduced after the expensive upgrade in 2015. Anglian Water said that upgrade made the sewage works future proofed for decades. It is an appalling waste... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 June 2023

  • Clare Harvey

    I am objecting to these proposals for environmental, economic and site suitability reasons. Environmental: loss of green belt land and adverse effects on local wildlife. Huge carbon cost of new... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 June 2023

  • Chris Pim

    I strongly object to the relocation of the sewage works to the Honey Hill site (and in general), with the main reasons being as follows: 1) It seems unacceptable during such a time of governmental... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • The Parochial Church Council of the Ecclesiastical Parish of Horningsea (The Parochial Church Council of the Ecclesiastical Parish of Horningsea)

    Representation on behalf of The Parochial Church Council of the Ecclesiastical Parish of Horningsea (“the Church”) The Church has been served with a notice pursuant to s56 of the Planning Act 2008 as... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • William Wykeham

    I am concerned about the environmental impact of this development. Building the new plant is extremely CO2 intensive due to the amount of concrete involved. It is also planned to be built on green... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Derek Langley

    I am objecting to the new sewage works at Honey Hill, for many reasons. Cambridge has a fully functioning sewage works that doesn’t need replacing and the carbon footprint of building a new sewage... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Jenny Langley

    I am objecting to the proposed construction of the new sewage works on Honey Hill, for lots of reasons: At present, Cambridge has a fully functioning sewage works that isn’t that old and I understand... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Julie Impey

    The site is unsuitable for a project of this size. It needs to be below the surface to be landscaped but the aquifer is near the ground level. There are contamination fears. It closely situated... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Karin Abram

    I am deeply concerned about this proposed plant for the following reasons: It seems to be a threat to a Principle Chalk Aquifer which according to DEFRA is at high risk of groundwater contamination. A... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Teversham Parish Council (Teversham Parish Council)

    As a Parish Council nearby we have concerns about the proposed relocation on the green belt and the precedent this sets for other development (we are already aware of other proposals). We have... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Valentina Recla

    To the Planning Inspectorate in the matter of Anglian Water’s application to relocate its sewage works to Honey Hill. I am registering to log my objection to this project. My objection has an... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • William Orme

    Successive governments for many decades have put in place the planning policy of greenbelts for very good reasons and these should be protected where at all possible. Relocating such a large and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • James Murray-White

    This proposal is ludicrous. It is unnecessary to relocate a sewage processing & wastewater plant simply to create more space to build more houses - what needs to be tackled is over development and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Barbara Sansom

    There is no operational need to move the sewage works. This is only being considered to allow housing to be built and money to be made by construction companies. Local hard working Cambridge residents... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 June 2023

  • Catherine Morris

    My objections and concerns are as follows: 1. The proposed site at Honey Hill should have been discounted from the get-go because it is the site of a Principal Chalk Aquifer which is, according to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 June 2023

  • John McGill

    I have strong objections to the proposed relocation of Anglian Water waste water plant from its present site to the Honey Hill vicinity. Reasons are given below. The land in question is categorized as... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 June 2023

  • Pegasus Planning Group Ltd (Pegasus Planning Group Ltd)

    Pegasus Group act on behalf of Arqiva Limited with regard to town planning matters throughout the UK. Arqiva operate an equipment room at the bottom of Fen Road, just to the south of the A14... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 June 2023

  • Professor Layla Skinns

    I wholly object to every aspect of the proposed move of the WWTP to Honey Hill, for the following reasons: 1. There is no operational reason to move as the current WWTP at Milton is fully functioning... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 June 2023

  • Tarek Saad

    I find it absurd to move the treatment works to a conservation area. I genuinely do not understand why the treatment works are not being left where it is rather than spending millions of tax payers... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 June 2023

  • Jenny Grewcock

    There is an existing site for the sewage works in Milton - and relocating this to greenbelt seems unnecessary and destructive to natural green areas which are important for wildlife and conservation.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Lucy Frazer MP

    I make this submission as the MP for South East Cambridgeshire, representing my constituents. The relocation of the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant (CWWTP) affects particularly the villages of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Simon Smithson

    A sewage plant is not compatible with a green belt - otherwise we might as well call it brown belt. The privatisation of the water companies unleashed the sale of the land assets that came with the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Xavier Castelino

    I am a school governor at [Redacted], in the local area. I’ve reviewed the details of the project, and although I am aware that areas sometimes need to change because of changing demographics, I am... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Laura Jones

    Firstly it is a waste of a huge amount of public money that could be put to much better use to Fund services for the community - public transport, healthcare, community projets, protecting the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 June 2023

  • Maria Goodall

    The relocation of the sewage works from its current location in Cowley Rd to the GREEN BELT between Feb Dutton and Horningsea. Firstly there is no need for the move as the current plant is future... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 June 2023

  • Cambridge Friends of the Earth (Cambridge Friends of the Earth)

    Cambridge Friends of the Earth is concerned about the proposal to move a, recently upgraded and perfectly adequate, sewage treatment works into Cambridge's Green Belt, purely to free up valuable land... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 16 June 2023

  • East Cambridgeshire District Council (East Cambridgeshire District Council)

    1. Impact on highways 2. Visual Impact 3. Biodiversity Impact 4. Public benefit of the scheme

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 16 June 2023

  • Jo-Anne White

    I object to the proposed project as this will have an adverse safety to cyclists in the area due to the anticipated increase in traffic on local roads and small lanes, in particular on High Ditch Road... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 June 2023

  • Stefanie Priewasser

    I object strongly to this project for the following reasons: I would like to express my concern regarding the impact of this project on the conservation areas of Fen Ditton and Horningsea. It is my... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 June 2023

  • Charlotte Attwood

    The cost to move the sewage works in terms of expense to the tax payer, the impact of building on the green belt land and the carbon generated by moving the existing works, which doesn't need moving... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 June 2023

  • Alex Corr

    The main issue is that the only reason this application has been proposed is because they want to build houses on the current site and have been offered lots of money to do so. The plant has no... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Andrew Roger Martin

    CWWTPR Introduction As a resident of Horningsea I was horrified to hear that the sewage plant could be moved to Honey Hill. Not only will this affect my family it will also affect:- The Village:... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023