Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I have live very loca l u to gatwick for some 10 years now and bleive I'd done correctly would be agent boost to the area
-
I am very much in favour of this Northern runway and increased capacity project at LGW.
-
Impact on local community (small villages over run with traffic), detrimental effect on health and wellbeing through increased air traffic noise, pollution and impact on environment, loss of habitat...
Read more
-
Register an interest to ensure I have a voice in the proceedings. I oppose any increase in aircraft noise and deplore the negative impact on climate change that additional flights will create. My home...
Read more
-
The expansion will increase carbon emissions affecting our ability to achieve net zero. It will also increase pollution over populated areas. Increased air traffic will impact wildlife. It will also...
Read more
-
I am extremely concerned with the proposal for an additional runway. Noise is already an issue, the proposal would mean residents in West Kent will have a constant stream of traffic over our homes....
Read more
-
If planes take off 12 m further north that will be right over my house, at the moment planes take off every 90 seconds if they double this it will be one plane every 45 seconds, currently when in...
Read more
-
Effect on local residents caused by increased use of the airport by the addition of a second runway Concerns about flight paths
-
Gatwick Airport says that the expanded use of the North Runway will be limited to smaller aircraft departures using existing flightpaths. Will this limitation hold good for a considerable guaranteed...
Read more
-
We live in a rural area of outstanding natural beauty which has been ruined since Gatwick moved the flight path in 2016 without any consultation with those affected. The noise is at times deafening...
Read more
-
Charlwood is a very small village and will not be able to take the extra traffic, noise , pollution that this proposal would cause it would be detrimental to the residents health and well being and...
Read more
-
Gatwick airport expansion will disrupt the lives of local residents for years to come throughout the works and the increase in aircraft traffic and noise, particularly at night and in the summer when...
Read more
-
Dear Sir, My concerns are numerous and I will need more time to collate once I have reviewed the proposal and more information is made available by GAL to the general public . But to summarise - an...
Read more
-
I live in the north-east corner of Horsham Town and am very concerned about increased noise levels from this proposal. Currently planes only fly near/over Horsham Town in emergency situations,...
Read more
-
Increase in road traffic, air traffic noise and pollution
-
If this project is given a green light this house would be unbearable to live in as would many houses around here. Currently there are on average 390 departures per day and this would rise by 270 per...
Read more
-
My concerns are over the increased number of flights with the result of significantly increased noise pollution and impact on mental health and property valuations. There are also broader impacts on...
Read more
-
I feel that there must be some increase in aircraft noise at this location. Can I expect any compensation in any respect for an increase in noise level. Which at peak periods is getting intrusive. The...
Read more
-
The extra flights and traffic will increase the pollution levels locally - we already have busy roads and skies and noise pollution and the extra fumes generated by more cars and aviation pollution...
Read more
-
As someone currently overflown by Gatwick arrivals, the proposed 2nd runway will have a significant further impact.
-
I am against further expansion at Gatwick due to environmental reasons, the need to disincentivise flights, noise pollution, local traffic increase
-
I live in Charlwood and so this will have an enormous detrimental impact on me and my family. We moved here knowing that the airport would cause some minimal noise however, the beautiful area, schools...
Read more
-
Deeply concerned about environmental and climate impact, plus the enormous increase in aircraft flying over the village. Already the later large aircraft takeoffs are unbearable. Deeply concerned...
Read more
-
My main concern is for the environment impact almost doubling the number of flights would have on the area. In addition the affect on the local infrastructure would be detrimental to the local...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the increase in air and noise pollution around my house. I am also concerned that public footpath and cycle access to Gatwick Train station as well as the airport is going to...
Read more
-
I object to this application for a variety of reasons. They are as follows:- 1. Environmental impact and the affects of climate change. 2. Noise pollution to the area with increased traffic. 3. Impact...
Read more
-
Increasing the number of flights inevitably will make it more difficult to control climate change, which clearly is already having disastrous effects around the world. For me personally, it seems...
Read more
-
I fully support the proposal to bring the 2nd runway at Gatwick into regular use. I genuinely believe there will be benefits for the local communities. Aircraft will only continue to become greener so...
Read more
-
The noise from over head planes (to and from Gatwick) is already at an unacceptable level and a second runway at Gatwick will only worsen the problem.
-
I am writing on behalf of the Gatwick Hotel Association to express our enthusiastic support for Gatwick Airport's Northern Runway. Our association, comprised of various local hotels, has a vested...
Read more
-
I believe the increased runway capacity will lower the value of our home due to the increased noise. we have already been affected by the flight path move in recent year which now means aircraft fly...
Read more
-
Creating additional runway and essentially 24/7 traffic will generate unbearable noise for the residents in my area, the current traffic is already too heavy, Gatwick Airport is not positioned to be...
Read more
-
The noise from overhead planes leaving and landing at Gatwick is already intolerable particularly at night. I have lived at the current address for 30 years and the noise form the planes had got...
