Filter
Lower Thames Crossing

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 901 to 1000 of 1148 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | View 50 results per page | 100

  • Dr Tim Stout

    Key Objections 1. Potential breach of government’s legal obligations under the Climate Change Act 2008 c.27 and the Environment Act 2021 c.30, especially in relation to biodiversity and air pollution... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Elizabeth Bruce

    I wish to object to the proposed Lower Thames Crossing as it will not solve the traffic problems at Dartford. Most of the traffic comes from the West and won't travel past Dartford to get across the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Elke Browning

    I am against the building if the LTC. Carving up huge swathes of green belt so more and more vehicles can travel around London causing massive pollution not needed. The only problem at the existing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Elwyn Lloyd Jones

    We have not seen the route and whether it will impede Thames Shipping. If this is a road link. New ICE cars will end in 2030. I don't believe EVs will replace them. So you'll have NO traffic. Also,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Erik Paul ter Brake

    I believe the new tunnel will induce demand for vehicle traffic in the area. As such the impact on the local residents, on congestion and on air quality are all detrimental.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Essex County Council (Essex County Council)

    Essex County Council’s Relevant Representation The Lower Thames Crossing (LTC) scheme as proposed represent a huge step change for how vehicles can cross the Thames, giving an alternative to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Glenn Daniels

    Objection to Location Objection to Noise Pollution Objection to Air Pollution Objection to Loss of Green Belt Objection to poor maps of the proposed plans that exclude majority of the housing in South... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Greater North Kent (Greater North Kent)

    Greater North Kent (GNK) is an alliance of, and collective voice for, the North Kent districts of Dartford, Gravesham, Maidstone and Swale together with Medway Unitary Authority and Kent County... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Greener Camping Club of GB (Greener Camping Club of GB)

    We intend to submit evidence that a piece of land being considered for compulsory purchase for the purpose of "off setting" part of this project cannot be considered or pursued as it is already been... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Henrietta Bewley

    The planning inspectorate should consider the impact of: 1. Rising sea levels due to climate change. Sea levels are predicted to rise between 40m and 70m, depending on the world temperature rise. It... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Henry Binns

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • DLA Piper UK LLP (DLA Piper UK LLP) on behalf of HS1 Limited (HS1 Limited)

    We have submitted a full document via email setting out HS1 Limited's relevant representation in respect of the Development Consent Order (“DCO”) application for the proposed A122 Lower Thames... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Jacqui Bedding

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Jacqui Mann

    As a local resident I am concerned about the infrastructure of this proposed development including increase in traffic, poor air quality, impact on local roads & destruction of green spaces. I am also... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • James Booth

    The LTC will increase traffic on the A227 cutting through to and from the M20 and M26, in particular goods vehicles. NO BUDGET HAS BEEN SET ASIDE TO MITIGATE THIS. NO ACTIONS TO RESTRICT HGV USE OF... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Jan Green

    Opposition to the LTC.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Jeff Stafford

    Key Objections 1. Potential breach of government’s legal obligations under the Climate Change Act 2008 c.27 and the Environment Act 2021 c.30, especially in relation to biodiversity and air pollution... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Jimmy Allan

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Joanne Taylor

    The project has a heavy effect on my home and surroundings. I therefore wish to be kept informed/updated and provide my input as I have done from the very beginning when this was started. Thank you.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • John Corbett

    The whole project will not achieve the stated aim of significantly reducing traffic at the Dartford Crossing. It still pollute and decimate a semi-rural area and is an expensive ill-conceived white... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • John Dighton

    I object to the LTC because of, 1 Damage to the environment 2 Damage an upheaval to Thurrock and Kent’s people lives and homes. Health with the increase traffic in the area. 3 The cost. We all realise... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Joyce Bell

    I am opposed to the scheme because It will not solve the problems at the Dartford Crossing It will lead to gridlock across North Kent if people try to get from the M25 to the LTC when there are... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Julia Lopez MP

    While not an exhaustive list, the main points that I wish to develop in my further detailed representation during the formal examination are: • That I am broadly supportive of the project, recognising... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Birketts LLP (Birketts LLP) on behalf of Kathryn Homes Limited (Kathryn Homes Limited)

    OUTLINE OF MAIN POINTS OF OBJECTION TO LOWER THAMES CROSSING 1. Unacceptable impacts on Whitecroft Care Home, Stanford Road, Orsett, Thurrock, and its residents and employees, due to the magnitude of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Kent Wildlife Trust (Kent Wildlife Trust)

    Kent Wildlife Trust (KWT) engaged with Highways England (“the Applicant”) prior to DCO submission, with a focus on reducing the impacts upon the internationally important habitats of the North Kent... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Linda Catton

    I strongly oppose option C

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • London Friends of the Earth Network (London Friends of the Earth Network)