Read more
-
1huge increase in noise.2huge increase in emissions.3the first two items will severely impact on the quality of lives.4we are constantly being told to embrace net zero policies and reduce consumption...
Read more
-
Additional flights at Gatwick will increase emissions, and therefore impact Climate Change. There is no logical reason to further impact the lives of millions by having additional flights at Gatwick....
Read more
-
Environmental issues Rural area with insufficient road infrastructure and narrow roads to cope with increased traffic Noise pollution Huge increase in aircraft traffic and noise during last three...
Read more
-
We already experience an increased noise level due to the changes in the flight path in recent years, whereas when we first bought our property in 2017, planes were much higher in altitude, they now...
Read more
-
I oppose the development of increased capacity at Gatwick and all other UK airports as it is currently incompatible with the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Increased airport capacity will...
Read more
-
Need to approve northern runway ASAP. Need to release all airport reserved land south of the airport for development ASAP. I approve of the relocation and use of the northern runway as proposed....
Read more
-
I support the plan. Gatwick airport is well positioned to serve the South by being near to most of the population, near to the M25 and realively close to London by train. It is also not too close to...
Read more
-
Too much pollution no to another runaway
-
The operation of this new runway will significantly increase noise pollution where I live ( and also many other house holders in Smallfield and Horley) as the flight path will be much closer to my...
Read more
-
1.increased volume of aircraft movements 2.use of the northern runway will bring arriving/departing aircraft over more properties.3.increased aircraft movements will bring more emissions.4more...
Read more
-
Concerns are, living under the take off flight path we are noticing the plans getting lower. With so many more planes taking off with an extra runway we are being exposed to a greater degree of noise...
Read more
-
Concerned about increased noise from aeroplanes and airport infrastructure, environment damage, traffic congestion and further airport expansion at a later date.
-
The current volume of flights into Gatwick is causing excessive noise and pollution. Any increase in flights should be balanced against the impact on those under the flight paths. We already suffer...
Read more
-
I am totally against it. The airport keeps trying to get this through. Using the safety runway as an additional runway. More noise from the aircraft. How can planes be net zero? This is rubbish. There...
Read more
-
With this new runway, Gatwick seeks over 101,000 extra flights a year (285,000 to 386,000), with 76m passengers (from 46.6m in 2019) travelling on the M23 and residential roads, and one of the worst...
Read more
-
Any airport expansion that increases overall emissions could be incompatible with the UK's legal commitments to reduce pollution. We have a global CO2e budget that is non-negotiable. Exceeding this...
Read more
-
Before any extension takes place, Gatwick Airport authorities, along with local councils (Borough or County level) should make an effort to improve the existing airport and surrounding environs. The...
Read more
-
The amount of aircraft’s already populating the sky in our area causing a constant noise pollution. This has a real (negative) impact on the lives of real people on a daily basis. We should do...
Read more
-
We have been particularly affected by Gatwick arrivals overflights, night and day, since the 2013 flightpath changes. In 2016, Gatwick promised improvements which have not been fulfilled. We are...
Read more
-
We are already plagued by noise and pollution, with no help from the airport to mitigate. This will worsen things and have a negative impact on the value of my property.
-
I commute to London everyday, the trains are overcrowded, the infrastructure can’t cope as it is. The airport has RACC concrete sort that first! I also live locally and don’t want to see and hear...
Read more
-
Concerns about the amount of aircraft taking off and flying low over my property, particularly early morning and late at night
-
Extra air pollution, extra noise, more fossil fuel being burnt by maneuvering aircraft. No quiet ground running area at Gatwick. Air traffic control will need to expand to contain the flight paths...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the expansion of Gatwick Airport and the2nd runway on the towns and villages in it flight paths.
-
There is already noise and air pollution from the current airport which is disturbing to live near. Also in recent years there has been a huge increase in taxi drivers and holiday makers using the...
Read more
-
I object to this development because: 1) It will cause more air pollution. 2) It will cause more noise pollution. 3) It is unnecessary as less people are flying since Covid. 4) We already suffer with...
Read more
-
Living under a flight path into Gatwick, I’m very aware of the increase in air traffic over the past 30 years. I consider the present volume of traffic to be the maximum that should be permitted but I...
Read more
-
I object to the further expansion at Gatwick. No only does the expansion breach green targets but the noise from low flying aircraft is already intolerable. In addition, Gatwick can nearly run a...
Read more
-
The environmental affects caused by increased flights, increased traffic with associated parking, etc.
-
I live in a village already affected by Gatwick flights and am extremely concerned about the impact a second runway will have. I am registering initially and will comment further as appropriate
-
I have an interest as a local resident affected by flightpaths
-
I strongly object to this proposal to bring Gatwick’s northern runway into permanent use. Gatwick is located in a rural position, well away from London. The flight paths affect rural neighbourhoods...
Read more
-
I have a vested interest as I sit under the flight path in the plans. The increased flights would have a negative impact on local residents and there must be some compromise. Night flights need to be...