    We are now in a climate emergency so dire that if we do not radically change our ways, will make th Earth largely uninhabitable for humans and most other creatures. We got a taste of that last year... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Lumen Technologies UK Limited (formerly CenturyLink) (Lumen Technologies UK Limited (formerly CenturyLink))

    Lumen Technologies UK Limited is a Communications utility who owns 80% of the worlds Sub-Sea fiber optic cables, the Lower Thames Crossing project will impact and affect 2 x separate Fibre Optic... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Madeleine Wells

    1. Biodiversity loss 2. Fragmentation of local habitats and corridors for wildlife. 3. Damage to ancient woodland 4. Noise pollution and light pollution blighting the lives of insects, particularly... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Margaret Moore

    This scheme creates massive environmental and social issues and does not solve the problems at Dartford Crossing. The cost is prohibitive, especially given the economic challenges in this country.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Marianne Longhurst

    All options to view what is going to be developed have been limited and last minute, thereby not providing communities with sufficient time to question what is happening. This has been concealed in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Matthew Fooks

    Concerns about -cost -envioronmental impact -a poor solution to solve the traffic problems at the Dartford Crossing -will cause unacceptable congestion on the M2 and A229 -Changes to A2/M2 junctions... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Meopham Parish Council (Meopham Parish Council)

    Meopham Parish Council has participated in all the many consultations run on this project and have concerns that have not been addressed in the consultation materials. Below is a summary of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Knight Frank (Knight Frank) on behalf of Metropolitan Police Service (Metropolitan Police Service)

    Knight Frank act on behalf of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) and the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC), in relation to the Metropolitan Police Service Training Centre (MPSTC)... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Metrotidal Limited (Metrotidal Limited)

    Post-Brexit, Post-Covid there is less demand for the road-only Lower Thames Crossing Midland-Dover HGV hypotenuse as freight can and will be diverted from Dover by the climate change, carbon-pricing,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Michael Shipway

    Build the tunnel. Trying to drive through the existing Dartford Tunnel is a conjecturing nightmare

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Michael Spurr

    I am against the crossing because it will not solve the problems at Dartford and make Gravesend more congested. The noise and pollution levels east of Gravesend will greatly increase and people's... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Mnika Davis

    I think this could be resolved in way good for environment and people too

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Moira Brock

    Having lived in this area all my life I find this proposal completely unrealistic. Every time you increase the road capacity you increase traffic, which in turn increases pollution and destroys the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Mr Peter Johnson

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: - Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, larger mammals, reptiles and rare insects. - Damage to and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Mr Robin Bull

    I do not believe the proposals will solve the problems suffered due to the Dartford Crossing (the original brief). The proposals will induce demand and increase cross river traffic (around 50%),... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Mrs Patricia Dobinson

    I am against the proposed crossing as it will be built on a large amount of green belt land. The placement takes traffic back onto already extremely busy motorways. The area in Essex already has high... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Mrs S Hadwin

    I am very much against this project particularly at a time when we are becoming more aware of the damage to our environment and the need to protect it. The loss of biodiversity in the UK has been... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Mrs. F. Ball

    Rising cost of the LTC. Length of time to complete the project is estimated at approx. 5 years Cost could rise again substantially. Increase in congestion during construction due to Construction... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • National Gas Transmission (National Gas Transmission)

    Relevant Representation of National Gas Transmission Plc in respect of the Lower Thames Crossing DCO (the “Project”) This relevant representation is submitted on behalf of National Gas Transmission... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Vicky Cashman (Vicky Cashman) on behalf of National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc (National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc)

    Relevant Representation of National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc in respect of the Lower Thames Crossing DCO (the “Project”) This relevant representation is submitted on behalf of National Grid... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Nicola Ovey

    As a resident, I whole heartedly object to this project through disruption to diverted traffic, being closed in a triangle of motorways subjected to increased pollution and increased noise levels.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • North Kent Marshes Internal Drainage Board (North Kent Marshes Internal Drainage Board)

    As both permanent and temporary works fall within the drainage district of the North Kent Marshes Internal Drainage Board, we would like to make comments regarding flood risk from primarily surface... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Winckworth Sherwood LLP on behalf of Northumbrian Water Limited (operating as Essex & Suffolk Water) (Northumbrian Water Limited (operating as Essex & Suffolk Water))

    Please see attached.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • BTF Partnership (BTF Partnership) on behalf of Orsett Fen Right Holders (Orsett Fen Right Holders)

    following and then if required, full reps can be submitted at the next stage. Anything to add? INTERESTED PARTY 1. Orsett Fen Right Holders PLOT NUMBERS 2. 35-11, 35-13, 35-14, 35-15, 35-16, 35-21,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Philip Leonard Edgar

    No sea wall to prevent flooding where proposed route is going

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Winckworth Sherwood LLP (Winckworth Sherwood LLP) on behalf of Port of London Authority (Port of London Authority)