Read more
-
Gatwick is seeking a new runway which would result in an extra 100,000 flights per year. Much of Surrey and Sussex are already impacted by noise and pollution from aircraft. This can only worsen if...
Read more
-
I am slightly in favour of an additional runway at Gatwick Airport. I have spent most of my life living close to international airports - Heathrow 31 years, Gatwick - 44 years. I worked airside at...
Read more
-
The increase in traffic on road and rail will have huge impact on locals. Further congestion of all roads as the rail line cannot be increased and roads are already overloaded at peak hours. No...
Read more
-
For me, the 24/7 concentrated flight paths introduced without consultative planning in 2013/2014 are a major reason for lack of sleep at night and rest and relaxation in the day. I cannot have people...
Read more
-
My home is likely to be adversely affected by additional aircraft movements resulting from development of the North Runway at Gatwick. I want to be informed about the proposed development.
-
Exssecive noise
-
I believe the UK transport infrastructure should be re-aligned to increase/improve road and rail public transport links within the UK rather than increase global aviation pollution. For the benefit of...
Read more
-
We are already impacted by noise pollution from aircraft and a second runway will increase our exposure. More emphasis on quieter less polluting aircraft using Gatwick is urgently required.
-
Additional aircraft flying overhead polluting the area even more Additional traffic on the surrounding roads which are already busy & subject to numerous accidents on the motorway which has no hard...
Read more
-
My home in Burgess hill is a stack location for aircraft and will be affected by the extra planes
-
Concerned about pollution,noise,extra traffic, harm to wildlife, taxis parking and littering.
-
There is too much aircraft noise NOW. Air traffic control allows short cuts and corner cutting allowing an increased noise footprint in thee local areas
-
There are already too many flights over the area with loud aircraft. And I don’t think there should be more flights considering environmental issues. I oppose a new runway.
-
Will additional flights be expected to fly around the village of Cowden as exhorting flights do and not over it?
-
- noise pollution - affect on local population capacity - traffic
-
Oppose the Development Consent Order (DCO) for the new runway due to air and noise pollution
-
I want to know how this proposed change will effect our quality of life.
-
The level of pollution from both noise and fumes in this area is already beyond unacceptable. As someone who does not smoke but has been diagnosed with (redacted) I am sure that the airport is a...
Read more
-
I object to the proposal on the grounds of increased noise, pollution, global warming emissions, and related development and road traffic.
-
For many years now, I have been officially complaining about aircraft noise over the rural village of Brenchley. As a consequence, I have a very thick file of papers in relation to the noise and...
Read more
-
I fully support the use of the northern runway. Gatwick is a huge asset for the local surrounding areas but also for the UK and I feel this must not be overlooked regardless of the naysayers. Yes...
Read more
-
I object on grounds of noise I oppose the new runway because noise & disturbance caused by increase in flights & lack of decent transport infrastructure
-
The noise is too intrusive & disturbing We have got to consider the pollution Cheap flight that are unreliable Overcrowding without the infrastructure
-
I strongly oppose the expansion of Gatwick Airport. It is environmentally irresponsible - we already suffer from poor air quality, aircraft noise and climate change impacts, a second runway will make...
Read more
-
My wife and I moved to RH12 3AH in 1989, and in those days, living right under the main flight path turning (yes, we live at the end of the 12-mile straight approach on an elevated hill) was not too...
Read more
-
I AM OPPOSED TO THE PROJECT IT GOES AGAINST YOUR CLIMATE CHANGE COMMITTEE YOU WILL BE ADDING TOO MANY CARBON EMISSIONS INTO THE AIR IT GOES AGAINST NET ZERO THE NOISE POLLUTION WILL BE TORTUROUS WE...
Read more
-
I see multiple challenges with the expansion. Firstly, the current noise pollution levels experienced by residents is already too high and causing mental health and quality of life challenges. Planes...
Read more
-
We are already overflown with a significant number of flights on a daily. We suffer from pollution from the planes and also noise issues. We also have these problems throughout the night as Gatwick...
Read more
-
Our property in Capel is directly overflown by aircraft taking off in a westerly direction and then turning north towards the east. More flights will mean more aircraft noise (which can be quite bad...
Read more
-
Oppose the Development Consent Order (DCO) for the new runway due to air and noise pollution
-
I am opposed to this development on multiple grounds, not least the increased noise disturbance. Planes already frequently deviate from the agreed corridors and more flights would exacerbate this. I...
Read more
-
Broader impact of combined disturbance by flights to include Heathrow and Redhill Airodrome as well as Gatwick, all of which together already have a deliterious impact on our area and home.
-
We are under the inbound flight path, at the bottom of the stack. We are already blighted by flights day and night causing disrupted sleep. There us no rest bite.
-
In the current move to reach net zero I’m not sure how almost doubling the capacity of an airport helps reach this. The infrastructure in the area is already stretched, this will not help in the...
Read more