    1. The Port of London Authority (“PLA”) is the statutory harbour authority for the tidal Thames (the “River”). Its statutory functions include responsibility for conservancy, including dredging and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Punam Chada

    1. Why is the proposal going ahead if it is not going to reduce the required level of traffic away from the Dartford crossing. You have quoted only 4% when much more is needed. 2. You are proposing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Richard Worn

    I have serious concerns about the impact of the Lower Thames Crossing on wildlife and habitats in Essex , including: • Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. • Damage to,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Birketts LLP (Birketts LLP) on behalf of Runwood Homes Limited (Runwood Homes Limited)

    OUTLINE OF MAIN POINTS OF OBJECTION TO LOWER THAMES CROSSING 1. Unacceptable impacts on Whitecroft Care Home, Stanford Road, Orsett, Thurrock, and its residents and employees, due to the magnitude of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Birketts LLP (Birketts LLP) on behalf of Runwood Properties Limited (Runwood Properties Limited)

    OUTLINE OF MAIN POINTS OF OBJECTION TO LOWER THAMES CROSSING 1. Unacceptable impacts on Whitecroft Care Home, Stanford Road, Orsett, Thurrock, and its residents and employees, due to the magnitude of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Sam Wollen

    We do not want the new road to come near Brandon groves for health and environmental reasons to the people that live on the estate as all wildlife around

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Sarah Daniels

    Objection to Location Objection to Noise Pollution Objection to Air Pollution Objection to Loss of Green Belt Objection to poor maps of the proposed plans that exclude majority of the housing in South... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Sarah Jane Scrace

    The environmental impact on the area will far outweigh any benefits. The years it will take to build causing chaos will double the environmental impact in the area and then it will bring more polygon... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Sarah Lovell

    Main points I intend to raise in relation to the application are: Would not solve the problems suffered due to the Dartford Crossing and be over capacity before it’s finished. Lack of adequate... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Sevenoaks District Council (Sevenoaks District Council)

    Lower Thames Crossing Pre Examination Representation Thank you for notifying Sevenoaks District Council on the formal notification of acceptance for the Lower Thames Crossing (LTC) Development Consent... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Shorne Parish Council (Shorne Parish Council)

    Shorne Parish is located east of Gravesend, a “reverse-L” shape extending from the middle of the A2 in the south to the middle of the Thames in the north. It includes several areas of ancient... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Steve Hackett

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Suami Rocha

    In a climate emergency, there’s no justification for going ahead with this project. The data on this is clear, our planet can’t cope with this and it’s going to increase our dependence on fossil fuels... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Susan Binns

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Susan Fitzjohn

    I am concerned about the impact on traffic on the M2/A2 between M25 interchange at Dartford and going down to the Bluebell Hill interchange, and beyond. The proposed tunnel will increase the amount of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Susan Hammock

    I last submitted consultation comments in September 2021 and my concerns still hold true today. Benefit - I do not agree that a crossing in this location would ease congestion at Dartford. The A2... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Susan Higgins

    I believe the annihilation of the countryside is despicable and the estimated costs far outweigh the benefits. The new roads will increase CO2 pollution, reduce wildlife habitat.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Gateley Hamer Limited (Gateley Hamer Limited) on behalf of Tarmac Building Products Limited (Tarmac Building Products Limited)

    See attached

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Thames Chase Trust (Thames Chase Trust)

    The response provided by the Trust on 19th December 2018 at 16:17:08 for the original statutory consultation remains valid (Response ID ANON-5C4S-Y8ZS-W), particularly in relation to the wider... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Thames Estuary Growth Board (Thames Estuary Growth Board)

    The Thames Estuary Growth Board fully endorses the Lower Thames Crossing application for Development Consent. The Thames Estuary Growth Board combines private and public sector representatives with a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Holmes and Hills Solicitors LLP (Holmes and Hills Solicitors LLP) on behalf of The owner/Occupiers of Foxburrows (The owner/Occupiers of Foxburrows)

    Holmes and Hills LLP is instructed by [Redacted] who are the owner-occupiers of Foxburrows [Redacted]. Part of their property falls within the Lower Thames Crossing DCO Order limits. Our client has... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Whirledge and Nott (Whirledge and Nott) on behalf of The owners C/O Rosenholme, Princess Margaret Road (The owners C/O Rosenholme, Princess Margaret Road)

    Mark Osborne, Shaun Osborne and Ms J Bower as freehold owners have instructed me to submit the following objection to the Lower Thames Crossing (“LTC”) application as their land is included in this.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council (Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council)

    Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council (TMBC) continues to support the Lower Thames Crossing Project, as we recognise that the existing Dartford Crossing is operating over capacity and there are limited... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Stantec (Stantec) on behalf of Uniper (Uniper)

    The representation has been prepared by Stantec who are working on behalf of Uniper in relation to the MedwayOne development at the former Kingsnorth Power Station on the Hoo Peninsular in Medway. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • DLP Planning Ltd (DLP Planning Ltd) on behalf of Warley Green Limited (Warley Green Limited)

    I am writing on behalf of our client, Warley Green Limited, in response to the notice of acceptance by the Secretary of State for the A122 Lower Thames Crossing Development Consent Order (DCO). The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Alan Wade

    I believe that the location of the proposed site is completely wrong, that it is not value for money, and that it's imposition will be detrimental to the residents of both Dartford and Thurrock , by... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Alasdair John Foden

    1) I believe in the light of the changes in inflation and uncertainties in Britain and The World during the last two years the total project cost will be significantly more than the £6.9 billion we... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Alison Campbell

    Impacts to listed buildings adjacent to High Road Orsett by the frequency and load of vehicles on High Road during the construction, mitigation and legacy phase of works. In particular the a circa... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Andrea Goring

    Public transport needs to be considered above and beyond more roads more cars means more carbon estimated at 6.6 million tonnes.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Andrew Smith

    This scheme is completely incompatible with the UK's obligations under the 2015 UN Climate Agreement made in Paris, and should be rejected out of hand.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Anglian Water Services Ltd (Anglian Water Services Ltd)

    Anglian Water is the statutory wastewater recycling provider (sewerage undertaker) for the project area north of the River Thames. Anglian Water and National Highways have been in discussion on the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Anne Bulman

    I want to object to the £10bn Lower Thames Crossing. I do not agree with spending public money on a single new road when fossil fuel use & resulting carbon emissions need to be stopped. This road will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Annie Webster

    Hello, as the window for guaranteed climate breakdown is fast closing, I feel that I must object strongly to this application to the Lower Thames Crossing. There is, imho, nothing post about this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Anthony Mack

    I campaigned successfully for National Cycle Route 177 and created the "Cyclopark" activity centre in Gravesham which in its missive statement encourages access to its facilities by sustainable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Anthony Rae

    I am a volunteer climate and transport campaigner, and I have reviewed the issues relating to this project on the Thames Crossing Action Group's, and the Transport Action Network's, websites. The ones... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Arundel SCATE South Coast Alliance for Transport & Environment (Arundel SCATE South Coast Alliance for Transport & Environment)

    Arundel Scate is a community group of around 200 residents concerned with the quality of transport infrastructure, impacts of transport on the environment, seeking progressive, evidence-based... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • City of London Corporation (Comptroller & City Solicitors) (City of London Corporation (Comptroller & City Solicitors)) on behalf of Barking Power Limited (Barking Power Limited)

    BPL has no objection to the principle of the Project. The majority of matters are agreed as set out in the Statement of Common Ground. Its concern the subject of this Representation relates to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Bev Lang

    I don’t think it would solve the problems suffered due to the Dartford Crossing, the impact to the local environment and communities is too significant and I feel it will make things worse. Traffic,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Brian Martin

    The project would damage valuable green belt land in a rural area, and create traffic and noise pollution. The lorry movements during construction project would also be disruptive to local residents.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Buglife- The Invertebrate Conservation Trust (Buglife- The Invertebrate Conservation Trust)

    Buglife has engaged with Highways England prior to the submission of the Lower Thames Crossing application over a number of years, with a focus on ensuring that the proposed mitigation and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • C Fox

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Caroline Beattie-Merriman

    I am emailing to register my strong objection to the scheme. More roads = more traffic. We need fewer vehicles on the road even if they are electrical, since the latter contain embedded carbon even if... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Carolyn Richards

    I am making this application to register interest as a means to support all those that are asking a change in the transport network of this country. To ask that roads and cars are not at the centre of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Caspar Hughes

    I object to the scheme. Do not increase traffic and carbon emissions in a climate emergency.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Catherine Hoggarth

    I disagree very strongly with the Lower Thames Crossing for the following reasons: The large and adverse impact on the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and the ancient woodlands is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Holland Land & Property Limited (Holland Land & Property Limited) on behalf of Cheale Group Limited (Cheale Group Limited)

    Our client objects to any permanent rights over the access route identified as plot 44-112 and area identified as plot 44-90 on the Land Plans Regulation 5(2) (i) Sheet 44 that would impede the use of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Chris Todd

    I wish to strongly object to the Lower Thames Crossing which fails to deliver on its objectives, leaving Dartford still over capacity while causing huge damage to people and the environment. It will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Chris White

    I am disgusted by this proposition for many reasons: * In hard times such as these, the Government should be prioritising our money on the less well of * The Government should be concentrating on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Christine Board

    The proposed crossing will make no difference to the traffic, coming from Dartford. The pollution caused will make Thurrock a no go area and quite frankly we cannot afford this to happen.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023